geekhack

geekhack Community => Keyboards => Topic started by: demik on Sat, 12 October 2013, 19:28:50

Title: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: demik on Sat, 12 October 2013, 19:28:50
Especially if a) they are "new" (unused) switches. and b) you spring swap with new korean switches.

also stickers are a placebo. the only thing that has been done to boards that makes a difference is lubing it. and those dental bands. everything else is just a hivemind following what the koreans say.

i can believe there is a difference between older blacks if you keep the original spring and it has seen some use and it has changed due to wear and tear. but anything else and you're just fooling yourself.

so all you vintage black lovers, prove me wrong.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: lcs on Sat, 12 October 2013, 19:32:10
so all you vintage black lovers, prove me wrong.

Impossible, you're the teller of truths. Therefore, it must be true.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: demik on Sat, 12 October 2013, 19:33:21
and that is why you're my favorite Brazilian!
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: lcs on Sat, 12 October 2013, 19:34:17
How many do you know? :P
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: demik on Sat, 12 October 2013, 19:34:35
a brazillion of them!
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: lcs on Sat, 12 October 2013, 19:37:40
 :-*
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: esoomenona on Sat, 12 October 2013, 19:41:51
You can drive a Bentley, if only in your mind.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: demik on Sat, 12 October 2013, 19:43:30
You can drive a Bentley, if only in your mind.

im driving a bentley right meow actually!
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: IvanIvanovich on Sat, 12 October 2013, 20:15:24
The older ones are WAY smoother feeling and a little lighter. If you go and modify them at all, then yes you just made it largely irrelevant. I have bought NOS G80 with vintage era blacks and I can definitely tell. It's not like night and day but there is some difference.

Linear clears and whites are still better.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: zoolzoo on Sat, 12 October 2013, 21:41:26
The older ones are WAY smoother feeling and a little lighter. If you go and modify them at all, then yes you just made it largely irrelevant. I have bought NOS G80 with vintage era blacks and I can definitely tell. It's not like night and day but there is some difference.

Linear clears and whites are still better.

Due to the spring only?
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Photekq on Sat, 12 October 2013, 21:47:54
Normal blacks - scratchy when you press down. very noticeable when you push slowly, a bit noticeable when you push normally.
Vintage blacks (on a 1501-had, not sure how much it was used) - a little bit better, but not really noticeable
Nixdorf blacks - PERFECTLY smooth. No scratch whatsoever. Lubing literally doesn't make them feel any different.. They're already perfect. However, using korean springs (i was using 55g) make them make a weird noise. I found you can remedy this by putting grease (i used gpl205) on the bottom of the springs.

I wouldn't use vintage blacks over blacks. The difference simply ain't big 'nuf. Nixdorf blacks though.. there's no denying they are DEFINITELY different from normal/vintage blacks.
Stickers? Yeah, they're placebo. There's no denying it. I only use 'em cause I think they look cool (even though you practically never see them)
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Photoelectric on Sat, 12 October 2013, 21:59:13
 My vintage Blacks from WhiskeyTango's WYSE terminal boards are much smoother than those installed into the LZ-GH I just got (unsure of the source of those switches, but it was assembled by Alaric).  So I'm not sure what to think there.  Both are installed with 62g Korean springs.  I did select the smoothest stems out of WT's switches to install, but on average, they are smoother.  With that said, I got a few gritty switches with my vintage Black batch: cleaned completely, even after lubricating.  I swapped those out right away.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: rowdy on Sat, 12 October 2013, 23:01:10
Actually scratchy blacks - this describes it perfectly!

I still like my blacks though :)
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: sherryton on Sun, 13 October 2013, 00:15:32
The Mcrip effect!
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Tony on Sun, 13 October 2013, 02:53:20
Ripster, you can now be happy that you have a great pupil.

All keyboards are the same unless felt otherwise.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: davkol on Sun, 13 October 2013, 05:37:40
I've never considered linear MX switches to be scratchy, but... it's a completely different story when compared to vintage blacks side by side. I've even tried blind testing to be sure.

Hell, I should put them on my ergodox.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: meiosis on Sun, 13 October 2013, 06:11:15
I think we should start a club where we segregate non-white switches
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Moosecraft on Sun, 13 October 2013, 07:03:20
I think we should start a club where we segregate non-white switches
Definitely, there have been so many variations over the years.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: demik on Sun, 13 October 2013, 07:04:25
now, how many of you have tried both without knowing there is a "difference"?

ive tried new and old switches and i truthfully feel no difference. no linear switch has felt scratchy at all.

and what exactly makes it scratchy? the plastic used on the stem? the housing? the spring?

Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: The_Beast on Sun, 13 October 2013, 07:07:36
TIL demik can spell "placebo"
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: czarek on Mon, 14 October 2013, 02:37:12
I don't have any new MX Black currently but I've got MX Reds and vintage blacks. Vintage switches feel way smoother than reds, pretty much in Topre territory in this regard. Reds feel scratchy when I switch from Topre, vintage blacks, feel buttery smooth.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: esoomenona on Wed, 16 October 2013, 08:45:31
I don't have any new MX Black currently but I've got MX Reds and vintage blacks. Vintage switches feel way smoother than reds, pretty much in Topre territory in this regard. Reds feel scratchy when I switch from Topre, vintage blacks, feel buttery smooth.

Try putting the springs from the Blacks into the Reds. Perhaps it's the weight that makes you think you feel what you do.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Dubsgalore on Wed, 16 October 2013, 08:51:17
I thought that the bottom housing was different in vintage blacks, and that the stem was that of a different plastic or material, and the spring was a little different and worn too...all combined to make something much smoother and better...

Stickers are a 'placebo', but i think that was obvious, i mean, there is no honest point to them, they just look cool.

It's not even funny how much of a difference lubing makes, to linears, makes them feel amazing and velvety and super smooth (y)

Nixdorf are another story, i'll get to test that out eventually :p
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: saturnotaku on Wed, 16 October 2013, 08:54:34
A couple folks have posted videos on YouTube of them typing on lubed vintage black switches, and you can hear the difference if you listen to a comparable "standard" black. The modified switches sound like raindrops pattering on your roof.  :)
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: esoomenona on Wed, 16 October 2013, 08:58:21
A couple folks have posted videos on YouTube of them typing on lubed vintage black switches, and you can hear the difference if you listen to a comparable "standard" black. The modified switches sound like raindrops pattering on your roof.  :)

Hmm...
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Computer-Lab in Basement on Wed, 16 October 2013, 09:01:19
A couple folks have posted videos on YouTube of them typing on lubed vintage black switches, and you can hear the difference if you listen to a comparable "standard" black. The modified switches sound like raindrops pattering on your roof.  :)

Hmm...

And I thought I was a master at stating the obvious...
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: terran5992 on Wed, 16 October 2013, 09:07:07
A couple folks have posted videos on YouTube of them typing on lubed vintage black switches, and you can hear the difference if you listen to a comparable "standard" black. The modified switches sound like raindrops pattering on your roof.  :)

Hmm...

And I thought I was a master at stating the obvious...

Lube , if you know what i mean
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Hellmark on Wed, 16 October 2013, 12:47:12
This is somewhat off topic, but anyone here think that new blues are a bit crappy?

Last night I was at Best Buy, and for the first time I got to see demo units of mechanical keyboards. They had a Razor BWU 2013 with Blues, and a logitech G710+ with browns. The Razor was really scratchy feeling, and the noise was horrible. I mean, I am use to stock buckling springs, and this thing seemed louder. The Browns were a bit light for my taste, but felt smooth. I didn't know if all blues where that way, or it is more of the Razor being a POS.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: SpAmRaY on Wed, 16 October 2013, 12:49:50
I'm wondering if there is something different about newer switches because I keep hearing people talk about scratchy switches but I've never had any that were scratchy.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: esoomenona on Wed, 16 October 2013, 12:50:45
I figured it out: http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=49765.msg1079200#msg1079200
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Dubsgalore on Wed, 16 October 2013, 12:53:08
what...

anways, i'm taking photos for sprit later today of some vintage stems I own

http://www1.kbdmania.net/xe/photo/7015418
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: rowdy on Wed, 16 October 2013, 21:13:18
I'm wondering if there is something different about newer switches because I keep hearing people talk about scratchy switches but I've never had any that were scratchy.

I have an older board with MX blacks (from a terminal) and a newer QFR also with blacks.  I've always had the feeling that the older board is smoother than the QFR, and the term "scratchy" sort of describes how the QFR feels when compared to the older board.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Masterchief79 on Thu, 17 October 2013, 05:15:01
I had a G80-1000HDD with vintage blacks from 1987 and they definitely feel totally different from modern blacks. Why? No idea. Multiple reasons I guess. Keep in mind a 26 year old keyboard probably has been used a lot, too. ;) Just saying they are feeling so much smoother when bottoming out.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: agodinhost on Thu, 17 October 2013, 06:48:18
How many do you know? :P
me?
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: tinco on Tue, 29 October 2013, 05:44:49
So is vintage blacks a thing? I recently bought a G80-1000 HDU off an online marketplace and I totally hate it.

What is the appeal? I mean there not as mushy as rubberdome, but it's close. There's not satisfaction to the press at all and the press is very heavy.

Compared to my Filco with MX Browns the G80-1000 is terrible, I was planning to harvest the keycaps and throw the board away.

Am I perhaps doing it wrong? Does it need cleaning/lubing and some getting used to?
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: iAmAhab on Tue, 29 October 2013, 06:10:04
Different strokes man, different strokes.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: agodinhost on Tue, 29 October 2013, 06:16:22
Normal blacks - scratchy when you press down. very noticeable when you push slowly, a bit noticeable when you push normally.
Vintage blacks (on a 1501-had, not sure how much it was used) - a little bit better, but not really noticeable
Nixdorf blacks - PERFECTLY smooth. No scratch whatsoever. Lubing literally doesn't make them feel any different.. They're already perfect. However, using korean springs (i was using 55g) make them make a weird noise. I found you can remedy this by putting grease (i used gpl205) on the bottom of the springs.

I wouldn't use vintage blacks over blacks. The difference simply ain't big 'nuf. Nixdorf blacks though.. there's no denying they are DEFINITELY different from normal/vintage blacks.
Stickers? Yeah, they're placebo. There's no denying it. I only use 'em cause I think they look cool (even though you practically never see them)
"Nixdorf blacks" ???
Gosh! I didn't even know it existed ...
Where I can get this one?
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: SpAmRaY on Tue, 29 October 2013, 06:18:33
So is vintage blacks a thing? I recently bought a G80-1000 HDU off an online marketplace and I totally hate it.

What is the appeal? I mean there not as mushy as rubberdome, but it's close. There's not satisfaction to the press at all and the press is very heavy.

Compared to my Filco with MX Browns the G80-1000 is terrible, I was planning to harvest the keycaps and throw the board away.

Am I perhaps doing it wrong? Does it need cleaning/lubing and some getting used to?

Everyone going to have a different response to any switch whether they are tactile, linear or clicky. Sounds like linear switches just aren't something you like.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Photekq on Tue, 29 October 2013, 09:15:47
"Nixdorf blacks" ???
Gosh! I didn't even know it existed ...
Where I can get this one?
From old nixdorf pcbs
(http://i.imgur.com/IkYkJgH.jpg)
(http://i.imgur.com/YA7CzkO.jpg)
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Oobly on Tue, 29 October 2013, 10:12:52
tp did some interesting testing of old and new blacks. His conclusion: The main difference is in the casings. Old ones feel smoother (on average) because the casings where the sliders go are smoother. Could be from wear or from manufacture.

Still, there is a difference at least. I know that keycaps can make a big difference to feel, too. Heavy caps will make the key feel "less scratchy" and smoother than light caps. Maybe a lot of the older boards had heavier caps, too?

P.S. - those Nixdorf switches look awesome with the clear tops!
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Hellmark on Tue, 29 October 2013, 10:20:16
The keycap weight makes sense. When I got to try out blues recently, they were on a BWU, and they had super light caps. Keys felt scratchy as hell. I wanted to run back home and cradle a model M.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Linkbane on Tue, 29 October 2013, 10:51:38
So is vintage blacks a thing? I recently bought a G80-1000 HDU off an online marketplace and I totally hate it.

What is the appeal? I mean there not as mushy as rubberdome, but it's close. There's not satisfaction to the press at all and the press is very heavy.

Compared to my Filco with MX Browns the G80-1000 is terrible, I was planning to harvest the keycaps and throw the board away.

Am I perhaps doing it wrong? Does it need cleaning/lubing and some getting used to?

I personally would rather type on RD than Blacks, they just don't feel right to me. All the lightness and soft touch I'm used to with Reds made heavy, but it's all personal preference, I know people find Blues annoying and scratchy also.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: JPG on Tue, 29 October 2013, 10:52:22
Vintage blacks are not placebo, they are swag!
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Hellmark on Tue, 29 October 2013, 11:07:45
I personally would rather type on RD than Blacks, they just don't feel right to me. All the lightness and soft touch I'm used to with Reds made heavy, but it's all personal preference, I know people find Blues annoying and scratchy also.

I am kinda in the same boat, I hate linear switches. Need some sort of tactile feedback, even if it is from a rubberdome.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: tp4tissue on Tue, 29 October 2013, 11:25:27
So is vintage blacks a thing? I recently bought a G80-1000 HDU off an online marketplace and I totally hate it.

What is the appeal? I mean there not as mushy as rubberdome, but it's close. There's not satisfaction to the press at all and the press is very heavy.

Compared to my Filco with MX Browns the G80-1000 is terrible, I was planning to harvest the keycaps and throw the board away.

Am I perhaps doing it wrong? Does it need cleaning/lubing and some getting used to?

It is a "THING" but not for the unsubstantiated reasons that have been tossed around... as in "Vintage Black is made from MAGICALLY Charged plastic infused with Unicorn Tears...""


Switch smoothness is in my guess-timate 90% due to wearing/ heavy use..

I believe that MOST people who are complaining about scratchiness in Cherry mx are just novice users who don't type enough to reach the "Threshold"  of switch smoothness.(http://www.cute-factor.com/images/smilies/onion_custom/th_aji.gif)
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Photoelectric on Tue, 29 October 2013, 11:30:28
Having tried slightly scratchy vintage Blacks now, at least compared to my ridiculously smooth hand-selected vintage Blacks from WiskyTango's WYSE terminals (I had a larger batch and selected the smoothest switches for my TKL set up from those), I should say that just using the term "vintage MX Blacks" does not imply or guarantee butter-smooth switches.  The difference between my vintage Blacks from used WYSE terminals and vintage Blacks that came with my LZ-GH is quite noticeable.  I've since swapped it to the WYSE vintage Blacks, and the feel is buttery smooth again.  That has nothing to do with lubrication either--I've tested it.  I am guessing the Blacks from LZ-GH were not well worn, despite their age.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: esoomenona on Tue, 29 October 2013, 11:32:29
All Blacks are "vintage" Blacks now. It's a buzzword. It's designed to create a selling point, and push linear switches which are primarily crappy. Being that there is no truth in it, people actually fall victim to the placebo effect, and feel the got a deal.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Photoelectric on Tue, 29 October 2013, 11:34:49
I sort of agree, but these are definitely "vintage" with large Cherry logos.  But in my limited experience, even they can be less than smooth.  So just buying "vintage Black" doesn't guarantee the smoothest experience.  I've found that gritty switches cannot be "fixed" with lube.  They can be helped, but they won't magically become smooth--that will happen with physical wear.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Hellmark on Tue, 29 October 2013, 11:39:56
For me though, I kinda hate having to deal with a break-in period. If a keyboard feels like crap from the get go, then I'll not want to use it long enough to break it in.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: SpAmRaY on Tue, 29 October 2013, 11:41:11
perhaps we need an automated jig set up to depress switches to smooth them out?
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: JPG on Tue, 29 October 2013, 11:41:51
I think TP4 hacked moose account  ;)
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: tp4tissue on Tue, 29 October 2013, 12:30:42
I think TP4 hacked moose account  ;)

why would i boost some one else's post-count...

no incentive for me...(http://www.cute-factor.com/images/smilies/onion_custom/th_0pride.gif)
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: goobus on Tue, 29 October 2013, 12:33:55
I think TP4 hacked moose account  ;)

why would i boost some one else's post-count...

no incentive for me...
Show Image
(http://www.cute-factor.com/images/smilies/onion_custom/th_0pride.gif)

That's an easy one, to give yourself more attention kekeke
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: agodinhost on Tue, 29 October 2013, 12:37:12
"Nixdorf blacks" ???
Gosh! I didn't even know it existed ...
Where I can get this one?
From old nixdorf pcbs
Show Image
(http://i.imgur.com/IkYkJgH.jpg)

Show Image
(http://i.imgur.com/YA7CzkO.jpg)

ty Photekq, awesome pictures!
 :)
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Dubsgalore on Tue, 29 October 2013, 21:45:57
Some of the concepts and theories in this thread are actually sad  :))

there is no 'selling point', there is no motive for selling switches...seriously guys  :))

I don't understand why there is so much hate for such a simple idea...it's literally facts about older switches..not a big deal

From old nixdorf pcbs
Show Image
(http://i.imgur.com/IkYkJgH.jpg)

Show Image
(http://i.imgur.com/YA7CzkO.jpg)


Still can't get over those pics... :-[ mine is still in limbo

Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Photoelectric on Tue, 29 October 2013, 21:55:51
Some of the concepts and theories in this thread are actually sad  :))

there is no 'selling point', there is no motive for selling switches...seriously guys  :))

I don't understand why there is so much hate for such a simple idea...it's literally facts about older switches..not a big deal

From old nixdorf pcbs
Show Image
(http://i.imgur.com/IkYkJgH.jpg)

Show Image
(http://i.imgur.com/YA7CzkO.jpg)


Still can't get over those pics... :-[ mine is still in limbo

People just love to argue on GH--that's just how it is.  On average, I think vintage Blacks will be smoother than modern ones that are new.  But as to why they are smoother--whether it's from wear or something else, no one seems to know the precise answer.  I don't think they are popular enough to be a selling point for a keyboard anyway.  Pretty sure "ergo-Clears" are the biggest buzzword for people in terms of boosting a sale on the Classifieds.  Vintage MX Blacks are not high up on that list.  Considering they've been sold for like $0.30 a switch, they are not like a royalty switch.  But those who know the buttery smoothness of how vintage MX Blacks can be will continue appreciating them, as well as those with worn-in modern MX Blacks.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Dubsgalore on Tue, 29 October 2013, 22:01:58
People just love to argue on GH--that's just how it is.  On average, I think vintage Blacks will be smoother than modern ones that are new.  But as to why they are smoother--whether it's from wear or something else, no one seems to know the precise answer.  I don't think they are popular enough to be a selling point for a keyboard anyway.  Pretty sure "ergo-Clears" are the biggest buzzword for people in terms of boosting a sale on the Classifieds.  Vintage MX Blacks are not high up on that list.  Considering they've been sold for like $0.30 a switch, they are not like a royalty switch.  But those who know the buttery smoothness of how vintage MX Blacks can be will continue appreciating them, as well as those with worn-in modern MX Blacks.

There is definitely something different, it's not a placebo. The diecast and the materials for stems changed over time with cherry production, and the springs are naturally worn down over time. I've also heard the bottom housing is different as well, but i can't confirm that at the second. Modern Blacks just feel scratchy at stock, and vintage ones are just smoother, it's not placebo. the 'selling point' is blatant stupidity, there is nothing of that going on. how cheap they are is also just even more to say about how it's not about selling them...i think Ergo-Clears, whites & greens are honestly buzzwords in the classifieds nowadays..
"But those who know the buttery smoothness of how vintage MX Blacks can be will continue appreciating them, as well as those with worn-in modern MX Blacks."
Very accurate statement right there ^ :D
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: SpAmRaY on Tue, 29 October 2013, 22:05:59
 I've never experienced any rough, scratchy or gritty switches....maybe I just have vintage fingers :eek:
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Photoelectric on Tue, 29 October 2013, 22:15:58
I've never experienced any rough, scratchy or gritty switches....maybe I just have vintage fingers :eek:

Or lucky.  I've experienced gritty / scratchy Browns and MX Blacks.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: SpAmRaY on Tue, 29 October 2013, 22:18:06
I'm just insensitive :D
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: PewMcDaddy on Tue, 29 October 2013, 22:19:45
I made this post by mistake.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Photoelectric on Tue, 29 October 2013, 22:22:18
Well, I think if I had put my old CM Storm Trigger next to a Ducky I had--both with Browns and brand new--and sat you down to type on each one, you'd notice immediately :)  I can feel a difference between vintage Blacks from WiskyTango and another batch of vintage Blacks similarly--one is very smooth, and the other is gritty in comparison.  Both are much smoother than brand new MX Blacks I had in one of my Filcos though.  I've tried so many different batches of switches now, I can tell right away the difference between smooth switches, some friction, or a lot of friction/grit.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: esoomenona on Wed, 30 October 2013, 06:34:43
I'm so glad Dubsgalore worked for Cherry in the 80s and early 90s, and has such insider knowledge on the die cast and material used in their production of switches.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: CPTBadAss on Wed, 30 October 2013, 06:39:03
The diecast and the materials for stems changed over time with cherry production.

Plastics aren't diecast. Most likely the stems are injection molded. Metals are diecast.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: SpAmRaY on Wed, 30 October 2013, 06:45:13
I made this post by mistake.

^^ best post in this thread :thumb:
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: esoomenona on Wed, 30 October 2013, 06:49:04
Guys, stop arguing, please. This discussion is over.

The facts are in. The definitive proof has been provided by the foremost expert in Cherry switch engineering.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Dubsgalore on Wed, 30 October 2013, 08:29:57
You tried to say that vintage blacks were designed as a 'selling point'........

The diecast and the materials for stems changed over time with cherry production.

Plastics aren't diecast. Most likely the stems are injection molded. Metals are diecast.

Ok my mistake, But i think something was changed over time about it, and i think that makes sense industrially and naturally
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: esoomenona on Wed, 30 October 2013, 08:34:44
Wow... don't sound so sure anymore.

And someone tried to counter with Ergo Clears being a buzzword. But Ergo Clears are definitive. They are Clears with lighter springs. We have plenty of evidence that springs are either lighter or heavier. There's no arguing that.

But there is this discussion constantly, and it's getting more and more buzz, so how is it not buzz? Someone says "ermahgerd, vintage blacks such smoove" and people go "hmm...", then someone posts "vintage" blacks, and boom they're sold. And even Photoelectric admits that the "vintage" blacks (s)he has received have been smoother or grittier, which doesn't tell me "vintage" blacks are smoother, but that, like so many things in life, these switches are made with tolerances and variations. But this can't be denied: "vintage" blacks will sell faster and likely at a higher cost than "regular" blacks purely because of the hype some people are creating around them.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Dubsgalore on Wed, 30 October 2013, 08:40:38
You sound like you just really hate the 'hype' being created around them. I'm sure there is a 'buzz' around the word 'vintage' which would motivate and entice people to buy them, but maybe let's make a new term for them that doesn't get you upset. There is no denying that the switches in old 1xxx boards and wyse and older terminal boards are not using the same blacks that are made today. I think it just literally makes sense for things to change over time. Modern blacks really feel scratchy and don't feel as smooth, and i firmly believe that.

I think there certainly is a 'placebo' that's being created here, but it's not everyone's motivation and it's certainly not a big deal. There actually is a difference between the 'older' blacks and the modern ones, whether you want to call them vintage or not. i wasn't arguing that if someone who isn't as informed sees 'vintage blacks' they might be inclined to want to buy them over regular ones, but that's simply just because of lack of information. they are different, but it is just preference.

Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Dubsgalore on Wed, 30 October 2013, 08:42:00
But this can't be denied: "vintage" blacks will sell faster and likely at a higher cost than "regular" blacks purely because of the hype some people are creating around them.

no one is arguing against that, i think you are telling yourself that people are. actually agree with you there, but you cannot deny there is a difference between the ones made originally, and the ones made today.

People are probably going to do this, and this happens everywhere, it's hard to get around. I don't think anyone is however offering them for premium prices either, and i don't think extreme profit is the motivator either.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: esoomenona on Wed, 30 October 2013, 08:44:38
That is the point of this thread. I CAN deny that there is a difference, and so do many other people.

I don't deny that they changed their logo, and thus probably made a new mold for the switch housing TOP, but that doesn't mean anything to me in regards to the stem or housing bottom.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Dubsgalore on Wed, 30 October 2013, 08:49:14
That is the point of this thread. I CAN deny that there is a difference, and so do many other people.

I don't deny that they changed their logo, and thus probably made a new mold for the switch housing TOP, but that doesn't mean anything to me in regards to the stem or housing bottom.

You are over exaggerating the point of the thread by 'attacking the hype', I don't think there is the malicious intended 'hype' that you think exists about them

The logo has certainly changed, and the top too, but everything i've heard in the last months was that the bottom housing and the stem both changed, and that was the big difference.

Sure isn't any immediate proof for you, but it is there. There isn't any proof that they are not the same either, is there any definite statement that they have no changed at all? It's not a one way street
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: esoomenona on Wed, 30 October 2013, 08:51:16
This is what's happening:

There is no actual proof. There is nothing but anecdotal "evidence". And there are so many conflicting accounts. Some people claim the stems are different (http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=49636.msg1095256#msg1095256), some people are claiming the housings are different (http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=50149.msg1091374#msg1091374), some people are saying "these are smoother" and "these are smoother smoother", and yet even more people claim there is no difference at all.

So how can you come in here and say, that the facts are clear and without a shadow of a doubt that they ARE different? Where is your unfounded proof?
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: esoomenona on Wed, 30 October 2013, 08:52:54
but everything i've heard in the last months

Hmmm... These "vintage" blacks have been around a lot longer than months though, right? Weird....

I don't think there is the malicious intended 'hype' that you think exists about them

I never said it was malicious. I said it was hype. And it is.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: JPG on Wed, 30 October 2013, 08:56:25
Only 1 way to prove anything:

Get someone to perform a lab test of the material used in different parts of the switches for a modern black and vintage black.

Until then, it's all suppositions. And the fact that vintage blacks will have been used for different amounts of keypress will be add a random factor to any "feel" test anyway.

But it's still swag  :thumb:
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: SpAmRaY on Wed, 30 October 2013, 08:58:33
http://deskthority.net/photos-videos-f8/cherry-mx-old-vs-new-t139.html (http://deskthority.net/photos-videos-f8/cherry-mx-old-vs-new-t139.html)

^^ some good info there about this
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: davkol on Wed, 30 October 2013, 09:15:30
That is the point of this thread. I CAN deny that there is a difference, and so do many other people.

I don't deny that they changed their logo, and thus probably made a new mold for the switch housing TOP, but that doesn't mean anything to me in regards to the stem or housing bottom.

And you CAN be wrong. In fact, you ARE.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: CPTBadAss on Wed, 30 October 2013, 09:37:44
http://deskthority.net/photos-videos-f8/cherry-mx-old-vs-new-t139.html (http://deskthority.net/photos-videos-f8/cherry-mx-old-vs-new-t139.html)


So here's one part of the puzzle I can talk about because of ray's find: The spring.

If sixty's confirmation source is correct, which I'm assuming it is, the same logic for Blues applies for Blacks. In other words, the diameter and material type have changed from '92 to '13. It might be that the diameter has to change because of the different Modulus of Elasticites between 304 and 301 to compensate and generate a similar K rate.

What sixty missed in the spring rate equation is that na is the number of active coils in the spring. These coils also have an angle they're spun at. So it would've been nice if we got pictures of the springs themselves to see if the coil number changed.

This could mean that the difference between Blue springs and Black springs is the number of active coils and the angle they're wound/spun/created at. If this is the case, that Black and Blue springs have the same material type but a different diameter, then we can then safely assume that the springs did change. And if the K values aren't exactly the same between the two springs, vintage versus modern, then that would contribute to feeling different.

(http://i.imgur.com/HaRK2h.jpg)
Check out the springs in ripster's picture (http://imgur.com/a/RJqM4).

From a glance it looks like the diameter of the wire looks the same between Blacks and Blues. So that assumptions means it's just coil and angle that is different. And the color of the springs could be different because of the cleaning method during post processing or maybe just the heat involved when making the springs. Of course, we also should account for wear or corrosion from use or lack of use but I think my logic is sound *if my assumption that Black and Blue springs share the same material is correct*.

Verdict's still out on the stem and bottom of the switch though.


And for anyone who's really curious, here's some links (Both are from Matweb) to statistics on 304 and 301 stainless steel so you can run numbers.

304 Stainless (http://asm.matweb.com/search/SpecificMaterial.asp?bassnum=MQ304A)

301 Stainless (http://www.matweb.com/search/datasheet.aspx?matguid=0cf4755fe3094810963eaa74fe812895&ckck=1)
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Photoelectric on Wed, 30 October 2013, 09:55:08
Smooth Blacks feel smooth regardless of what springs are in them.  I can't comment on springs, as my batch of vintage Blacks from Whiskytango has been used stock as well as with 62g Originative springs, and it feels ridiculously smooth vs. modern Blacks but also other vintage Blacks I've tried (only one other batch, so small number statistics...)--regardless of springs.  I've been somewhat avoiding these discussions and yet participating in a way, because I can't argue something I don't have enough data on, but at the same time I'm interested in the truth, as I love my smooth vintage Blacks.  I am a scientist in my background, and I can only extrapolate on what I know and see if what others say fits with that and try to make conclusions.  But the problem with Vintage Blacks is that there is not enough actual comparison.  Someone needs to find a brand new unused board with vintage Blacks--better yet a few unused boards, as I firmly believe that different batches of switches can have varying smoothness.  Then try those few keyboards and compare them against 2-3 brand new modern keyboards with MX Blacks.  And after that, do some chemical analysis to see if composition of the stems is different.  Perhaps look under an electronic microscope to see if there are any obvious surface texture differences (I used to be able to access one when my friend was still a Biology post doc nearby).

Until then, the speculation will continue.  But the amount of reviews stating that vintage Blacks are smooth is in favor of it being a safe assumption that vintage Blacks are *smooth* switches.  The degree of smoothness will vary, but chances are--they will be smooth.  Used modern MX Blacks will also be smooth on more frequently used switches, but I don't know how the two will compare.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: SpAmRaY on Wed, 30 October 2013, 09:57:45
Smooth Blacks feel smooth regardless of what springs are in them.  I can't comment on springs, as my batch of vintage Blacks from Whiskytango has been used stock as well as with 62g Originative springs, and it feels ridiculously smooth vs. modern Blacks but also other vintage Blacks I've tried (only one other batch, so small number statistics...)--regardless of springs.  I've been somewhat avoiding these discussions and yet participating in a way, because I can't argue something I don't have enough data on, but at the same time I'm interested in the truth, as I love my smooth vintage Blacks.  I am a scientist in my background, and I can only extrapolate on what I know and see if what others say fits with that and try to make conclusions.  But the problem with Vintage Blacks is that there is not enough actual comparison.  Someone needs to find a brand new unused board with vintage Blacks--better yet a few unused boards, as I firmly believe that different batches of switches can have varying smoothness.  Then try those few keyboards and compare them against 2-3 brand new modern keyboards with MX Blacks.  And after that, do some chemical analysis to see if composition of the stems is different.  Perhaps look under an electronic microscope to see if there are any obvious surface texture differences (I used to be able to access one when my friend was still a Biology post doc nearby).

Until then, the speculation will continue.  But the amount of reviews stating that vintage Blacks are smooth is in favor of it being a safe assumption that vintage Blacks are *smooth* switches.  The degree of smoothness will vary, but chances are--they will be smooth.  Used modern MX Blacks will also be smooth on more frequently used switches, but I don't know how the two will compare.

^^ I vote this be your next project!!! ('mad keyboard scientist') ;)
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: esoomenona on Wed, 30 October 2013, 10:14:09
That is the point of this thread. I CAN deny that there is a difference, and so do many other people.

I don't deny that they changed their logo, and thus probably made a new mold for the switch housing TOP, but that doesn't mean anything to me in regards to the stem or housing bottom.

And you CAN be wrong. In fact, you ARE.

And you CAN try to prove me wrong. In fact, you have NO PROOF.

And you CAN jump into a conversation and provide little to nothing in it. In fact, you ARE.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: davkol on Wed, 30 October 2013, 11:20:05
That is the point of this thread. I CAN deny that there is a difference, and so do many other people.

I don't deny that they changed their logo, and thus probably made a new mold for the switch housing TOP, but that doesn't mean anything to me in regards to the stem or housing bottom.

And you CAN be wrong. In fact, you ARE.

And you CAN try to prove me wrong. In fact, you have NO PROOF.

And you CAN jump into a conversation and provide little to nothing in it. In fact, you ARE.

Bah, looking at your other thread, you're just trolling. Hopefully.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: esoomenona on Wed, 30 October 2013, 11:36:41
That is the point of this thread. I CAN deny that there is a difference, and so do many other people.

I don't deny that they changed their logo, and thus probably made a new mold for the switch housing TOP, but that doesn't mean anything to me in regards to the stem or housing bottom.

And you CAN be wrong. In fact, you ARE.

And you CAN try to prove me wrong. In fact, you have NO PROOF.

And you CAN jump into a conversation and provide little to nothing in it. In fact, you ARE.

Bah, looking at your other thread, you're just trolling. Hopefully.

The burden of proof has been placed on those who make claims that can't be corroborated but from other people who claim they feel the same thing in the face of even more people who claim that there is no different feeling, which gives rise to the possibility of it being a placebo effect, and you are going to take the easy route out in saying that I'm trolling because I've made a joke in the past?
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Dubsgalore on Wed, 30 October 2013, 12:04:04
but everything i've heard in the last months
Hmmm... These "vintage" blacks have been around a lot longer than months though, right? Weird....

what i've heard in the last months...not saying they have only been here for a few months..
can you read words? literally just read it and don't make a little immature dig at what was said
 
I don't think there is the malicious intended 'hype' that you think exists about them

I never said it was malicious. I said it was hype. And it is.

So why do you get so butthurt over it? hype is going to exist in a place like this, being an edgy asshat isn't going to get you to your goal of getting rid of it
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: esoomenona on Wed, 30 October 2013, 12:08:01
I find it hilarious that you think my intent is to be butthurt and "edgy", merely because I oppose your point of view. Sounds as though you're the one who is butthurt because I don't agree with you.

The fact is, I don't care at all about this thread, this topic, or most of what you say. But I'm sure you know that. Yet you just can't help yourself but to continue to think that I do. You're egotistic and narcissistic in that you think people should care and agree with you, and it upsets you when someone doesn't. I've seen this numerous times, from your outrage at my moosesicle, your anger at me saying something that others agreed with and caused them to say you were wrong, how you continually talk about me and what I say in IRC because it upsets you, and just now.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: SpAmRaY on Wed, 30 October 2013, 12:10:54
[attachimg=1]

anybody know what happened to thimplum
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Dubsgalore on Wed, 30 October 2013, 12:31:47
I think you're upset about what happened back 2 months ago, and how everything has gone since then.
If you can read my last post, i literally said that I agree with you on some points here in this thread, (which you continue to post in) but i disagree with other things.
People who truly don't care don't have to declare that they don't care, but you obviously just did declare that you don't.
Your accusations about my 'narcissism' and my 'ego' (ironic, right?) really make me laugh, it shows that you've thought about this and you continue you.
Honestly, I don't know why you think i talk so much about you, maybe if you spent time in IRC and didn't have missilaire or whoever else watch for you, then you would realize that you are not brought up...no one focuses on you, you're not the 'talk of the town' with your edgy posts.

And to be 100% honest, I am angry about you, because I really liked you for a long time, and I saw you as my good friend. You gave me a lot of advice and taught me a lot, and i honestly miss that about you. You began to act like a ****, and i didn't like that, and i guess we clashed. So yes, i am sad about how this turned out, and i am angry, because this hasn't been fun or pleasant. 

The point is, I don't know why you think that I care so much about if others agree with me or not, or talk ****, or anything, because I really, really don't. I don't hate you, I don't want to fight really, I do still think that vintage blacks are different, and i will find proof to show that you are wrong.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: esoomenona on Wed, 30 October 2013, 12:37:52
I'm not upset in the slightest. I am, in fact, having a great time.

Your post did say that you agree with some things and disagree with others. And my post in response said I disagree with some of the things you say, and in response, because you can't argue any further, you resort to name calling. Posing an argument in a discussion thread is now edgy and makes the person doing so an asshat? Well, I'll be.

I don't have anyone watching the IRC for me. But when you mention something that someone thinks is funny enough to mention to me, then of course I'm going to hear about it.

The truth is, if you're the one who thought of me as a good friend, they why did you decide to destroy that friendship by attacking me multiple times because of petty things? I didn't clash with you at all then. I let you say what you had to say the first time, you apologized, and I said alright. Then you did it again, tried to apologize a second time, but I knew that sticking around for that **** would see me having to listen to you whine about something else a third time.


In conclusion, I only tried to defend my argument in this discussion thread, you couldn't handle it, and resorted to calling me an asshat for no reason.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: JPG on Wed, 30 October 2013, 12:39:11
Come on, stop discussing this until someone brings some lab results.

Until then, no one knows for sure.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Photoelectric on Wed, 30 October 2013, 12:45:19
This is a good example of 10% logical discussion bringing up facts and 90% forum bickering.  Is this a thread to point fingers or to establish the nature of vintage Cherry switches?  Sadly, many similar discussions regarding vintage MX Blacks devolve into this.  But also you can't just disregard people who own vintage Blacks and post that in their experience, vintage Blacks are very smooth--smoother than modern ones they've tried.  We at least have that feedback from quite a few people.  As to WHY that is the case, we don't yet know.  So until there are more facts, there's no point to call it a fad or anything at all--just concede that more research needs to be done and help with that.  It's just switches... there are dozens of them to suit everyone's tastes.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Dubsgalore on Wed, 30 October 2013, 12:52:00
"And my post in response said I disagree with some of the things you say," that is true
"and in response, because you can't argue any further, you resort to name calling." this is not true. you followed up with your reply, by picking apart my response and making more digs at me

If you don't have anyone watching for you, then i don't know why you think I "how you continually talk about me and what I say in IRC because it upsets you", i don't see how you could think that, because it's simply not true. please check the logs, I can get them for you from the last two months if you wish, and you can sift through

Don't act like I destroyed our friendship, because I didn't. Can you not admit the type of your posts have changed at one point? at one point, you went from a pretty serious, cool guy, to a constant troll. I didn't get mad over petty things, I didn't like how you were changing and I honestly saw you becoming a **** on the forum. I actually got upset over the damn moosesicle because i thought you had been teasing giving it to me for a while. hell, even before you did it, you asked me if i would buy a julysicle for the right price. "but I knew that sticking around for that **** would see me having to listen to you whine about something else a third time.", what was i 'whining' about? Don't act at all like i was the one to bother you and whine to you about 'petty things', to the point where it ruined our friendship after two incidences.

Your arugment in this thread consists of you trolling it (as usual) and actually acted like an asshat. I saw your post about becoming a "selling point" and i just face palmed. you literally come into every thread with such negativity. It's very bothering and doesn't help the conversation and discussion.

I hope you are having a great time, because i'm not.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: tp4tissue on Wed, 30 October 2013, 12:52:06
I'm not upset in the slightest. I am, in fact, having a great time.

Your post did say that you agree with some things and disagree with others. And my post in response said I disagree with some of the things you say, and in response, because you can't argue any further, you resort to name calling. Posing an argument in a discussion thread is now edgy and makes the person doing so an asshat? Well, I'll be.

I don't have anyone watching the IRC for me. But when you mention something that someone thinks is funny enough to mention to me, then of course I'm going to hear about it.

The truth is, if you're the one who thought of me as a good friend, they why did you decide to destroy that friendship by attacking me multiple times because of petty things? I didn't clash with you at all then. I let you say what you had to say the first time, you apologized, and I said alright. Then you did it again, tried to apologize a second time, but I knew that sticking around for that **** would see me having to listen to you whine about something else a third time.


In conclusion, I only tried to defend my argument in this discussion thread, you couldn't handle it, and resorted to calling me an asshat for no reason.

OMG esoo.... and davk...dubsg... You guys are turning into women... Stop this... righ now... 

Next ur gonna start talking about your feelings.....

MEN don't have feelings...


Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: DrinkTea on Thu, 31 October 2013, 09:23:16
OK, if you guys are REALLY interested in this question, I will help design and experiment and analyse the results. It is relatively straightforward to do if we can make boards with each switch where it isn't identifiable which has which switch by looking at it. Then we send them around in a tour, or gather people in one place to test.

If anyone's interested, I'd be more than happy to lend my statistical training to the community.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: SpAmRaY on Thu, 31 October 2013, 09:24:54
OK, if you guys are REALLY interested in this question, I will help design and experiment and analyse the results. It is relatively straightforward to do if we can make boards with each switch where it isn't identifiable which has which switch by looking at it. Then we send them around in a tour, or gather people in one place to test.

If anyone's interested, I'd be more than happy to lend my statistical training to the community.

It's still subjective, what we need is some chemical analysis!!
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: CPTBadAss on Thu, 31 October 2013, 09:25:41
FWIW, I have setup plans to try and get access to a plastics testing lab so we can do some proper testing and figure out what materials the stems are made from.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: DrinkTea on Thu, 31 October 2013, 09:26:35
No, it isn't.

What we'd be testing for is if people can tell the difference.

We would ask people to identify which board was which just by typing on them. With a reasonable sample size, it would be obvious if people can identify them at a rate better than chance.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: DrinkTea on Thu, 31 October 2013, 09:27:37
FWIW, I have setup plans to try and get access to a plastics testing lab so we can do some proper testing and figure out what materials the stems are made from.

Even if the plastic is different, that wouldn't tell you if there's a non-placebo difference in feel. I still advocate statistics as well.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: CPTBadAss on Thu, 31 October 2013, 09:30:44
Didn't realize that's what you wanted to run. Thought you just wanted to offer people the chance to try out "vintage" Blacks vs "modern" Blacks. I'm still doing my experiment if the person is willing to help. If you want to run your tour/experiment, that'd be interesting and I'd like to take part :D.

Don't really know that much about placebo testing off the top of my head, maybe you can fill me in?
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: SpAmRaY on Thu, 31 October 2013, 09:32:32
FWIW, I have setup plans to try and get access to a plastics testing lab so we can do some proper testing and figure out what materials the stems are made from.

Even if the plastic is different, that wouldn't tell you if there's a non-placebo difference in feel. I still advocate statistics as well.

But would peoples experience with different switches, time in use etc all play into the outcome?
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: DrinkTea on Thu, 31 October 2013, 09:42:14
FWIW, I have setup plans to try and get access to a plastics testing lab so we can do some proper testing and figure out what materials the stems are made from.

Even if the plastic is different, that wouldn't tell you if there's a non-placebo difference in feel. I still advocate statistics as well.

But would peoples experience with different switches, time in use etc all play into the outcome?

Easy enough to keep track of. We can ask people a series of questions like if they've used vintage blacks before, how many switch types they've tried, how long they've been into keyboards, etc.
Then you can use those as predictors in a logistic regression.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: SpAmRaY on Thu, 31 October 2013, 09:44:18
So maybe we can analyze the people and the plastics!!!! :eek:
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: CPTBadAss on Thu, 31 October 2013, 09:45:00
I think this is the start of something awesome. DrinkTea, I'm game for your statistical experiment if you are. It'd be a cool compliment to the analysis I hope to setup soon. Let me know what you're thinking here or in PMs :D.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: DrinkTea on Thu, 31 October 2013, 09:45:42
Didn't realize that's what you wanted to run. Thought you just wanted to offer people the chance to try out "vintage" Blacks vs "modern" Blacks. I'm still doing my experiment if the person is willing to help. If you want to run your tour/experiment, that'd be interesting and I'd like to take part :D.

Don't really know that much about placebo testing off the top of my head, maybe you can fill me in?

Basically, the simplest way to do is it kind of like a double blind clinical trial. Say we have two switches, vintage and not. Someone makes two keyboards that are uniquely identified in some way, but that doesn't give away what kind of switch it has.
Then, each person reports which keyboard felt smoother. If no one can tell a difference, we would expect people to basically guess and have a 50% chance of correctly identifying the vintages. Using the data we collect, we can see if the "people are just guessing" hypothesis is plausible.

There are more complicated variations that let us look at more things, but this is a start.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Photoelectric on Thu, 31 October 2013, 10:03:10
You can't make a typing test for those, because how are you going to compare them against modern Blacks that are very well worn-in and also have lost most or all of their noticeable friction?  I thought the point was that vintage Blacks STARTED OUT being smoother than modern.  You need to compare unused vintage MX Blacks against unused modern MX Blacks, preferably from a few different batches.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: esoomenona on Thu, 31 October 2013, 10:19:19
Also, there has to be removed any identifying marks. Logos, larger smaller, and anything else, so people don't try popping caps and comparing. Maybe even super glue the caps onto the stems.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: SpAmRaY on Thu, 31 October 2013, 10:20:44
Maybe even super glue the caps onto the stems.

^^ I was thinking this.

OR setup a double blind study with random people off the street maybe we could get CM to sponsor to get the word out about mechnicals.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: DrinkTea on Thu, 31 October 2013, 10:25:05
Maybe even super glue the caps onto the stems.

^^ I was thinking this.

OR setup a double blind study with random people off the street maybe we could get CM to sponsor to get the word out about mechnicals.

Yes, you would need a way to prevent people from checking, but it seems doable. And actually that sponsored trial idea sounds cool. CM seems pretty down with working with enthusiasts.

And regarding picking keyboards. There are ways to compare with more than two categories. It's a little more involved, but completely doable.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: JPG on Thu, 31 October 2013, 10:26:36
The real problem with this is that we would need NEW vintage blacks and be able to compare them with NEW blacks. Also, it would be even more nice to have a batch of both with original spring and then another batch of both modded with the same new spring. This way, we could more easily discard the wear factor of the switch itself since there is a very possible chance that people could prefer vintage blacks for the simple reason that either the spring is different OR the switch has been used a lot and feels smoother simply because it has been used a lot.

So I would much prefer a test analysis, but this blind test could be fun anyway even if I doubt we could get an accurate conclusion because of the reasons mentioned above.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: DrinkTea on Thu, 31 October 2013, 10:33:05
The real problem with this is that we would need NEW vintage blacks and be able to compare them with NEW blacks. Also, it would be even more nice to have a batch of both with original spring and then another batch of both modded with the same new spring. This way, we could more easily discard the wear factor of the switch itself since there is a very possible chance that people could prefer vintage blacks for the simple reason that either the spring is different OR the switch has been used a lot and feels smoother simply because it has been used a lot.

So I would much prefer a test analysis, but this blind test could be fun anyway even if I doubt we could get an accurate conclusion because of the reasons mentioned above.

You could take vintage blacks and regular blacks and swap the springs if you want to see if that's a contributing factor.
However, we can use the power of statistics to get more accurate results!
One is that there are ways to control for these confounders. Another is that we can use more than two keyboards. What we really care about is the AVERAGE difference between vintage and regular blacks. Any two keyboards could be highly variable. But if we have enough people typing on enough keyboards, we can get a sense of the group differences. It doesn't even have to be the same people typing on each set of keyboards.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Photoelectric on Thu, 31 October 2013, 10:38:14
I don't know why springs are brought up--they do nothing to change the smooth or scratchy feeling.  I've tested my vintage Blacks from 2 batches with different springs--they feel the same just lighter or heavier.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: esoomenona on Thu, 31 October 2013, 10:49:02
I don't know why springs are brought up--they do nothing to change the smooth or scratchy feeling.  I've tested my vintage Blacks from 2 batches with different springs--they feel the same just lighter or heavier.

To eliminate as many variances as possible.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Photoelectric on Thu, 31 October 2013, 11:06:53
Have vintage Black springs been compared to modern Black springs?  I thought they are slightly lighter than modern just because of extra wear.  If you compare unused vintage Black switches to unused modern Black switches, the spring feel will probably be ~the same to keep up with Cherry's force diagram for MX Black (unless that's been modified over time).  But sure, for consistency's sake, could go with all modern springs.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: CPTBadAss on Fri, 01 November 2013, 06:54:36
From what I've read, some people think that its the spring itself that causes the different feel in vintage blacks. That's why I'm interested in them since I believe it's another variable like moose said. I think all of these are a factor when comparing the two switches:

- Housing tops
- Housing bottom
- Spring
- Stem

Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Hyde on Fri, 01 November 2013, 08:56:25
Just out of curiosity, are vintage blacks and modern blacks identical in design?  Is it only the material used is different?

Say for example if I pop one of them open would the stem look identical?
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: esoomenona on Fri, 01 November 2013, 09:02:12
Just out of curiosity, are vintage blacks and modern blacks identical in design?  Is it only the material used is different?

Say for example if I pop one of them open would the stem look identical?

For the most part, yes. Any piece can be swapped with another and work just fine. The debate is only whether they provide any different feel.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: IvanIvanovich on Fri, 01 November 2013, 14:20:13
While it is entirely possible (and I think likely) that plastic formula was changed due to environmental laws, costs or many other factors may have effect on friction. Vintage switch pieces feel different to my fingers when handling them. They seem more slippery, especially the stems which feel a lot more like ptfe than the newer ones. Pieces made in the first X period of a molds existence may be smoother from less imperfections (which I think leads to the scratchiness)  that are picked up over time over the molds life span / cleaning frequency between batch runs. Older springs may have been made out of different material/alloy ratio as I notice they seem to look more 'brassy' which may have different compression than now due to costs or other factors. Older springs do seem to have a few less turns in them too. While I still maintain that there are differences in how they feel, to many the differences will be very subtle at best. Much of it depends on how sensitive a person is to picking up small details and how familiar they are with a particular switch to start with. Same can be said of vintage blues which have the same set of so far unprovable difference factors.

I can tell personally difference quite easily on new condition keyboards in my collection made in 1980's vs 2000's quite easily. Some of the used ones are a lot harder as how much they were used and the conditions they were stored in can have a considerable effect. A couple of my really old ones with blacks made in mid 80's I could probably mistake from reds if put in front of me blind folded... while some others don't really feel too good as they were stored poorly and the switches have dirt and such inside making them feel rough and gritty.

Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: eth0s on Fri, 01 November 2013, 15:18:46
Well, I performed a scientific experiment on myself, and I preferred vintage "used" blacks to modern "new" blacks.  I didn't tell myself which one I preferred until after the test was completed.  So my results are pretty definitive:  vintage blacks are definitely better, and there is no placebo effect.  My sample set preferred the vintage blacks over the new blacks 100% of the time.  That is stated with a confidence level of 99% (which is the highest confidence interval you can get in statistics).
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Photoelectric on Fri, 01 November 2013, 15:22:27
Well, I performed a scientific experiment on myself, and I preferred vintage "used" blacks to modern "new" blacks.  I didn't tell myself which one I preferred until after the test was completed.  So my results are pretty definitive:  vintage blacks are definitely better, and there is no placebo effect.  My sample set preferred the vintage blacks over the new blacks 100% of the time.  That is stated with a confidence level of 99% (which is the highest confidence interval you can get in statistics).

:thumb: It may be in our heads, but the feels speak for themselves :D
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: tp4tissue on Fri, 01 November 2013, 15:22:48
The real problem with this is that we would need NEW vintage blacks and be able to compare them with NEW blacks. Also, it would be even more nice to have a batch of both with original spring and then another batch of both modded with the same new spring. This way, we could more easily discard the wear factor of the switch itself since there is a very possible chance that people could prefer vintage blacks for the simple reason that either the spring is different OR the switch has been used a lot and feels smoother simply because it has been used a lot.

So I would much prefer a test analysis, but this blind test could be fun anyway even if I doubt we could get an accurate conclusion because of the reasons mentioned above.

You could take vintage blacks and regular blacks and swap the springs if you want to see if that's a contributing factor.
However, we can use the power of statistics to get more accurate results!
One is that there are ways to control for these confounders. Another is that we can use more than two keyboards. What we really care about is the AVERAGE difference between vintage and regular blacks. Any two keyboards could be highly variable. But if we have enough people typing on enough keyboards, we can get a sense of the group differences. It doesn't even have to be the same people typing on each set of keyboards.

Drinktea... We already know that they "could" feel "VERY" different..   There is no doubt that "SOME" vintage black switches do feel smoother...

In my tests..

100% of the time..

If I pull a stem from an already "very smooth" switch, and put it into the housing of a "very scratchy" switch.. (both vintage blacks)... The result is a "scratchy feel"..

Conversely,  If I pull a stem from a "very scratchy" switch, and put it into the housing of a "very smooth" switch.. (both vintage blacks)... The result is a "smooth feel"..


I also put the stems from smooth switches into heavily used switch key housing on my ergodox..

The result is ,

Smooth feel in the heavily used keys.. e, a ,s ,t etc,.

Scratchy in the lesser used keys like layer toggle, capslock certain punctuations, and function keys, prt scrn..

To go further... we would need some sort of machine to sort things out with accurate smoothness measures..  AND a way to get a relatively-reliable manufacture date on the switches..

The measuring machine is required because the differences between "springs" / stems/ are too minute..



Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Photoelectric on Fri, 01 November 2013, 15:26:24
I've had a different experience from you, tp4.  I've found that housing doesn't make much of a difference--at least the bottom housing (unsure about top).  Stems are what creates the scratchy feeling on the switches I've tested.  Transparent switch tops (not produced by Cherry) are a tad tighter around the stems and increase friction, but I don't think regular Cherry tops have this issue.  In other words, I can put a stem into vintage Black housing bottom with a spring, and depending on which stem I place, the switch ends up either smooth or with noticeable friction.

For reference,  I've done a lot of stem swapping and switch swapping.  Like my LZ-GH currently has smooth vintage Blacks, stock Clears (new), and ergo-Clears in vintage Black housings, all mixed, because I'm still undecided what I'll end up using >.>  (Oh yes, also 3 Jailhouse Blue switches).
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: cgbuen on Fri, 01 November 2013, 15:29:23
It's always a weird feeling to agree with tp, but for several months, I myself have thought it was the bottom housing all along too: http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=37987.msg765987#msg765987

My thought has been that it's not necessarily (just) the side rails of the housing, but the tension of the gold contacts against the stem legs - maybe by design, or maybe by wear.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: noisyturtle on Fri, 01 November 2013, 16:14:19
Vintage any MX switch is hipster placebo bull**** imo. If anything they're worse because they've been used a lot, thus reducing the lifetime actuation's.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Photoelectric on Fri, 01 November 2013, 16:15:21
It's always a weird feeling to agree with tp, but for several months, I myself have thought it was the bottom housing all along too: http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=37987.msg765987#msg765987

My thought has been that it's not necessarily (just) the side rails of the housing, but the tension of the gold contacts against the stem legs - maybe by design, or maybe by wear.

I've tested it not to be the case, at least with my switches.  I have 2 batches of vintage Blacks.  The stems make the difference, not the housings.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: esoomenona on Fri, 01 November 2013, 16:22:34
Differing opinions on what makes them smoove? D: Nooo...
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: tp4tissue on Fri, 01 November 2013, 16:32:59
It's always a weird feeling to agree with tp, but for several months, I myself have thought it was the bottom housing all along too: http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=37987.msg765987#msg765987

My thought has been that it's not necessarily (just) the side rails of the housing, but the tension of the gold contacts against the stem legs - maybe by design, or maybe by wear.

I've tested it not to be the case, at least with my switches.  I have 2 batches of vintage Blacks.  The stems make the difference, not the housings.

How large of a sample did you test....  I know you had 2 batches.... but how many did you actually swap..

I sorted 110 switches

25% very smooth 35% very scratchy...  the rest were in-between-ers.

I took ALL of the smooth switch stems out and put them in the scratchy switch housings.

ALL of them resulted in scratchy


I find it terribly unlikely that with this much consistency in my experiment, that there could be a contrary-view...


Did you sort your switches out to represent the more polar "extremes"  of scratchy vs smooth....  (if I had done my experiment with the (in-between-er) switches... I really wouldn't be able to tell if the result was better or worse in terms of smooth/scratchy...


It's not that I do not believe you... It's just that if what you said is true... it means I'm crazy... and/or I have broken vibration sensors at my finger tips.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: davkol on Fri, 01 November 2013, 16:33:35
FWIW I have a Cherry G80-1000HAD/14. Nothing extraordinary, except... As I've mentioned elsewhere, switches have *new* style logos, unless I'm blind, although keyboard's date code is A29; and they feel extremely smooth, almost like filled with some fluid (I suck at analogies)—consistently on all switches and note that nearly all keycaps are in mint condition.

For comparison, I own a NIB 2004 G80-11900 and a heavily used 2006 G80-1851. Switches on the latter are a bit lighter, but both boards are much scratchier than the vintage one.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Photoelectric on Fri, 01 November 2013, 16:50:55
I've not had any "scratchy" housings.  I've used about 200 vintage Black switches.  ~120 from various used WYSE terminal boards and 87 from my LZ-GH that come from a different source (unknown).  The vintage Blacks in LZ-GH were "scratchy".  I took them apart, cleaned the stems and housing tops completely, and cleaned the bottoms as much as possible with alcohol + swabs--still scratchy.  Out of my 120-switch vintage Blacks from WYSE boards, most are very smooth, maybe 30% have some noticeable friction, though not much.   I used the smoothest stems from my WYSE batch in the LZ-GH (using them right now)--very smooth, despite the bottom housing + tops being the same.  So in my case, it's the stems that make the difference.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: DrinkTea on Fri, 01 November 2013, 19:56:20
I think you guys are missing the point... anecdote and hearsay don't show anything. There are some things that you can test easier than others, but as long as you specify the question clearly, we can test it properly.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Photoelectric on Fri, 01 November 2013, 19:57:49
Most people talking in this thread are not sharing hearsay and anecdotes--we're sharing our experiences, albeit limited.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: DrinkTea on Fri, 01 November 2013, 21:29:20
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/anecdote
OK, so I guess "personal anecdote" is more accurate and hearsay isn't correct if it's personal experiences.
But I guess my point was that it drives me bonkers when people debate something that can actually be quantified and answered.
I'm happy to help with experimental design and analysis. The important thing is science!
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Photoelectric on Fri, 01 November 2013, 21:56:51
I guess I was just trying to say, as someone who is a scientist by profession, that your assessment was a bit off to say that we're just speculating with no evidence whatsoever  :)  But while we don't have any definitive composition and surface imaging tests, we can still speculate about our experiences and simplified tests.  That's science too.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: tp4tissue on Fri, 01 November 2013, 22:10:50
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/anecdote
OK, so I guess "personal anecdote" is more accurate and hearsay isn't correct if it's personal experiences.
But I guess my point was that it drives me bonkers when people debate something that can actually be quantified and answered.
I'm happy to help with experimental design and analysis. The important thing is science!


I did quantify it.. 

http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=50149.0
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: WhiteFireDragon on Sat, 02 November 2013, 01:05:06
I tested this "vintage black vs modern black" a while ago, and here's what I found. First off, for those that test a switch or two and make the claim that one is smoother than the other, is bogus. Not only do you need to test very large sample sizes, but you need to be sensitive enough to differentiate between scratchy and smooth.

I had 300 vintage blacks and 400 modern blacks, tested each one individually, and separated each type into 4 different boxes: extremely smooth, smooth, average, and scratchy. The vintage blacks had a higher percentage of smooth switch than modern switches (also implying that the modern blacks had a higher percentage of average and scratchy switches than vintage blacks). You can conclude that you'll have a higher chance of getting smooth switches if you use vintage blacks, but this doesn't guarantee that every vintage black switch you use will be smoother than every modern black switch. I had a pile of smooth modern blacks, likewise I also had a pile of scratchy vintage blacks.

My personal keyboard uses both vintage blacks and modern blacks, but only the smooth ones. The extremely smooth switches went into the home keys (A,S,D,F) and most common letters (E,T,O,I,etc) according to HERE (http://scottbryce.com/cryptograms/stats.htm).


ive tried new and old switches and i truthfully feel no difference. no linear switch has felt scratchy at all.

I can say with 100% confidence that there are clear differences between the smoothest ones and scratchy ones. It's no placebo. If you can't feel the difference, then simply your fingers are not sensitive to these things, so this whole topic is irrelevant to people that are less sensitive.


PS - moose and Dubsgalore, just get a room and go have sex already.
Title: Re: Vintage Blacks are a placebo, prove me wrong.
Post by: Photoelectric on Sat, 02 November 2013, 01:08:21
Thank you for sharing, WFD (and welcome back, again!).  This confirms other reports, including mine.  Now we just need to learn whether vintage MX Blacks start out smoother on average due to different plastic or what not, or if they just have a higher probability of being smoother due to being mostly used (and thus, smoothed out via mechanical friction over time).  According to IvanIvanovich, the former could be true.

Update: some more recent evidence in favor of BIN vintage Blacks being smoother:
http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=52458.msg1165081#msg1165081