For a modern 60% keyboard, not providing a way to program your own layout is a clear NO-NO. Especially knowing that they are using a very powerful microcontroller that could EASILY support programmability.
Worse, the Fn layout they provide doesn't make sense. It's unusable.
So they won't get my money.
I didn't find any modern 60% in commercial with user programmable feature, even the next new product - ducky mini will be the same.
Currently I only know that poker/pure-pro can re-assign the key map.
But they all can't be programmable like GH60, or other user DIY modules.
Hope those companies can improve this.
Being programmable is a requirement for a 60% keyboard. I have not found it is required for a TKL or a full size.
All my 60% keyboards are programmable, either fully or at least enough that I can remap the Fn layer: Poker X (modded, and connected to Hasu's PS/2 converter), HHKB Pro 2 (with Hasu's dedicated controller board), GH60, Poker 2, KBT Pure Pro.
If I didn't have some way to program their Fn layer, I would spend my time switching to different layouts all the time. It's simply impossible.
So I want to make it clear that I call programmability a requirement because it really is, not because I have some kind of agenda in favor of this feature. The lack of standard for the Fn layouts, which most importantly tells you where you find the arrow keys, is what makes programmability mandatory.
Tex cannot get away with an expensive keyboard that is not programmable. It's a serious design flaw, almost inexcusable for a keyboard that already has a powerful microcontroller, made only worse by the fact that great programmable firmwares like Hasu's or Soarer's are available as open source.