Are your eyes bleeding? You can always change your theme.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
so here's the deal.My understanding of patent was like i made up sth write it down and it was blocked for 20/25 years. Now patent ends but i'm still able to "lock down patent" for myself cause hell why not since i was the one to create that stuff ......... since i was clearly wrong due to mass production about new cherry clones coming so what the f**k went wrong? i mean ibm sold patent to unicomp and it's working so why cherry couldn't do it?
Quote from: mapple on Fri, 07 March 2014, 08:37:30so here's the deal.My understanding of patent was like i made up sth write it down and it was blocked for 20/25 years. Now patent ends but i'm still able to "lock down patent" for myself cause hell why not since i was the one to create that stuff ......... since i was clearly wrong due to mass production about new cherry clones coming so what the f**k went wrong? i mean ibm sold patent to unicomp and it's working so why cherry couldn't do it?MX was patented in 1983. It's been more than 20 years, so no longer under patent.
Perhaps no one else is interested in BS... or the tooling isn't cheap...?
I mean after patent time is over isn't that like owners choice to pay first to stretch that time? or to pay and lock it again for another 20 years?
Cause then again how come only unicomp is only company which can make buckling spring? i'm more than sure that buckling spring patent is long time done...