geekhack

geekhack Community => Off Topic => Topic started by: phoenix1234 on Tue, 08 July 2014, 22:08:07

Title: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: phoenix1234 on Tue, 08 July 2014, 22:08:07
Should GeekHack allow only static picture for avatar?
IMO, the dynamic GIF should be disabled or pre-processed to become a single frame picture before publishing as an avatar.
What is your opinion about that?
Please share.
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: Puddsy on Tue, 08 July 2014, 22:08:50
yes because gifs are really irritating when you see them on a page like 6 times
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: phoenix1234 on Tue, 08 July 2014, 22:13:38
This is exactly what I see in the GIF avatar
(http://www.thisiscolossal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/130207.gif)

And this is what I feel a moment later
(http://31.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0892qflQq1rn95k2o1_500.gif)

 :))
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: riotonthebay on Tue, 08 July 2014, 22:17:28
Just ban pacifist. 2 birds 1 stone, most annoying person and avatar.
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: tp4tissue on Tue, 08 July 2014, 22:27:22
This is exactly what I see in the GIF avatar
Show Image
(http://www.thisiscolossal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/130207.gif)


And this is what I feel a moment later
Show Image
(http://31.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0892qflQq1rn95k2o1_500.gif)


 :))

You're wasting mah CPU POwah...   (http://a.deviantart.net/avatars/k/y/kyleoniplz.gif?1)
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: jonathanyu on Tue, 08 July 2014, 23:06:14
Yes. imo, gif avatar is really annoying.  Example: pacifist
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: digi on Tue, 08 July 2014, 23:10:16
Well played, Phoenix :)...well played.
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: HoffmanMyster on Tue, 08 July 2014, 23:15:13
Just ban pacifist. 2 birds 1 stone, most annoying person and avatar.

I didn't say it.
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: The_Beast on Tue, 08 July 2014, 23:16:06
Just ban pacifist. 2 birds 1 stone, most annoying person and avatar.

I didn't say it.

I didn't quote someone who didn't say it...
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: GSimon on Tue, 08 July 2014, 23:21:46
Just ban pacifist. 2 birds 1 stone, most annoying person and avatar.

Adblock has been working wonders for this.

Right-Click -> Ad-Block -> Block this Ad

It's really the most annoying avatar ever. Also I'm sure it's been said before but why does the guy try so hard to embody the antithesis of what his username represents?
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: Pacifist on Tue, 08 July 2014, 23:38:21
Just ban pacifist. 2 birds 1 stone, most annoying person and avatar.

Adblock has been working wonders for this.

Right-Click -> Ad-Block -> Block this Ad

It's really the most annoying avatar ever. Also I'm sure it's been said before but why does the guy try so hard to embody the antithesis of what his username represents?

Or you can just disable avatars, or if you don't want to remove all avatars, put me on your ignore list. So really, there's no reason to ***** about the avatar.

And to the question, frankly, its because bunnylake has been a **** to me since January.

first person to post a hand written sign with a gh key cap saying "i tried to order some keycaps but the pacifist cancelled my order" gets these

Show Image
(http://i.imgur.com/AHGkWnP.jpg)


And I'm going to stay here unless

however i dont agree with his post, i think we should all be encouraging the speedy sale of your items so that you will leave

Then I offer you a proposition: Purchase everything I have for sale at the prices I have listed, in this thread and my other, and I will forever leave GH and any other mechanical keyboard forum. I will live my life without seeing you again, you will live your life without seeing me again. Win win.
Otherwise I stick around until everything is sold

So if you want me gone, go PM bunnylake, give him money, and let him buy my caps at my markups.
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: katushkin on Tue, 08 July 2014, 23:45:03
I don't care for the anti-Pacifist posts. On his classified thread, on off topic, or whatever. If you really hate him so much, make a thread about it to get all your anger out so we don't all have to hear about it over and over again. It really doesn't do the community any favors.

And as for gif avatars, why do they need banning? It isn't as if you can't just scroll past them. The size limit on avatars already limits how much precious CPU power they will suck from your machine, I don't really see the point in limiting it =/
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: noisyturtle on Tue, 08 July 2014, 23:47:19
.Gif (do you capitalize .gif there?) avatars and sigs are annoying as ****. Reason why I had to mute the only person I have ever muted on GH (not Pacifist,) their posts made my phone choppy.
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: phoenix1234 on Tue, 08 July 2014, 23:47:55
Pacifist, you shouldn't be so sensitive that everything is against you. My intention for this post is for asking general purpose so that Geek Hack can setup a rule for proper avatar. It is for common interests, hypnosis-free avatar community. Once GH can change the rules, everybody should follow it. There is no hatreds on any particular individual.
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: Pacifist on Tue, 08 July 2014, 23:50:12
Pacifist, you shouldn't be so sensitive that everything is against you. My intention for this post is for asking general purpose so that Geek Hack can setup a rule for proper avatar. It is for common interests, hypnosis-free avatar community. Once GH can change the rules, everybody should follow it. There is no hatreds on any particular individual.

Umm then why did the thread suddenly mention my name in the 4th reply and then derail to that topic for the rest of the posts?
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: GSimon on Tue, 08 July 2014, 23:53:54
Or you can just disable avatars, or if you don't want to remove all avatars, put me on your ignore list. So really, there's no reason to ***** about the avatar.

And to the question, frankly, its because bunnylake has been a **** to me since January.

Well I'm pretty tolerant as far as avatars go, it's hard to argue that yours isn't visually distracting to put it kindly as it's near epilepsy inducing. Could manage for the first couple months...

Not looking to disable avatars as I like others, and your posts (at least on the Great finds sub) are worth keeping you off the ignore list.

I suppose I understand the drama which stemmed from the keycap thread (no pun intended) and the frustration. Probably could have been handled better from both parties, though you didn't do the best job of diffusing the copycat allegations which may have resolved some of these problems.
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: HoffmanMyster on Wed, 09 July 2014, 00:03:59
Just ban pacifist. 2 birds 1 stone, most annoying person and avatar.

Adblock has been working wonders for this.

Right-Click -> Ad-Block -> Block this Ad

It's really the most annoying avatar ever. Also I'm sure it's been said before but why does the guy try so hard to embody the antithesis of what his username represents?

Or you can just disable avatars, or if you don't want to remove all avatars, put me on your ignore list. So really, there's no reason to ***** about the avatar.

What a positive attitude.  It's never your fault, there's never anything that you could do to make things enjoyable for others.  Screw everyone else.
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: Pacifist on Wed, 09 July 2014, 00:05:02
Or you can just disable avatars, or if you don't want to remove all avatars, put me on your ignore list. So really, there's no reason to ***** about the avatar.

And to the question, frankly, its because bunnylake has been a **** to me since January.

Well I'm pretty tolerant as far as avatars go, it's hard to argue that yours isn't visually distracting to put it kindly as it's near epilepsy inducing. Could manage for the first couple months...

Not looking to disable avatars as I like others, and your posts (at least on the Great finds sub) are worth keeping you off the ignore list.

I suppose I understand the drama which stemmed from the keycap thread (no pun intended) and the frustration. Probably could have been handled better from both parties, though you didn't do the best job of diffusing the copycat allegations which may have resolved some of these problems.

Does everybody have ADHD or something and if there's movement in the corner of the screen they are completely absorbed by it? I barely notice it when I'm scrolling through or even when re-reading a post.

Also, unfortunately, putting one on ignore only hides their posts in a thread but in spy and unread, its still there, and doesn't make them completely invisible.

Once again, please refer to the quote from bunnylake, which is one example of him somehow pissed off at me, so he threw an allegation at me that all the sheeple started chewing up like cocaine, an allegation about a prototype I didn't plan on releasing but did when I saw how much it stirred people.
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: digi on Wed, 09 July 2014, 00:06:17
Or you can just disable avatars, or if you don't want to remove all avatars, put me on your ignore list. So really, there's no reason to ***** about the avatar.

And to the question, frankly, its because bunnylake has been a **** to me since January.

Well I'm pretty tolerant as far as avatars go, it's hard to argue that yours isn't visually distracting to put it kindly as it's near epilepsy inducing. Could manage for the first couple months...

Not looking to disable avatars as I like others, and your posts (at least on the Great finds sub) are worth keeping you off the ignore list.

I suppose I understand the drama which stemmed from the keycap thread (no pun intended) and the frustration. Probably could have been handled better from both parties, though you didn't do the best job of diffusing the copycat allegations which may have resolved some of these problems.

Does everybody have ADHD or something and if there's movement in the corner of the screen they are completely absorbed by it? I barely notice it when I'm scrolling through or even when re-reading a post.

Also, unfortunately, putting one on ignore only hides their posts in a thread but in spy and unread, its still there, and doesn't make them completely invisible.

Once again, please refer to the quote from bunnylake, which is one example of him somehow pissed off at me, so he threw an allegation at me that all the sheeple started chewing up like cocaine, an allegation about a prototype I didn't plan on releasing but did when I saw how much it stirred people.

tl;dr, how's the cap making business going?
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: nubbinator on Wed, 09 July 2014, 00:07:42
Does everybody have ADHD or something and if there's movement in the corner of the screen they are completely absorbed by it? I barely notice it when I'm scrolling through or even when re-reading a post.

More
(http://i.imgur.com/82nrn5o.gif)
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: dustinhxc on Wed, 09 July 2014, 00:08:03
microsoft windows......
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: phoenix1234 on Wed, 09 July 2014, 00:08:37
Umm then why did the thread suddenly mention my name in the 4th reply and then derail to that topic for the rest of the posts?

Maybe they are but you shouldn't take them as the main purpose.
Please take their messages as positive contributions like some highlighted points so far:
- Repeatedly GIF avatar may slow down the low-power consumption device
- Repeatedly GIF avatar is really annoying because repetition tends to cause frustration and boredom
- Repeatedly GIF avatar is really hurting the eyes because it is just like hypnosis, it tends to have the post distraction ( when we reading the text next to a movement object repeatedly ),  it may encourage people to scroll faster to ignore the posts because they are afraid of those avatar
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: noisyturtle on Wed, 09 July 2014, 00:09:01
Inclined to mute just because of the Frozen .gif Add a pony one and you've earned yourself a mute sir!  :thumb:
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: Pacifist on Wed, 09 July 2014, 00:09:11
Just ban pacifist. 2 birds 1 stone, most annoying person and avatar.

Adblock has been working wonders for this.

Right-Click -> Ad-Block -> Block this Ad

It's really the most annoying avatar ever. Also I'm sure it's been said before but why does the guy try so hard to embody the antithesis of what his username represents?

Or you can just disable avatars, or if you don't want to remove all avatars, put me on your ignore list. So really, there's no reason to ***** about the avatar.

What a positive attitude.  It's never your fault, there's never anything that you could do to make things enjoyable for others.  Screw everyone else.

Do I have to **** myself out to everybody else and be polite everywhere? I believe in the right to free speech. I fully realize the limitations, ie there is backlash, but I don't really care about. But the backlash of people complaining about my posts is truly stupid as they can just ignore me and move on with their lives, but they chose not to.
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: nubbinator on Wed, 09 July 2014, 00:09:21
microsoft windows......

His whole sig and avatar makes me want to dropkick a puppy.  Personally, I'd love to see gifs banned from all avatars and sigs.  It's one thing to have some gif responses (especially not flashy obnoxious ones), it's another to have epilepsy/vomit inducing gifs for one or both.

Do I have to **** myself out to everybody else and be polite everywhere? I believe in the right to free speech. I fully realize the limitations, ie there is backlash, but I don't really care about. But the backlash of people complaining about my posts is truly stupid as they can just ignore me and move on with their lives, but they chose not to.

Claims right to free speech, *****es about others expressing right to free speech.

(http://i.imgur.com/usgnAdF.gif)
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: Pacifist on Wed, 09 July 2014, 00:11:20
Umm then why did the thread suddenly mention my name in the 4th reply and then derail to that topic for the rest of the posts?

Maybe they are but you shouldn't take them as the main purpose.
Please take their messages as positive contributions like some highlighted points so far:
- Repeatedly GIF avatar may slow down the low-power consumption device
- Repeatedly GIF avatar is really annoying because repetition tends to cause frustration and boredom
- Repeatedly GIF avatar is really hurting the eyes because it is just like hypnosis, it tends to have the post distraction ( when we reading the text next to a movement object repeatedly ),  it may encourage people to scroll faster to ignore the posts because they are afraid of those avatar

Only posts I see about that and not about me in this entire thread is:

This is exactly what I see in the GIF avatar
Show Image
(http://www.thisiscolossal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/130207.gif)


And this is what I feel a moment later
Show Image
(http://31.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0892qflQq1rn95k2o1_500.gif)


 :))

You're wasting mah CPU POwah...   
Show Image
(http://a.deviantart.net/avatars/k/y/kyleoniplz.gif?1)


.Gif (do you capitalize .gif there?) avatars and sigs are annoying as ****. Reason why I had to mute the only person I have ever muted on GH (not Pacifist,) their posts made my phone choppy.
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: HoffmanMyster on Wed, 09 July 2014, 00:12:58
microsoft windows......

His whole sig and avatar makes me want to dropkick a puppy.  Personally, I'd love to see gifs banned from all avatars and sigs.  It's one thing to have some gif responses (especially not flashy obnoxious ones), it's another to have epilepsy/vomit inducing gifs for one or both.

If only we had users that didn't abuse the system to be *******s.   :rolleyes:

I personally do not want to do away with them as a whole. I love jwaz's signature.
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: calavera on Wed, 09 July 2014, 00:13:27
Avatars are fine. Signature full of useless bs isn't imo.
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: The_Beast on Wed, 09 July 2014, 00:14:34
microsoft windows......

His whole sig and avatar makes me want to dropkick a puppy.  Personally, I'd love to see gifs banned from all avatars and sigs.  It's one thing to have some gif responses (especially not flashy obnoxious ones), it's another to have epilepsy/vomit inducing gifs for one or both.

If only we had users that didn't abuse the system to be *******s.   :rolleyes:

I personally do not want to do away with them as a whole. I love jwaz's signature.

Abuseful *******s always ruin it for the rest non ******* members
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: GSimon on Wed, 09 July 2014, 00:14:42
microsoft windows......

His whole sig and avatar makes me want to dropkick a puppy.

Haha yea...the novelty of the account wore off for me real quick. And I really like Microsoft Windows (the OS)..
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: digi on Wed, 09 July 2014, 00:15:28
Abuseful *******s always ruin it for the rest non ******* members

^^ RIP Classifieds!
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: IPT on Wed, 09 July 2014, 00:20:17
but i like my avatar...=(
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: nubbinator on Wed, 09 July 2014, 00:21:06
but i like my avatar...=(

To be fair, yours is more subtle than the obnoxious ones people are complaining about.
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: dustinhxc on Wed, 09 July 2014, 00:23:01
My signature is beautiful, Jessica.. mmmmmmmmm
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: lightsout714 on Wed, 09 July 2014, 00:28:31
I ad blocked pacifists avatar a while ago. That thing is obnoxious.
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: bueller on Wed, 09 July 2014, 00:29:19
So if you want me gone, go PM bunnylake, give him money, and let him buy my caps at my markups.

If I had the money, I really would. You're without a doubt one of the most infuriating people who've joined here over the last year. You've burned bridges and pissed people off everywhere you've gone and then when people arc up you act like you're being victimised. Grow up kid.
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: IPT on Wed, 09 July 2014, 00:29:27
but i like my avatar...=(

To be fair, yours is more subtle than the obnoxious ones people are complaining about.

i removed it for now =O
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: baldgye on Wed, 09 July 2014, 06:25:48
Just ban pacifist. 2 birds 1 stone, most annoying person and avatar.

Adblock has been working wonders for this.

Right-Click -> Ad-Block -> Block this Ad

It's really the most annoying avatar ever. Also I'm sure it's been said before but why does the guy try so hard to embody the antithesis of what his username represents?

Or you can just disable avatars, or if you don't want to remove all avatars, put me on your ignore list. So really, there's no reason to ***** about the avatar.

What a positive attitude.

Wait... Wasn't this what was suggested to me when I disagreed with the movement to make avatars bigger?
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: paicrai on Wed, 09 July 2014, 06:51:56
you old men with tweed hats
and canes, gif avatars are completely fine
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: Computer-Lab in Basement on Wed, 09 July 2014, 07:15:34
REASONABLE GIF avatars are fine IMO. Ones that could potentially cause seizures should be removed.

HOWEVER, since a GIF is a GIF is a GIF, just ban them all.



Oh, and Pacifist, you should seriously grow up. Maybe people won't **** on you so much if you did...

That is from a totally objective perspective, as I really have no personal reason to dislike you.
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: SpAmRaY on Wed, 09 July 2014, 07:17:45
For all those wondering why I haven't been posting, I keep losing hours of time being mesmerized by all the gifs......
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: absyrd on Wed, 09 July 2014, 07:19:02
For all those wondering why I haven't been posting, I keep losing hours of time being mesmerized by all the gifs......

So you are saying that gifs keep the amount of spam on the forum down? Tough choice...
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: JPG on Wed, 09 July 2014, 07:20:37
God why all the drama? I personally like his gif, looks cool.
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: SpAmRaY on Wed, 09 July 2014, 07:22:57
For all those wondering why I haven't been posting, I keep losing hours of time being mesmerized by all the gifs......

So you are saying that gifs keep the amount of spam on the forum down? Tough choice...



[attachimg=1]
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: tp4tissue on Wed, 09 July 2014, 07:24:37
WTF man... pacifist is young..  he talks and behaves young... 

Deal with it...  young people are like that....

It's only more apparent in young people's online-persona, because social-restrictors are removed..


think back,  ya'll were all at one point in time exactly like this..  perhaps not AFK,  but online,, everyone goes through a period of zeal...

Pacifist doesn't come close to the explosives on chan...  he's quite tame when you consider all that exists online..




Tp4 wishes ya'll relax..

(http://emoticoner.com/files/emoticons/onion-head/happy-onion-head-emoticon.gif?1292862507)
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: BunnyLake on Wed, 09 July 2014, 07:27:40
as much as im not a fan of gif avatars, i think within reason its fine, the issue people are making with pacifists is its there literally to be annoying, he has gone out of his way to annoy people with his avatar, in the same way he does with his posts

Just ban pacifist. 2 birds 1 stone, most annoying person and avatar.

Adblock has been working wonders for this.

Right-Click -> Ad-Block -> Block this Ad

It's really the most annoying avatar ever. Also I'm sure it's been said before but why does the guy try so hard to embody the antithesis of what his username represents?

Or you can just disable avatars, or if you don't want to remove all avatars, put me on your ignore list. So really, there's no reason to ***** about the avatar.

And to the question, frankly, its because bunnylake has been a **** to me since January.

first person to post a hand written sign with a gh key cap saying "i tried to order some keycaps but the pacifist cancelled my order" gets these

Show Image
(http://i.imgur.com/AHGkWnP.jpg)


And I'm going to stay here unless

however i dont agree with his post, i think we should all be encouraging the speedy sale of your items so that you will leave

Then I offer you a proposition: Purchase everything I have for sale at the prices I have listed, in this thread and my other, and I will forever leave GH and any other mechanical keyboard forum. I will live my life without seeing you again, you will live your life without seeing me again. Win win.
Otherwise I stick around until everything is sold

So if you want me gone, go PM bunnylake, give him money, and let him buy my caps at my markups.

you are so full of ****, you are trying to say you are the way you are or your leaving because ive been a **** to you since january, you quote one post like nobody knows what it means, i didnt coin the term the canceller, nor did i use it frequently,  that was in the public domain as a running joke because of your actions, and i was just making a harmless reference to a geekhack inside joke for a giveaway

i wasnt being a **** then, but i will openly say im a **** to you now, you go out of your way to be hurtful to me and rude to my friends, i dont like you

all you do is try and get under peoples skin, and i hate to admit it but you got under mine, you used to really annoy me, but now you are just a joke, you took it all to far and much like your caps, you have become a parody of yourself



Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: Computer-Lab in Basement on Wed, 09 July 2014, 07:30:41
Welp. Time to move this to a new thread, maybe? Let's be considerate to the OP here, he said this is NOT about Pacifist.
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: baldgye on Wed, 09 July 2014, 07:31:10
as much as im not a fan of gif avatars, i think within reason its fine, the issue people are making with pacifists is its there literally to be annoying, he has gone out of his way to annoy people with his avatar, in the same way he does with his posts

Just ban pacifist. 2 birds 1 stone, most annoying person and avatar.

Adblock has been working wonders for this.

Right-Click -> Ad-Block -> Block this Ad

It's really the most annoying avatar ever. Also I'm sure it's been said before but why does the guy try so hard to embody the antithesis of what his username represents?

Or you can just disable avatars, or if you don't want to remove all avatars, put me on your ignore list. So really, there's no reason to ***** about the avatar.

And to the question, frankly, its because bunnylake has been a **** to me since January.

first person to post a hand written sign with a gh key cap saying "i tried to order some keycaps but the pacifist cancelled my order" gets these

Show Image
(http://i.imgur.com/AHGkWnP.jpg)


And I'm going to stay here unless

however i dont agree with his post, i think we should all be encouraging the speedy sale of your items so that you will leave

Then I offer you a proposition: Purchase everything I have for sale at the prices I have listed, in this thread and my other, and I will forever leave GH and any other mechanical keyboard forum. I will live my life without seeing you again, you will live your life without seeing me again. Win win.
Otherwise I stick around until everything is sold

So if you want me gone, go PM bunnylake, give him money, and let him buy my caps at my markups.

you are so full of ****, you are trying to say you are the way you are or your leaving because ive been a **** to you since january, you quote one post like nobody knows what it means, i didnt coin the term the canceller, nor did i use it frequently,  that was in the public domain as a running joke because of your actions, and i was just making a harmless reference to a geekhack inside joke for a giveaway

i wasnt being a **** then, but i will openly say im a **** to you now, you go out of your way to be hurtful to me and rude to my friends, i dont like you

all you do is try and get under peoples skin, and i hate to admit it but you got under mine, you used to really annoy me, but now you are just a joke, you took it all to far and much like your caps, you have become a parody of yourself





(http://i.imgur.com/aZqD4ef.jpg)
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: riotonthebay on Wed, 09 July 2014, 07:35:06
Show Image
(http://i.imgur.com/aZqD4ef.jpg)


Why would that box come with 4 keyboards, and why would you stack them on top of one another like that?
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: baldgye on Wed, 09 July 2014, 07:36:13
Show Image
(http://i.imgur.com/aZqD4ef.jpg)


Why would that box come with 4 keyboards, and why would you stack them on top of one another like that?

I'm sorry to go off topic but I feel like this is something that has hurt me to my core. So, to reply to this hurtful and aggressive question; Why not?





:D
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: Puddsy on Wed, 09 July 2014, 07:52:16
Welp. Time to move this to a new thread, maybe? Let's be considerate to the OP here, he said this is NOT about Pacifist.

agreed

this thread just became "let's hate on pacifist"

not cool guys
Title: Re: Should GH allow only static picture for avatar?
Post by: phoenix1234 on Wed, 09 July 2014, 07:53:33
It seems some of the discussion are going on a different path with my intention.
It is my fault.  I'm sincerely sorry for this misleading.
Perhaps the moderators team already noted about this GIFs issue so I should lock this topic to avoid unnecessary heat.