I knew someone with the first-gen Mazda 3 wagon - hatchback, whatever - with a full manual. Very nice car, I doubt you'll be disappointed unless the tranny ruins it somehow.
just got back from a 3 hour mazda3 voyage.
This is the actual car I drove:
Pros:
-this is an impressive automobile
-BROAD power band, torquey as heck, peppy as heck
-tiptronic: not as annoying as the audi's tiptronic! was fun for about 5 minutes before i got bored and put it back into auto. But thats 4 minutes longer than I enjoyed the audi's. (Nothing beats a standard manual of course, as far as driving fun goes.)
-i'd be proud to own one
-extremely comfy seats, firm ride (slightly jarring over potholes but mostly just supple)
-quality-everything, from door-thud to switches and knobs
-this zipcar happened to be brand new, about 100 miles on it, with temporary license plates and new car smell.
-bought some lumber from home depot and the inherent utility of the "hatchback" design shone through once again
Cons:
-has the turning radius of a drunken elephant. Seriously. My honda turned like a shopping cart. The mazda3 needs a 6 lane highway to perform a u-turn.
-looks are a bit controversial. Taken as a whole, its not a bad looking car, but its not the down-to-business look of the gti. I like the clean utilitarian lines of the gti or the conservative sleekness of the focus. The mazda is, well,
curvy, all over. The headlight bubbles, the backlight bubbles, curves curves curves. The side scoops, the front-end grin. Everything bulges or scoops or smiles.
So while its not a bad looking car by any means, for myself I'd probably still take a GTI (or scirroco, or ford focus hatch) with their cleaner lines. Just a personal aesthetic preference. But I have a feeling the mazda3 is probably a much better value for the money and is likely every bit the same quality, if not better.
Next time i'll take either the Mini or the beemer
been wanting to try them out too.