geekhack

geekhack Community => Off Topic => Topic started by: tp4tissue on Tue, 12 March 2019, 09:40:26

Title: Ur most used SSD
Post by: tp4tissue on Tue, 12 March 2019, 09:40:26
@ 1.5 years on dis' one

only 58.5 Terabyte written.


[attachimg=1]
Title: Re: Ur most used SSD
Post by: xtrafrood on Tue, 12 March 2019, 11:05:09
Sir, yes sir!

3754 hrs
Title: Re: Ur most used SSD
Post by: tp4tissue on Tue, 12 March 2019, 11:09:28
Sir, yes sir!

3754 hrs

Buh, how many Jiggabites written ?. ?
Title: Re: Ur most used SSD
Post by: xtrafrood on Tue, 12 March 2019, 11:47:25
Sir, yes sir!

3754 hrs

Buh, how many Jiggabites written ?. ?

Sectors (512) written: 5012069568 which I think maths to ~2.4TB.  My guest OS's, ISO builds, and downloads are managed via spinning rust.  Though the SSD does handle swap/page cache, etc.

I'm like 4-5 Debian ISO builds deep right now without sleep--brain is kinda mushy atm
Title: Re: Ur most used SSD
Post by: SBJ on Tue, 12 March 2019, 12:43:43
Most used SSD has 16,5TB written. 20k on hours.
That's... really not a lot.
Title: Re: Ur most used SSD
Post by: tp4tissue on Tue, 12 March 2019, 12:56:15
Most used SSD has 16,5TB written. 20k on hours.
That's... really not a lot.

and people love to argue about SSDs wearing out.. as if..
Title: Re: Ur most used SSD
Post by: FreeCopy on Tue, 12 March 2019, 13:30:38
12989 GB
25081 Hours
Title: Re: Ur most used SSD
Post by: Leslieann on Tue, 12 March 2019, 23:10:04
Second oldest (8 years)
36,192 hours
154 TB written

My newest... 8 months old
3346hours - 21TB written

Looking at your responses, I write a lot of data.
Title: Re: Ur most used SSD
Post by: xtrafrood on Wed, 13 March 2019, 12:46:15
I've had my SSD since August, 9 2018.  Most of my writes were YT videos, swap space, system updates, occasional software compiling, and Firefox.
Title: Re: Ur most used SSD
Post by: SpAmRaY on Wed, 13 March 2019, 12:51:40
Doesn't show writes but another software showed around 41TB(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190313/cc5157553a71ed219da6f7ec0d890961.jpg)

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Ur most used SSD
Post by: xtrafrood on Wed, 13 March 2019, 13:01:33
Doesn't show writes but another software showed around 41TB
Show Image
(https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20190313/cc5157553a71ed219da6f7ec0d890961.jpg)


Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Oh no :(
Title: Re: Ur most used SSD
Post by: tp4tissue on Wed, 13 March 2019, 13:10:06
Doesn't show writes but another software showed around 41TB
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

Oh no :(

41 TB on a 240gb MLC drive should be fine. Maybe overheat or sumtn'
Title: Re: Ur most used SSD
Post by: The_Boom_Boy on Fri, 15 March 2019, 08:51:27
Around 4 years of consistant daily use. Main boot/everything disk. Really amazing. I would have never known. Guess I am not that hard core...   :(
Title: Re: Ur most used SSD
Post by: tp4tissue on Fri, 15 March 2019, 09:33:05
Around 4 years of consistant daily use. Main boot/everything disk. Really amazing. I would have never known. Guess I am not that hard core...   :(

/Headscratch

I wonder how samsung meters their endurance,  the spec sheet says 140TB on the 500gb drive, so. how can 33TB write not put Any dent in that at all ?


Title: Re: Ur most used SSD
Post by: Leslieann on Fri, 15 March 2019, 20:24:47
I wonder how samsung meters their endurance,  the spec sheet says 140TB on the 500gb drive, so. how can 33TB write not put Any dent in that at all ?
It's going to say good because even at 33% used, it still has tons and tons of life left.
Most data just sits there is only moved around for wear leveling.

At current wear rates it has 6-8 years of life left before it's expected to even start compensating for wear. Why warn you about it now?
If they did it would just cause you to become concerned, buy another and complain about how it started to wear out before you expected it to.
Title: Re: Ur most used SSD
Post by: Leslieann on Fri, 15 March 2019, 20:42:44
Second oldest (8 years)
36,192 hours
154 TB written

I've been looking at these numbers and I'm pretty sure it's wrong.
This would put this drive pretty much at the end of it's lifespan, which is certainly possible, however the amount of data it would need to write in order to make it to this point seems impossible.
Title: Re: Ur most used SSD
Post by: fanpeople on Fri, 15 March 2019, 21:37:14
[attachimg=1]

I bought this brand new start of 2014 IIRC.

Title: Re: Ur most used SSD
Post by: tp4tissue on Fri, 15 March 2019, 21:53:41
I wonder how samsung meters their endurance,  the spec sheet says 140TB on the 500gb drive, so. how can 33TB write not put Any dent in that at all ?
It's going to say good because even at 33% used, it still has tons and tons of life left.
Most data just sits there is only moved around for wear leveling.

At current wear rates it has 6-8 years of life left before it's expected to even start compensating for wear. Why warn you about it now?
If they did it would just cause you to become concerned, buy another and complain about how it started to wear out before you expected it to.


Mine is rated for 220TB, and having written 59TB, my lvl is 87%,  assuming it wasn't full cycles, that at least make sense.

To put it at 100% is a bit misleading.
Title: Re: Ur most used SSD
Post by: Leslieann on Sat, 16 March 2019, 00:42:06
It's probably a buffer, where as long as it's above a certain amount it reads 100%, this keeps people from freaking out and thinking something is wrong when there isn't. BMW had to do to their temp gauges when people started buying for the name rather than performance. The would freak out if the needle went above the mid point even though it was perfectly within normal operating temps.

To a degree, it makes sense, like I said, you wouldn't want someone seeing 80% and thinking they needed to run out and replace it even if it had years of perfectly normal life left.
Title: Re: Ur most used SSD
Post by: The_Boom_Boy on Sat, 16 March 2019, 03:03:08
Around 4 years of consistant daily use. Main boot/everything disk. Really amazing. I would have never known. Guess I am not that hard core...   :(

/Headscratch

I wonder how samsung meters their endurance,  the spec sheet says 140TB on the 500gb drive, so. how can 33TB write not put Any dent in that at all ?



It is interesting how writing all that data hasn't resulted in any drop in health on the chart.