Author Topic: Cherry Greens vs Buckling Spring  (Read 24001 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline daerid

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 4276
  • Location: Denver, CO
    • Rossipedia
Cherry Greens vs Buckling Spring
« on: Mon, 03 December 2012, 18:13:43 »
I'm not the hugest fan of BS keyboards (blasphemy, I know), but I do like me some Cherry Blues occasionally. I was wondering, how does the higher stiffness and feel of Cherry Greens compare to that of a buckling spring board like a Unicomp or Model M?

Offline REVENGE

  • Posts: 568
Re: Cherry Greens vs Buckling Spring
« Reply #1 on: Mon, 03 December 2012, 21:00:23 »
Force is somewhat similar, tactility is rather different.

Springs gone be springs mang!  :cool:
◕ ‿ ◕

Offline AKIMbO

  • HHKBro
  • Posts: 1778
  • Location: Tennessee
  • Know Topre, Know Peace. No Topre, No Peace.
Re: Re: Cherry Greens vs Buckling Spring
« Reply #2 on: Mon, 03 December 2012, 21:11:08 »
Force is somewhat similar, tactility is rather different.

Springs gone be springs mang!  :cool:
what he said.
Mkawa Beta SSK | IBM SSK | IBM Model AT F | IBM F 122 | IBM Unsaver | LZ-GH (62g ergo clears) | HHKB Pro2 Type-S | HHKB Pro2 | Realforce 87U-Silent (55g uniform) | Leopold FC660C | Omnikey 101 (blue alps) | Kingsaver (blue alps) | Zenith ZKB2 (green alps)
| KBD75 (box reds)

Offline jabar

  • Posts: 848
  • Location: TX, USA
Re: Cherry Greens vs Buckling Spring
« Reply #3 on: Mon, 03 December 2012, 21:46:49 »
I don't have a Buckling Spring keyboard at my side with my current MX Green keyboard (I have a few years' experience on a Model M though). I agree that the force required does feel similar but the tactility is much more pronounced in the Buckling Keyboard switch than the MX Greens. However, I am still very happy with the MX Greens as it provides much better resistance from bottoming out than MX Blues.
« Last Edit: Mon, 03 December 2012, 23:38:36 by jabar »
Leopold FC660C - Max Keyboard Nighthawk X8 - Ducky DK9008 Shine II 78 Edition - Noppoo Choc Mini - Cherry G80-2100HDD - Cherry G80-8113HDPUS - Plu-M87 - Leopold FC700R Ergo Clears - Deck Legend Frost 105 - IBM F PC Keyboard - IBM M 122 (Lexmark) - Apple Extended Keyboard II

Phantom 7bit

Offline daerid

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 4276
  • Location: Denver, CO
    • Rossipedia
Re: Cherry Greens vs Buckling Spring
« Reply #4 on: Mon, 03 December 2012, 22:58:43 »
Yeah, blues really feel like they kind of have a linear force resistance (not taking into account the tactile bump).

Offline Deverica Wolf

  • Posts: 185
  • Location: Rhode Island
  • My name is Hack, Geek Hack.
    • Head-Fi
Re: Cherry Greens vs Buckling Spring
« Reply #5 on: Sat, 08 December 2012, 09:10:03 »
So, as a fan of Buckling Springs, the only benefit of going Green would be Tenkeyless?
UNICOMP.Spacesaver BS  |  FILCO Majestouch-2 TKL  |  FILCO Majestouch-2  [-_-]~ TKL  |  FILCO Majestouch-2 TKL
FILCO Majestouch-2 TKL  |  Deck Legend - ToXic  |  CHERRY Touchboard ITA

Offline Shadovved

  • * Esteemed Elder
  • Posts: 2401
  • Location: Little Red Dot
  • King of Stickers (and GBs)
Re: Cherry Greens vs Buckling Spring
« Reply #6 on: Sat, 08 December 2012, 09:11:47 »
So, as a fan of Buckling Springs, the only benefit of going Green would be Tenkeyless?

m'dear, you have teh SSK for TKL BS. So, no benefits to convert  :p :p
-

Offline dorkvader

  • Posts: 6289
  • Location: Boston area
  • all about the "hack" in "geekhack"
Re: Cherry Greens vs Buckling Spring
« Reply #7 on: Sat, 08 December 2012, 11:48:11 »
Keep in mind there is a lot of variation in BS keyboards. My F-122 has a much lighter actuation than my 2010 Unicomp. I prefer BS to greens, but Greens are really nice for peolpe like me that use heavy switches all day. I don't bottom out as much.

Holding the switches at the tactile point is really easy with greens, It's pretty helpful in those games that require precise timing (like frets on fire, lol) but the switches are really too heavy for me if I'm writing a paper or something.

That said, this model F has by far the best key action of any keyboard I've yet used.
---
Tenkeyless model F's exist as well. Look up the so-called "space unsaver"1387033
« Last Edit: Sat, 08 December 2012, 11:50:14 by dorkvader »

Offline MMB

  • I no longer use this account. Please email me.
  • Posts: 1162
Re: Cherry Greens vs Buckling Spring
« Reply #8 on: Sat, 08 December 2012, 11:51:10 »
There is no MX switch that is going to give you a buckling spring feel. They are 2 completely different mechanisms, with different actuation distances and feels.

Offline AKIMbO

  • HHKBro
  • Posts: 1778
  • Location: Tennessee
  • Know Topre, Know Peace. No Topre, No Peace.
Re: Re: Cherry Greens vs Buckling Spring
« Reply #9 on: Sat, 08 December 2012, 14:42:10 »
There is no MX switch that is going to give you a buckling spring feel. They are 2 completely different mechanisms, with different actuation distances and feels.

There's no buckling spring that will give you a capacitive buckling spring feel.  They are totally different.  I'm hoping to win a model f xt on Ebay and convert it to USB with soarers code and start a 2012 gh model f tour.  Gotta spread the good word.
Mkawa Beta SSK | IBM SSK | IBM Model AT F | IBM F 122 | IBM Unsaver | LZ-GH (62g ergo clears) | HHKB Pro2 Type-S | HHKB Pro2 | Realforce 87U-Silent (55g uniform) | Leopold FC660C | Omnikey 101 (blue alps) | Kingsaver (blue alps) | Zenith ZKB2 (green alps)
| KBD75 (box reds)

Offline BucklingSpring

  • Posts: 1613
Re: Cherry Greens vs Buckling Spring
« Reply #10 on: Sun, 09 December 2012, 13:31:03 »
There's no buckling spring that will give you a capacitive buckling spring feel.  They are totally different.  I'm hoping to win a model f xt on Ebay and convert it to USB with soarers code and start a 2012 gh model f tour.  Gotta spread the good word.

If anyone revives the capacitive buckling spring technology on a keyboard under 400$ - I buy!!!
In memory of smallfry 1996-2013
Boards I own, click ->
More
Ducky x2 (9008G2 Pro PBT/MX Green and Mini MX Red), Matias x2 (QP and Mini QP Dampened ALPS), Topre RealForce x4 (87U 55g/Digilog case, 103U-UW & 104UG High-Profile x2), Filco Majestouch x2 (TKL MX Blue & V2 AI 104 MX Blue), IBM-M x2 (BS & RD), Unicomp-M x5 (BS black on black x2, BS Ivory x2, QT Ultra-Classic), Deck x4 (Legend MX Black & MX Clear, Hassium & Francium w/ MX Brown), DAS III (MX Blue), KBT Pure Pro 60% (MX Red), NMB-RT8256CW+ x2 (black space invader), XArmor U9BL-S (MX Brown) given for free to someone I hate, CM X2 (Trigger/MX Green + Storm TKL/NovaTouch), TVS GOLD (MX Blue) and a many many more (NMB, DELL, MS, ATT, KeyTronic, Etc...)

Offline daerid

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 4276
  • Location: Denver, CO
    • Rossipedia
Re: Cherry Greens vs Buckling Spring
« Reply #11 on: Sun, 09 December 2012, 15:20:35 »
What's the difference between Capacitive BS and say a Model M? I thought all BS boards used capacitance to trigger the switch.

Offline fohat.digs

  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 6533
  • Location: 35°55'N, 83°53'W
  • weird funny old guy
Re: Cherry Greens vs Buckling Spring
« Reply #12 on: Sun, 09 December 2012, 15:58:06 »
Model Ms have a series of membranes and the internal construction is completely different.

When you take them apart, you see that the Model F is a throwback to an era where each piece was sturdy and replaceable, and that the whole was intended to be serviceable throughout.

The Model M was intended to reduce costs drastically and make for swifter assembly-line production. A bolt-mod is merely a partial attempt to re-create the way it should have been done in the first place.

I am not sure that it is the underlying switch that makes the difference (although the Model F hammers are triple the size of Model M hammers) but rather the entire construction of the beast as a whole.

If Unicomp had the Model F patents as well as the Model M patents, I suspect that the modern Model F would cost at least double what the M costs. After all, if I remember correctly, the Model F sold for about $350 and the Model M for about $250, and those were 1985 dollars.
« Last Edit: Sun, 09 December 2012, 16:01:02 by fohat.digs »
From the US Constitution, Article 1, Section 8 :

The   Congress   shall have Power
To declare War,  grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
To provide for calling forth the Militia  to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Offline Deverica Wolf

  • Posts: 185
  • Location: Rhode Island
  • My name is Hack, Geek Hack.
    • Head-Fi
Re: Cherry Greens vs Buckling Spring
« Reply #13 on: Mon, 10 December 2012, 00:36:58 »
I'd pay top dollar for a Model F if it was nicer than the Model M.  :p
UNICOMP.Spacesaver BS  |  FILCO Majestouch-2 TKL  |  FILCO Majestouch-2  [-_-]~ TKL  |  FILCO Majestouch-2 TKL
FILCO Majestouch-2 TKL  |  Deck Legend - ToXic  |  CHERRY Touchboard ITA

Offline sherryton

  • * Vendor
  • Posts: 881
  • Location: Los Angeles
  • Kībōdo
    • Originative
Re: Cherry Greens vs Buckling Spring
« Reply #14 on: Mon, 10 December 2012, 00:46:56 »
Wow daerid, where have you been? I do not think I have seen a post from you since forever.  Anyhow, if no one has mentioned this yet, I think that buckling springs have a higher force more compared to the greens.  The greens should feel a bit more smooth though.

Offline daerid

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 4276
  • Location: Denver, CO
    • Rossipedia
Re: Cherry Greens vs Buckling Spring
« Reply #15 on: Mon, 10 December 2012, 01:37:25 »
Oh? I've been here. Mainly stick to Keyboards tho.. don't really jump into the other boards all that much. Back OT tho, I'm really curious about greens, but I'm worried that I'll probably not like them as much as I think I will. I've kind of gotten addicted to Topre recently.

Offline Viper2

  • Posts: 57
Re: Cherry Greens vs Buckling Spring
« Reply #16 on: Mon, 10 December 2012, 04:41:21 »
Both are noisy.  Cherry MX Green was originally meant for spacebar usage, please keep that in mind.  I don't see any reason why Cherry MX Green would be preferable to Buckling Spring being that they are both noisy.  Maybe Buckling Spring is noisier though, I'm not sure. 

If you want a switch with firmness, tactility, and quietness, then I would highly recommend Cherry MX Clear.  I am extremely impressed with my Deck Legend Frost Tactile which uses Cherry MX Clear.

Good luck.

Offline daerid

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 4276
  • Location: Denver, CO
    • Rossipedia
Re: Cherry Greens vs Buckling Spring
« Reply #17 on: Mon, 10 December 2012, 10:49:05 »
Didn't really like clears all that much when I tried them out. Although, Ergo Clears were pretty swank. Don't really care about noise, TBH, just feel

Offline rknize

  • * Administrator
  • Posts: 1731
  • Location: Chicago
    • metaruss
Re: Cherry Greens vs Buckling Spring
« Reply #18 on: Tue, 11 December 2012, 00:40:13 »
As a buckling spring guy, I can parrot what others have said.  You can't reproduce that buckling effect with a linear spring.  The Model F/M springs collapse after actuation while the MX keeps pushing back harder.  The ergo-clear is about the closest feel to a Model M that I have experienced so far.  They are also quieter and don't have that high reset position that blues/greens have.  That said, the greens are heavier and have a more solid click sound than blues have, which makes them a bit more like a Model M in that sense.

I'm typing on a Model F right now and nothing compares.  :)

Russ

Offline iri

  • Posts: 1031
  • Location: England
Re: Cherry Greens vs Buckling Spring
« Reply #19 on: Tue, 11 December 2012, 02:33:47 »
f**k topre. i need that model f.
(...)Whereas back then I wrote about the tyranny of the majority, today I'd combine that with the tyranny of the minorities. These days, you have to be careful of both. They both want to control you. The first group, by making you do the same thing over and over again. The second group is indicated by the letters I get from the Vassar girls who want me to put more women's lib in The Martian Chronicles, or from blacks who want more black people in Dandelion Wine.
I say to both bunches, Whether you're a majority or minority, bug off! To hell with anybody who wants to tell me what to write. Their society breaks down into subsections of minorities who then, in effect, burn books by banning them. All this political correctness that's rampant on campuses is b.s.

-Ray Bradbury

Offline daerid

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 4276
  • Location: Denver, CO
    • Rossipedia
Re: Cherry Greens vs Buckling Spring
« Reply #20 on: Tue, 11 December 2012, 20:18:32 »
f**k topre. i need that model f.

Sacrilege. Blasphemy. Etc..

Offline Hak Foo

  • Posts: 1272
  • Make America Clicky Again!
Re: Cherry Greens vs Buckling Spring
« Reply #21 on: Tue, 11 December 2012, 22:24:46 »
Does Unicomp also own the patents to the Capacitive components of the older boards (ie: Model F)?

Given the tech was valid by 1981, and completely mature by 1985 at least, the patents are long expired.

Honestly, having spent a while on a 122F at home and a 122M at work, the difference between capacitive BS and membrane BS is far less than, say, BS and Blue.

The F tends to have a distinctive "twang" though; it's similar, I think, to how some Fukka-Alps boards will "ring" when struck.
Overton130, Box Pale Blues.