Author Topic: Why do tenkeyless layouts dominate over "nav-less" designs?  (Read 1055 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline spremino

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 365
  • Location: Italy
Why do tenkeyless layouts dominate over "nav-less" designs?
« on: Sun, 04 January 2026, 08:10:09 »
From a functionality point of view, a nav-less layout keeps all keys. The numpad can already act as a navigation block, but the navigation block cannot replace the numpad.

The only explanations that come to my mind are that TKL is easier to manufacture as a cut-down full-size board, or that many users simply prefer a dedicated navigation cluster. I am curious what other reasons people see, thank you.
A long space bar... what a waste of space!

Offline Findecanor

  • Posts: 5110
  • Location: Stockholm
Re: Why do tenkeyless layouts dominate over "nav-less" designs?
« Reply #1 on: Sun, 04 January 2026, 10:51:30 »
Unfortunately, it is rare that programs support key combinations with modifier keys on the numpad.
So you can't always select text and/or jump to next/previous word or top/bottom of document using the numpad the same way as with the dedicated arrow keys.

I've learned that the space around the inverse-T cluster matters for people. it helps people locate it.
Even some 65% and 75% layout keyboards have space around the arrow keys for that reason.

The inverse-T is IMHO superior ergonomically to the cross-layout embedded in the numpad. When you rest your fingers on the cluster, the middle finger — being longer — has its natural resting position in-between the Up and Down arrow keys, with equal distance to both. The numpad could be improved if the Numpad-5 key was an additional Down key, but I've never seen support for that.

I have become accustomed to having Home/End/PgUp/PgDn above the cursor keys. I use them all the time for editing text and code and wouldn't want to be without them.
I have a couple keyboards where the nav cluster above the cursor keys are 2×2 or 2×3, and the entire keyboard being one column less wide than a typical TKL, and I have had no problem going between that and a TKL.

There are lots of 65% and 75% keyboards that don't even include the full for nav keys, but instead have Ins and Del, or Del and PageUp, or PageUp/PageDown. Many even lack a Del key. I would never buy such a keyboard.
« Last Edit: Wed, 07 January 2026, 01:30:11 by Findecanor »
🍉

Offline fohat.digs

  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 6559
  • Location: 35°55'N, 83°53'W
  • weird funny old guy
Re: Why do tenkeyless layouts dominate over "nav-less" designs?
« Reply #2 on: Mon, 05 January 2026, 07:55:10 »

Many even lack a Del key. I would never buy such a keyboard.


Hear, hear. "Delete" is one of the most often-used keys by my right hand. Do I make a lot of mistakes? Maybe.
 
Meanwhile, Kelly gave a strong statement in response:
“My rank and retirement are things that I earned through my service and sacrifice for this country.
I got shot at. I missed holidays and birthdays. I commanded a space shuttle mission while my wife Gabby recovered from a gunshot wound to the head.”

Offline Findecanor

  • Posts: 5110
  • Location: Stockholm
Re: Why do tenkeyless layouts dominate over "nav-less" designs?
« Reply #3 on: Mon, 05 January 2026, 13:06:19 »
BTW. There have been a couple keyboards which have overlaid inverse-T arrow keys and nav keys on top of a numeric keypad.
One of them was the Cooler Master CM Storm Quickfire TK from 2012:

315732-0
🍉

Offline HungerMechanic

  • Posts: 1450
Re: Why do tenkeyless layouts dominate over "nav-less" designs?
« Reply #4 on: Tue, 06 January 2026, 22:43:42 »
Yes. The "Nav. Cluster" is ergonomically superior.

I can use the numpad for the same functions, but the Nav. Cluster is faster and easier.

I don't buy anything without a Nav. Cluster, unless I am looking for something very compact. That's why I have TKLs. I have a 70% board, but I find myself wanting the F-row.