This is an HP KB-0630 keyboard that came with an HP Pavilion I purchased in 2007. I'll start out perfectly honest here: there's probably some bias on my part, because I hate this keyboard. I mean, really, really hate it. And after opening it up, I have even more reasons to hate it.
Again, I was surprised to find that this keyboard was also made by Chicony, just like the eMachines KB-0108 which I was so pleasantly surprised by the other day. But this glimmer of hope soon evaporated.
Here's one of the things that made me hate this keyboard. It's so minor, but so unbelievably annoying. They put a SLEEP key right next to esc. A sleep key, as in a key that puts the computer in sleep mode. So if I'm playing, say, Left 4 Dead and go to hit esc... OOPS! I hit sleep, now my computer is basically shutting off and I can't stop it so my character is going to die. Fantastic. WTH, HP? This makes no sense.
Another day, another rubber dome keyboard.
Other things that pissed me off were the quick degradation of the key feel (my step-dad has this keyboard as well; it takes approx. 6-9 months for it to lose its feel completely) and the short, jarring travel time. It also feels rather flimsy. The bottom is painted to look like aluminum, but is actually just plastic.
So now opening it up I find some more signs of cheapness. One of the screwholes was already stripped before I started opening it up, and I think one or two more might have stripped on the way out. No putting this back together.
Yawn.
I was honestly shocked to find a marking on the inside casing saying this was made of ABS, because it doesn't feel like it. The eMachines keyboard took quite a bit of effort to flex, and the Model M's ABS takes even more. This flexes as easily as most PVC keyboard housings. I think it's using a more flexible, lighter formula of ABS, and in addition is substantially thinner, about 2/3 the thickness of the eMachines' housing.
Here's the membrane, pretty standard, so I'll just... Hey... waaaaait a second...
Hah! The eMachines didn't do this.
The membrane, as I've said before, is three layers: top, spacer, bottom. Here you can finally see them. Why didn't I show the separate layers on the eMachines keyboard? Simple: they wouldn't split apart because they were glued together all along the edge.
On the HP there are maybe a half dozen glue spots holding the layers together, so they can peel apart fairly easily. Even when only three years old, the glue on the outer glue spots has degraded to the point of worthlessness. Obviously this was a cost cutting measure. What does this mean to the user? The membranes are held more loosely together, and have room to curl or bunch slightly, and so it can take more effort to push a key down, and key presses on outer keys may not go through if it gets really bad. Shod-dy.
Here's the controller. I don't know why it's more complicated than the eMachines one, there's nothing special extra going on.
Here's one of its keycaps in comparison to a keycap from the eMachines (the other stuff there is so my camera can focus). Sorry, this is the best picture I can get. As you can see the eMachines keycap is far larger and thicker, and much more sturdily attached to the housing. Again, no calipers or other precise measuring tools on hand, but I'd say the HP's keycaps are about a third as thick, and weigh a quarter as much.
Both use pad printing, but while the eMachines board has full-key pad printing, the HP simply has decals. You can see what I mean in some pictures in the mechanical keyboard guide.
So. Final impression? Cheap. Thin plastic, thin cheap keycaps, stripped screwholes, poor layout of media buttons, poor method of holding the membranes together, poor key feel that quickly gets worse... This could be an archetypical "cheap-o" rubber dome keyboard. The funniest part of the joke? It's generally more expensive than the eMachines keyboard. :doh: