geekhack

geekhack Community => Keyboards => Topic started by: Coreda on Tue, 24 July 2018, 16:46:13

Title: Elgato Stream Decks (6/15 LCD buttons, hacking potential)
Post by: Coreda on Tue, 24 July 2018, 16:46:13
Figured I'd post in Keyboards since they're boards of keys and are the only other consumer boards I can think of with LCD buttons outside of the Optimus. It's designed for video game streamers as a switching booth, with customizable LCD button images and functions (only within a limited selection though afaik).

Natively the drivers only support W10/macOS but I'm more interested the device's potential via hacking for other purposes as for $100 ($140 for the 15 button version) it could make for an interesting contextualized button array for various applications. See this open source project (https://github.com/OpenStreamDeck/StreamDeckSharp) which opens up more possibilities and enables support all the way down to Windows XP.

In its native state also has a kind of folder-style navigation UI where pressing some buttons displays a child group of buttons, which I thought was interesting.

Microsite (https://www.elgato.com/en/gaming/stream-deck-mini)

(https://i.imgur.com/k9Ty2Py.png) (https://i.imgur.com/LH6kQCI.png)
(https://i.imgur.com/pORixpT.jpg)

Hacked example of the larger device playing a video using StreamDeck#:


Title: Re: Elgato Stream Decks (6/15 LCD buttons, hacking potential)
Post by: tp4tissue on Tue, 24 July 2018, 21:13:44
Hrrrrmmm.. I think it looks cool.. but will peeps really buy another Thingie just for hotkey ?

It's already been demonstrated that people don't really need to look at their keyboard for productivity oriented- hot-keying'

The old fotoshop/ autodesk pros all draw without looking down.
Title: Re: Elgato Stream Decks (6/15 LCD buttons, hacking potential)
Post by: ag36 on Fri, 27 July 2018, 17:44:18
Doesn't look very practical to me due to cost/reliability/software quality, should using a tablet do better than this since the size is not adequate for one-to-one key to function either therefore no ergonomic advantage.