Author Topic: Lotus Notes  (Read 2471 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Trent

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 29
Lotus Notes
« on: Sun, 18 November 2012, 23:31:08 »
I just lost 5 hours of work.



Is anyone else required to use this wretched program?
Quote from: Trent
I hate fun
IBM Model M | IBM Model M SSK | FK-2000 | FK-8000 | FK-9000 | Fujitsu Peerless | Zenith Data Systems (Yellow ALPS!) | AEK

Offline SmallFry

  • ** Moderator Emeritus
  • Posts: 3887
  • Location: Wisconsin, USA
  • Leaving 6/15; returning 6/22 or so.
Re: Lotus Notes
« Reply #1 on: Sun, 18 November 2012, 23:36:31 »
Sorry to hear that man. Ever note?

Offline rowdy

  • HHKB Hapster
  • * Erudite Elder
  • Posts: 21175
  • Location: melbourne.vic.au
  • Missed another sale.
Re: Lotus Notes
« Reply #2 on: Sun, 18 November 2012, 23:49:24 »
I used to develop apps for Lotus Notes waaay back.  No idea if it is any easier, but it used to be a real pain.

We had an old salesman who came into my office one day and said "I've got a problem with Notus Lotes".  Ever since then I've been calling it "Notus Lotes".
"Because keyboards are accessories to PC makers, they focus on minimizing the manufacturing costs. But that’s incorrect. It’s in HHKB’s slogan, but when America’s cowboys were in the middle of a trip and their horse died, they would leave the horse there. But even if they were in the middle of a desert, they would take their saddle with them. The horse was a consumable good, but the saddle was an interface that their bodies had gotten used to. In the same vein, PCs are consumable goods, while keyboards are important interfaces." - Eiiti Wada

NEC APC-H4100E | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED red | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED green | Link 900243-08 | CM QFR MX black | KeyCool 87 white MX reds | HHKB 2 Pro | Model M 02-Mar-1993 | Model M 29-Nov-1995 | CM Trigger (broken) | CM QFS MX green | Ducky DK9087 Shine 3 TKL Yellow Edition MX black | Lexmark SSK 21-Apr-1994 | IBM SSK 13-Oct-1987 | CODE TKL MX clear | Model M 122 01-Jun-1988

Ị̸͚̯̲́ͤ̃͑̇̑ͯ̊̂͟ͅs̞͚̩͉̝̪̲͗͊ͪ̽̚̚ ̭̦͖͕̑́͌ͬͩ͟t̷̻͔̙̑͟h̹̠̼͋ͤ͋i̤̜̣̦̱̫͈͔̞ͭ͑ͥ̌̔s̬͔͎̍̈ͥͫ̐̾ͣ̔̇͘ͅ ̩̘̼͆̐̕e̞̰͓̲̺̎͐̏ͬ̓̅̾͠͝ͅv̶̰͕̱̞̥̍ͣ̄̕e͕͙͖̬̜͓͎̤̊ͭ͐͝ṇ̰͎̱̤̟̭ͫ͌̌͢͠ͅ ̳̥̦ͮ̐ͤ̎̊ͣ͡͡n̤̜̙̺̪̒͜e̶̻̦̿ͮ̂̀c̝̘̝͖̠̖͐ͨͪ̈̐͌ͩ̀e̷̥͇̋ͦs̢̡̤ͤͤͯ͜s͈̠̉̑͘a̱͕̗͖̳̥̺ͬͦͧ͆̌̑͡r̶̟̖̈͘ỷ̮̦̩͙͔ͫ̾ͬ̔ͬͮ̌?̵̘͇͔͙ͥͪ͞ͅ

Offline swagpiratex

  • Posts: 309
  • Location: Orange County, CA
Re: Lotus Notes
« Reply #3 on: Mon, 19 November 2012, 00:25:41 »
People still use that dinosaur of a system?

Offline Trent

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 29
Re: Lotus Notes
« Reply #4 on: Mon, 19 November 2012, 00:32:54 »
People still use that dinosaur of a system?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Lotus_Notes

Quote
Initial release   1989
Stable release   8.5.3  (October 3, 2011; 13 months ago)

Yep.
Quote from: Trent
I hate fun
IBM Model M | IBM Model M SSK | FK-2000 | FK-8000 | FK-9000 | Fujitsu Peerless | Zenith Data Systems (Yellow ALPS!) | AEK

Offline SmallFry

  • ** Moderator Emeritus
  • Posts: 3887
  • Location: Wisconsin, USA
  • Leaving 6/15; returning 6/22 or so.
Re: Lotus Notes
« Reply #5 on: Mon, 19 November 2012, 00:47:55 »
Holy hell. Haven't they heard of evernote? Jeeez!

Offline sth

  • 2 girls 1 cuprubber
  • Posts: 3438
Re: Lotus Notes
« Reply #6 on: Mon, 19 November 2012, 00:54:26 »
People still use that dinosaur of a system?

 i see you've never worked in enterprise IT.
11:48 -!- SmallFry [~SmallFry@unaffiliated/smallfry] has quit [Ping timeout: 245 seconds] ... rest in peace

Offline SmallFry

  • ** Moderator Emeritus
  • Posts: 3887
  • Location: Wisconsin, USA
  • Leaving 6/15; returning 6/22 or so.
Re: Re: Lotus Notes
« Reply #7 on: Mon, 19 November 2012, 00:59:44 »
People still use that dinosaur of a system?

 i see you've never worked in enterprise IT.
'Tis true. I hate how slow my school was to adapt before my boss took over.

Offline mickd

  • Posts: 652
  • Location: Australia
Re: Lotus Notes
« Reply #8 on: Mon, 19 November 2012, 01:52:19 »
Thankfully everyone at my work place is using outlook now. Though we still have a few users that opt to keep lotus notes around (even if they don't use it anymore).

Offline swagpiratex

  • Posts: 309
  • Location: Orange County, CA
Re: Lotus Notes
« Reply #9 on: Wed, 21 November 2012, 11:05:55 »
People still use that dinosaur of a system?

 i see you've never worked in enterprise IT.

Yea I'm in finance. My previous employer was using Lotus Notes when I was working in the Fixed Income Dept.

Offline inlikeflynn

  • * Esteemed Elder
  • Posts: 768
  • Location: MN
  • file not found
Re: Lotus Notes
« Reply #10 on: Wed, 21 November 2012, 12:24:19 »
I was so glad when I left IBM to never have to use Lotus Notes again. Best part now is hearing the sob stories from the people still using it :(
----------- __o
--------- _`\<,_
BRAAP(>)/ (*)
************^^^^^^

Offline Lanx

  • Posts: 1915
Re: Lotus Notes
« Reply #11 on: Wed, 21 November 2012, 12:35:26 »
i know an engineer in a fortune 500 company up until last year they still used lotus, just switched to the microsoft suite, the reason, there were too many complaints from the contrators (of 10 years) that they have to deal with lotus files and conversions.

oh, but they are still fighting to use xp, new dell laptops get downgraded from windows 8 to win xp, i laugh and say, then what is the point of these laptops having 6gb of ram lol.

Offline davkol

  •  Post Editing Timeout
  • Posts: 4994
Re: Lotus Notes
« Reply #12 on: Wed, 21 November 2012, 14:00:58 »
oh, but they are still fighting to use xp, new dell laptops get downgraded from windows 8 to win xp, i laugh and say, then what is the point of these laptops having 6gb of ram lol.
PAE? 64bit WinXP?

Thankfully everyone at my work place is using outlook now. Though we still have a few users that opt to keep lotus notes around (even if they don't use it anymore).
Much better. -_-

Offline hoggy

  • * Ergonomics Moderator
  • Posts: 1502
  • Location: Isle of Man
Re: Lotus Notes
« Reply #13 on: Wed, 21 November 2012, 14:24:26 »
Still using it at work.  It's what you get used to I guess.
GH Ergonomic Guide (in progress)
http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=54680.0