I guess you know about modern IPS types, including the recent 10-bit ones. Except for some specific niche tasks, can you cite reasons to prefer CRT? I know why I don't.
Yep, I stated that progress in refresh rate is necessary. And yes, 5-bits per channel is okay-ish. I use laptops in 16-bit mode to conserve battery, no problemo. How much a non-photo oriented desktop really needs?
IPS is nice, but contrast is around 1:12-1:1500 for the good ones and they are still slower than TNs. Both things where a CRT is superior.
And 10-bit? I'm certain you mean displays with 10-bit LUTs, they have been around in the professional market for quite some time. And are sooo badly expensive. I don't get it why it's reserved to upper-class displays, the tech must be inexpensive and without it any tweaking of monitor contrast and gamma curves results in banding >.<
Are you sure 16-bit mode conserves battery? Didn't use it in ages ;-)
@Fwiffo:
Who cares how much the roadmap is delayed. There are already small devices OLED being used and it will only go up. LG already released a first consumer buyable one, sure, $3000 for 15 inch but hey, LCDs started out even more ridiculous. For a much, much worse tech. Plus, OLED lighting.
Not on anyone normal's roadmap but here in Europe Philips and Osram are already clearing the stock of their energy saving fluorescent lamps. (because the decision to BAN incandescent here in Europe certainly was a completely ecologically propelled decision... yeahhhhhh)