Courtesy of everyone's favorite IBM vendor -
1. (http://cgi.ebay.ie/IBM-Model-M13-Trackpoint-Keyboard-13H6705-Black-549_W0QQitemZ130376315972QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item1e5b08b444#ht_1216wt_939)
2. (http://cgi.ebay.ie/IBM-Model-M13-Trackpoint-Keyboard-13H6705-Black-547_W0QQitemZ140392593470QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item20b00cf83e#ht_1328wt_939)
Ignore the high shipping price, it's set to give the cost for shipping to Ireland.
That's what I paid for a Lexmark one(my working one), but would not do for a Maxi-Switch model. If there are no meaningful differences, so be it. One good M13 is enough here, it'll only be bonus if the M13 on the way has repairable(and not show-stopping) defects.
That Akio Toyoda guy?Different type of "customer disservice", and only by scale.Show Image(http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/2010/02/25/alg_toyota_president.jpg)
I was too late for the M5-1 but I have a feeling these keyboards: the M5-1, the M5-2, and M13 just aren't designed for modern 1900x1200 screens. This Unicomp M13 at full acceleration just isn't cutting it.
As I understand it, it's the Lexmark ones that are inferior...Maxi Switch used the real trackpoint, Lexmark the less-good one.
Geekhack members have told me this...not sure if it's true or not.
You're thinking of Unicomp.
Well yeah, but what I was told (I think by you...) is that Lexmark introduced the crappy trackpoint that Unicomp still uses.
That would have happened in my M5-2 thread.
Edit: whoops, my mistake (http://geekhack.org/showpost.php?p=144436&postcount=18). There was no mention of Lexmark either way.
I think I would have remembered if I had said something completely wrong like that...