One bigger than the other? Why I'm already sensitive about the left one hanging lower like 65% of the population
I really like my Ergonomic Touchpad. I am a Mac user so I have a few less stock options than in Win, but that is easily made up with 3rd party software nicely.(http:///Users/dp/Pictures/Palm Photos/dp/Expansion Card -74A0/Palm/Photo_032010_001.jpg)
My goal now is for a multi-touch/gestures integrated touchpad.
Burro Volando: Could you post a pic of you DH-touchpad set up?
Show Image(http:///Users/dp/Pictures/Palm Photos/dp/Expansion Card -74A0/Palm/Photo_032010_001.jpg)
I hope this works. I may have to do this more than once to present a good image.
WOW!What is the third party software needed to add functionality for Mac users? I am a Mac user, and I have been getting along without it. Yet, I am still happier than I have ever been with any other mousing device!!!
You are not kidding about modding the bottom keys! Initially seems very extreme, but I can see how it potentially could have a large beneficial effect (I do not have a Datahand, but used one about 5 years ago).
I'm glad someone else likes the Ergonomic Touchpad, no one seems to know about it.
Thank you for pics and info on different tab lengths (mentioned in another thread).
WOW!
You are not kidding about modding the bottom keys! Initially seems very extreme, but I can see how it potentially could have a large beneficial effect (I do not have a Datahand, but used one about 5 years ago).
I'm glad someone else likes the Ergonomic Touchpad, no one seems to know about it.
Thank you for pics and info on different tab lengths (mentioned in another thread).
--huge Block of text--
This brings me to another matter I am thinking to address for your benefit inasmuch as I see you are a Colemak user. I use the Dvorak layout on the DataHand keyboard, and I have from the beginning, because I learned the Dvorak layout on the flat keyboard about seven years before I got my first DataHand keyboard in 1992. In the beginning, I used standard conversion software to make the change, but in 1998, DataHand Systems offered their own version of Dvorak, and it is better. It is optimized for the DataHand keyboard design. In addition, it improves on DataHand QWERTY by improving the functionality of the Arrow keys. They are placed on the right pinky in the NAS mode. Thus, by holding down the thumb on that hand, the little finger can quickly be used to navigate. I use this feature to avoid having to use the mouse. I estimate that this saves me from using the mouse about 30% of the time, maybe more. It is very fast, because there is no hand movement to get to the Arrow keys (as on the flat keyboard).
I mention this, because you might want to get DataHand Dvorak and convert it to Colemac with a software package like Ukelele (which I have not tried to use on a DataHand keyboard, so I do not know how it would work). On DataHand QWERTY the Arrow keys are in the Mouse mode, and they require a more awkward double shift. I think DataHand Systems should give DataHand QWERTY users the same functionality they have given to DataHand Dvorak users, but they have not done it. They could have made the change 12 years ago when the idea was installed on DataHand Dvorak, but they did not. DataHand QWERTY users do not know about this feature, so they do not demand it.
To me, one of the best features of Colemak is the swapping of the Backspace and the Shift Lock keys, but on the DataHand layout that is not needed, because the Backspace key is already in a very convenient place. If there are any keys to use less on the DataHand keyboard, it is the north keys, because the fingernail activation of keys is the most awkward movement for most people. After people get used to it, it is not so awkward, but with QWERTY, 50% of the work is on the north row. I would rather concentrate more of the work on the center and south rows, and both Dvorak and Colemak do that better than QWERTY does.
Dvorak puts about 70% of the work on the center row, and I think Colemak does similarly. The Blickensderfer DHIATENSOR layout would probably be the best layout on the DataHand keyboard, but it took me until last year to figure that out. It puts 70% of the work on the south row on the flat keyboard and more than 95% of the work on the south and center rows plus four side keys on the DataHand keyboard. That leaves very little work to be done by the fingernails. I hope this will be a helpful expansion of the discussion.
The Blickensderfer DHIATENSOR layout would probably be the best layout on the DataHand keyboard,
The mouse speed is one of the few consistent complaints I hear.
In the manual, it explains how to change the speed of both the slow finger and the fast finger, and of course, if both are pushed together the speed is additive. They can also be pushed together in different directions to move in an arc.
The problem with all this for me is that there is no acceleration and deceleration.
There is a nudge feature, but it is comparatively time consuming. The people who get good with the Finger Mouse are those with the reflexes needed to hit their target accurately without the benefit of deceleration. It is like a sports skill, and some take it as a challenge, but to me it is not user friendly enough.
http://cgi.ebay.com/Vintage-IBM-Rt-3200-trackpoint-Keyboard_W0QQitemZ250611478224QQcmdZViewItemQQptZPCA_Mice_Trackballs?hash=item3a599baed0#ht_6473wt_1167
A 3 button TP on a desktop keyboard! I'm wondering if this is the same internals as the KPD8923 which has a 2 button TP (with the TP totally separate from the keyboard)?
So I need to see the internals of a Space Saver II to see if the TP can be removed...
EDIT:
Looking online...it appears to be tied into the keyboard controller :(
Tex:
This shows the Space Saver II TP going to the keyboard controller