« previous next »
Pages:  [1]     Go Down

Author Topic: IBM Model F 6110347 vs 6110345  (Read 2278 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Honq

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 28
IBM Model F 6110347 vs 6110345
« on: Sat, 07 June 2014, 20:48:48 »
I'm having a rough time figuring out what the difference between these two 122 key Model Fs are.

Can anyone help me out?
Logged

Offline fohat.digs

  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 6533
  • Location: 35°55'N, 83°53'W
  • weird funny old guy
Re: IBM Model F 6110347 vs 6110345
« Reply #1 on: Sat, 07 June 2014, 22:09:32 »
I have had several 6110xxx Model Fs and have never seen any difference in any of them. Plus, my highest number, a 6110668, is my oldest one.
« Last Edit: Sun, 08 June 2014, 09:36:41 by fohat.digs »
Logged
"Starting in 2011, the deficits again started to shrink. During Obama’s term  the deficit was reduced by $900 Billion  before finally in 2015 the GOP managed to wrangle a “reconciliation” bill out of Obama where he again cut corporate taxes, as well as made permanent some of George W. Bush’s original tax cuts. This is the year everything reversed. Before this, under Clinton, Bush and Obama the deficit in almost every year was gradually decreasing. The balance we had of taxes and the economy was bringing the deficit down, the money coming in was slowly catching up with the money going out until 2015. Trump’s subsequent tax cut has continued the new trend even after the rest of Bush’s cuts have since expired. Obama had an average GDP of 2.3%, with 11.6 million jobs created and unemployment peaking at 10% in 2009, then falling to 4.3% in 2016. If we had continued on that downward deficit track, we would have again reached balance and another surplus in 2017-2018.
– Frank V Walton 2025-07-01

Offline Honq

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 28
Re: IBM Model F 6110347 vs 6110345
« Reply #2 on: Sat, 07 June 2014, 22:11:26 »
Thanks! Im just trying to find some data to sell mine.Recent sales are all on ####347 so i didnt know if I could look for that as guidance.
Logged

Offline dorkvader

  • Posts: 6289
  • Location: Boston area
  • all about the "hack" in "geekhack"
Re: IBM Model F 6110347 vs 6110345
« Reply #3 on: Sun, 08 June 2014, 02:38:35 »
Quote from: Honq on Sat, 07 June 2014, 22:11:26
Thanks! Im just trying to find some data to sell mine.Recent sales are all on ####347 so i didnt know if I could look for that as guidance.

With respect to sale value, there sholud be no difference.

There is some evidence that the 611066* (of which the most common is likely the 6110668) came with a different (or older?) terminal than the 611034* (*345, *346, and *347 are all "known" examples which I think vary in their keycaps slightly)

Sadly, I have not bee able to gather and better (or more concrete) data than this. Best of luck on your market research and sale.
Logged

Offline ZSYStriker

  • Posts: 4
  • Location: Washington, DC
Re: IBM Model F 6110347 vs 6110345
« Reply #4 on: Sun, 08 June 2014, 21:16:01 »
I have three F-122's: 6110345, 6110668 and 1385151.  And I've seen 6110347.  They are almost identical with minor variations in key labels.  I think 611034*'s all are essentially the same.  On the other hand, 6110668 and 138515 have a set of 8 DIP switches on the bottom.  I'm not really sure what they do, if anything.  I left the ones on 1385151 alone and got it to work with Soarer's converter with no problem.  I read somewhere that the DIP switches can be used to set the keyboard ID, but functionally they don't make any difference.
Logged
____________________________________________________
Just a collector...

Offline dorkvader

  • Posts: 6289
  • Location: Boston area
  • all about the "hack" in "geekhack"
Re: IBM Model F 6110347 vs 6110345
« Reply #5 on: Sun, 08 June 2014, 22:19:05 »
afaik, the 1385151 is the same as the 6110668, but the with more "modern" serial number and date.
Logged
Pages:  [1]     Go Up
« previous next »