(Sorry for the long post ... getting nervous ;-)
Anyone here still have a BBC Micro and can describe how a Cherry MX compares to the standard BBC Micro keyswitch? (I think I mistakenly gave away my rare BBC Micro keyboard that was much nicer to type on! D’oh. Felt sure that was still on my spare under the bed, but alas no.)
The BBC Micro keyswitches are constant force, non-clicky, non-tactile. As I understand it, Cherry MX black increases in resistance the further down you press the key, but these have absolutely no change of resistance at all.
The BBC Micro keyboard is one of the oddest keyboards I've ever used -- just never felt comfortable on it. Always felt stiff, slow, a lot of effort to type for some reason. (I was perfectly happy with the layout though, in the day, even the loony arrow keys! Then again, games split x and y axis movement between your two hands, a practice that for whatever reason has died out.)
I'm hoping that a Cherry MX blue and brown feel the same as my (real or fake) blue ALPS keyboard, very light and fluid, no wobble or rattle. Most of the sound from a BBC Micro or Dell rubber dome keyboard seems to come from the rattle of the key caps. (My work Dell rubber dome is an anomaly, replacing the usual mud feeling with light action and a lot of rattle.)
I'm just nervous about spending £110 on a FILCO having never experienced the feel of the keys, or the sound levels of blue and brown. I did a sound test of my blue ALPS -- it's capable of drowning out some music, which put me off Cherry blue; then again, some tunes will blot out the keyboard noise, so I think that, despite my love for clicky, the feel is all that will truly matter. No mush, no rattle, no wobble, just silky smooth vertical motion of quality keyswitches. (Like a blue ALPS ;-)