Interestingly that Samsung F3 benches better than the VelociRaptors. see?
I can't say I'm particularly fond of benchmarks pulling numbers out of thin air. They state:
These overall scores are calculated from three different tests measuring the read speed, write speed and seek time of hard disk drives.
So this is purely synthetic: measure transfer rates and access time, do some weighting that gives halfway realistic-looking results, spit out number. StorageReview.com was lightyears ahead of that 10 years ago, even h2benchw should be better.
Most any harddrive will be fast when it's new and near-empty. After a few years of use (with a gazillion Windows updates alone) things will look quite different. You'll also notice the difference when you ask the drive to do multiple things at a time - the higher-RPM unit will simply handle this with more authority. That assumes they're reasonably close in terms of technology, of course. A current 7k2 unit may very well be faster than a 10k that's 2 generations older.
My 2TB WD Black just tears through data. Puts my 2TB Samsung Spinpoint to shame.
It should. The Caviar Black has pretty powerful electronics, with dual processors and a good amount of cache. If I had upgraded my HDD lately, I would have used one of these. (Shouldn't be all that much more expensive than the F3 of same capacity either.) The Samsung should be more equivalent to a Caviar Blue.
But is it just me or has the conventional HDD market slowed down quite a bit? I hadn't looked at it for a while, and it appears the common models still are pretty much the same as they were a year or two back.
EDIT: OK, so it does seem like there's a Spinpoint F4 out, and 3 TB drives from all the major manufacturers.
Having an ssd would always be nice but save for getting a second hand Intel X25 on eBay it's not really possible at a $60 price point.
Understood. I'd go for a Caviar Black then. WDs have always been good in terms of real-life performance, even if they had their share of problems like anyone else.
EDIT^2: Holy Carp(R), it seems the number of independent HDD makers has been going down from 4 to 2 lately.
