geekhack

geekhack Community => Keyboards => Topic started by: ike2030 on Sat, 03 August 2013, 09:30:46

Title: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: ike2030 on Sat, 03 August 2013, 09:30:46
Thanks to geekhack and many other forums I've narrowed down which type of keyboard I want. I play a game that needs a lot of rapid key presses and slides from one key to another. I know red and brown have about the same actuation force, but i tried the logitech g710+ in a store and i couldn't feel the tactile bump. All i could feel was mushiness from the O-rings. For the game i play i have to do movements like this:

I've been looking at the CM storm quickfire pro because it only has backlighting where i need it and it offers nkro over USB. So which one should i get, red or brown??
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: tp4tissue on Sat, 03 August 2013, 09:32:13
Thanks to geekhack and many other forums I've narrowed down which type of keyboard I want. I play a game that needs a lot of rapid key presses and slides from one key to another. I know red and brown have about the same actuation force, but i tried the logitech g710+ in a store and i couldn't feel the tactile bump. All i could feel was mushiness from the O-rings. For the game i play i have to do movements like this:

I've been looking at the CM storm quickfire pro because it only has backlighting where i need it and it offers nkro over USB. So which one should i get, red or brown??

if you want SERIOUS tactile, buckling is good.

all tactile mx are subtle when you're typing fast.

Sadly the ultimate layout of the Ergodox is only available in CHERRY mx.

And Layout trumps the switch type when it comes to actually USING a keyboard.


The people who love to TALK about keyboards will tell you differently.

But all avid USERS agree. EDx ftw. :thumb:
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: ike2030 on Sat, 03 August 2013, 09:36:26
i think the tactile bump will just slow me down since i wont even feel it and its just extra force. IDK how to embed a video in here but if you go to the link in the original post you will see the keyboard movements i do.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: CPTBadAss on Sat, 03 August 2013, 09:40:04
Youtube links should look like: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5qm8PH4xAss

If you want a lot of switch reviews, check out this link (http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=44165.0).
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: tp4tissue on Sat, 03 August 2013, 09:40:07
i think the tactile bump will just slow me down since i wont even feel it and its just extra force. IDK how to embed a video in here but if you go to the link in the original post you will see the keyboard movements i do.


Ta DA................... :p

also, Looking at this game,,  You would definately be served well with an ergodox.. and it is available with any MX switch..

Imagine playing that game, such that you can place the right and left hand anywhere, and you don't have to turn your wrist to match your keyboard, you can just turn the whole half of the keyboard.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: ike2030 on Sat, 03 August 2013, 09:56:00
When im gaming i just treat my keyboard like a piece of paper. SInce im right handed i slant the keyboard to my left so ergonomics stuff isn't really neccessary unless its substantially cheaper and actually works well.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: PointyFox on Sat, 03 August 2013, 10:26:16
You'll want MX black switches and contoured keys like DCS.  MX red will also work too, but may result in some ergonomic issues due to harder bottoming out.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: ike2030 on Fri, 25 October 2013, 05:30:07
O-rings would help lessen the impact of bottoming out on the reds, right?
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Polymer on Fri, 25 October 2013, 08:54:54
Thanks to geekhack and many other forums I've narrowed down which type of keyboard I want. I play a game that needs a lot of rapid key presses and slides from one key to another. I know red and brown have about the same actuation force, but i tried the logitech g710+ in a store and i couldn't feel the tactile bump. All i could feel was mushiness from the O-rings. For the game i play i have to do movements like this:

I've been looking at the CM storm quickfire pro because it only has backlighting where i need it and it offers nkro over USB. So which one should i get, red or brown??

Browns have a very light tactile bump..you'll feel it when you type (it'll feel normal).  Pushing the key individually makes them feel weird and probably isn't a good way to test it.

You might not notice it but if you haven't used reds, you'll definitely see a difference...the reds will be a LOT smoother, actually quite a bit lighter as well...
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Linkbane on Fri, 25 October 2013, 10:26:52
i think the tactile bump will just slow me down since i wont even feel it and its just extra force. IDK how to embed a video in here but if you go to the link in the original post you will see the keyboard movements i do.

It's not extra force, it's still 45g to actuation. For gaming, I prefer Reds, but Browns, when I tried them, were much better for typing.
Also, there aren't any O-rings on the keyboards. Thought you should know that O-rings are aftermarket.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: metalliqaz on Fri, 25 October 2013, 10:40:40
I prefer MX brown.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Polymer on Fri, 25 October 2013, 10:49:24
i think the tactile bump will just slow me down since i wont even feel it and its just extra force. IDK how to embed a video in here but if you go to the link in the original post you will see the keyboard movements i do.

It's not extra force, it's still 45g to actuation. For gaming, I prefer Reds, but Browns, when I tried them, were much better for typing.
Also, there aren't any O-rings on the keyboards. Thought you should know that O-rings are aftermarket.

It is extra force...look at the force diagrams...same spring but the tactile bump adds to the resistance...It isn't a huge difference but enough to where you can feel it..using them side by side you can feel the difference...
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Linkbane on Fri, 25 October 2013, 10:55:31
i think the tactile bump will just slow me down since i wont even feel it and its just extra force. IDK how to embed a video in here but if you go to the link in the original post you will see the keyboard movements i do.

It's not extra force, it's still 45g to actuation. For gaming, I prefer Reds, but Browns, when I tried them, were much better for typing.
Also, there aren't any O-rings on the keyboards. Thought you should know that O-rings are aftermarket.

It is extra force...look at the force diagrams...same spring but the tactile bump adds to the resistance...It isn't a huge difference but enough to where you can feel it..using them side by side you can feel the difference...

There's a bump; it's still 45g. The amount of pressure required to go past the bump hardly exists.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: C5Allroad on Fri, 25 October 2013, 10:56:28
On the G710+ the bump is almost non existent. On my shine 3 I can feel a large difference.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Polymer on Fri, 25 October 2013, 10:59:35
i think the tactile bump will just slow me down since i wont even feel it and its just extra force. IDK how to embed a video in here but if you go to the link in the original post you will see the keyboard movements i do.

It's not extra force, it's still 45g to actuation. For gaming, I prefer Reds, but Browns, when I tried them, were much better for typing.
Also, there aren't any O-rings on the keyboards. Thought you should know that O-rings are aftermarket.

It is extra force...look at the force diagrams...same spring but the tactile bump adds to the resistance...It isn't a huge difference but enough to where you can feel it..using them side by side you can feel the difference...

There's a bump; it's still 45g. The amount of pressure required to go past the bump hardly exists.

See the force graph...compare the two...it most definitely exists..

They both actuate at 45g..but 45g actuation on brown is after the bump (after it drops off from the bump)...on reds it is linear...to actually get over the tactile bump on brown you're over 50g.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Linkbane on Fri, 25 October 2013, 11:09:09
i think the tactile bump will just slow me down since i wont even feel it and its just extra force. IDK how to embed a video in here but if you go to the link in the original post you will see the keyboard movements i do.

It's not extra force, it's still 45g to actuation. For gaming, I prefer Reds, but Browns, when I tried them, were much better for typing.
Also, there aren't any O-rings on the keyboards. Thought you should know that O-rings are aftermarket.

It is extra force...look at the force diagrams...same spring but the tactile bump adds to the resistance...It isn't a huge difference but enough to where you can feel it..using them side by side you can feel the difference...

There's a bump; it's still 45g. The amount of pressure required to go past the bump hardly exists.

See the force graph...compare the two...it most definitely exists..

They both actuate at 45g..but 45g actuation on brown is after the bump...on reds it is linear...to actually get over the tactile bump on brown you're over 50g.

Two things: first of all, periods do not act as commas, no matter how many you use.
Second, I have seen the force graph. I've also tried the switch and listened to the opinions of many users; about all of us agree that the tactility is very light, hardly noticeable. It might be higher, but it's again still low enough that it's not noticeable.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: ynrozturk on Fri, 25 October 2013, 11:09:46
I just like the feeling of Browns so much more. I never really liked any of the linear switches.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Polymer on Fri, 25 October 2013, 11:11:33
Two things: first of all, periods do not act as commas, no matter how many you use.
Second, I have seen the force graph. I've also tried the switch and listened to the opinions of many users; about all of us agree that the tactility is very light, hardly noticeable. It might be higher, but it's again still low enough that it's not noticeable.

And people shouldn't make comments about stuff they haven't used but that hasn't stopped you.  Attack my ... all you want...does it help your argument?

No.

Why?  Cause you're wrong.  It requires more force.  That is a fact.  It is an actual objective fact.  You're wrong.  Move on. 

Changing your argument now to "it is more but it doesn't feel like it" should have been your original argument...but you quoted how they're both 45g..which means you completely ignored the fact that the bump requires MORE force than the actuation point...probably because you didn't know....

Game.  Set.  Match.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Linkbane on Fri, 25 October 2013, 11:27:18
Funny guy polymer. Offended when I point out something unrelated and completely separate it, telling everyone that it has nothing to do with the argument.

Have fun convincing everyone that the tactility is significant. I'm sure that they'll agree with you.
Really it's pretty sad watching you take some self-righteous opinion on and making it seem even more wrong than it is. Continue arguing with yourself. //thread
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: tp4tissue on Fri, 25 October 2013, 11:30:20
Two things: first of all, periods do not act as commas, no matter how many you use.
Second, I have seen the force graph. I've also tried the switch and listened to the opinions of many users; about all of us agree that the tactility is very light, hardly noticeable. It might be higher, but it's again still low enough that it's not noticeable.

And people shouldn't make comments about stuff they haven't used but that hasn't stopped you.  Attack my ... all you want...does it help your argument?

No.

Why?  Cause you're wrong.  It requires more force.  That is a fact.  It is an actual objective fact.  You're wrong.  Move on. 

Changing your argument now to "it is more but it doesn't feel like it" should have been your original argument...but you quoted how they're both 45g..which means you completely ignored the fact that the bump requires MORE force than the actuation point...probably because you didn't know....

Game.  Set.  Match.

wo wo wo.......   I am the master of the................ ... ................../ disapprove................................................(http://www.cute-factor.com/images/smilies/onion/3c68bb64.gif)

I've even got that emoticon for it....
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Polymer on Fri, 25 October 2013, 11:30:28
Funny guy polymer. Offended when I point out something unrelated and completely separate it, telling everyone that it has nothing to do with the argument.

Have fun convincing everyone that the tactility is significant. I'm sure that they'll agree with you.
Really it's pretty sad watching you take some self-righteous opinion on and making it seem even more wrong than it is. Continue arguing with yourself. //thread

I'm not offended at all...I just think it is a pathetic attempt to deflect your mistake. 

The bump requires more force.  It isn't an argument, it is a fact.  You argued they're both 45g so therefore it doesn't require more force..but that doesn't make any sense since the 45g is after bump which is a drop off in force from the actual bump. 

Continue to make your bad argument..hide the fact that you made a mistake....why not just man up and say you didn't realize they were different? 

BOOM.  HEADSHOT.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: tp4tissue on Fri, 25 October 2013, 11:32:05
Funny guy polymer. Offended when I point out something unrelated and completely separate it, telling everyone that it has nothing to do with the argument.

Have fun convincing everyone that the tactility is significant. I'm sure that they'll agree with you.
Really it's pretty sad watching you take some self-righteous opinion on and making it seem even more wrong than it is. Continue arguing with yourself. //thread

I'm not offended at all...I just think it is a pathetic attempt to deflect your mistake. 

The bump requires more force.  It isn't an argument, it is a fact.  You argued they're both 45g so therefore it doesn't require more force..but that doesn't make any sense since the 45g is after bump and after the drop off.

Continue to make your bad argument..hide the fact that you made a mistake....why not just man up and say you didn't realize they were different? 

BOOM.  HEADSHOT.

Polymer... you can chill dude... I think the point is that when typing fast... the bump on browns is below the just-noticeable threshold... It's just too small.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Polymer on Fri, 25 October 2013, 11:38:12
Funny guy polymer. Offended when I point out something unrelated and completely separate it, telling everyone that it has nothing to do with the argument.

Have fun convincing everyone that the tactility is significant. I'm sure that they'll agree with you.
Really it's pretty sad watching you take some self-righteous opinion on and making it seem even more wrong than it is. Continue arguing with yourself. //thread

I'm not offended at all...I just think it is a pathetic attempt to deflect your mistake. 

The bump requires more force.  It isn't an argument, it is a fact.  You argued they're both 45g so therefore it doesn't require more force..but that doesn't make any sense since the 45g is after bump and after the drop off.

Continue to make your bad argument..hide the fact that you made a mistake....why not just man up and say you didn't realize they were different? 

BOOM.  HEADSHOT.

Polymer... you can chill dude... I think the point is that when typing fast... the bump on browns is below the just-noticeable threshold... It's just too small.

I agree..the bump is really small..not disagreeing with that at all...as I type this with MX browns...But I think the point is, it does require slightly more force..it is noticeable..and unlike what's his face, I'm actually comparing the two right now...it isn't a huge difference but it is slight...

But he goes out of his way to actually convince people he's right when factually he's absolutely wrong...he's even mixing up his facts quoting they're both 45g actuation so therefore they require the same force....which is absolutely false because while both have 45g actuation..they both don't require the same amount of force...And you know what?  All someone would need to say is.....oh..yeah, I made a mistake.  That ends it right there.  But that won't happen.  He's faced with actual facts and it still won't happen...Instead he's now making up some silly excuses...it is actually pretty pathetic. 
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: digi on Fri, 25 October 2013, 11:42:58
Reds and Browns have the same actuation force and travel distance. Only difference is the tactile bump in the brownies, either switch is great, just preference. Try them both, you eventually will :).
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: dante on Fri, 25 October 2013, 11:59:45
Funny guy polymer. Offended when I point out something unrelated and completely separate it, telling everyone that it has nothing to do with the argument.

Have fun convincing everyone that the tactility is significant. I'm sure that they'll agree with you.
Really it's pretty sad watching you take some self-righteous opinion on and making it seem even more wrong than it is. Continue arguing with yourself. //thread

I'm not offended at all...I just think it is a pathetic attempt to deflect your mistake. 

The bump requires more force.  It isn't an argument, it is a fact.  You argued they're both 45g so therefore it doesn't require more force..but that doesn't make any sense since the 45g is after bump and after the drop off.

Continue to make your bad argument..hide the fact that you made a mistake....why not just man up and say you didn't realize they were different? 

BOOM.  HEADSHOT.

Polymer... you can chill dude... I think the point is that when typing fast... the bump on browns is below the just-noticeable threshold... It's just too small.

For me it's noticeable enough for a +15 wpm gain.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Linkbane on Fri, 25 October 2013, 12:49:46
I typed on it and I feel as if I could type about as fast as blues. It's there, miniscule perhaps, but it's there.
I doubt that it would give me 15 wpm, perhaps 10 wpm is a better estimate. Not a fan of Reds, I can't get higher than a bit over 130 on those.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: tp4tissue on Fri, 25 October 2013, 13:01:56
Funny guy polymer. Offended when I point out something unrelated and completely separate it, telling everyone that it has nothing to do with the argument.

Have fun convincing everyone that the tactility is significant. I'm sure that they'll agree with you.
Really it's pretty sad watching you take some self-righteous opinion on and making it seem even more wrong than it is. Continue arguing with yourself. //thread

I'm not offended at all...I just think it is a pathetic attempt to deflect your mistake. 

The bump requires more force.  It isn't an argument, it is a fact.  You argued they're both 45g so therefore it doesn't require more force..but that doesn't make any sense since the 45g is after bump and after the drop off.

Continue to make your bad argument..hide the fact that you made a mistake....why not just man up and say you didn't realize they were different? 

BOOM.  HEADSHOT.

Polymer... you can chill dude... I think the point is that when typing fast... the bump on browns is below the just-noticeable threshold... It's just too small.

I agree..the bump is really small..not disagreeing with that at all...as I type this with MX browns...But I think the point is, it does require slightly more force..it is noticeable..and unlike what's his face, I'm actually comparing the two right now...it isn't a huge difference but it is slight...

But he goes out of his way to actually convince people he's right when factually he's absolutely wrong...he's even mixing up his facts quoting they're both 45g actuation so therefore they require the same force....which is absolutely false because while both have 45g actuation..they both don't require the same amount of force...And you know what?  All someone would need to say is.....oh..yeah, I made a mistake.  That ends it right there.  But that won't happen.  He's faced with actual facts and it still won't happen...Instead he's now making up some silly excuses...it is actually pretty pathetic. 

Polymer I know too well the RAGE that you feel...

In fact, After the mods banned me for the 5th/6th lost count time... I finally took to reflecting... We may be people with "too much passion" for facts.....  And this coupled with an unchecked ego over the web, results in the heated discourse that often transpires.

We could all be much happier in co-existence if we took the step back to ameliorate our tone of engagement.

I am not above admitting that in the past I may have been overly rambunctious...   

(http://s1.postimage.org/15t6n5hok/image.gif)
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: ynrozturk on Fri, 25 October 2013, 13:09:00
You're actually a very decent guy when you're not rambling about the Ergodox every two minutes.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: tp4tissue on Fri, 25 October 2013, 13:09:30
I typed on it and I feel as if I could type about as fast as blues. It's there, miniscule perhaps, but it's there.
I doubt that it would give me 15 wpm, perhaps 10 wpm is a better estimate. Not a fan of Reds, I can't get higher than a bit over 130 on those.

i believe there was a speed discussion a while back.. and some conclusions were that it comes down to how fast you can "mentally" parse what you are reading..   The influence from the keyboard itself is minimal.

This is relative to ULTIMATE achievable transcription speed... it comes down to memorizing "finger rolls" n-graphs... like t-ion, tre-e, poin-t.. upp-er , those are trigraph, trigraph, quadrigrph, and digraphs

When you memorize the finger rolls of common n-graphs, they can be executed with far greater speed during mental parsing.

VS

I don't really remember how to spell gundanium until I sound it out... which is significantly slower.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Oobly on Fri, 25 October 2013, 13:10:11
Let me just throw in my 2 cents: I use browns and that little tactile bump makes a HUGE difference to the feel for me and how I type & game. For me, it's a good thing, for others, it depends how they use their keyboard.

Semi-related info: The shock from bottoming out all the time if you really mash the keys can be detrimental to your fingers' long term health, just in case you didn't know.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: ynrozturk on Fri, 25 October 2013, 13:13:23
I typed on it and I feel as if I could type about as fast as blues. It's there, miniscule perhaps, but it's there.
I doubt that it would give me 15 wpm, perhaps 10 wpm is a better estimate. Not a fan of Reds, I can't get higher than a bit over 130 on those.

i believe there was a speed discussion a while back.. and some conclusions were that it comes down to how fast you can "mentally" parse what you are reading..   The influence from the keyboard itself is minimal.

This is relative to ULTIMATE achievable transcription speed... it comes down to memorizing "finger rolls" n-graphs... like t-ion, tre-e, poin-t.. upp-er , those are trigraph, trigraph, quadrigrph, and digraphs

When you memorize the finger rolls of common n-graphs, they can be executed with far greater speed during mental parsing.

VS

I don't really remember how to spell gundanium until I sound it out... which is significantly slower.

That is very true. Speaking for myself, my brain can't keep up with my fingers all the time. I need to work on what you just said - to sync the two together.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: tp4tissue on Fri, 25 October 2013, 13:14:25
You're actually a very decent guy when you're not rambling about the Ergodox every two minutes.

Haha.. there was the thing in the bible warning us about "idols".. The deep-end of such envelopment had beco-meth me at times regarding the Egdx...

But.. sigh.. please do not let my rough-conduct deter any of you towards the impeccable merits of the Egdx. (http://www.cute-factor.com/images/smilies/onion/th_111_.gif)
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: tp4tissue on Fri, 25 October 2013, 13:19:39
Let me just throw in my 2 cents: I use browns and that little tactile bump makes a HUGE difference to the feel for me and how I type & game. For me, it's a good thing, for others, it depends how they use their keyboard.

Semi-related info: The shock from bottoming out all the time if you really mash the keys can be detrimental to your fingers' long term health, just in case you didn't know.

I believe this is why they use dampeners in pianos.. because for certain crescendos in charged-pieces, you literally have to get out of your seat and cast ragnarok the keys.. 

I've also noticed many OLD OLD players having to wear these rubber tip things on their fingers because they've damaged the nerve endings in their hand from too-much-ragnorok...
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: C5Allroad on Fri, 25 October 2013, 15:15:00
The bump is almost non existent. Doesn't require a HUGE amount of force to pass it. It's very subtle though.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Linkbane on Fri, 25 October 2013, 15:30:05
I typed on it and I feel as if I could type about as fast as blues. It's there, miniscule perhaps, but it's there.
I doubt that it would give me 15 wpm, perhaps 10 wpm is a better estimate. Not a fan of Reds, I can't get higher than a bit over 130 on those.

i believe there was a speed discussion a while back.. and some conclusions were that it comes down to how fast you can "mentally" parse what you are reading..   The influence from the keyboard itself is minimal.

This is relative to ULTIMATE achievable transcription speed... it comes down to memorizing "finger rolls" n-graphs... like t-ion, tre-e, poin-t.. upp-er , those are trigraph, trigraph, quadrigrph, and digraphs

When you memorize the finger rolls of common n-graphs, they can be executed with far greater speed during mental parsing.

VS

I don't really remember how to spell gundanium until I sound it out... which is significantly slower.

It is true that mental speed determines speed, but that's only a maximum; the keyboard can get in the way of your speed. I need to confirm that I've done a word before I move on to the next one, and using a linear switch or membrane makes me do too way too much rather than the click of a Blue. Also, reds are sometimes light and my fingers tend to make errors because the fingers must move across very quickly and errors can happen when it brushes a key with enough force; this happens less on tactile and stiffer switches.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: swill on Fri, 25 October 2013, 16:11:19
Here are my two cents on the topic.  I have used both switches and this is my experience.

If you ALWAYS bottom out the keys, then you probably will not notice much of a difference between the two.

When I type quickly I don't always bottom out the keys.  Because of this, I find on reds that sometimes I have to actually check to see if a letter was typed when I do not bottom out.  That is the main reason why I prefer browns.  When I type, my fingers know if the key pressed.  There is not much of a bump when you are looking for it, but when you are just typing and not paying attention, it is enough of a bump that your fingers know you hit it.

I can type much faster on browns than reds simply because I know whether or not the key was pressed without having the check.

Hope that is helpful for someone...
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: dorkvader on Fri, 25 October 2013, 16:35:59
for that game, you'll likely be bottoming out whatever switch you get. I recommend O rings or soft landing pads to give your fingers a bit of a rest.

Reds don't give any indication when the switch actuates, so you have to learn to "float" your fingers and not bottom out. Once you get this down, typing can be a real breeze. I don't think it'll help your gameplay at all, unless you plan to ride the actuation point on the switches.

Oh, and I recommend a sturdy plate mount keyboard, which should well handle the abuse you'll no doubt put into it :p
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: swill on Fri, 25 October 2013, 16:52:13
I also put o-rings on both my reds and my browns.  I like the way o-rings make the bottom out feel and it also shortens the keystroke distance.

I game on browns with no problems at all...
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: tp4tissue on Fri, 25 October 2013, 20:47:50
Here are my two cents on the topic.  I have used both switches and this is my experience.

If you ALWAYS bottom out the keys, then you probably will not notice much of a difference between the two.

When I type quickly I don't always bottom out the keys.  Because of this, I find on reds that sometimes I have to actually check to see if a letter was typed when I do not bottom out.  That is the main reason why I prefer browns.  When I type, my fingers know if the key pressed.  There is not much of a bump when you are looking for it, but when you are just typing and not paying attention, it is enough of a bump that your fingers know you hit it.

I can type much faster on browns than reds simply because I know whether or not the key was pressed without having the check.

Hope that is helpful for someone...

I don't believe hit-confirming would make typing faster.. if anything it would slow it down.

because fast typing relys on rolling the n-graph... it doesn't matter if you're @ 100% accuracy...

Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: swill on Fri, 25 October 2013, 21:00:36
Here are my two cents on the topic.  I have used both switches and this is my experience.

If you ALWAYS bottom out the keys, then you probably will not notice much of a difference between the two.

When I type quickly I don't always bottom out the keys.  Because of this, I find on reds that sometimes I have to actually check to see if a letter was typed when I do not bottom out.  That is the main reason why I prefer browns.  When I type, my fingers know if the key pressed.  There is not much of a bump when you are looking for it, but when you are just typing and not paying attention, it is enough of a bump that your fingers know you hit it.

I can type much faster on browns than reds simply because I know whether or not the key was pressed without having the check.

Hope that is helpful for someone...

I don't believe hit-confirming would make typing faster.. if anything it would slow it down.

because fast typing relys on rolling the n-graph... it doesn't matter if you're @ 100% accuracy...

If I understand you correctly, I think you and I are saying the same thing... 
- On browns, I never have to check what happened cause my brain already knows. 
- On reds, I have to look at the screen to know if the keystroke registered when I am typing fast and don't bottom out the key.  I find that slows me down.

I am more comfortable on browns.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Tony on Fri, 25 October 2013, 21:09:35
Red is good for FPS where you press the same keys repeatedly with all your strength. (Duck, fire, headshot, then duck again!)

Brown is good for typing and RTS where you press multiple keys but in different orders each time, and you need to know for sure you have pressed the right keys. (Get gold, build some buildings, then build some archers and fighters, then gather to attack, while continuing to mine golds and stones)
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: swill on Fri, 25 October 2013, 21:29:20
^
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: soleusrex on Fri, 25 October 2013, 21:35:42
Brown is good for typing and RTS where you press multiple keys but in different orders each time, and you need to know for sure you have pressed the right keys. (Get gold, build some buildings, then build some archers and fighters, then gather to attack, while continuing to mine golds and stones)

For some reason I find this description of RTS gameplay really funny. Mine golds and stones!
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: metalliqaz on Sat, 26 October 2013, 10:19:18
All the talk in this thread is so cheap.  It's just a matter of what you prefer.  WAY overanalyzed.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: tp4tissue on Sat, 26 October 2013, 11:56:20
All the talk in this thread is so cheap.  It's just a matter of what you prefer.  WAY overanalyzed.

why cheap
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: swill on Sat, 26 October 2013, 12:39:25
All the talk in this thread is so cheap.  It's just a matter of what you prefer.  WAY overanalyzed.

I agree, but if someone does not have the chance to try the switchs before buying, these types of threads are helpful.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Linkbane on Sat, 26 October 2013, 16:18:18
Here are my two cents on the topic.  I have used both switches and this is my experience.

If you ALWAYS bottom out the keys, then you probably will not notice much of a difference between the two.

When I type quickly I don't always bottom out the keys.  Because of this, I find on reds that sometimes I have to actually check to see if a letter was typed when I do not bottom out.  That is the main reason why I prefer browns.  When I type, my fingers know if the key pressed.  There is not much of a bump when you are looking for it, but when you are just typing and not paying attention, it is enough of a bump that your fingers know you hit it.

I can type much faster on browns than reds simply because I know whether or not the key was pressed without having the check.

Hope that is helpful for someone...

I don't believe hit-confirming would make typing faster.. if anything it would slow it down.

because fast typing relys on rolling the n-graph... it doesn't matter if you're @ 100% accuracy...

Fast typing relies also on your ability to recognize when you've hit a key and press the next one. At very high speeds, the speed in which you type your word is extremely important, and confirming definitely does help. The whole point about a mechanical is not bottoming out.
But I mean, it's no different if you're on an MX Red or Blue if you never bottom out. It's just much easier to not do it on the Blues.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: tp4tissue on Sat, 26 October 2013, 16:33:30
Here are my two cents on the topic.  I have used both switches and this is my experience.

If you ALWAYS bottom out the keys, then you probably will not notice much of a difference between the two.

When I type quickly I don't always bottom out the keys.  Because of this, I find on reds that sometimes I have to actually check to see if a letter was typed when I do not bottom out.  That is the main reason why I prefer browns.  When I type, my fingers know if the key pressed.  There is not much of a bump when you are looking for it, but when you are just typing and not paying attention, it is enough of a bump that your fingers know you hit it.

I can type much faster on browns than reds simply because I know whether or not the key was pressed without having the check.

Hope that is helpful for someone...

I don't believe hit-confirming would make typing faster.. if anything it would slow it down.

because fast typing relys on rolling the n-graph... it doesn't matter if you're @ 100% accuracy...

Fast typing relies also on your ability to recognize when you've hit a key and press the next one. At very high speeds, the speed in which you type your word is extremely important, and confirming definitely does help. The whole point about a mechanical is not bottoming out.
But I mean, it's no different if you're on an MX Red or Blue if you never bottom out. It's just much easier to not do it on the Blues.

but superstar sean wrona bottoms out.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Linkbane on Sat, 26 October 2013, 16:35:15
Fast typing relies also on your ability to recognize when you've hit a key and press the next one. At very high speeds, the speed in which you type your word is extremely important, and confirming definitely does help. The whole point about a mechanical is not bottoming out.
But I mean, it's no different if you're on an MX Red or Blue if you never bottom out. It's just much easier to not do it on the Blues.

but superstar sean wrona bottoms out.

He only seems to do it partially to me. But Sean Wrona's mind and ability is so advanced beyond most peoples', he can do whatever he wants.

Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: tp4tissue on Sat, 26 October 2013, 16:35:47
Fast typing relies also on your ability to recognize when you've hit a key and press the next one. At very high speeds, the speed in which you type your word is extremely important, and confirming definitely does help. The whole point about a mechanical is not bottoming out.
But I mean, it's no different if you're on an MX Red or Blue if you never bottom out. It's just much easier to not do it on the Blues.

but superstar sean wrona bottoms out.

He only seems to do it partially to me. But Sean Wrona's mind and ability is so advanced beyond most peoples', he can do whatever he wants.



well... i'm just trend spotting's all.

I believe his ability comes from immense concentration.. it looks as if he forgot to breath at times..

I've seen some higher-up fighting-game players that forget to breath as well.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: goobus on Sat, 26 October 2013, 16:37:05
Thanks to geekhack and many other forums I've narrowed down which type of keyboard I want. I play a game that needs a lot of rapid key presses and slides from one key to another. I know red and brown have about the same actuation force, but i tried the logitech g710+ in a store and i couldn't feel the tactile bump. All i could feel was mushiness from the O-rings. For the game i play i have to do movements like this:

I've been looking at the CM storm quickfire pro because it only has backlighting where i need it and it offers nkro over USB. So which one should i get, red or brown??

if you want SERIOUS tactile, buckling is good.

all tactile mx are subtle when you're typing fast.

Sadly the ultimate layout of the Ergodox is only available in CHERRY mx.

And Layout trumps the switch type when it comes to actually USING a keyboard.


The people who love to TALK about keyboards will tell you differently.

But all avid USERS agree. EDx ftw. :thumb:

Did you even read the op? He said he needs rapid keypresses. Your post was not only off point, it was unconstructive.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: tp4tissue on Sat, 26 October 2013, 16:38:56
Thanks to geekhack and many other forums I've narrowed down which type of keyboard I want. I play a game that needs a lot of rapid key presses and slides from one key to another. I know red and brown have about the same actuation force, but i tried the logitech g710+ in a store and i couldn't feel the tactile bump. All i could feel was mushiness from the O-rings. For the game i play i have to do movements like this:

I've been looking at the CM storm quickfire pro because it only has backlighting where i need it and it offers nkro over USB. So which one should i get, red or brown??

if you want SERIOUS tactile, buckling is good.

all tactile mx are subtle when you're typing fast.

Sadly the ultimate layout of the Ergodox is only available in CHERRY mx.

And Layout trumps the switch type when it comes to actually USING a keyboard.


The people who love to TALK about keyboards will tell you differently.

But all avid USERS agree. EDx ftw. :thumb:

Did you even read the op? He said he needs rapid keypresses. Your post was not only off point, it was unconstructive.

starcraft players have much higher apm than all other games.. 

they predominantly use blues...  so if that's not "Rapid" enough for you... (http://www.cute-factor.com/images/smilies/onion/026.gif)
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Linkbane on Sat, 26 October 2013, 16:41:03
And Layout trumps the switch type when it comes to actually USING a keyboard.

Untrue. A good typist can get used to any format given that it has most of the keys in the same places. I could still type the same speed on QWERTZ as I could on QWERTY a couple of years ago. and now whichever keyboard layout I use, I can easily manage 135+ on RD. On Reds, though, I couldn't surpass 130 more than once in ten tries.

Switch >>> Layout
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: tp4tissue on Sat, 26 October 2013, 16:47:59
And Layout trumps the switch type when it comes to actually USING a keyboard.

Untrue. A good typist can get used to any format given that it has most of the keys in the same places. I could still type the same speed on QWERTZ as I could on QWERTY a couple of years ago. and now whichever keyboard layout I use, I can easily manage 135+ on RD. On Reds, though, I couldn't surpass 130 more than once in ten tries.

Switch >>> Layout

well, you have 2 thoughts there.

Good user can "be fast/ proficient" on any layout.

Good user can "be fast/ proficient" on any switch.  (you personally can do within 5% between 2 switches)


My point is that, no matter HOW GOOD, the user is... Will he be "comfortable" while using his keyboard.

Given broad shoulders on most males.. it's impossible to be comfortable on a standard keyboard..

____you have to bring your hands so close together and compress your chest while typing..
____Alternatively, you can keep your chest open, but you'd have to lift your shoulder slightly and elbow upwards to get your hand into keyboarding position on staggered qwerty..

I don't disagree with the points you made...

My point is separate,  ergonomics is more important for prolonged keyboard usage.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Linkbane on Sat, 26 October 2013, 17:11:28
And Layout trumps the switch type when it comes to actually USING a keyboard.

Untrue. A good typist can get used to any format given that it has most of the keys in the same places. I could still type the same speed on QWERTZ as I could on QWERTY a couple of years ago. and now whichever keyboard layout I use, I can easily manage 135+ on RD. On Reds, though, I couldn't surpass 130 more than once in ten tries.

Switch >>> Layout

well, you have 2 thoughts there.

Good user can "be fast/ proficient" on any layout.

Good user can "be fast/ proficient" on any switch.  (you personally can do within 5% between 2 switches)


My point is that, no matter HOW GOOD, the user is... Will he be "comfortable" while using his keyboard.

Given broad shoulders on most males.. it's impossible to be comfortable on a standard keyboard..

____you have to bring your hands so close together and compress your chest while typing..
____Alternatively, you can keep your chest open, but you'd have to lift your shoulder slightly and elbow upwards to get your hand into keyboarding position on staggered qwerty..

I don't disagree with the points you made...

My point is separate,  ergonomics is more important for prolonged keyboard usage.

144 vs 130 (and the second one averages in the mid-120's after a few minutes, a much sharper drop off), it's still probably around 10%.
And I mean, true, it's not a big deal. It only matters to people who require almost impractical speed.

I see what you mean with ergonomics; I actually saw a very cool device at a store which was like a keyboard stand but completely controllable in its angle as well as the xyz axis, it ran about $150 if I remember correctly.
Anyways, we can base this off of a good position, not what's common. True, most typists have a horrible position, but I found that angling my shoulders out and then in from my elbows results in a much more comfortable position. Certainly not as good as the egdx or similar, but a happy medium.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: goobus on Sat, 26 October 2013, 17:18:28
Thanks to geekhack and many other forums I've narrowed down which type of keyboard I want. I play a game that needs a lot of rapid key presses and slides from one key to another. I know red and brown have about the same actuation force, but i tried the logitech g710+ in a store and i couldn't feel the tactile bump. All i could feel was mushiness from the O-rings. For the game i play i have to do movements like this:

I've been looking at the CM storm quickfire pro because it only has backlighting where i need it and it offers nkro over USB. So which one should i get, red or brown??

if you want SERIOUS tactile, buckling is good.

all tactile mx are subtle when you're typing fast.

Sadly the ultimate layout of the Ergodox is only available in CHERRY mx.

And Layout trumps the switch type when it comes to actually USING a keyboard.


The people who love to TALK about keyboards will tell you differently.

But all avid USERS agree. EDx ftw. :thumb:

Did you even read the op? He said he needs rapid keypresses. Your post was not only off point, it was unconstructive.

starcraft players have much higher apm than all other games.. 

they predominantly use blues...  so if that's not "Rapid" enough for you...
Show Image
(http://www.cute-factor.com/images/smilies/onion/026.gif)

I used to play SC2 at high master level and I know for a fact most pros use browns, blacks or reds. Blues are not even close to "predominant".  Only "pro" I know who uses blues is Destiny and that guy is a joke.  Fact is, heavily tactile switches are just terrible for any kind of gaming unless you're playing Mavis teaches typing or something.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Linkbane on Sat, 26 October 2013, 17:27:28
Goobus, I don't know where you heard Blues were heavy switches...
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: giltyler on Sat, 26 October 2013, 17:30:20
The Logitech comes factory with a dampening ring of some sort and I just wanted to point that out since someone above stated that was aftermarket only
I am not trying to step on any toes here.
From Logitech Website




Whisper-quiet keys

Focus on game

Quiet, non-clicking key switches and a built-in dampening ring underneath each keycap significantly reduce the distracting noise coming from your keypresses— without sacrificing responsiveness
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Tony on Sat, 26 October 2013, 19:15:54
Goobus, I don't know where you heard Blues were heavy switches...

The weight difference between switches will be obvious for a pro-player with ~300 APM.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Linkbane on Sat, 26 October 2013, 19:59:50
Goobus, I don't know where you heard Blues were heavy switches...

The weight difference between switches will be obvious for a pro-player with ~300 APM.

The springs are the exact same, so no it will not be. The click might be obvious, it's a 5g increase.

Let me rephrase that in a way more similar to your own:
"The weight difference between switches will be completely indistinguishable for a pro-typist with ~730 CPM. If you type faster, maybe it'll become noticeable."

Seriously, no. There is 0 difference besides the click, the amount of force required is about the same.

Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Polymer on Sat, 26 October 2013, 21:19:00
Goobus, I don't know where you heard Blues were heavy switches...

The weight difference between switches will be obvious for a pro-player with ~300 APM.

The springs are the exact same, so no it will not be. The click might be obvious, it's a 5g increase.

Let me rephrase that in a way more similar to your own:
"The weight difference between switches will be completely indistinguishable for a pro-typist with ~730 CPM. If you type faster, maybe it'll become noticeable."

Seriously, no. There is 0 difference besides the click, the amount of force required is about the same.

I wonder if you actually understand the force graphs....

Actuation force is meaningless so stop quoting that.. it isn't a 5g difference.  Unless you're talking Browns vs. Blues..which I don't think you are but if you are, congrats, you learned something. 

Blues require 60gs of force to overcome the tactile point so while the actual actuation point is 50g, that is after the drop off.  So to actually actuate the switch, what is the minimum required force?  60g. 

Reds don't actually have bump so they require 45g to hit actuation. 

15g, is that significant or not?  Browns are about 55g.  10g, is that significant or not?

If anything I'd argue browns and blues are actually pretty close together feel wise...with browns only being about 5g difference in force needed to overcome the bump (55g vs. 60g) and actually drop off faster than blues which may or may not be a good thing...
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: goobus on Sun, 27 October 2013, 01:53:04
Goobus, I don't know where you heard Blues were heavy switches...

The weight difference between switches will be obvious for a pro-player with ~300 APM.

The springs are the exact same, so no it will not be. The click might be obvious, it's a 5g increase.

Let me rephrase that in a way more similar to your own:
"The weight difference between switches will be completely indistinguishable for a pro-typist with ~730 CPM. If you type faster, maybe it'll become noticeable."

Seriously, no. There is 0 difference besides the click, the amount of force required is about the same.

Have you even used blue switches? I'm starting to wonder you actually have no idea what you're talking about.

Here I'll solve it for you - I've used browns blues and reds for Starcraft, and there is a mile's difference between blues and reds/browns. 1) blues are stiffer at the tactile bump point than browns or reds; 2) double tapping quickly on blues is close to impossible; 3) there is a difference between the actuation point and the tactile bump on blues which makes it terrible if you want to be precise about how many key presses you make (i.e. For building units).

I used to play SC at 250+ APM, and I've used a blackwidow and a Filco with brown switches. Playing with blues was the most terrible experience. It felt scratchy, sluggish, and I couldn't double tap to center my camera when I needed (like when someone is attacking my units I need to double tap the control group ASAP, but I couldn't even do that as quickly as I could on my browns).

Just because YOU can't feel a difference doesn't mean there is no difference - there's a world of difference, and your conjecturing won't change that fact.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Tony on Sun, 27 October 2013, 03:03:45
Polymer and goobus said it all. When you type or play games, your fingers are sensitive enough to feel clearly 5g difference in switch forces, especially you have to type fast as well as mouse positioning at the same time.

Linkbane, look at the force graph, since the switches are not only differentiated by spring force, but also about the place of actuation point as well as the delay time when passing it. Blue delays more than brown, that's why repeating keys in a blue is harder.

Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: proxy2gate on Sun, 27 October 2013, 04:50:53
I don't really like reds personally. They are too easy to actuate and it's actually quite annoying. I like blues the best, personally, but browns are acceptable as well.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: mauri on Sun, 27 October 2013, 05:41:02
I don't really like reds personally. They are too easy to actuate and it's actually quite annoying. I like blues the best, personally, but browns are acceptable as well.

Reds ain't that bad, have you ever tested 30g topre? You mess up more typing than with a smart phone :P
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: proxy2gate on Sun, 27 October 2013, 05:52:48
I don't really like reds personally. They are too easy to actuate and it's actually quite annoying. I like blues the best, personally, but browns are acceptable as well.

Reds ain't that bad, have you ever tested 30g topre? You mess up more typing than with a smart phone :P

I just like the bump for whatever reason. Maybe it's because I've used ghetto keyboards for ages. Just really like the feel for blues, a lot!
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: bMind on Sun, 27 October 2013, 07:49:02
I dunno..but you shove a lot of technical data to someone who (I may be of course wrong) won't be able to make decision based on it. When I put myself in the same position..This would really make more harm than good..Force graphs? 55g or 45g? Topre 30g? Seriously? ;D And saying that you should pick what you prefer is kinda strange when you are picking between two things you don't know about and you only read specs of them or watched those cool gifs showing how they work or trying to do some reading here :)

But that's just 2c from my noobish perspective ;)

Peace!
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: goobus on Sun, 27 October 2013, 08:03:25
I dunno..but you shove a lot of technical data to someone who (I may be of course wrong) won't be able to make decision based on it. When I put myself in the same position..This would really make more harm than good..Force graphs? 55g or 45g? Topre 30g? Seriously? ;D And saying that you should pick what you prefer is kinda strange when you are picking between two things you don't know about and you only read specs of them or watched those cool gifs showing how they work or trying to do some reading here :)

But that's just 2c from my noobish perspective ;)

Peace!
And that's why I am trying to give you some of my personal experience on switches when applied especially to playing SC2. I think reds or browns are perfect for it since these are more "spammy."
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: bMind on Sun, 27 October 2013, 08:07:04
And that's why I am trying to give you some of my personal experience on switches when applied especially to playing SC2. I think reds or browns are perfect for it since these are more "spammy."


That's why me as a noob in terms of keyboards and SC, decided to get Browns, maybe later reds :)
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: ike2030 on Mon, 06 January 2014, 22:21:08
I think we are missing the point of the thread I made. If you look at the video on the first page, those are the key actions that i will need to do. I'm pretty convinced that the tactile bump will just get in my way based on the game that i play so cherry mx reds seem to be the way to go. If i want to lessen the bottoming out force a lot could I put TWO O-rings under the movement keys?
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Tony on Tue, 07 January 2014, 00:32:59
You can use o-rings, but that dampen the typing feel quite severely. I prefer to type lighter, as if typing on a cloud. That brings the booby feel that reds are so famous for.

These below pictures may not describe exactly the typing feel, but quite close.

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-xfhnPILB6n0/UbhK5cybPfI/AAAAAAABheI/O6xNbAqAPLg/s640/3.jpg)

(http://i.imgur.com/oTCS0nb.jpg)

(http://files.tested.com/photos/2012/07/16/38913-sdcc2012_429.jpg)
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: epzy on Tue, 07 January 2014, 00:41:35
@OP why would you only need LEDs for "WASD"? Do you look at them while you're playing video games or what? Isn't your hands on the "WASD" cluster like 24/7...:p
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: rowdy on Tue, 07 January 2014, 01:34:22
^ With a girl like that on your booth - nerds would flock to see what was there!
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: stancato9 on Tue, 07 January 2014, 02:06:08
You can use o-rings, but that dampen the typing feel quite severely. I prefer to type lighter, as if typing on a cloud. That brings the booby feel that reds are so famous for.

These below pictures may not describe exactly the typing feel, but quite close.

Show Image
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-xfhnPILB6n0/UbhK5cybPfI/AAAAAAABheI/O6xNbAqAPLg/s640/3.jpg)


Show Image
(http://i.imgur.com/oTCS0nb.jpg)


Show Image
(http://files.tested.com/photos/2012/07/16/38913-sdcc2012_429.jpg)


HHKB Pro 3 Confirmed.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: rowdy on Tue, 07 January 2014, 02:59:00
You can use o-rings, but that dampen the typing feel quite severely. I prefer to type lighter, as if typing on a cloud. That brings the booby feel that reds are so famous for.

These below pictures may not describe exactly the typing feel, but quite close.

Show Image
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-xfhnPILB6n0/UbhK5cybPfI/AAAAAAABheI/O6xNbAqAPLg/s640/3.jpg)


Show Image
(http://i.imgur.com/oTCS0nb.jpg)


Show Image
(http://files.tested.com/photos/2012/07/16/38913-sdcc2012_429.jpg)


HHKB Pro 3 Confirmed.

Half-Life 3 confirmed!!
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: terran5992 on Tue, 07 January 2014, 03:24:28
You can use o-rings, but that dampen the typing feel quite severely. I prefer to type lighter, as if typing on a cloud. That brings the booby feel that reds are so famous for.

These below pictures may not describe exactly the typing feel, but quite close.

Show Image
(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-xfhnPILB6n0/UbhK5cybPfI/AAAAAAABheI/O6xNbAqAPLg/s640/3.jpg)


Show Image
(http://i.imgur.com/oTCS0nb.jpg)


Show Image
(http://files.tested.com/photos/2012/07/16/38913-sdcc2012_429.jpg)


HHKB Pro 3 Confirmed.

Half-Life 3 confirmed!!

Portal 3 Coming soon
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: ike2030 on Tue, 07 January 2014, 03:26:56
@epzy i dont need backlighting at all actually.  I just need a keyboard thats cherry mx red and has the best setup for the game i play.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: epzy on Tue, 07 January 2014, 10:15:17
Goobus, I don't know where you heard Blues were heavy switches...

The weight difference between switches will be obvious for a pro-player with ~300 APM.

The springs are the exact same, so no it will not be. The click might be obvious, it's a 5g increase.

Let me rephrase that in a way more similar to your own:
"The weight difference between switches will be completely indistinguishable for a pro-typist with ~730 CPM. If you type faster, maybe it'll become noticeable."

Seriously, no. There is 0 difference besides the click, the amount of force required is about the same.

http://www.originativeco.com/pages/mechboard-101

Reds listed at 40g probably is 40-45g. Brown = 55g peak.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: Linkbane on Tue, 07 January 2014, 12:29:25
Goobus, I don't know where you heard Blues were heavy switches...

The weight difference between switches will be obvious for a pro-player with ~300 APM.

The springs are the exact same, so no it will not be. The click might be obvious, it's a 5g increase.

Let me rephrase that in a way more similar to your own:
"The weight difference between switches will be completely indistinguishable for a pro-typist with ~730 CPM. If you type faster, maybe it'll become noticeable."

Seriously, no. There is 0 difference besides the click, the amount of force required is about the same.

http://www.originativeco.com/pages/mechboard-101

Reds listed at 40g probably is 40-45g. Brown = 55g peak.

Peak doesn't have all that much to do with it. I have both Reds and Blues, and the difficulty is supposed to be in pressing the switch, not overcoming the click. I had a Green keyboard for a while and the click didn't really matter because of the hysteresis (the drop off in force and then rise making it natural), but the spring force was much greater. Blues have a peak force, according to Cherry, of about 56g, I believe, and Browns are definitely not 55g peak force.. Either way, they're all pretty easy on the hands. This is coming from someone with a CPM of often over 800.
Title: Re: Cherry MX Red vs Cherry MX Brown
Post by: dimamantra on Tue, 07 January 2014, 12:49:25
I play FPS games a lot.

Anyone wanna play BF4?

I have a QFR with blacks and I must say one thing about them. After an extended stint of gaming, as I like to do, my wrists can become sore from the tension on the blacks. Reds are suppose to be soft blacks. Just keep that in mind.