Author Topic: Unicomp Endurapro Mouse Button  (Read 1214 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ime1729

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 16
  • Location: CA
Unicomp Endurapro Mouse Button
« on: Tue, 01 April 2014, 14:07:58 »
Hi guys --

I've worn out a sizeable dent in my endurapro's left mouse click button and have recently placed a piece of duct tape on top to guard against even more erosion. Is this expected?

Also, I haven't had a cover on the stick for quite some time now. Will my finger also wear down the joystick too?

Offline E TwentyNine

  • Posts: 884
    • Some of My Keyboards
Re: Unicomp Endurapro Mouse Button
« Reply #1 on: Tue, 01 April 2014, 14:28:57 »
You can get replacement parts from Unicomp.
Daily driver: SSK or Tenkeyless IBM AT
1984 Model M Industrial Prototype ⌨ 1992 Black Oval Industrial SSK ⌨ 1982 5251 Beam Spring ⌨ 89 Key "SSK" ⌨ M13 triplets

Offline berserkfan

  • Posts: 2135
  • Location: Not CONUS Not CONUS Not CONUS Not CONUS
  • changing diapers is more fun than model f assembly
Re: Unicomp Endurapro Mouse Button
« Reply #2 on: Tue, 01 April 2014, 15:29:43 »
It seems the endurapro is a very, very inferior version of the IBM original. I once had an endurapro pass through my hands, and I was amazed at how clearly badly worn the keyboard was. I was wondering whether the keyboard was really made of pbt, having never seen a model M 3 or 4 times the age of this keyboard in such poor condition before.
Most of the modding can be done on your own once you break through the psychological barriers.

Offline ime1729

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 16
  • Location: CA
Re: Unicomp Endurapro Mouse Button
« Reply #3 on: Tue, 01 April 2014, 17:20:10 »
I think the other problem is that it's a single point of wear that is used highly, such as the edges of the ESC key of VIM users or the edges of Control/Alt of EMACS users. Personally I just noticed that my Control key is significantly smoother than any of my other keys due to the high wear situation posted.

(Also the mouse is used significantly more now than before because of the shift in paradigm... you have to consider wear patterns too)