geekhack

geekhack Community => Off Topic => Topic started by: noisyturtle on Mon, 13 October 2014, 05:11:55

Title: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: noisyturtle on Mon, 13 October 2014, 05:11:55
I just watched Sin City: A Dame To Kill For and it got me thinking, what are some of history's worst sequels? Not just movies where the sequel is not as good as the original, but movies where the sequel is a genuinely awful film.

I'll start off with a heavy hitter of horrible heinousness: Starship Troopers 2
Truly terrible.
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: Flyersfan1 on Mon, 13 October 2014, 06:23:24
Caddyshack 2, Die Hard 4.
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: StylinGreymon on Mon, 13 October 2014, 06:25:05
An Extremely Goofy Movie.
No Roxanne, no musical numbers...

Talk about bogus...
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: baldgye on Mon, 13 October 2014, 06:27:47
Alien 3.
It was a good movie but Resurection is total
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: paicrai on Mon, 13 October 2014, 06:44:28
everything after the first Alien
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: Findecanor on Mon, 13 October 2014, 06:54:40
Indiana Jones: Raiders of the Lost Ark was good. Temple of Doom was awful. The Last Crusade was awesome.
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: baldgye on Mon, 13 October 2014, 06:57:48
everything after the first Alien

Well that's just wrong.
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: noisyturtle on Mon, 13 October 2014, 06:58:01
everything after the first Alien

Have you seen Aliens? It's a goddamn masterpiece.
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: iri on Mon, 13 October 2014, 07:05:06
Madchen Madchen
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: baldgye on Mon, 13 October 2014, 07:15:56
everything after the first Alien

Have you seen Aliens? It's a goddamn masterpiece.

The special edition version of Alien 3 is also quite good and very much worthy a follow up to Aliens. It's such a shame they total ****ed the director making it and totally changed the movie as they were making it... The theatrical version is trash.
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: Findecanor on Mon, 13 October 2014, 08:12:18
The special edition version of Alien 3 is also quite good and very much worthy a follow up to Aliens. It's such a shame they total ****ed the director making it and totally changed the movie as they were making it... The theatrical version is trash.
Interesting... I just realized that I have the SE on DVD but have never watched it ...

There is also a completely different script for a third Alien movie that has been going around. That script is set in orbit around Earth, with the Cold War between USA and USSR still going on and both sides getting hit by aliens.

btw. Cameron's Aliens is awesome.
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: slip84 on Mon, 13 October 2014, 08:30:46
The Matrix, while no Citizen Kane, was a great stand-alone movie. Then they made money and decided sequels were wise.
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: baldgye on Mon, 13 October 2014, 08:57:19
The special edition version of Alien 3 is also quite good and very much worthy a follow up to Aliens. It's such a shame they total ****ed the director making it and totally changed the movie as they were making it... The theatrical version is trash.
Interesting... I just realized that I have the SE on DVD but have never watched it ...

There is also a completely different script for a third Alien movie that has been going around. That script is set in orbit around Earth, with the Cold War between USA and USSR still going on and both sides getting hit by aliens.

btw. Cameron's Aliens is awesome.


If you have the chance watch the making off doc for Alien 3, it's pretty amazing. The original script and plot of Alien 3 that was green lit is almost nothing like the movie that then got made.
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: dorkvader on Mon, 13 October 2014, 10:01:10
The Matrix, while no Citizen Kane, was a great stand-alone movie. Then they made money and decided sequels were wise.

https://xkcd.com/566/

I forgot how good that movie was. To bad they never made any sequels.
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: noisyturtle on Mon, 13 October 2014, 11:20:51
I actually loved the whole chase/fight sequence in the middle of the 2nd one, it was brilliantly choreographed. From the Frenchman's palace to the highway, that was all great entertainment.
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: slip84 on Mon, 13 October 2014, 11:34:09
I actually loved the whole chase/fight sequence in the middle of the 2nd one, it was brilliantly choreographed. From the Frenchman's palace to the highway, that was all great entertainment.
Oh, I agree. They were fun movies, but they added nothing to the first film apart from tight choreography and special effects. The story got worse and I grew to hate the characters. Everyone.

EDIT: Actually, the first sequel was fun. The second was not fun. And heavy handed. And irritating. I kind of blocked it out of my memory for the most part.
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: heedpantsnow on Mon, 13 October 2014, 11:37:17
Bourne Series of movies. Departed from the books halfway through the first one, and just kept going down from there IMHO.
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: tp4tissue on Mon, 13 October 2014, 15:04:34
Alien 3.
It was a good movie but Resurection is total

I thought all the alien movies were OK...   AVP is the bad spin off..
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: tp4tissue on Mon, 13 October 2014, 15:07:17
The Matrix, while no Citizen Kane, was a great stand-alone movie. Then they made money and decided sequels were wise.

Matrix 2 and 3 weren't that bad..


I think the issue is.. they were too similar to alot of scifi stuff (anime too) that's already come out since the first matrix...

So that is to say, ,they waited too long to make the squeals..  if they were done a bit earlier, then it would've been Fresh..
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: tp4tissue on Mon, 13 October 2014, 15:10:13
Indiana Jones: Raiders of the Lost Ark was good. Temple of Doom was awful. The Last Crusade was awesome.

They were all good technical feats... the trouble with Temple of Doom was the really Odd comic-book boss type bad guy... which took some of the realism away from the series.


I thought Last Crusade was awesome, with the exception of the leap of faith..  I mean.. I know they didn't have the CGI to do something fancier..  but still... that was just dumb...  maybe if they made the bridge out of glass or something.

Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: tp4tissue on Mon, 13 October 2014, 15:11:49
I just watched Sin City: A Dame To Kill For and it got me thinking, what are some of history's worst sequels? Not just movies where the sequel is not as good as the original, but movies where the sequel is a genuinely awful film.

I'll start off with a heavy hitter of horrible heinousness: Starship Troopers 2
Truly terrible.

I didn't bother watching a dame to kill for.. I just knew it'd be bad...


Starship Troopers, the whole series was NOT meant to be serious, so I thought they carried out what the audience was expecting quite well.
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: bazh on Mon, 13 October 2014, 15:24:59
The Silence of the Lambs
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: StylinGreymon on Mon, 13 October 2014, 15:36:20
Anchorman 1 was probably my favorite comedy in the last 10 or so years.

And yet, Anchorman 2 was so awful.
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: noisyturtle on Mon, 13 October 2014, 15:52:43
Anchorman 2 was so awful.

All the this!
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: tp4tissue on Mon, 13 October 2014, 16:05:22
Anchorman 1 was probably my favorite comedy in the last 10 or so years.

And yet, Anchorman 2 was so awful.

it was bad....... sigh........
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: scubaste on Mon, 13 October 2014, 16:17:39
I was just reading that Super Troopers 2 is confirmed, I hope that it never ends up in this thread.
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: Lanx on Mon, 13 October 2014, 16:31:41
robocop 3
terminator 3 et al
godfather 3
spiderman3 +new reboot series
xmen 3/xmen wolverine/wolverine
batman forever/robin/dark knight rises/ future prediction afleck batman
back to the future 3
die hard anything past 2000
transporter 2 et al
alien 3 et all avp/prometheus
species 2/3/4
scream 2 et al
underworld 2 et al
transformers 2007/2009/2011/2014 (this means transformers 1986 cartoon good)
superman 2/3/4/reboots all ****
blade 2/3

basically sequels suck, unless lightning strikes twice, almost never 3x.
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: noisyturtle on Mon, 13 October 2014, 16:36:57
I've got a soft spot for the Blade trilogy. It's that special kind of good/bad, like a Schwarzenegger movie.
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: bazh on Mon, 13 October 2014, 16:37:51
^: disagree with you on the reboot spidey (that means, The Amazing Spiderman), totally better than the Original Moaning Spiderman
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: StylinGreymon on Mon, 13 October 2014, 16:50:59
I've got a soft spot for the Blade trilogy. It's that special kind of good/bad, like a Schwarzenegger movie.
Patton Oswalt has an amazing story about what it was like on the set of Blade 3.
Wesley Snipes' antics are hilarious.
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: tp4tissue on Mon, 13 October 2014, 16:53:10
I've got a soft spot for the Blade trilogy. It's that special kind of good/bad, like a Schwarzenegger movie.
Patton Oswalt has an amazing story about what it was like on the set of Blade 3.
Wesley Snipes' antics are hilarious.

Black people are just m0re funner than white people.. this is a fact..
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: nubbinator on Mon, 13 October 2014, 16:54:01
Troll 2.  I mean, come on, there weren't even any trolls in the movie!
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: StylinGreymon on Mon, 13 October 2014, 16:54:13
I've got a soft spot for the Blade trilogy. It's that special kind of good/bad, like a Schwarzenegger movie.
Patton Oswalt has an amazing story about what it was like on the set of Blade 3.
Wesley Snipes' antics are hilarious.

Black people are just m0re funner than white people.. this is a fact..
Huh...
Well, I guess that's a compliment, so...
Danke
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: tp4tissue on Mon, 13 October 2014, 18:17:28
I've got a soft spot for the Blade trilogy. It's that special kind of good/bad, like a Schwarzenegger movie.
Patton Oswalt has an amazing story about what it was like on the set of Blade 3.
Wesley Snipes' antics are hilarious.

Black people are just m0re funner than white people.. this is a fact..
Huh...
Well, I guess that's a compliment, so...
Danke

(http://emoticoner.com/files/emoticons/onion-head/pretty-onion-head-emoticon.gif?1292862516)
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: Lastpilot on Mon, 13 October 2014, 18:44:51
Speed
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: Findecanor on Tue, 14 October 2014, 05:11:54
robocop 3
Robocop 2 wasn't very good either.
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: tp4tissue on Tue, 14 October 2014, 05:56:58
robocop 3
Robocop 2 wasn't very good either.


I thought all 3 movies were GREAT..

when I was 7, I watched it on ****ty VHS quality.. My vcr didn't even have s-video, it only had the yellow RCA connector with the dot crawl..

(http://emoticoner.com/files/emoticons/onion-head/cheer2-onion-head-emoticon.gif?1292862495)
Title: Re: Movies with terrible sequels
Post by: jackalope on Wed, 15 October 2014, 00:14:44
Every texas chainsaw massacre movie after the second one.
Attack of the killer tomatoes 2
blues brothers 2000
The third exorcist