I enjoy Wallace quite a bit.
But I ain't got time for dat.
Yea, that's exactly how I feel. His short stories and nonfiction essays are amazing, though. If you don't feel like reading Infinite Jest, at least do yourself a favor and read the shorter stuff.
On what page did you start to feel that way? Even 300 pages in I still feel like it's very well edited.
Within the first dozen pages. Then I had to return the book to the library.
I hold the belief that a writer has a duty to write stories that are not overly burdensome for the reader, both in length and complexity. Not all of us have the free time to read novels of that length. But I know that Wallace was such an amazing writer and a few friends whose opinions I respect have wonderful opinions of Infinite Jest. So I think that I'll take another stab at some point.
I understand the sentiment but I think
Infinite Jest is the exception. Even at 1,000 pages there isn't a single sentence that isn't carefully crafted. His ability to mirror the subject's speaking/writing style in his grammar, syntax, word choices, etc. is otherworldly. The only other writer that I can think of having a similar skill is Faulkner or maybe Hemingway in
For Whom the Bell Tolls.
1 But in that respect, I actually think DFW did it better than them. It's a 1,000+ page book but it's also about a dozen different books with a dozen totally distinct writing styles that somehow all play into each other.
But you won't know until you give the book a shot.
P.S. I read
Consider the Lobster and
A Supposedly Fun Thing I'll Never Do Again and I thought that DFW was just a really good essayist until I started reading
Infinite Jest and realized that more broadly he's the greatest US writing talent of at least the past 30 years.
1 Interesting to note that Hemingway's use of archaisms and Romance-language grammar structures is also found in the
Infinite Jest in which the characters are French Canadian (e.g. Marathe).