Author Topic: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?  (Read 26058 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Hyde

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 2643
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • White Tofu Extraordinaire
Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« on: Mon, 20 May 2013, 01:44:05 »
So today I swing by my local computer store just to take a look.  They happen to have a lot of new display area and I get to try all their display mouse/mousepad/keyboard.

What caught my attention is Roccat Kone Pure and R.A.T.7.  Personally I have a small hand and uses claw grip, so it was really hard to find a good 5 button laser mouse for my hand size.

I previously used Razer Naga and is currently using Logitech G9X.  Now I'm debating to try Roccat Kone Pure or R.A.T.7 for my next purchase.

Though how are Roccat and Cyborg product reliability?  I took a quick look around online and it seem that Roccat has horrible track record and Cyborg seems ok but isn't amazing either.

Anyone here have any personal experience to share?
« Last Edit: Mon, 20 May 2013, 01:46:38 by Hyde »

Archiss ProgresTouch Retro - Gateron Yellow  |  Topre Realforce 104UW - 45g Silent  |  Topre Type Heaven  |  Beige Filco Ninja 104 - MX Red  |  Das Keyboard - MX Brown  |  Poker II - MX Red  |  Race II - MX Brown  |  Matias Quiet Pro - Matias Dampened ALPS  |  Logitech K840 - Romer G  |  Cherry MX Board 2.0 - MX Red  |  Cherry G84-4100 - ML  |  IBM Model M
Roccat Kone Pure  |  Logitech G203  |  Logitech G303  |  Logitech G302  |  Razer Naga  |  CM Storm Xornet  |  Razer Goliathus Mobile Stealth  |  Razer Goliathus Control  |  Artisan Hien  |  Artisan Hayate  |  Artisan Shiden

Offline Photekq

  • wheat flour zone
  • Posts: 4794
  • Location: North Wales, UK
  • sorry if i was ever an ******* to you
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #1 on: Mon, 20 May 2013, 01:53:31 »
Roccat usually has reliable mice. Same can't really be said for Cyborg. I know a friend who has had his R.A.T.7 replaced 6 times. If the RAT has a wire then it should be fine, but don't get a wireless one - they are prone to breaking.
https://kbdarchive.org/
github
discord: hi mum#5710

Offline stingrae

  • Posts: 267
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #2 on: Mon, 20 May 2013, 03:40:33 »
I have the old rat 3, it is pretty solid. I would get the new RAT 3 as it has the avago 3090 sensor. Another thing to consider is the TTEsports Saphira which has the same sensor. I have the genius maurus which suits my needs fine but the 5th button is not easy to use. All of these mice are around the size of the abyssus usually a little bigger/heavier.
Filco Ninja Tenkeyless  -Noppoo Choc MiniCm Storm Quickfire Rapid

Offline vun

  • Posts: 1499
  • Location: Norway
  • Just one more thing
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #3 on: Mon, 20 May 2013, 05:26:28 »
Cyborg mice should be OK now, they had a few issues at first but I believe at least some of them are solved now. Still, I wouldn't recommend a RAT for anyone looking for a reliable mouse. They're cool and interesting mice but I wouldn't trust them too much.

That said, I do love my RAT 7 and my current one has given me no problems whatsoever. However, except for the RAT 3 all the RAT mice use the PTE sensor, so while the RAT 7 is a cool mouse that I would personally pick above most Roccat offerings I don't feel I can safely recommend the RAT over a Roccat mouse.

The RAT 3 does have a decent optical sensor if you can live without laser, but it also lacks all of the features that make the RAT 7 interesting, so there's that.

I have no personal experience with Roccat yet, I find that if I want gaming marketed mice I'll go buy something more unique as I find the Roccat mice to be as interesting as rebranded OEM mice(and I would not be all that surprised if some of them actually are).

Offline Hyde

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 2643
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • White Tofu Extraordinaire
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #4 on: Mon, 20 May 2013, 12:41:59 »
I have the old rat 3, it is pretty solid. I would get the new RAT 3 as it has the avago 3090 sensor. Another thing to consider is the TTEsports Saphira which has the same sensor. I have the genius maurus which suits my needs fine but the 5th button is not easy to use. All of these mice are around the size of the abyssus usually a little bigger/heavier.

Genius Maurus look interesting, though typically I don't like gloss finish and mouse that flare out at the bottom like.  I pick up my mouse a lot so \__/ shape is preferred.  I think I returned my Razer Orochi before partially because of that, main reason was that it was too small.

Thermaltake Saphira look very interesting though, too bad it's optical sensor but this got me to look at Thermaltake Theron.  I see a lot of positive review online and one guy even prefer it over G9X.  But reading the length on the spec sheet worries me a bit since it's 12.37 cm and it's not exactly small.  Otherwise this feel like one of those hidden gem mouse but I might have to read more into it later.

Cyborg mice should be OK now, they had a few issues at first but I believe at least some of them are solved now. Still, I wouldn't recommend a RAT for anyone looking for a reliable mouse. They're cool and interesting mice but I wouldn't trust them too much.

That said, I do love my RAT 7 and my current one has given me no problems whatsoever. However, except for the RAT 3 all the RAT mice use the PTE sensor, so while the RAT 7 is a cool mouse that I would personally pick above most Roccat offerings I don't feel I can safely recommend the RAT over a Roccat mouse.

The RAT 3 does have a decent optical sensor if you can live without laser, but it also lacks all of the features that make the RAT 7 interesting, so there's that.

I have no personal experience with Roccat yet, I find that if I want gaming marketed mice I'll go buy something more unique as I find the Roccat mice to be as interesting as rebranded OEM mice(and I would not be all that surprised if some of them actually are).

I guess I was hesitant on RAT before because it has a lot of moving adjustable parts.  Typically more moving parts = more parts to break.  Also I wasn't too sure how I feel about those open gaps.  Though my first impression on demo model is positive so far.

As for Roccat I don't really have any experience with it either.  It was by chance that I tried the demo model and found it to be really comfortable and fit my hand well lol.  But I'm not big on the giant cat logo.

Maybe I'll wait to see if any of those will go on sale for cheap then think about it after.  Because at full price I'm not really tempted to buy it consider I already have G9X and it's been great so far (Only drawback with G9X I'd say is that it flare out at bottom a little bit).


EDIT:  Oh by any chance you guys know if the new white RAT mouse are still gloss finish?  From the picture it look like matte but I know the older design it was gloss.  But they recently sorta "rebranded" their new designs I wonder if it's still glossy.
« Last Edit: Mon, 20 May 2013, 12:48:38 by Hyde »

Archiss ProgresTouch Retro - Gateron Yellow  |  Topre Realforce 104UW - 45g Silent  |  Topre Type Heaven  |  Beige Filco Ninja 104 - MX Red  |  Das Keyboard - MX Brown  |  Poker II - MX Red  |  Race II - MX Brown  |  Matias Quiet Pro - Matias Dampened ALPS  |  Logitech K840 - Romer G  |  Cherry MX Board 2.0 - MX Red  |  Cherry G84-4100 - ML  |  IBM Model M
Roccat Kone Pure  |  Logitech G203  |  Logitech G303  |  Logitech G302  |  Razer Naga  |  CM Storm Xornet  |  Razer Goliathus Mobile Stealth  |  Razer Goliathus Control  |  Artisan Hien  |  Artisan Hayate  |  Artisan Shiden

Offline vun

  • Posts: 1499
  • Location: Norway
  • Just one more thing
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #5 on: Mon, 20 May 2013, 13:53:57 »
One white RAT is glossy, one is matte. I can't remember which is which though. I think the Albino is matte and Contagion is glossy.

Offline stingrae

  • Posts: 267
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #6 on: Mon, 20 May 2013, 16:37:56 »
Why on earth do you want a laser sensor? :s

I remember you saying that about the maurus but in reality it's just a barrier between your fingertips and the mouse mat. I no longer use my abyssus and that's not only because of the side buttons.

On glossy I was a hater, accidentally got an abyssus mirrored edition got used to it pretty fast didn't really get much dirtier than my old diamondback (although neither of my mice could easily be 'shared' without some more tlc...I was scared since I live in a country and place where the weather at the time was around 26-33c mostly and humid. So far though slipping wasn't really a concern because I was more likely to have to lie down due to being hot xD...

Maurus seems better overall, scroll wheel is smoother, buttons seem to require less force and sides are slightly rubberized. The only thing i'd replace this mouse with is a diamondback 3g and maybe just maybe a thermaltake saphira/rat 3 but who really needs to buy a 5th mouse :|????
« Last Edit: Mon, 20 May 2013, 16:40:53 by stingrae »
Filco Ninja Tenkeyless  -Noppoo Choc MiniCm Storm Quickfire Rapid

Offline vun

  • Posts: 1499
  • Location: Norway
  • Just one more thing
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #7 on: Tue, 21 May 2013, 07:34:53 »
but who really needs to buy a 5th mouse :|????

>_>
<_<

Offline Grim Fandango

  • * Esteemed Elder
  • Posts: 1036
  • Location: The Moon
  • "The living still give me the creeps."
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #8 on: Tue, 21 May 2013, 07:44:34 »
I do not know too much about Roccat, but I am always wary of superheavy mice with laser sensors and adjustable light and things like that.

The RAT7 for example is an expensive mouse with all the bells and whistles. Yet when it comes to basic functionality, I would rather get a WMO 1.1 since the Philips Twin Eye Sensor in the RAT7 is terrible for me (I play on very low sensitivity and pick the mouse up a lot). I have a hard time justifying purchasing such an expensive mouse when the sensor it not up to par. I guess that is because when I buy a mouse, it is actually the sensor that is most important, along with the comfort of its shape. If there are other things you take into account, for example, the number of buttons, then you might make a different decision.

When it comes to Madcatz, generally they have a pretty poor reputation when it comes to their peripherals. Though I have never owned anything in their RAT series.
« Last Edit: Tue, 21 May 2013, 07:55:27 by Grim Fandango »
Mouse Guide 2.0: A list of mice with superior sensors and more.
http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=56240.0

Offline inteli722

  • Posts: 858
  • Location: America
  • Waiting for too much stuff...
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #9 on: Tue, 21 May 2013, 07:49:59 »
I feel like I should state my position on this again...

I used the RAT 7, I liked it, it served me for a year before it broke (but that was all my fault, as I wrapped the cable around the mouse enough that the connection to the mouse loosed.) If you like a large mouse and you play at high sensitivity, then I would recommend it.
More

Visit the Typing Test and try!
R.I.P. SmallFry! You will be dearly missed.
Leopold FC200 |  CoolerMaster QFP Browns | Quickfire Rapid Greens | Quickfire Rapid Blues
Waiting for: Phantom Plate

Offline Hyde

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 2643
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • White Tofu Extraordinaire
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #10 on: Tue, 21 May 2013, 22:38:08 »
lol I like laser because you can do finer dpi adjustment.  Like it bugs me a little that my Logitech G9X can only do 200 dpi increments and while my Razer Naga can do 100 dpi increments.  But it's even more stupid that my super old Logitech G5 (first gen) can do 50 dpi increments.

Though I'll admit 50 might be a bit overkill but I'd like to adjust in 100 dpi increments at least lol.

As for gloss, I find it make my hand sweat more also it build up finger gunk.  Like my Naga has glossy sides and I find I have to wipe off the gunk build up every 2-3 days.  And I live in Canada and it's not even that hot here.

So far I like soft rubber surface the best.  Which is good that the wide load grip on the G9X come with that  :D

If you like a large mouse and you play at high sensitivity, then I would recommend it.

lol I like small mouse and I play at medium sensitivity (around 1100-1200 dpi).  Though I find R.A.T. at its smallest form is not too bad.  Maybe I'll wait for sale one day  :P

but who really needs to buy a 5th mouse :|????

>_>
<_<

lol I'm at 3 mouse so far and I have no double I'll reach 5 one day.  But I'm still a long way to catch up to vun LOL.

Archiss ProgresTouch Retro - Gateron Yellow  |  Topre Realforce 104UW - 45g Silent  |  Topre Type Heaven  |  Beige Filco Ninja 104 - MX Red  |  Das Keyboard - MX Brown  |  Poker II - MX Red  |  Race II - MX Brown  |  Matias Quiet Pro - Matias Dampened ALPS  |  Logitech K840 - Romer G  |  Cherry MX Board 2.0 - MX Red  |  Cherry G84-4100 - ML  |  IBM Model M
Roccat Kone Pure  |  Logitech G203  |  Logitech G303  |  Logitech G302  |  Razer Naga  |  CM Storm Xornet  |  Razer Goliathus Mobile Stealth  |  Razer Goliathus Control  |  Artisan Hien  |  Artisan Hayate  |  Artisan Shiden

Offline GeoTang

  • Posts: 40
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #11 on: Wed, 22 May 2013, 21:44:46 »
My Roccat Savu is still going strong but it's only been about a year so far.

Offline stingrae

  • Posts: 267
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #12 on: Thu, 23 May 2013, 04:42:49 »
You can get fine adjustments by using the sensitivity slider in windows or on the mouse's software. I think there's a post about getting equiv dpi values using this method on OCL somewhere...

Rubber hides dirt in my opinion xD

Filco Ninja Tenkeyless  -Noppoo Choc MiniCm Storm Quickfire Rapid

Offline vun

  • Posts: 1499
  • Location: Norway
  • Just one more thing
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #13 on: Thu, 23 May 2013, 04:49:32 »
You can get fine adjustments by using the sensitivity slider in windows or on the mouse's software. I think there's a post about getting equiv dpi values using this method on OCL somewhere...

Rubber hides dirt in my opinion xD



This leads to pixel skipping/adding, it's best to leave windows at 6/11 and then adjusting dpi. And for that purpose I fully understand someone wanting a laser sensor as most optical sensors are very limited in their dpi steps. And if anyone brings up the DeathAdder 3.5G and Synapse; no. It might look like Synapse will let you set dpi outside of the normal DA steps, but afaik what it does is interpolate the dpi and driver sensitivity, which is a fairly murky deal as last time I checked nobody knew how this affected precision. Although if there are no negative benefits(other than having to use Synapse) then that could be a valid option. Of course this isn't only limited to Synapse, any mouse where you can set both dpi and sensitivty independently of the windows sensitivity will work for this purpose.

Offline Grim Fandango

  • * Esteemed Elder
  • Posts: 1036
  • Location: The Moon
  • "The living still give me the creeps."
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #14 on: Thu, 23 May 2013, 05:05:34 »
You can get fine adjustments by using the sensitivity slider in windows or on the mouse's software. I think there's a post about getting equiv dpi values using this method on OCL somewhere...

Rubber hides dirt in my opinion xD



This leads to pixel skipping/adding, it's best to leave windows at 6/11 and then adjusting dpi. And for that purpose I fully understand someone wanting a laser sensor as most optical sensors are very limited in their dpi steps. And if anyone brings up the DeathAdder 3.5G and Synapse; no. It might look like Synapse will let you set dpi outside of the normal DA steps, but afaik what it does is interpolate the dpi and driver sensitivity, which is a fairly murky deal as last time I checked nobody knew how this affected precision. Although if there are no negative benefits(other than having to use Synapse) then that could be a valid option. Of course this isn't only limited to Synapse, any mouse where you can set both dpi and sensitivty independently of the windows sensitivity will work for this purpose.

I keep it at 6/11 as well. Though I am not too picky about the "dpi steps" since I just adjust the ingame settings. Right now I am playing at just 450-500 DPI (Zowie FK), and my Counter Strike ingame sensitivity is 1.75 (I think). If I were to use a different DPI, I could adjust ingame sensitivity to get a similar result. Outside of games I find that I am way less picky about the sensitivity settings. Anything 500-1200 DPI with windows 6/11 feels perfectly fine to me. Though even here, I prefer a slightly lower sensitivity than most I guess.
« Last Edit: Thu, 23 May 2013, 05:07:55 by Grim Fandango »
Mouse Guide 2.0: A list of mice with superior sensors and more.
http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=56240.0

Offline Hyde

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 2643
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • White Tofu Extraordinaire
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #15 on: Thu, 23 May 2013, 20:58:02 »
Yeah I want laser mouse for that reason.  I leave windows at 6/11.

And surprisingly I actually notice the difference between 1000 dpi and 1100 dpi.  So being able to do that extra fine tuning is a plus for me.

So I'm still waiting for the day that manufactures make a perfect mouse for me.

Archiss ProgresTouch Retro - Gateron Yellow  |  Topre Realforce 104UW - 45g Silent  |  Topre Type Heaven  |  Beige Filco Ninja 104 - MX Red  |  Das Keyboard - MX Brown  |  Poker II - MX Red  |  Race II - MX Brown  |  Matias Quiet Pro - Matias Dampened ALPS  |  Logitech K840 - Romer G  |  Cherry MX Board 2.0 - MX Red  |  Cherry G84-4100 - ML  |  IBM Model M
Roccat Kone Pure  |  Logitech G203  |  Logitech G303  |  Logitech G302  |  Razer Naga  |  CM Storm Xornet  |  Razer Goliathus Mobile Stealth  |  Razer Goliathus Control  |  Artisan Hien  |  Artisan Hayate  |  Artisan Shiden

Offline stingrae

  • Posts: 267
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #16 on: Fri, 24 May 2013, 01:02:40 »
Yeah I want laser mouse for that reason.  I leave windows at 6/11.

And surprisingly I actually notice the difference between 1000 dpi and 1100 dpi.  So being able to do that extra fine tuning is a plus for me.

So I'm still waiting for the day that manufactures make a perfect mouse for me.

Isn't it a little funny to be worried about pixel skipping with sensors that mostly have tracking related issues?

Not saying optical are any better as there have been firmware issues with things like the cm storm spawn and abyssus. Just saying trying to get exactly 1100cpi/dpi is a bit ocd when games have sensitivity sliders usually. Also it's limiting your search of mice that are available drastically.

Filco Ninja Tenkeyless  -Noppoo Choc MiniCm Storm Quickfire Rapid

Offline Hyde

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 2643
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • White Tofu Extraordinaire
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #17 on: Sat, 25 May 2013, 22:28:06 »
Hmmmm it's not entirely just that, somehow even for non-gaming usage that having 6/11 windows sensitivity and 1100 dpi feels "just right".

I tried replicating it with a optical mouse and tweak windows sensitivity after but I could never get the right sensitivity I want, it just keep feeling "slightly off" it's hard to explain.

Though I'll admit I am a little bit OCD in that respect lol.  But I happen to use 2D/3D graphic software at home for freelance work once in a while, so I'd like to get a mouse that's comfortable for that also.

Archiss ProgresTouch Retro - Gateron Yellow  |  Topre Realforce 104UW - 45g Silent  |  Topre Type Heaven  |  Beige Filco Ninja 104 - MX Red  |  Das Keyboard - MX Brown  |  Poker II - MX Red  |  Race II - MX Brown  |  Matias Quiet Pro - Matias Dampened ALPS  |  Logitech K840 - Romer G  |  Cherry MX Board 2.0 - MX Red  |  Cherry G84-4100 - ML  |  IBM Model M
Roccat Kone Pure  |  Logitech G203  |  Logitech G303  |  Logitech G302  |  Razer Naga  |  CM Storm Xornet  |  Razer Goliathus Mobile Stealth  |  Razer Goliathus Control  |  Artisan Hien  |  Artisan Hayate  |  Artisan Shiden

Offline davkol

  •  Post Editing Timeout
  • Posts: 4994
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #18 on: Sun, 26 May 2013, 08:22:45 »
Though I'll admit I am a little bit OCD in that respect lol.

No, you're not. It has nothing to do with real OCD.

Offline typo

  • Posts: 1676
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #19 on: Sun, 26 May 2013, 13:03:54 »
I was wondering if the roccat is more accurate than the g500s. since the sensor is in the middle. I am not gaming though.

edit: roccat kone xcd. I will forget this one. read bad cs,no phone. went through that with steel series. no free spinning wheel. 4th button hard to reach. buggy software for some that talks annoyingly. most importantly dpi only adjustable in 200dpi increments. oh, one more thing it gives you "trophies" for whatever,weak imo. it is just another less than perfcet mouse as I can see. well, they all are really.
« Last Edit: Sun, 26 May 2013, 14:16:11 by typo »

Offline vun

  • Posts: 1499
  • Location: Norway
  • Just one more thing
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #20 on: Sun, 26 May 2013, 14:40:01 »
I was wondering if the roccat is more accurate than the g500s. since the sensor is in the middle. I am not gaming though.

edit: roccat kone xcd. I will forget this one. read bad cs,no phone. went through that with steel series. no free spinning wheel. 4th button hard to reach. buggy software for some that talks annoyingly. most importantly dpi only adjustable in 200dpi increments. oh, one more thing it gives you "trophies" for whatever,weak imo. it is just another less than perfcet mouse as I can see. well, they all are really.

I'm curious; why is sensor precision important to you if you're not gaming? Didn't you say in another thread that you already had a tablet for graphic/3D work, which is the only other area where I could imagine someone thinking it being important(it really isn't)?

Offline typo

  • Posts: 1676
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #21 on: Sun, 26 May 2013, 16:14:39 »
honestly...ocd. actually I sort of take back what I said. I would gather the roccat is very nice for gamers. I like to feel I have stuff with great specs that's all. I have 2x gtx 590 and I have not played a game yet!

Offline vun

  • Posts: 1499
  • Location: Norway
  • Just one more thing
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #22 on: Sun, 26 May 2013, 16:28:01 »
honestly...ocd. actually I sort of take back what I said. I would gather the roccat is very nice for gamers. I like to feel I have stuff with great specs that's all. I have 2x gtx 590 and I have not played a game yet!

Oh, fair enough. If you don't game then I'd say even a single 590 would be overkill, might be useful for 3D stuff(been a while since I dabbled in 3D so I don't really remember which component is more important) but that's about it. But I'm not gonna tell you how to spend your money, I'm not one to talk about not buying things you don't really need anyways, although I will say that fussing over sensor is downright silly and a waste of time if you're not planning on ever gaming. What you should be looking at is shape and other features.

Offline typo

  • Posts: 1676
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #23 on: Sun, 26 May 2013, 16:38:02 »
that is why I like the g500/s. it is more suited to general usage. interestingly said not to be that good at games. however, now I am going to look into a thumb trackball. yeah, it is nothing to brag about. however I am reading it is better suited to general usage,prevents injury and actually is more precise in apps such as Bryce. oh, in case you were wondering the machine I work on has quadros. this is just my toy I make no real use of :)

Offline vun

  • Posts: 1499
  • Location: Norway
  • Just one more thing
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #24 on: Sun, 26 May 2013, 16:45:28 »
that is why I like the g500/s. it is more suited to general usage. interestingly said not to be that good at games. however, now I am going to look into a thumb trackball. yeah, it is nothing to brag about. however I am reading it is better suited to general usage,prevents injury and actually is more precise in apps such as Bryce. oh, in case you were wondering the machine I work on has quadros. this is just my toy I make no real use of :)
I can highly recommend using a trackball for general PC use, although I don't really think it's more precise than a mouse in certain programs by virtue of being a trackball, this is something that depends on the user, similar to tablets. Some people adapt to drawing with a tablet within minutes, others struggle more with making sense of having to draw where they aren't looking.
But while it might not be more precise it should be more comfortable in most cases.


Offline typo

  • Posts: 1676
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #25 on: Sun, 26 May 2013, 19:32:52 »
thank you vun. i just like accurate mice. although i hear the g500s is not considered accurate anyways. however i could do without all the wrist movement. i think i will try the m570 but i am guessing i will go back to the g500s. i do like the roccat to be back on topic but it is really adapted for gaming. for which it is probably better than the g500s i imagine.

Offline Hyde

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 2643
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • White Tofu Extraordinaire
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #26 on: Sun, 26 May 2013, 23:29:14 »
I was wondering if the roccat is more accurate than the g500s. since the sensor is in the middle. I am not gaming though.

edit: roccat kone xcd. I will forget this one. read bad cs,no phone. went through that with steel series. no free spinning wheel. 4th button hard to reach. buggy software for some that talks annoyingly. most importantly dpi only adjustable in 200dpi increments. oh, one more thing it gives you "trophies" for whatever,weak imo. it is just another less than perfcet mouse as I can see. well, they all are really.

Damn Roccat Kone XTD has bad review?  I swing by the computer store today again just to look at Roccat Kone Pure (similar model).  I still think the shape and size seems very comfortable for me.  Really tempted to buy it.  For me it has pretty much what I'm looking forward in a mouse (nice shape size and don't need too much extra features I won't use).  The 200 dpi increment sucks a little but I think I can live with it.  Maybe I'll read up more about it before I actually buy it.

Oh I also look at Logitech G100s and R.A.T.7 again today.  Logitech G100s has a very good comfortable shape and the scroll wheel is not bad, but the left/right click is kinda stiff and doesn't feel very good.  R.A.T.7 overall is good but I just realize that the scroll wheel is a bit far today, so both 2 are off my list now  :P

But yeah I kind of agree with vun here, for general 3D use I'd say just find one that's comfortable in shape and size.  As for sensor I think both g500s and roccat kone xtd should be both good enough for what you do.  You probably won't reach the maximum tracking speed doing 3D also the sensor location shouldn't be too big of a deal I think.  I use G9X right now and the sensor location hasn't bug me yet.

Archiss ProgresTouch Retro - Gateron Yellow  |  Topre Realforce 104UW - 45g Silent  |  Topre Type Heaven  |  Beige Filco Ninja 104 - MX Red  |  Das Keyboard - MX Brown  |  Poker II - MX Red  |  Race II - MX Brown  |  Matias Quiet Pro - Matias Dampened ALPS  |  Logitech K840 - Romer G  |  Cherry MX Board 2.0 - MX Red  |  Cherry G84-4100 - ML  |  IBM Model M
Roccat Kone Pure  |  Logitech G203  |  Logitech G303  |  Logitech G302  |  Razer Naga  |  CM Storm Xornet  |  Razer Goliathus Mobile Stealth  |  Razer Goliathus Control  |  Artisan Hien  |  Artisan Hayate  |  Artisan Shiden

Offline typo

  • Posts: 1676
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #27 on: Mon, 27 May 2013, 06:38:33 »
the roccat had mostly good reviews. I picked some negative ones because they were things that matter to me. lousy cs is always a deal breaker on anything for me. indeed, I will never even come close to the max acceleration of these mice. that is what the position of the sensor does? I thought it had to do with the accuracy. anyways, these are all plenty accurate for what I do. even if I am making a 3d model animation. I can go as slow as I want and then set the playback later. I barely use the capabilities of any of these mice but I like them. really I want to be a gamer but I am no good at it.

I found the trackball does not have enough dpi for me. otherwise I like it. except for the lack of buttons. on the other hand if I adjust the windows slider it is fine. I think that does not matter to me since negative acceleration is a non issue for what I do.

I am assuming I did not get the best trackball either. the m570. I don't know anything about them though.

I would like to thank all of you for answering my questions in a thread that was not really about this.

Offline vun

  • Posts: 1499
  • Location: Norway
  • Just one more thing
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #28 on: Mon, 27 May 2013, 06:52:04 »
The placement of the sensor is related to wrist position and movement. Most people prefer centered sensors as that means they can  turn the mouse around the z-axis and the cursor will stay in place, meaning what position their wrist is in won't matter. It's not a massive issue, though, the G9x continue to be popular amongst gamers despite the flaws. It's not as popular in the FPS scene, but I remember seeing it used by loads of Korean SC2 players.

Offline typo

  • Posts: 1676
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #29 on: Mon, 27 May 2013, 10:22:48 »
the trackball is not really more comfortable for me. it is too slow(mouse is at 3000 dpi). it lacks buttons I use. I can see why people like the ergonomics but I am sticking with the mouse.


oops, sorry I already said this today.
« Last Edit: Mon, 27 May 2013, 11:11:11 by typo »

Offline insilica

  • Posts: 259
  • Location: GCHQ
  • Keyboard Geeza
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #30 on: Wed, 12 June 2013, 11:43:33 »
I don't know about the cyborg but I had the original kone. I loved it but the scroll wheel axil snapped! Very poor scroll wheels back then, not sure about now though... otherwise solid mouse.
FreeBSD :: Gentoo :: Arch :: [Project Roswell] :: U2410 Eyefinity :: WC P280 :: 3930K [C2] (4.5GHz)
ASUS Maximus IV :: 64GB Vengeance :: MSI 7970 xFire ::  Seasonic 1KW :: M4 256GB

REALFORCE 87U Silent (Variable) | Filco Majestouch 2 Ninja TKL (Brown) | FC660C

Offline muchidna

  • Posts: 5
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #31 on: Mon, 17 June 2013, 06:37:05 »
i have a r.a.t 7 and it does mess up sometimes, like sometimes it will lock to a certain axis, which is remedied quickly by just picking it up and putting it back down

it was my 2nd cyborg mouse, the first being the r.a.t 5 which was great also, i'm a fan of the products, they have a sturdy feel to them and very nice grip for me, easy to adjust, the r.a.t 5 didnt have the sensor problem, and it's probably just as good as the r.a.t 7, you just get a few extra stupid pieces and ability to adjust more stuff which i feel isn't as important
another problem is, the feet wear out after a while (i had my r.a.t 5 feet for atleast a year, but i replaced my r.a.t 7 feet after a few months even though the old ones still had a little life)

anyways, the only other "gaming" mouse i've tried have felt rather cheap, probably because they were, i tried a razer mouse and steelseries (though i think i'll give steelseries another shot on the higher end mice once one of my current ones wear out)

Offline vun

  • Posts: 1499
  • Location: Norway
  • Just one more thing
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #32 on: Mon, 17 June 2013, 07:53:38 »
i have a r.a.t 7 and it does mess up sometimes, like sometimes it will lock to a certain axis, which is remedied quickly by just picking it up and putting it back down

it was my 2nd cyborg mouse, the first being the r.a.t 5 which was great also, i'm a fan of the products, they have a sturdy feel to them and very nice grip for me, easy to adjust, the r.a.t 5 didnt have the sensor problem, and it's probably just as good as the r.a.t 7, you just get a few extra stupid pieces and ability to adjust more stuff which i feel isn't as important
another problem is, the feet wear out after a while (i had my r.a.t 5 feet for atleast a year, but i replaced my r.a.t 7 feet after a few months even though the old ones still had a little life)

anyways, the only other "gaming" mouse i've tried have felt rather cheap, probably because they were, i tried a razer mouse and steelseries (though i think i'll give steelseries another shot on the higher end mice once one of my current ones wear out)

The axis lock problem with the PTE sensor in the 7 is because of dust, it's fairly easy to eliminate the problem as all you need to do is keep your mouse area clean, and maybe go over the sensor with a q-tip or something once in a while.

Offline muchidna

  • Posts: 5
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #33 on: Wed, 19 June 2013, 01:45:40 »
Well, i usually just brush over it with a finger, but it works fine if i just pick it up and put it back down too.

Offline Riddixk51PB

  • Posts: 15
  • Location: Lincoln.ne.us
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #34 on: Wed, 19 June 2013, 21:59:40 »
Though how are Roccat and Cyborg product reliability?  I took a quick look around online and it seem that Roccat has horrible track record and Cyborg seems ok but isn't amazing either.

Anyone here have any personal experience to share?

you must be confusing Roccat with Razer.  My Roccat Kone XTD has been solid the two months I've owned it.  I'd imagine the Pure is just as good.  I like the materials used to manufacture mine, it's not too slick like the Logitech G400s.
KBD: CM Storm QuickFire Pro, Cherry MX Brown
Mouse: Roccat Kone XTD (Avago ADNS-9800 High-Performance LaserStream™)

Offline Bullveyr

  • Posts: 386
  • Location: Austria
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #35 on: Thu, 20 June 2013, 02:16:12 »
Roccat had a massive problem with braking mouse wheels with their first mouse (Kone), that gave them a bad reputation.
Quote from: ripster;185750
Mechanical switches are mechanical.

Offline Riddixk51PB

  • Posts: 15
  • Location: Lincoln.ne.us
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #36 on: Mon, 24 June 2013, 06:27:05 »
Roccat addresses wheel issues with a brand new "Titan" wheel, described here: http://www.roccat.org/Products/#crb_3
KBD: CM Storm QuickFire Pro, Cherry MX Brown
Mouse: Roccat Kone XTD (Avago ADNS-9800 High-Performance LaserStream™)

Offline Bullveyr

  • Posts: 386
  • Location: Austria
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #37 on: Mon, 24 June 2013, 07:48:31 »
I know that they don't have issues with their wheels anymore but the damage to their reputation has been done.

I never really looked at their current wheels (stupid marketing anyway, as usual with Roccat) for the simple reason that wheel durability isn't normally an issue, so who cares if it is more durable on paper. I'm too lazy to check it out but I would be surprised if they use a way different encoder than their (high end) competitors.
Quote from: ripster;185750
Mechanical switches are mechanical.

Offline Riddixk51PB

  • Posts: 15
  • Location: Lincoln.ne.us
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #38 on: Mon, 24 June 2013, 14:01:23 »
i see that you want to insist on Roccat having a bad reputation.  i understand that this is very important to you.  maybe this important to every other gh member as well.  but, that doesn't matter to me.

a lot of esea cs players absolutely despise razer equipment.  those guys i trust.  if you've never played against those guys in a pug, your opinion is most likely rendered questionable.

i did a google lookup on roccat and "problems" wasn't even on the list.

now, i did see an anandtech review on the kone xtd and the kone pure which resulted in a very positive opinion.  pcmag gave the roccat a 4 out of 5 stars in their review as well.  but i suspect the pcmag staff are more wishy washy with their mouse reviews.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/6802/capsule-review-roccats-kone-xtd-and-kone-pure-gaming-mice/4

your disdain for roccat is noted.  you'll excuse me while i've decided not to heed your warning.
KBD: CM Storm QuickFire Pro, Cherry MX Brown
Mouse: Roccat Kone XTD (Avago ADNS-9800 High-Performance LaserStream™)

Offline Bullveyr

  • Posts: 386
  • Location: Austria
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #39 on: Mon, 24 June 2013, 15:02:12 »
Dunno why you take this so personnel and you obviously didn't understand what I wrote. At no point did I say that their products are bad or that they have quality issues. In fact I rate them on a similar level compared to big gaming brands like Razer, Logitech or SteelSeries. I admit that I don't find their products very appealing, I find their kiddy marketing rather stupid and for my taste their products are too flashy and packed with (for me) useless stuff.

All I said was that the whole broken wheel issue still gives them a rather bad reputation from some people, you can read that on a rather regular basis on various forums, especially german ones. Not really surprising with stories of people with 5 broken (original) Kones.

As I side note, I don't care much about reviews from sites like Anandtech.
I also don't trust opinion just because someone is a skilled player, I trust others opinions when I know who that guy is and on what it's based.

I know my stuff about mice and their technology, just ask around.
Quote from: ripster;185750
Mechanical switches are mechanical.

Offline Riddixk51PB

  • Posts: 15
  • Location: Lincoln.ne.us
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #40 on: Mon, 24 June 2013, 16:07:40 »
Dunno why you take this so personnel

what exactly does that sentence mean?  personnel?  your grasp of english is reckless, that could include your knowledge of mice as well.  I think you meant that I'm taking this very personally.  I see.  May I ask you what leads you to this conclusion?  I hardly find anything you can type and/or cut/paste would cause me deep personal concern.  I assure you, I'm all about the facts and reality, keeping personal feelings out of it.  I find nothing you type which could cause me to be miffed~  nice try tho!~   :))



...you obviously didn't understand what I wrote.  At no point did I say that their products are bad or that they have quality issues.

yea, but that's kinda sorta inferred when you, and these are your words, wait for them...wait for them...here we go, the following said by Bullveyr: "Not really surprising with stories of people with 5 broken (original) Kones."

now i ask you, are you not inferring bad products -and- quality issues?

come on now, own up to your own words.  lets move on to another blunder you made.



In fact I rate them on a similar level compared to big gaming brands like Razer, Logitech or SteelSeries.

The Logitech MX500 is not described as a "Gaming" mouse.  It is described as follows: "The Logitech MX500 mouse is clad in an elegant two-tone finish, with a sleek and contoured shape for a perfect grip. The two thumb buttons on the mouse facilitate moving forward and backward between pages easily for Internet browsing. This mouse also features a USB and PS/2 port for ease of connectivity."

That's just part of its description.  Nowhere does it label the MX500 a "Gaming" mouse.  Now I'm going to school you on something.  Here are the descendants of the Logitech MX500: MX510 -> MX518 -> G400 -> G400s.

You, in error, claim Logitech to be a "big gaming brand."  That may be true now (debateable), but it was not true at one time, as I have shown here with the MX500 lineage.



I admit that I don't find their products very appealing, I find their kiddy marketing rather stupid and for my taste their products are too flashy and packed with (for me) useless stuff.

I bought mine because of the kiddy marketing.  Kidding.  It is German engineering as well as German design.  Aren't the Germans legendary in this respect?  May I ask what mouse you use?  I am curious what a mouse connisseur uses.



As I side note, I don't care much about reviews from sites like Anandtech.  I also don't trust opinion just because someone is a skilled player, I trust others opinions when I know who that guy is and on what it's based.  I know my stuff about mice and their technology, just ask around.

Have you ever heard of NiP, ESEA-Invite, or Dreamhack?  How about the following link, ever seen it?  http://www.esreality.com/index.php?a=post&id=2024663

At least I got to do some typing on my new keyboard (in my sig).
KBD: CM Storm QuickFire Pro, Cherry MX Brown
Mouse: Roccat Kone XTD (Avago ADNS-9800 High-Performance LaserStream™)

Offline Bullveyr

  • Posts: 386
  • Location: Austria
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #41 on: Tue, 25 June 2013, 09:03:54 »
You can keep your smart-ass remarks.

Dunno why you take this so personnel

what exactly does that sentence mean?  personnel?  your grasp of english is reckless, that could include your knowledge of mice as well.  I think you meant that I'm taking this very personally.  I see.  May I ask you what leads you to this conclusion?  I hardly find anything you can type and/or cut/paste would cause me deep personal concern.  I assure you, I'm all about the facts and reality, keeping personal feelings out of it.  I find nothing you type which could cause me to be miffed~  nice try tho!~   :))
I'm not a native English speaker but I could have tried harder, my fault but you seem to just wanna pick a fight.

Quote
...you obviously didn't understand what I wrote.  At no point did I say that their products are bad or that they have quality issues.

yea, but that's kinda sorta inferred when you, and these are your words, wait for them...wait for them...here we go, the following said by Bullveyr: "Not really surprising with stories of people with 5 broken (original) Kones."

now i ask you, are you not inferring bad products -and- quality issues?

come on now, own up to your own words.  lets move on to another blunder you made.
Are you not able or just not willing to understand what people post.?

It's a simple fact that the original Kone had an issue with broken wheels and that some people RMAed their Kone 4 times just to see the 5th braking again. Again, at no point did i say that Roccat still has quality issues, but this whole story still gives them a bad reputation (at least in the eyes of some people).

Quote
In fact I rate them on a similar level compared to big gaming brands like Razer, Logitech or SteelSeries.

The Logitech MX500 is not described as a "Gaming" mouse.  It is described as follows: "The Logitech MX500 mouse is clad in an elegant two-tone finish, with a sleek and contoured shape for a perfect grip. The two thumb buttons on the mouse facilitate moving forward and backward between pages easily for Internet browsing. This mouse also features a USB and PS/2 port for ease of connectivity."

That's just part of its description.  Nowhere does it label the MX500 a "Gaming" mouse.  Now I'm going to school you on something.  Here are the descendants of the Logitech MX500: MX510 -> MX518 -> G400 -> G400s.

You, in error, claim Logitech to be a "big gaming brand."  That may be true now (debateable), but it was not true at one time, as I have shown here with the MX500 lineage.
Why do you come up with the MX500?
Who cares how Logitech advertised/labeled the MX500 over 10 years ago, they certainly now brand mice as gaming and they are the biggest manufacturer of "gaming mice". So I take the freedom to label Logitech as a big gaming brand, despite that they make many other products.
You don't have to school me on anything, I'm well aware of Logitech past and current lineup.
You could also name the G5 as descendant but that is debatable depending on point of view.

Quote
I admit that I don't find their products very appealing, I find their kiddy marketing rather stupid and for my taste their products are too flashy and packed with (for me) useless stuff.

I bought mine because of the kiddy marketing.  Kidding.  It is German engineering as well as German design.  Aren't the Germans legendary in this respect?
German design is certainly not legendary for being flashy.

Quote
May I ask what mouse you use?  I am curious what a mouse connisseur uses.
Final production sample of the Xai I got from SteelSeries.

I value shape and feel of the mouse over minor sensor issues, looking at your sig you probably feel the same way.

Quote
As I side note, I don't care much about reviews from sites like Anandtech.  I also don't trust opinion just because someone is a skilled player, I trust others opinions when I know who that guy is and on what it's based.  I know my stuff about mice and their technology, just ask around.

Have you ever heard of NiP, ESEA-Invite, or Dreamhack?  How about the following link, ever seen it?  http://www.esreality.com/index.php?a=post&id=2024663
Sure I heard of them but I don't play CS, not my game, although I sometimes watch some matches. Still no reason to rate peoples choice of mouse based on their skill, especially if they are sponsored, which often limits their options.

I know that thread on ESReality but I find labeling sensors (or their particular implementation in a certain mouse) as flawless rather stupid and not helpful.Btw, I wouldn't even put the MLT04 in that category if I would have to.
Quote from: ripster;185750
Mechanical switches are mechanical.

Offline Riddixk51PB

  • Posts: 15
  • Location: Lincoln.ne.us
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #42 on: Tue, 25 June 2013, 19:23:42 »
You can keep your smart-ass remarks.

what's good for the goose is good for the gander



I'm not a native English speaker but I could have tried harder, my fault but you seem to just wanna pick a fight.

you're delusional



Are you not able or just not willing to understand what people post.?

look in the mirror and say that



It's a simple fact that the original Kone had an issue with broken wheels and that some people RMAed their Kone 4 times just to see the 5th braking again. Again, at no point did i say that Roccat still has quality issues, but this whole story still gives them a bad reputation (at least in the eyes of some people).

doesn't really matter whether it's a "simple fact" or a complex fact.  what you don't get is that i'm not arguing your point here.  i take your word for it that there were broken wheels on Kone mice.

and now you've changed your wording to "at no point did i say that Roccat still has quality issues.  true, Roccat might not have quality issues now.  time will tell.

i'd never heard of roccat's bad reputation in the past.  there are probably some who are very spiteful toward roccat.  some people have difficulty and want to live in the past, rather than the present.



Why do you come up with the MX500?

to provide exhibit A that the great grandfather of today's logitech gaming mice was not labeled as a "gaming mouse" by the manufacturer (logitech).  furthermore, i highly doubt logitech, at the release of the mx500 mouse, was a full-blown gaming company.  if you were to look at the logitech website under the us website version, there's still barely, and i emphasize barely, any reference to gaming at all.

now, if you look at the de version of logitech, you'll see a gaming mouse prominently displayed on the homepage of logitech de.

so in this case, i'm right in my opinion that logitech is not emphasizing the gaming aspect of the website.  however, we can see that you are right about logitech de, in that it is well, maybe a full-blown gaming organization.



German design is certainly not legendary for being flashy.

uh-huh.  http://www.lamborghini.com/de/home/#!slide/3009.  German owned Lamborghini.  nothing flashy about those cars eh?  how about Audi R8?  550hp.  nothing flashy there either?  how about Porsche 911 GT3?  yea, you're right, nothing flashy about that.  or the carrera GT.  or basically any BMW, nothing flashy about those.  you know what?  i find myself agreeing with you.  nothing flashy about any of those cars.  how many people do you think will agree with us?  answer: not many



Sure I heard of them but I don't play CS, not my game, although I sometimes watch some matches. Still no reason to rate peoples choice of mouse based on their skill, especially if they are sponsored, which often limits their options.

I know that thread on ESReality but I find labeling sensors (or their particular implementation in a certain mouse) as flawless rather stupid and not helpful.Btw, I wouldn't even put the MLT04 in that category if I would have to.

that's fine that you don't play cs.  just wanted to get a feel for your general gaming knowledge.
KBD: CM Storm QuickFire Pro, Cherry MX Brown
Mouse: Roccat Kone XTD (Avago ADNS-9800 High-Performance LaserStream™)

Offline davkol

  •  Post Editing Timeout
  • Posts: 4994
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #43 on: Tue, 25 June 2013, 21:09:58 »
Not sure if trolling or stupid... Probably both.

Offline Riddixk51PB

  • Posts: 15
  • Location: Lincoln.ne.us
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #44 on: Wed, 26 June 2013, 05:34:20 »
Not sure if trolling or stupid... Probably both.

try to post something relevant to the thread title.  that would be your best course of action.

if you're going to come in with a troll blast, you should probly name the offender, else no one knows who you're referring to.  just sayin'
KBD: CM Storm QuickFire Pro, Cherry MX Brown
Mouse: Roccat Kone XTD (Avago ADNS-9800 High-Performance LaserStream™)

Offline Bullveyr

  • Posts: 386
  • Location: Austria
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #45 on: Wed, 26 June 2013, 10:45:24 »
It's a simple fact that the original Kone had an issue with broken wheels and that some people RMAed their Kone 4 times just to see the 5th braking again. Again, at no point did i say that Roccat still has quality issues, but this whole story still gives them a bad reputation (at least in the eyes of some people).

doesn't really matter whether it's a "simple fact" or a complex fact.  what you don't get is that i'm not arguing your point here.  i take your word for it that there were broken wheels on Kone mice.

and now you've changed your wording to "at no point did i say that Roccat still has quality issues.  true, Roccat might not have quality issues now.  time will tell.
I didn't change the wording on purpose (the meaning is the same), the present tense alone wasn't enough for you to understand that I'm talking about the present anyway.


Quote
i'd never heard of roccat's bad reputation in the past.

That just means that you aren't as educated on that matter as you thought.

Quote
there are probably some who are very spiteful toward roccat.  some people have difficulty and want to live in the past, rather than the present.
So now you are pretty much agreeing on my original statement.



Quote
Quote
Why do you come up with the MX500?

to provide exhibit A that the great grandfather of today's logitech gaming mice was not labeled as a "gaming mouse" by the manufacturer (logitech).  furthermore, i highly doubt logitech, at the release of the mx500 mouse, was a full-blown gaming company.  if you were to look at the logitech website under the us website version, there's still barely, and i emphasize barely, any reference to gaming at all.

now, if you look at the de version of logitech, you'll see a gaming mouse prominently displayed on the homepage of logitech de.

so in this case, i'm right in my opinion that logitech is not emphasizing the gaming aspect of the website.  however, we can see that you are right about logitech de, in that it is well, maybe a full-blown gaming organization.
I never called Logitech a "full-blown gaming company", I called them a big gaming brand (because they are the biggest manufacturer of gaming mice).

If you insist on looking on Logitech's us-webpage you may notice that one of their 3 sub-pages is "Gaming" ("Ultimate Ears"and "for business" are the other 2), just saying.

Quote
Quote
German design is certainly not legendary for being flashy.

uh-huh.  http://www.lamborghini.com/de/home/#!slide/3009.  German owned Lamborghini.  nothing flashy about those cars eh?  how about Audi R8?  550hp.  nothing flashy there either?  how about Porsche 911 GT3?  yea, you're right, nothing flashy about that.  or the carrera GT.  or basically any BMW, nothing flashy about those.  you know what?  i find myself agreeing with you.  nothing flashy about any of those cars.  how many people do you think will agree with us?  answer: not many
Lamborghini is still owned by Audi, respectively VW. Lambos are designed and manufactured in Italy which makes them Italian Cars, they don't become German just because the company is owned by a German one.
Since when is a car flashy because of the hp under the hood? Rolls Royce certainly disagrees.
The R8 is kind of Audi's version of the Gallardo, which is in probaly most eyes way more flashy.
GT3 is rather flashy, basic 911 not so much. Dunno what's so flashy about a BMW.
German supercars aren't flashy compared to other supercar manufacturers.

Kind of funny that you argue the "flashyness" of german cars mainly with their supercars which obviously only makes a small percentage of their cars but at the same time you insist to not call Logitech a gaming brand (in a discussion about gaming mice) because they make many other non-gaming products.

Sure I heard of them but I don't play CS, not my game, although I sometimes watch some matches. Still no reason to rate peoples choice of mouse based on their skill, especially if they are sponsored, which often limits their options.

I know that thread on ESReality but I find labeling sensors (or their particular implementation in a certain mouse) as flawless rather stupid and not helpful.Btw, I wouldn't even put the MLT04 in that category if I would have to.

that's fine that you don't play cs.  just wanted to get a feel for your general gaming knowledge.
[/quote]

Not sure if trolling or stupid... Probably both.
...
if you're going to come in with a troll blast, you should probly name the offender, else no one knows who you're referring to.  just sayin'
At least we can agree on that.

 
To settle the original argument I contacted a trustworthy source in that matter, not surprisingly he wants to keep it of the record, so I won't name him and only summarize his statement.
Yes, the whole story with the Kone did hurt Roccat's image and it isn't simply a thing that is forgotten and lays in the past, especially in Germany because at that time Roccat was only present in Europe.

Not that you will believe me that anyway.


Imho it speaks for Roccat that they're still around, it could have sunk them.
Quote from: ripster;185750
Mechanical switches are mechanical.

Offline ImperfectLink

  • Posts: 154
  • Location: Columbus
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #46 on: Thu, 27 June 2013, 21:20:18 »
One thing about Roccat. They're one of the few mouse companies i've seen that provides a Linux driver for their products.

Offline Hyde

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 2643
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • White Tofu Extraordinaire
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #47 on: Fri, 28 June 2013, 00:00:01 »
Well to be fair, Roccat has only been out for 5 years.  So I'd imagine they were probably doing things the trial and error way until recently.

Hopefully by now they know what their doing and bumped up their quality control.

I'm set to buy a Kone Pure no matter what though so I'll let you guys know later lol.

Archiss ProgresTouch Retro - Gateron Yellow  |  Topre Realforce 104UW - 45g Silent  |  Topre Type Heaven  |  Beige Filco Ninja 104 - MX Red  |  Das Keyboard - MX Brown  |  Poker II - MX Red  |  Race II - MX Brown  |  Matias Quiet Pro - Matias Dampened ALPS  |  Logitech K840 - Romer G  |  Cherry MX Board 2.0 - MX Red  |  Cherry G84-4100 - ML  |  IBM Model M
Roccat Kone Pure  |  Logitech G203  |  Logitech G303  |  Logitech G302  |  Razer Naga  |  CM Storm Xornet  |  Razer Goliathus Mobile Stealth  |  Razer Goliathus Control  |  Artisan Hien  |  Artisan Hayate  |  Artisan Shiden

Offline Bullveyr

  • Posts: 386
  • Location: Austria
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #48 on: Fri, 28 June 2013, 03:05:14 »
I certainly wouldn't call it trial and error, they had things to learn but it's not like that only guys new to the business were involved in the development of the original Kone.

Btw, they actually had one of their guys sorting out the "bad" A6090 sensors in the factory.

Are you going for the normal Kone Pure (laser) or the upcoming optical one?
Quote from: ripster;185750
Mechanical switches are mechanical.

Offline Hyde

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 2643
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • White Tofu Extraordinaire
Re: Roccat And Cyborg Product Reliability?
« Reply #49 on: Mon, 01 July 2013, 11:53:19 »
I'm thinking to get the normal Kone Pure since I like laser sensor better.  I'm picky about my dpi steps lol.

Though I might wait till the Phantom White Kone Pure Color comes out to decide if I want the white one better or the regular color one.  :P

Archiss ProgresTouch Retro - Gateron Yellow  |  Topre Realforce 104UW - 45g Silent  |  Topre Type Heaven  |  Beige Filco Ninja 104 - MX Red  |  Das Keyboard - MX Brown  |  Poker II - MX Red  |  Race II - MX Brown  |  Matias Quiet Pro - Matias Dampened ALPS  |  Logitech K840 - Romer G  |  Cherry MX Board 2.0 - MX Red  |  Cherry G84-4100 - ML  |  IBM Model M
Roccat Kone Pure  |  Logitech G203  |  Logitech G303  |  Logitech G302  |  Razer Naga  |  CM Storm Xornet  |  Razer Goliathus Mobile Stealth  |  Razer Goliathus Control  |  Artisan Hien  |  Artisan Hayate  |  Artisan Shiden