we already one tp.
and mini tp (trenza)
we dont need another.
we already one tp.
and mini tp (trenza)
we dont need another.
*whispers; its too late now.
;)
I don't believe in this stuff but in theory, your best chance of 'ghost hunting' is with a thermal imaging camera. I'm just going off lore, since nothing has been proven by science, who can really say that temperature is a deciding factor? Digital is fine, it was only a problem when the resolution caused constant artifacts. Years ago I was interested and liked to debunk pictures I found on the internet. Read your camera manual, clean your lens or send it in for maintenance, and you're golden. I've read that infrared film works really well. That stuff is a beast to load and have developed though.
For UFOs Maybe a digital telescope that can take a memory card of some kind? Or how about A 360° camera system with telephoto lenses and high aperture settings?
Alternatively, might I suggest you invest as little money as possible into this new hobby you may or may not be interested in? I've wasted a few rolls of film when I tried to see what the fuss was about. That was too much money imho
I don't believe in this stuff but in theory, your best chance of 'ghost hunting' is with a thermal imaging camera. I'm just going off lore, since nothing has been proven by science, who can really say that temperature is a deciding factor? Digital is fine, it was only a problem when the resolution caused constant artifacts. Years ago I was interested and liked to debunk pictures I found on the internet. Read your camera manual, clean your lens or send it in for maintenance, and you're golden. I've read that infrared film works really well. That stuff is a beast to load and have developed though.
For UFOs Maybe a digital telescope that can take a memory card of some kind? Or how about A 360° camera system with telephoto lenses and high aperture settings?
Alternatively, might I suggest you invest as little money as possible into this new hobby you may or may not be interested in? I've wasted a few rolls of film when I tried to see what the fuss was about. That was too much money imho
Well, I was mainly referring to phenomenons visible to the human eye (like a UFO), but you are probably right about the infrared-ghost thing, but that's not the kind of thing I was thinking about. The reason I think film is better then a digital camera is because electronics are very sensitive and can very easily be manipulated and distorted, that cannot happen with a fully mechanical camera. Also, Film is (pretty much) fake proof. I have often heard story's of Phones being deactivated or digital files being deleted from the phone, or being heavily distorted and unusable. When it comes to reliability, a manual film camera will serve you the best, what's captured is captured, its a physical thing, it cannot be simply deleted. There is no alien or UFO that can simply deactivate your manual camera. its also more safe in regard to privacy, a government cannot simply access that picture, since its laying in some drawer in not on your hard drive.
I don't believe in this stuff but in theory, your best chance of 'ghost hunting' is with a thermal imaging camera. I'm just going off lore, since nothing has been proven by science, who can really say that temperature is a deciding factor? Digital is fine, it was only a problem when the resolution caused constant artifacts. Years ago I was interested and liked to debunk pictures I found on the internet. Read your camera manual, clean your lens or send it in for maintenance, and you're golden. I've read that infrared film works really well. That stuff is a beast to load and have developed though.
For UFOs Maybe a digital telescope that can take a memory card of some kind? Or how about A 360° camera system with telephoto lenses and high aperture settings?
Alternatively, might I suggest you invest as little money as possible into this new hobby you may or may not be interested in? I've wasted a few rolls of film when I tried to see what the fuss was about. That was too much money imho
Well, I was mainly referring to phenomenons visible to the human eye (like a UFO), but you are probably right about the infrared-ghost thing, but that's not the kind of thing I was thinking about. The reason I think film is better then a digital camera is because electronics are very sensitive and can very easily be manipulated and distorted, that cannot happen with a fully mechanical camera. Also, Film is (pretty much) fake proof. I have often heard story's of Phones being deactivated or digital files being deleted from the phone, or being heavily distorted and unusable. When it comes to reliability, a manual film camera will serve you the best, what's captured is captured, its a physical thing, it cannot be simply deleted. There is no alien or UFO that can simply deactivate your manual camera. its also more safe in regard to privacy, a government cannot simply access that picture, since its laying in some drawer in not on your hard drive.
Ohhh, so if the creature could tap into the frequency of your devices you would technically still be able to snap a shot of it with a manual camera. I just finished a film that featured an alien from Venus (totally possible btw). The damn thing could disable mechanical things like firearms. Hopefully, that will never happen because that film was awful.
AFAIK the US loves when people spend money. If you're not breaking the law they don't seem to care. If you're doing awesome things they might offer you a job :cool: I've read that Germany is similar in some ways but not so much in other ways. If I was to walk into a UFO and take several hundred photos, the Department Of Defense would probably just say that I'm really good at faking photos, and leave it at that. That would be enough negative exposure to limit the number of professionals who would be willing to authenticate the photos in question.
I don't believe in this stuff but in theory, your best chance of 'ghost hunting' is with a thermal imaging camera. I'm just going off lore, since nothing has been proven by science, who can really say that temperature is a deciding factor? Digital is fine, it was only a problem when the resolution caused constant artifacts. Years ago I was interested and liked to debunk pictures I found on the internet. Read your camera manual, clean your lens or send it in for maintenance, and you're golden. I've read that infrared film works really well. That stuff is a beast to load and have developed though.
For UFOs Maybe a digital telescope that can take a memory card of some kind? Or how about A 360° camera system with telephoto lenses and high aperture settings?
Alternatively, might I suggest you invest as little money as possible into this new hobby you may or may not be interested in? I've wasted a few rolls of film when I tried to see what the fuss was about. That was too much money imho
Well, I was mainly referring to phenomenons visible to the human eye (like a UFO), but you are probably right about the infrared-ghost thing, but that's not the kind of thing I was thinking about. The reason I think film is better then a digital camera is because electronics are very sensitive and can very easily be manipulated and distorted, that cannot happen with a fully mechanical camera. Also, Film is (pretty much) fake proof. I have often heard story's of Phones being deactivated or digital files being deleted from the phone, or being heavily distorted and unusable. When it comes to reliability, a manual film camera will serve you the best, what's captured is captured, its a physical thing, it cannot be simply deleted. There is no alien or UFO that can simply deactivate your manual camera. its also more safe in regard to privacy, a government cannot simply access that picture, since its laying in some drawer in not on your hard drive.
Ohhh, so if the creature could tap into the frequency of your devices you would technically still be able to snap a shot of it with a manual camera. I just finished a film that featured an alien from Venus (totally possible btw). The damn thing could disable mechanical things like firearms. Hopefully, that will never happen because that film was awful.
AFAIK the US loves when people spend money. If you're not breaking the law they don't seem to care. If you're doing awesome things they might offer you a job :cool: I've read that Germany is similar in some ways but not so much in other ways. If I was to walk into a UFO and take several hundred photos, the Department Of Defense would probably just say that I'm really good at faking photos, and leave it at that. That would be enough negative exposure to limit the number of professionals who would be willing to authenticate the photos in question.
I think if would "walk into a UFO and take several hundred photos" and made them public, you would have other things to worry about then a cheap comment from the Department Of Defence, things like... a couple of friendly men in black suits knocking on your door.
I don't believe in this stuff but in theory, your best chance of 'ghost hunting' is with a thermal imaging camera. I'm just going off lore, since nothing has been proven by science, who can really say that temperature is a deciding factor? Digital is fine, it was only a problem when the resolution caused constant artifacts. Years ago I was interested and liked to debunk pictures I found on the internet. Read your camera manual, clean your lens or send it in for maintenance, and you're golden. I've read that infrared film works really well. That stuff is a beast to load and have developed though.
For UFOs Maybe a digital telescope that can take a memory card of some kind? Or how about A 360° camera system with telephoto lenses and high aperture settings?
Alternatively, might I suggest you invest as little money as possible into this new hobby you may or may not be interested in? I've wasted a few rolls of film when I tried to see what the fuss was about. That was too much money imho
Well, I was mainly referring to phenomenons visible to the human eye (like a UFO), but you are probably right about the infrared-ghost thing, but that's not the kind of thing I was thinking about. The reason I think film is better then a digital camera is because electronics are very sensitive and can very easily be manipulated and distorted, that cannot happen with a fully mechanical camera. Also, Film is (pretty much) fake proof. I have often heard story's of Phones being deactivated or digital files being deleted from the phone, or being heavily distorted and unusable. When it comes to reliability, a manual film camera will serve you the best, what's captured is captured, its a physical thing, it cannot be simply deleted. There is no alien or UFO that can simply deactivate your manual camera. its also more safe in regard to privacy, a government cannot simply access that picture, since its laying in some drawer in not on your hard drive.
Ohhh, so if the creature could tap into the frequency of your devices you would technically still be able to snap a shot of it with a manual camera. I just finished a film that featured an alien from Venus (totally possible btw). The damn thing could disable mechanical things like firearms. Hopefully, that will never happen because that film was awful.
AFAIK the US loves when people spend money. If you're not breaking the law they don't seem to care. If you're doing awesome things they might offer you a job :cool: I've read that Germany is similar in some ways but not so much in other ways. If I was to walk into a UFO and take several hundred photos, the Department Of Defense would probably just say that I'm really good at faking photos, and leave it at that. That would be enough negative exposure to limit the number of professionals who would be willing to authenticate the photos in question.
I think if would "walk into a UFO and take several hundred photos" and made them public, you would have other things to worry about then a cheap comment from the Department Of Defence, things like... a couple of friendly men in black suits knocking on your door.
For real? Men In Black? Would Will Smith sing Miami during any of this?
I don't believe in this stuff but in theory, your best chance of 'ghost hunting' is with a thermal imaging camera. I'm just going off lore, since nothing has been proven by science, who can really say that temperature is a deciding factor? Digital is fine, it was only a problem when the resolution caused constant artifacts. Years ago I was interested and liked to debunk pictures I found on the internet. Read your camera manual, clean your lens or send it in for maintenance, and you're golden. I've read that infrared film works really well. That stuff is a beast to load and have developed though.
For UFOs Maybe a digital telescope that can take a memory card of some kind? Or how about A 360° camera system with telephoto lenses and high aperture settings?
Alternatively, might I suggest you invest as little money as possible into this new hobby you may or may not be interested in? I've wasted a few rolls of film when I tried to see what the fuss was about. That was too much money imho
Well, I was mainly referring to phenomenons visible to the human eye (like a UFO), but you are probably right about the infrared-ghost thing, but that's not the kind of thing I was thinking about. The reason I think film is better then a digital camera is because electronics are very sensitive and can very easily be manipulated and distorted, that cannot happen with a fully mechanical camera. Also, Film is (pretty much) fake proof. I have often heard story's of Phones being deactivated or digital files being deleted from the phone, or being heavily distorted and unusable. When it comes to reliability, a manual film camera will serve you the best, what's captured is captured, its a physical thing, it cannot be simply deleted. There is no alien or UFO that can simply deactivate your manual camera. its also more safe in regard to privacy, a government cannot simply access that picture, since its laying in some drawer in not on your hard drive.
Ohhh, so if the creature could tap into the frequency of your devices you would technically still be able to snap a shot of it with a manual camera. I just finished a film that featured an alien from Venus (totally possible btw). The damn thing could disable mechanical things like firearms. Hopefully, that will never happen because that film was awful.
AFAIK the US loves when people spend money. If you're not breaking the law they don't seem to care. If you're doing awesome things they might offer you a job :cool: I've read that Germany is similar in some ways but not so much in other ways. If I was to walk into a UFO and take several hundred photos, the Department Of Defense would probably just say that I'm really good at faking photos, and leave it at that. That would be enough negative exposure to limit the number of professionals who would be willing to authenticate the photos in question.
I think if would "walk into a UFO and take several hundred photos" and made them public, you would have other things to worry about then a cheap comment from the Department Of Defence, things like... a couple of friendly men in black suits knocking on your door.
For real? Men In Black? Would Will Smith sing Miami during any of this?
It wouldn't be the men in black if he didn't.
I don't believe in this stuff but in theory, your best chance of 'ghost hunting' is with a thermal imaging camera. I'm just going off lore, since nothing has been proven by science, who can really say that temperature is a deciding factor? Digital is fine, it was only a problem when the resolution caused constant artifacts. Years ago I was interested and liked to debunk pictures I found on the internet. Read your camera manual, clean your lens or send it in for maintenance, and you're golden. I've read that infrared film works really well. That stuff is a beast to load and have developed though.
For UFOs Maybe a digital telescope that can take a memory card of some kind? Or how about A 360° camera system with telephoto lenses and high aperture settings?
Alternatively, might I suggest you invest as little money as possible into this new hobby you may or may not be interested in? I've wasted a few rolls of film when I tried to see what the fuss was about. That was too much money imho
Well, I was mainly referring to phenomenons visible to the human eye (like a UFO), but you are probably right about the infrared-ghost thing, but that's not the kind of thing I was thinking about. The reason I think film is better then a digital camera is because electronics are very sensitive and can very easily be manipulated and distorted, that cannot happen with a fully mechanical camera. Also, Film is (pretty much) fake proof. I have often heard story's of Phones being deactivated or digital files being deleted from the phone, or being heavily distorted and unusable. When it comes to reliability, a manual film camera will serve you the best, what's captured is captured, its a physical thing, it cannot be simply deleted. There is no alien or UFO that can simply deactivate your manual camera. its also more safe in regard to privacy, a government cannot simply access that picture, since its laying in some drawer in not on your hard drive.
Ohhh, so if the creature could tap into the frequency of your devices you would technically still be able to snap a shot of it with a manual camera. I just finished a film that featured an alien from Venus (totally possible btw). The damn thing could disable mechanical things like firearms. Hopefully, that will never happen because that film was awful.
AFAIK the US loves when people spend money. If you're not breaking the law they don't seem to care. If you're doing awesome things they might offer you a job :cool: I've read that Germany is similar in some ways but not so much in other ways. If I was to walk into a UFO and take several hundred photos, the Department Of Defense would probably just say that I'm really good at faking photos, and leave it at that. That would be enough negative exposure to limit the number of professionals who would be willing to authenticate the photos in question.
I think if would "walk into a UFO and take several hundred photos" and made them public, you would have other things to worry about then a cheap comment from the Department Of Defence, things like... a couple of friendly men in black suits knocking on your door.
For real? Men In Black? Would Will Smith sing Miami during any of this?
It wouldn't be the men in black if he didn't.Show Image(https://media.giphy.com/media/oV92AAEu4Rig0/giphy.gif)
I don't believe in this stuff but in theory, your best chance of 'ghost hunting' is with a thermal imaging camera. I'm just going off lore, since nothing has been proven by science, who can really say that temperature is a deciding factor? Digital is fine, it was only a problem when the resolution caused constant artifacts. Years ago I was interested and liked to debunk pictures I found on the internet. Read your camera manual, clean your lens or send it in for maintenance, and you're golden. I've read that infrared film works really well. That stuff is a beast to load and have developed though.
For UFOs Maybe a digital telescope that can take a memory card of some kind? Or how about A 360° camera system with telephoto lenses and high aperture settings?
Alternatively, might I suggest you invest as little money as possible into this new hobby you may or may not be interested in? I've wasted a few rolls of film when I tried to see what the fuss was about. That was too much money imho
Well, I was mainly referring to phenomenons visible to the human eye (like a UFO), but you are probably right about the infrared-ghost thing, but that's not the kind of thing I was thinking about. The reason I think film is better then a digital camera is because electronics are very sensitive and can very easily be manipulated and distorted, that cannot happen with a fully mechanical camera. Also, Film is (pretty much) fake proof. I have often heard story's of Phones being deactivated or digital files being deleted from the phone, or being heavily distorted and unusable. When it comes to reliability, a manual film camera will serve you the best, what's captured is captured, its a physical thing, it cannot be simply deleted. There is no alien or UFO that can simply deactivate your manual camera. its also more safe in regard to privacy, a government cannot simply access that picture, since its laying in some drawer in not on your hard drive.
Ohhh, so if the creature could tap into the frequency of your devices you would technically still be able to snap a shot of it with a manual camera. I just finished a film that featured an alien from Venus (totally possible btw). The damn thing could disable mechanical things like firearms. Hopefully, that will never happen because that film was awful.
AFAIK the US loves when people spend money. If you're not breaking the law they don't seem to care. If you're doing awesome things they might offer you a job :cool: I've read that Germany is similar in some ways but not so much in other ways. If I was to walk into a UFO and take several hundred photos, the Department Of Defense would probably just say that I'm really good at faking photos, and leave it at that. That would be enough negative exposure to limit the number of professionals who would be willing to authenticate the photos in question.
I think if would "walk into a UFO and take several hundred photos" and made them public, you would have other things to worry about then a cheap comment from the Department Of Defence, things like... a couple of friendly men in black suits knocking on your door.
For real? Men In Black? Would Will Smith sing Miami during any of this?
It wouldn't be the men in black if he didn't.Show Image(https://media.giphy.com/media/oV92AAEu4Rig0/giphy.gif)
A bit out of context, but you said in the beginning: "I don't believe in this stuff ", and I think at this point in time, where we have nearly immediate access to all this information, especially related to UFO's, aliens and conspiracy's connected to that, its more about simply what you know or want to know, rather then what you believe in. Just wanted to put this out there, I don't want to start a discussion, since in the end, its still up to the individual to decide what is true or not for him or her, in that regard, truth is very much subjective, or should I say relative.
I don't believe in this stuff but in theory, your best chance of 'ghost hunting' is with a thermal imaging camera. I'm just going off lore, since nothing has been proven by science, who can really say that temperature is a deciding factor? Digital is fine, it was only a problem when the resolution caused constant artifacts. Years ago I was interested and liked to debunk pictures I found on the internet. Read your camera manual, clean your lens or send it in for maintenance, and you're golden. I've read that infrared film works really well. That stuff is a beast to load and have developed though.
For UFOs Maybe a digital telescope that can take a memory card of some kind? Or how about A 360° camera system with telephoto lenses and high aperture settings?
Alternatively, might I suggest you invest as little money as possible into this new hobby you may or may not be interested in? I've wasted a few rolls of film when I tried to see what the fuss was about. That was too much money imho
Well, I was mainly referring to phenomenons visible to the human eye (like a UFO), but you are probably right about the infrared-ghost thing, but that's not the kind of thing I was thinking about. The reason I think film is better then a digital camera is because electronics are very sensitive and can very easily be manipulated and distorted, that cannot happen with a fully mechanical camera. Also, Film is (pretty much) fake proof. I have often heard story's of Phones being deactivated or digital files being deleted from the phone, or being heavily distorted and unusable. When it comes to reliability, a manual film camera will serve you the best, what's captured is captured, its a physical thing, it cannot be simply deleted. There is no alien or UFO that can simply deactivate your manual camera. its also more safe in regard to privacy, a government cannot simply access that picture, since its laying in some drawer in not on your hard drive.
Ohhh, so if the creature could tap into the frequency of your devices you would technically still be able to snap a shot of it with a manual camera. I just finished a film that featured an alien from Venus (totally possible btw). The damn thing could disable mechanical things like firearms. Hopefully, that will never happen because that film was awful.
AFAIK the US loves when people spend money. If you're not breaking the law they don't seem to care. If you're doing awesome things they might offer you a job :cool: I've read that Germany is similar in some ways but not so much in other ways. If I was to walk into a UFO and take several hundred photos, the Department Of Defense would probably just say that I'm really good at faking photos, and leave it at that. That would be enough negative exposure to limit the number of professionals who would be willing to authenticate the photos in question.
I think if would "walk into a UFO and take several hundred photos" and made them public, you would have other things to worry about then a cheap comment from the Department Of Defence, things like... a couple of friendly men in black suits knocking on your door.
For real? Men In Black? Would Will Smith sing Miami during any of this?
It wouldn't be the men in black if he didn't.Show Image(https://media.giphy.com/media/oV92AAEu4Rig0/giphy.gif)
A bit out of context, but you said in the beginning: "I don't believe in this stuff ", and I think at this point in time, where we have nearly immediate access to all this information, especially related to UFO's, aliens and conspiracy's connected to that, its more about simply what you know or want to know, rather then what you believe in. Just wanted to put this out there, I don't want to start a discussion, since in the end, its still up to the individual to decide what is true or not for him or her, in that regard, truth is very much subjective, or should I say relative.
I'll listen to people that want to tell me of the many races of aliens that they believe exist. Mostly out of pure morbid curiosity. I'm not the kind of guy to say this stuff doesn't exist. I won't say that you'll waste both your time, and money as you stare up at the sky. There are just a few details missing from all the stories and hearsay. Like, if we had a UFO there would have been great technological gains during a short period of time. It took the world nearly a century to perfect the art of plastic, so I seriously doubt any of it is real especially when I consider that the 'Roswell UFO' rumor was the first of many stories. Sure, sure, they moved it to Hangar 18 right? I think that was the rumor anyway, it's been so long since I read up on all of this.
I don't believe in this stuff but in theory, your best chance of 'ghost hunting' is with a thermal imaging camera. I'm just going off lore, since nothing has been proven by science, who can really say that temperature is a deciding factor? Digital is fine, it was only a problem when the resolution caused constant artifacts. Years ago I was interested and liked to debunk pictures I found on the internet. Read your camera manual, clean your lens or send it in for maintenance, and you're golden. I've read that infrared film works really well. That stuff is a beast to load and have developed though.
For UFOs Maybe a digital telescope that can take a memory card of some kind? Or how about A 360° camera system with telephoto lenses and high aperture settings?
Alternatively, might I suggest you invest as little money as possible into this new hobby you may or may not be interested in? I've wasted a few rolls of film when I tried to see what the fuss was about. That was too much money imho
Well, I was mainly referring to phenomenons visible to the human eye (like a UFO), but you are probably right about the infrared-ghost thing, but that's not the kind of thing I was thinking about. The reason I think film is better then a digital camera is because electronics are very sensitive and can very easily be manipulated and distorted, that cannot happen with a fully mechanical camera. Also, Film is (pretty much) fake proof. I have often heard story's of Phones being deactivated or digital files being deleted from the phone, or being heavily distorted and unusable. When it comes to reliability, a manual film camera will serve you the best, what's captured is captured, its a physical thing, it cannot be simply deleted. There is no alien or UFO that can simply deactivate your manual camera. its also more safe in regard to privacy, a government cannot simply access that picture, since its laying in some drawer in not on your hard drive.
Ohhh, so if the creature could tap into the frequency of your devices you would technically still be able to snap a shot of it with a manual camera. I just finished a film that featured an alien from Venus (totally possible btw). The damn thing could disable mechanical things like firearms. Hopefully, that will never happen because that film was awful.
AFAIK the US loves when people spend money. If you're not breaking the law they don't seem to care. If you're doing awesome things they might offer you a job :cool: I've read that Germany is similar in some ways but not so much in other ways. If I was to walk into a UFO and take several hundred photos, the Department Of Defense would probably just say that I'm really good at faking photos, and leave it at that. That would be enough negative exposure to limit the number of professionals who would be willing to authenticate the photos in question.
I think if would "walk into a UFO and take several hundred photos" and made them public, you would have other things to worry about then a cheap comment from the Department Of Defence, things like... a couple of friendly men in black suits knocking on your door.
For real? Men In Black? Would Will Smith sing Miami during any of this?
It wouldn't be the men in black if he didn't.Show Image(https://media.giphy.com/media/oV92AAEu4Rig0/giphy.gif)
A bit out of context, but you said in the beginning: "I don't believe in this stuff ", and I think at this point in time, where we have nearly immediate access to all this information, especially related to UFO's, aliens and conspiracy's connected to that, its more about simply what you know or want to know, rather then what you believe in. Just wanted to put this out there, I don't want to start a discussion, since in the end, its still up to the individual to decide what is true or not for him or her, in that regard, truth is very much subjective, or should I say relative.
I'll listen to people that want to tell me of the many races of aliens that they believe exist. Mostly out of pure morbid curiosity. I'm not the kind of guy to say this stuff doesn't exist. I won't say that you'll waste both your time, and money as you stare up at the sky. There are just a few details missing from all the stories and hearsay. Like, if we had a UFO there would have been great technological gains during a short period of time. It took the world nearly a century to perfect the art of plastic, so I seriously doubt any of it is real especially when I consider that the 'Roswell UFO' rumor was the first of many stories. Sure, sure, they moved it to Hangar 18 right? I think that was the rumor anyway, it's been so long since I read up on all of this.
OH, I think you got the wrong idea, this stuff is not actually my "hobby", its just something I'm interested in, I am not actually spending money and time on this. I'm not doing professional research or anything, Its just something I brought up.
Besides that, there where and still are HUGE "great technological gains during a short period of time"! First of all, not every reverse engineered technology and not all the information is made public, that's for sure, but even considering that, the late 19th century and throughout the entire 20th century we made technological process that under "normal" conditions would take thousands, or at least hundreds of years. That's not how a society or evolution normally behaves, we had "help". That's is the reason why we have this mess with all the different generations and all this cluster-**** in society and the world in general at the moment, just look at all the events and wars that where happening during that time frame, and compare that to the rest of our history. Its not natural, its all happing too fast for society to catch up. If it would be natural we wouldn't have these problems, it would be much more "smooth". Also, of cause not every field of technology is affected by that, because you mentioned "It took the world nearly a century to perfect the art of plastic", whish I know was just a ironic statement.
I don't believe in this stuff but in theory, your best chance of 'ghost hunting' is with a thermal imaging camera. I'm just going off lore, since nothing has been proven by science, who can really say that temperature is a deciding factor? Digital is fine, it was only a problem when the resolution caused constant artifacts. Years ago I was interested and liked to debunk pictures I found on the internet. Read your camera manual, clean your lens or send it in for maintenance, and you're golden. I've read that infrared film works really well. That stuff is a beast to load and have developed though.
For UFOs Maybe a digital telescope that can take a memory card of some kind? Or how about A 360° camera system with telephoto lenses and high aperture settings?
Alternatively, might I suggest you invest as little money as possible into this new hobby you may or may not be interested in? I've wasted a few rolls of film when I tried to see what the fuss was about. That was too much money imho
Well, I was mainly referring to phenomenons visible to the human eye (like a UFO), but you are probably right about the infrared-ghost thing, but that's not the kind of thing I was thinking about. The reason I think film is better then a digital camera is because electronics are very sensitive and can very easily be manipulated and distorted, that cannot happen with a fully mechanical camera. Also, Film is (pretty much) fake proof. I have often heard story's of Phones being deactivated or digital files being deleted from the phone, or being heavily distorted and unusable. When it comes to reliability, a manual film camera will serve you the best, what's captured is captured, its a physical thing, it cannot be simply deleted. There is no alien or UFO that can simply deactivate your manual camera. its also more safe in regard to privacy, a government cannot simply access that picture, since its laying in some drawer in not on your hard drive.
Ohhh, so if the creature could tap into the frequency of your devices you would technically still be able to snap a shot of it with a manual camera. I just finished a film that featured an alien from Venus (totally possible btw). The damn thing could disable mechanical things like firearms. Hopefully, that will never happen because that film was awful.
AFAIK the US loves when people spend money. If you're not breaking the law they don't seem to care. If you're doing awesome things they might offer you a job :cool: I've read that Germany is similar in some ways but not so much in other ways. If I was to walk into a UFO and take several hundred photos, the Department Of Defense would probably just say that I'm really good at faking photos, and leave it at that. That would be enough negative exposure to limit the number of professionals who would be willing to authenticate the photos in question.
I think if would "walk into a UFO and take several hundred photos" and made them public, you would have other things to worry about then a cheap comment from the Department Of Defence, things like... a couple of friendly men in black suits knocking on your door.
For real? Men In Black? Would Will Smith sing Miami during any of this?
It wouldn't be the men in black if he didn't.Show Image(https://media.giphy.com/media/oV92AAEu4Rig0/giphy.gif)
A bit out of context, but you said in the beginning: "I don't believe in this stuff ", and I think at this point in time, where we have nearly immediate access to all this information, especially related to UFO's, aliens and conspiracy's connected to that, its more about simply what you know or want to know, rather then what you believe in. Just wanted to put this out there, I don't want to start a discussion, since in the end, its still up to the individual to decide what is true or not for him or her, in that regard, truth is very much subjective, or should I say relative.
I'll listen to people that want to tell me of the many races of aliens that they believe exist. Mostly out of pure morbid curiosity. I'm not the kind of guy to say this stuff doesn't exist. I won't say that you'll waste both your time, and money as you stare up at the sky. There are just a few details missing from all the stories and hearsay. Like, if we had a UFO there would have been great technological gains during a short period of time. It took the world nearly a century to perfect the art of plastic, so I seriously doubt any of it is real especially when I consider that the 'Roswell UFO' rumor was the first of many stories. Sure, sure, they moved it to Hangar 18 right? I think that was the rumor anyway, it's been so long since I read up on all of this.
OH, I think you got the wrong idea, this stuff is not actually my "hobby", its just something I'm interested in, I am not actually spending money and time on this. I'm not doing professional research or anything, Its just something I brought up.
Besides that, there where and still are HUGE "great technological gains during a short period of time"! First of all, not every reverse engineered technology and not all the information is made public, that's for sure, but even considering that, the late 19th century and throughout the entire 20th century we made technological process that under "normal" conditions would take thousands, or at least hundreds of years. That's not how a society or evolution normally behaves, we had "help". That's is the reason why we have this mess with all the different generations and all this cluster-**** in society and the world in general at the moment, just look at all the events and wars that where happening during that time frame, and compare that to the rest of our history. Its not natural, its all happing too fast for society to catch up. If it would be natural we wouldn't have these problems, it would be much more "smooth". Also, of cause not every field of technology is affected by that, because you mentioned "It took the world nearly a century to perfect the art of plastic", whish I know was just a ironic statement.
Nope, I didn't mean for that sentence to sound ironic. Just meant for that sentence to sound silly. All the technological leaps and bounds were thanks to modern communications and transporation. It's just that simple.
I don't believe in this stuff but in theory, your best chance of 'ghost hunting' is with a thermal imaging camera. I'm just going off lore, since nothing has been proven by science, who can really say that temperature is a deciding factor? Digital is fine, it was only a problem when the resolution caused constant artifacts. Years ago I was interested and liked to debunk pictures I found on the internet. Read your camera manual, clean your lens or send it in for maintenance, and you're golden. I've read that infrared film works really well. That stuff is a beast to load and have developed though.
For UFOs Maybe a digital telescope that can take a memory card of some kind? Or how about A 360° camera system with telephoto lenses and high aperture settings?
Alternatively, might I suggest you invest as little money as possible into this new hobby you may or may not be interested in? I've wasted a few rolls of film when I tried to see what the fuss was about. That was too much money imho
Well, I was mainly referring to phenomenons visible to the human eye (like a UFO), but you are probably right about the infrared-ghost thing, but that's not the kind of thing I was thinking about. The reason I think film is better then a digital camera is because electronics are very sensitive and can very easily be manipulated and distorted, that cannot happen with a fully mechanical camera. Also, Film is (pretty much) fake proof. I have often heard story's of Phones being deactivated or digital files being deleted from the phone, or being heavily distorted and unusable. When it comes to reliability, a manual film camera will serve you the best, what's captured is captured, its a physical thing, it cannot be simply deleted. There is no alien or UFO that can simply deactivate your manual camera. its also more safe in regard to privacy, a government cannot simply access that picture, since its laying in some drawer in not on your hard drive.
Ohhh, so if the creature could tap into the frequency of your devices you would technically still be able to snap a shot of it with a manual camera. I just finished a film that featured an alien from Venus (totally possible btw). The damn thing could disable mechanical things like firearms. Hopefully, that will never happen because that film was awful.
AFAIK the US loves when people spend money. If you're not breaking the law they don't seem to care. If you're doing awesome things they might offer you a job :cool: I've read that Germany is similar in some ways but not so much in other ways. If I was to walk into a UFO and take several hundred photos, the Department Of Defense would probably just say that I'm really good at faking photos, and leave it at that. That would be enough negative exposure to limit the number of professionals who would be willing to authenticate the photos in question.
I think if would "walk into a UFO and take several hundred photos" and made them public, you would have other things to worry about then a cheap comment from the Department Of Defence, things like... a couple of friendly men in black suits knocking on your door.
For real? Men In Black? Would Will Smith sing Miami during any of this?
It wouldn't be the men in black if he didn't.Show Image(https://media.giphy.com/media/oV92AAEu4Rig0/giphy.gif)
A bit out of context, but you said in the beginning: "I don't believe in this stuff ", and I think at this point in time, where we have nearly immediate access to all this information, especially related to UFO's, aliens and conspiracy's connected to that, its more about simply what you know or want to know, rather then what you believe in. Just wanted to put this out there, I don't want to start a discussion, since in the end, its still up to the individual to decide what is true or not for him or her, in that regard, truth is very much subjective, or should I say relative.
I'll listen to people that want to tell me of the many races of aliens that they believe exist. Mostly out of pure morbid curiosity. I'm not the kind of guy to say this stuff doesn't exist. I won't say that you'll waste both your time, and money as you stare up at the sky. There are just a few details missing from all the stories and hearsay. Like, if we had a UFO there would have been great technological gains during a short period of time. It took the world nearly a century to perfect the art of plastic, so I seriously doubt any of it is real especially when I consider that the 'Roswell UFO' rumor was the first of many stories. Sure, sure, they moved it to Hangar 18 right? I think that was the rumor anyway, it's been so long since I read up on all of this.
OH, I think you got the wrong idea, this stuff is not actually my "hobby", its just something I'm interested in, I am not actually spending money and time on this. I'm not doing professional research or anything, Its just something I brought up.
Besides that, there where and still are HUGE "great technological gains during a short period of time"! First of all, not every reverse engineered technology and not all the information is made public, that's for sure, but even considering that, the late 19th century and throughout the entire 20th century we made technological process that under "normal" conditions would take thousands, or at least hundreds of years. That's not how a society or evolution normally behaves, we had "help". That's is the reason why we have this mess with all the different generations and all this cluster-**** in society and the world in general at the moment, just look at all the events and wars that where happening during that time frame, and compare that to the rest of our history. Its not natural, its all happing too fast for society to catch up. If it would be natural we wouldn't have these problems, it would be much more "smooth". Also, of cause not every field of technology is affected by that, because you mentioned "It took the world nearly a century to perfect the art of plastic", whish I know was just a ironic statement.
Nope, I didn't mean for that sentence to sound ironic. Just meant for that sentence to sound silly. All the technological leaps and bounds were thanks to modern communications and transporation. It's just that simple.
I have edited a lot in my post. It would be great if "It's just that simple.", but sadly, once you start to get a deeper understanding of the bigger picture, its a bit more complex then that.
I don't believe in this stuff but in theory, your best chance of 'ghost hunting' is with a thermal imaging camera. I'm just going off lore, since nothing has been proven by science, who can really say that temperature is a deciding factor? Digital is fine, it was only a problem when the resolution caused constant artifacts. Years ago I was interested and liked to debunk pictures I found on the internet. Read your camera manual, clean your lens or send it in for maintenance, and you're golden. I've read that infrared film works really well. That stuff is a beast to load and have developed though.
For UFOs Maybe a digital telescope that can take a memory card of some kind? Or how about A 360° camera system with telephoto lenses and high aperture settings?
Alternatively, might I suggest you invest as little money as possible into this new hobby you may or may not be interested in? I've wasted a few rolls of film when I tried to see what the fuss was about. That was too much money imho
Well, I was mainly referring to phenomenons visible to the human eye (like a UFO), but you are probably right about the infrared-ghost thing, but that's not the kind of thing I was thinking about. The reason I think film is better then a digital camera is because electronics are very sensitive and can very easily be manipulated and distorted, that cannot happen with a fully mechanical camera. Also, Film is (pretty much) fake proof. I have often heard story's of Phones being deactivated or digital files being deleted from the phone, or being heavily distorted and unusable. When it comes to reliability, a manual film camera will serve you the best, what's captured is captured, its a physical thing, it cannot be simply deleted. There is no alien or UFO that can simply deactivate your manual camera. its also more safe in regard to privacy, a government cannot simply access that picture, since its laying in some drawer in not on your hard drive.
Ohhh, so if the creature could tap into the frequency of your devices you would technically still be able to snap a shot of it with a manual camera. I just finished a film that featured an alien from Venus (totally possible btw). The damn thing could disable mechanical things like firearms. Hopefully, that will never happen because that film was awful.
AFAIK the US loves when people spend money. If you're not breaking the law they don't seem to care. If you're doing awesome things they might offer you a job :cool: I've read that Germany is similar in some ways but not so much in other ways. If I was to walk into a UFO and take several hundred photos, the Department Of Defense would probably just say that I'm really good at faking photos, and leave it at that. That would be enough negative exposure to limit the number of professionals who would be willing to authenticate the photos in question.
I think if would "walk into a UFO and take several hundred photos" and made them public, you would have other things to worry about then a cheap comment from the Department Of Defence, things like... a couple of friendly men in black suits knocking on your door.
For real? Men In Black? Would Will Smith sing Miami during any of this?
It wouldn't be the men in black if he didn't.Show Image(https://media.giphy.com/media/oV92AAEu4Rig0/giphy.gif)
A bit out of context, but you said in the beginning: "I don't believe in this stuff ", and I think at this point in time, where we have nearly immediate access to all this information, especially related to UFO's, aliens and conspiracy's connected to that, its more about simply what you know or want to know, rather then what you believe in. Just wanted to put this out there, I don't want to start a discussion, since in the end, its still up to the individual to decide what is true or not for him or her, in that regard, truth is very much subjective, or should I say relative.
I'll listen to people that want to tell me of the many races of aliens that they believe exist. Mostly out of pure morbid curiosity. I'm not the kind of guy to say this stuff doesn't exist. I won't say that you'll waste both your time, and money as you stare up at the sky. There are just a few details missing from all the stories and hearsay. Like, if we had a UFO there would have been great technological gains during a short period of time. It took the world nearly a century to perfect the art of plastic, so I seriously doubt any of it is real especially when I consider that the 'Roswell UFO' rumor was the first of many stories. Sure, sure, they moved it to Hangar 18 right? I think that was the rumor anyway, it's been so long since I read up on all of this.
OH, I think you got the wrong idea, this stuff is not actually my "hobby", its just something I'm interested in, I am not actually spending money and time on this. I'm not doing professional research or anything, Its just something I brought up.
Besides that, there where and still are HUGE "great technological gains during a short period of time"! First of all, not every reverse engineered technology and not all the information is made public, that's for sure, but even considering that, the late 19th century and throughout the entire 20th century we made technological process that under "normal" conditions would take thousands, or at least hundreds of years. That's not how a society or evolution normally behaves, we had "help". That's is the reason why we have this mess with all the different generations and all this cluster-**** in society and the world in general at the moment, just look at all the events and wars that where happening during that time frame, and compare that to the rest of our history. Its not natural, its all happing too fast for society to catch up. If it would be natural we wouldn't have these problems, it would be much more "smooth". Also, of cause not every field of technology is affected by that, because you mentioned "It took the world nearly a century to perfect the art of plastic", whish I know was just a ironic statement.
Nope, I didn't mean for that sentence to sound ironic. Just meant for that sentence to sound silly. All the technological leaps and bounds were thanks to modern communications and transporation. It's just that simple.
I have edited a lot in my post. It would be great if "It's just that simple.", but sadly, once you start to get a deeper understanding of the bigger picture, its a bit more complex then that.
Seriously? Is this that hard to understand? You keep quoting me, what is that about?
I don't believe in this stuff but in theory, your best chance of 'ghost hunting' is with a thermal imaging camera. I'm just going off lore, since nothing has been proven by science, who can really say that temperature is a deciding factor? Digital is fine, it was only a problem when the resolution caused constant artifacts. Years ago I was interested and liked to debunk pictures I found on the internet. Read your camera manual, clean your lens or send it in for maintenance, and you're golden. I've read that infrared film works really well. That stuff is a beast to load and have developed though.
For UFOs Maybe a digital telescope that can take a memory card of some kind? Or how about A 360° camera system with telephoto lenses and high aperture settings?
Alternatively, might I suggest you invest as little money as possible into this new hobby you may or may not be interested in? I've wasted a few rolls of film when I tried to see what the fuss was about. That was too much money imho
Well, I was mainly referring to phenomenons visible to the human eye (like a UFO), but you are probably right about the infrared-ghost thing, but that's not the kind of thing I was thinking about. The reason I think film is better then a digital camera is because electronics are very sensitive and can very easily be manipulated and distorted, that cannot happen with a fully mechanical camera. Also, Film is (pretty much) fake proof. I have often heard story's of Phones being deactivated or digital files being deleted from the phone, or being heavily distorted and unusable. When it comes to reliability, a manual film camera will serve you the best, what's captured is captured, its a physical thing, it cannot be simply deleted. There is no alien or UFO that can simply deactivate your manual camera. its also more safe in regard to privacy, a government cannot simply access that picture, since its laying in some drawer in not on your hard drive.
Ohhh, so if the creature could tap into the frequency of your devices you would technically still be able to snap a shot of it with a manual camera. I just finished a film that featured an alien from Venus (totally possible btw). The damn thing could disable mechanical things like firearms. Hopefully, that will never happen because that film was awful.
AFAIK the US loves when people spend money. If you're not breaking the law they don't seem to care. If you're doing awesome things they might offer you a job :cool: I've read that Germany is similar in some ways but not so much in other ways. If I was to walk into a UFO and take several hundred photos, the Department Of Defense would probably just say that I'm really good at faking photos, and leave it at that. That would be enough negative exposure to limit the number of professionals who would be willing to authenticate the photos in question.
I think if would "walk into a UFO and take several hundred photos" and made them public, you would have other things to worry about then a cheap comment from the Department Of Defence, things like... a couple of friendly men in black suits knocking on your door.
For real? Men In Black? Would Will Smith sing Miami during any of this?
It wouldn't be the men in black if he didn't.Show Image(https://media.giphy.com/media/oV92AAEu4Rig0/giphy.gif)
A bit out of context, but you said in the beginning: "I don't believe in this stuff ", and I think at this point in time, where we have nearly immediate access to all this information, especially related to UFO's, aliens and conspiracy's connected to that, its more about simply what you know or want to know, rather then what you believe in. Just wanted to put this out there, I don't want to start a discussion, since in the end, its still up to the individual to decide what is true or not for him or her, in that regard, truth is very much subjective, or should I say relative.
I'll listen to people that want to tell me of the many races of aliens that they believe exist. Mostly out of pure morbid curiosity. I'm not the kind of guy to say this stuff doesn't exist. I won't say that you'll waste both your time, and money as you stare up at the sky. There are just a few details missing from all the stories and hearsay. Like, if we had a UFO there would have been great technological gains during a short period of time. It took the world nearly a century to perfect the art of plastic, so I seriously doubt any of it is real especially when I consider that the 'Roswell UFO' rumor was the first of many stories. Sure, sure, they moved it to Hangar 18 right? I think that was the rumor anyway, it's been so long since I read up on all of this.
OH, I think you got the wrong idea, this stuff is not actually my "hobby", its just something I'm interested in, I am not actually spending money and time on this. I'm not doing professional research or anything, Its just something I brought up.
Besides that, there where and still are HUGE "great technological gains during a short period of time"! First of all, not every reverse engineered technology and not all the information is made public, that's for sure, but even considering that, the late 19th century and throughout the entire 20th century we made technological process that under "normal" conditions would take thousands, or at least hundreds of years. That's not how a society or evolution normally behaves, we had "help". That's is the reason why we have this mess with all the different generations and all this cluster-**** in society and the world in general at the moment, just look at all the events and wars that where happening during that time frame, and compare that to the rest of our history. Its not natural, its all happing too fast for society to catch up. If it would be natural we wouldn't have these problems, it would be much more "smooth". Also, of cause not every field of technology is affected by that, because you mentioned "It took the world nearly a century to perfect the art of plastic", whish I know was just a ironic statement.
Nope, I didn't mean for that sentence to sound ironic. Just meant for that sentence to sound silly. All the technological leaps and bounds were thanks to modern communications and transporation. It's just that simple.
I have edited a lot in my post. It would be great if "It's just that simple.", but sadly, once you start to get a deeper understanding of the bigger picture, its a bit more complex then that.
Seriously? Is this that hard to understand? You keep quoting me, what is that about?
Because I'm lazy and copy and pasting is quicker and required less work then writing is myself. I also don't see how this is related to anything we've talked about."Seriously? Is this that hard to understand?" All I'm going to say to that is that the deeper you'r understanding of something is, the more questions will open up. Just like the quote goes, "the more you find out, the less you will know".
The one theoretical piece of it that does intrigue me is the appearance and spike of UFO sightings in the decade after WW2 when the human race started detonating nukes in earnest. If that really was like a beacon (eg Battlestar Galactica) then perhaps it did draw somebody's attention?
I was going to avoid this wall of text but I guess I was a bit bored and curious this morning.
Personally, I have no doubt that there is intelligent life in the universe besides what is on this planet. In fact, I would find it far harder to believe that it did not exist than that it did. But I am of the "If they really did come here then why are rumors of anal probings in the desert at midnight and huge glyphs carved into the soil back in the Bronze Age all there is to show for it?" school of thought.
Since I am of a relatively primitive mindset, I cannot accept that FTL is possible, and therefore the distances involved in travel are simply prohibitive. And that deal about gigantic "generational" spaceships taking millennia to get to another habitable planet - what happens when you run into a rock the size of a football at 0.98c? Or a grain of sand? There is absolutely no way you could go all that way without hitting something!
The one theoretical piece of it that does intrigue me is the appearance and spike of UFO sightings in the decade after WW2 when the human race started detonating nukes in earnest. If that really was like a beacon (eg Battlestar Galactica) then perhaps it did draw somebody's attention?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9lquok4Pdk (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9lquok4Pdk)
Since I am of a relatively primitive mindset, I cannot accept that FTL is possible, and therefore the distances involved in travel are simply prohibitive.
Saying that FTL is not possible is just as ignorant as saying that we are alone in the entire universe.
Since I am of a relatively primitive mindset, I cannot accept that FTL is possible, and therefore the distances involved in travel are simply prohibitive.
Saying that FTL is not possible is just as ignorant as saying that we are alone in the entire universe.
Frankly, as an old man, I more and more perceive my physical body as a significant limitation.
From where I sit, I would imagine that evolving out of a physical existence would be easier and more desirable than moving tons of metal through near-unimaginable distances - for what purpose?