Show Image
(http://geekhack.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=9768)
Hah, 100.7 is a local classic rock station. That'll save you when the apocalypse comes :)
Yeah, I got that- and when the batteries start wearing down when you're halfway down the rain-washed culvert? The fact that they held out for however long before that doesn't help you when you need one hand to steady yourself, one for the light and one to crank it... A squeeze bar you just... squeeze. And really, do you think everyone (even a majority) make sure it's kept fully charged or that the batteries haven't degraded from storage?
Alright, so let's suppose the crank design is absolutely dumb (I don't think it is because I think the uh...leverage? that the length of the crank handle affords permits greater results for a given effort). Show me an example of a device which uses this squeeze method...I've honestly never seen such a thing and don't see how it could be implemented.
Summat like this (http://www.southerntackle.com/proddetail.asp?prod=FP22620):
Show Image
(http://productimages.moteng.com/FP22620.jpg)
That isn't what I thought you were describing...I will agree however that this actually looks like a better idea because it is one-handed. It'd probably more fatiguing because of the effort you exert to get the same rotations of the generator, but it being only one handed adds a touch of versatility.
spanking the monkey
I prefer shocking it.
>[/youtube]
Show Image
(http://productimages.moteng.com/FP22620.jpg)
Sooo... that works for a flashlight and could work if you had a small radio, but how does it fit on something like this?
(http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41-bZc7cz7L._SL500_AA300_.jpg)
Yeah, you need two hands to crank it, but I don't think this thing was meant for your Indiana Jones cliffhanger moments when you want to groove on some tunes while you're hanging off of a bridge with one arm.