Author Topic: Vintage Blacks vs Standard Blacks?  (Read 1235 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline y0fate

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 36
  • Location: California
  • The Holy CBass.
Vintage Blacks vs Standard Blacks?
« on: Thu, 13 June 2013, 04:47:26 »
I'm just wondering if there is any NOTICEABLE difference (IE. not 60g vs 62g springs), are they rare or sought after?
"No"- Greed

Offline Jocelyn

  • Posts: 1608
  • Location: Orlando, FL
  • 조셀린
Re: Vintage Blacks vs Standard Blacks?
« Reply #1 on: Thu, 13 June 2013, 04:48:20 »
I can't answer this for you, but you may post this kind of thread in keyboards section if you'd prefer. Up to you :)

This is also a good thread to post things like this in - http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=40501.0 but it is ultimately up to you.

Offline Photekq

  • wheat flour zone
  • Posts: 4794
  • Location: North Wales, UK
  • sorry if i was ever an ******* to you
Re: Vintage Blacks vs Standard Blacks?
« Reply #2 on: Thu, 13 June 2013, 04:50:04 »
They're not that rare. You can find them in lots and lots of old Cherry boards which sell for cheap. You will just need to desolder them.

They are supposedly smoother although I have never tried them so I cannot comment.

Also, as Jocelyn suggested you should post this kind of thing in the simple questions simple answers thread. People can reference you to links that should answer your questions.
https://kbdarchive.org/
github
discord: hi mum#5710

Offline y0fate

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 36
  • Location: California
  • The Holy CBass.
Re: Vintage Blacks vs Standard Blacks?
« Reply #3 on: Thu, 13 June 2013, 04:53:52 »
Didn't search for hard for a suitable thread/forum, my mistake!
"No"- Greed

Offline rowdy

  • HHKB Hapster
  • * Erudite Elder
  • Posts: 21175
  • Location: melbourne.vic.au
  • Missed another sale.
"Because keyboards are accessories to PC makers, they focus on minimizing the manufacturing costs. But that’s incorrect. It’s in HHKB’s slogan, but when America’s cowboys were in the middle of a trip and their horse died, they would leave the horse there. But even if they were in the middle of a desert, they would take their saddle with them. The horse was a consumable good, but the saddle was an interface that their bodies had gotten used to. In the same vein, PCs are consumable goods, while keyboards are important interfaces." - Eiiti Wada

NEC APC-H4100E | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED red | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED green | Link 900243-08 | CM QFR MX black | KeyCool 87 white MX reds | HHKB 2 Pro | Model M 02-Mar-1993 | Model M 29-Nov-1995 | CM Trigger (broken) | CM QFS MX green | Ducky DK9087 Shine 3 TKL Yellow Edition MX black | Lexmark SSK 21-Apr-1994 | IBM SSK 13-Oct-1987 | CODE TKL MX clear | Model M 122 01-Jun-1988

Ị̸͚̯̲́ͤ̃͑̇̑ͯ̊̂͟ͅs̞͚̩͉̝̪̲͗͊ͪ̽̚̚ ̭̦͖͕̑́͌ͬͩ͟t̷̻͔̙̑͟h̹̠̼͋ͤ͋i̤̜̣̦̱̫͈͔̞ͭ͑ͥ̌̔s̬͔͎̍̈ͥͫ̐̾ͣ̔̇͘ͅ ̩̘̼͆̐̕e̞̰͓̲̺̎͐̏ͬ̓̅̾͠͝ͅv̶̰͕̱̞̥̍ͣ̄̕e͕͙͖̬̜͓͎̤̊ͭ͐͝ṇ̰͎̱̤̟̭ͫ͌̌͢͠ͅ ̳̥̦ͮ̐ͤ̎̊ͣ͡͡n̤̜̙̺̪̒͜e̶̻̦̿ͮ̂̀c̝̘̝͖̠̖͐ͨͪ̈̐͌ͩ̀e̷̥͇̋ͦs̢̡̤ͤͤͯ͜s͈̠̉̑͘a̱͕̗͖̳̥̺ͬͦͧ͆̌̑͡r̶̟̖̈͘ỷ̮̦̩͙͔ͫ̾ͬ̔ͬͮ̌?̵̘͇͔͙ͥͪ͞ͅ

Offline Jocelyn

  • Posts: 1608
  • Location: Orlando, FL
  • 조셀린
Re: Vintage Blacks vs Standard Blacks?
« Reply #5 on: Thu, 13 June 2013, 05:13:15 »
Didn't search for hard for a suitable thread/forum, my mistake!

No it's okay. It's hard to search geekhack imo and I recommend you google site:geekhack.org instead. No worries on not searching, I was letting you know it is okay to post in keyboard section even if you start new thread. No need to off topic.
That way more people will see your thread :)

Offline y0fate

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 36
  • Location: California
  • The Holy CBass.
Re: Vintage Blacks vs Standard Blacks?
« Reply #6 on: Thu, 13 June 2013, 05:18:12 »
http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=36485.0
http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=38921.0
Then if you were to just lube regular blacks wouldn't it be almost identical to Vintage Blacks?
"No"- Greed