Ok, yes.. but that isn't how planets are formed..
when the materials first accrete inwards, what would it deposit onto to create the cavity..
You must be extremely bored.
You must be extremely bored.
Ok, yes.. but that isn't how planets are formed..
when the materials first accrete inwards, what would it deposit onto to create the cavity..
Ok, yes.. but that isn't how planets are formed..
when the materials first accrete inwards, what would it deposit onto to create the cavity..
I have made a quick little diagram, again with paint, to show you how I would imagine such a planet to be formed. Puush link: http://puu.sh/p11pi.png
Keep in mind, at this stage our planet would still rotate really fast, I think centrifugal force might play is not insignificant role in how the gasses and molten silicates would behave and form.
Ok, yes.. but that isn't how planets are formed..
when the materials first accrete inwards, what would it deposit onto to create the cavity..
I have made a quick little diagram, again with paint, to show you how I would imagine such a planet to be formed. Puush link: http://puu.sh/p11pi.png
Keep in mind, at this stage our planet would still rotate really fast, I think centrifugal force might play is not insignificant role in how the gasses and molten silicates would behave and form.
Just because a balloon is possible, doesn't mean it could form that way...
It would have to start solid to first create the outer shell, then for some reason, the inside would have to go Poooof, then the pressure pushes outwards making the planet larger, but to have a strong enough shell at the earths current volumn
You'd already have quite a LARGE solid ball to begin with.. How would the center have so much potential energy stored up that it would suddenly expand in gas form..Show Image(http://emoticoner.com/files/emoticons/onion-head/embarrassed2-onion-head-emoticon.gif?1292862502)
Ok, yes.. but that isn't how planets are formed..
when the materials first accrete inwards, what would it deposit onto to create the cavity..
I have made a quick little diagram, again with paint, to show you how I would imagine such a planet to be formed. Puush link: http://puu.sh/p11pi.png
Keep in mind, at this stage our planet would still rotate really fast, I think centrifugal force might play is not insignificant role in how the gasses and molten silicates would behave and form.
Just because a balloon is possible, doesn't mean it could form that way...
It would have to start solid to first create the outer shell, then for some reason, the inside would have to go Poooof, then the pressure pushes outwards making the planet larger, but to have a strong enough shell at the earths current volumn
You'd already have quite a LARGE solid ball to begin with.. How would the center have so much potential energy stored up that it would suddenly expand in gas form..Show Image(http://emoticoner.com/files/emoticons/onion-head/embarrassed2-onion-head-emoticon.gif?1292862502)
I mean, isn't that pretty much what my picture tries to explain? Another more simple scenario would be that a planet starts solid, pressure and heat rise at its core, the crystal grows, but when it has reached a certain size or diameter the centrifugal energy of its rotation forces the liquid inside to flow away from the centre, collecting more close to the crust, making it partly hollow, why wouldn't that be possible?. If that doesn't make any sense I'm sorry. Next time I see that geologist from 100 years in the future I'll ask him, I promise. :))
Ok, yes.. but that isn't how planets are formed..
when the materials first accrete inwards, what would it deposit onto to create the cavity..
I have made a quick little diagram, again with paint, to show you how I would imagine such a planet to be formed. Puush link: http://puu.sh/p11pi.png
Keep in mind, at this stage our planet would still rotate really fast, I think centrifugal force might play is not insignificant role in how the gasses and molten silicates would behave and form.
Just because a balloon is possible, doesn't mean it could form that way...
It would have to start solid to first create the outer shell, then for some reason, the inside would have to go Poooof, then the pressure pushes outwards making the planet larger, but to have a strong enough shell at the earths current volumn
You'd already have quite a LARGE solid ball to begin with.. How would the center have so much potential energy stored up that it would suddenly expand in gas form..Show Image(http://emoticoner.com/files/emoticons/onion-head/embarrassed2-onion-head-emoticon.gif?1292862502)
I mean, isn't that pretty much what my picture tries to explain? Another more simple scenario would be that a planet starts solid, pressure and heat rise at its core, the crystal grows, but when it has reached a certain size or diameter the centrifugal energy of its rotation forces the liquid inside to flow away from the centre, collecting more close to the crust, making it partly hollow, why wouldn't that be possible?. If that doesn't make any sense I'm sorry. Next time I see that geologist from 100 years in the future I'll ask him, I promise. :))
Because centrifugal or, more accurately, centripetal force cannot act in all directions evenly at once. If that were the dominant force in creating the shape of our planet, our planet would be shaped like a donut and be completely unstable because zero force would be applied at the poles.
Ok, yes.. but that isn't how planets are formed..
when the materials first accrete inwards, what would it deposit onto to create the cavity..
I have made a quick little diagram, again with paint, to show you how I would imagine such a planet to be formed. Puush link: http://puu.sh/p11pi.png
Keep in mind, at this stage our planet would still rotate really fast, I think centrifugal force might play is not insignificant role in how the gasses and molten silicates would behave and form.
Just because a balloon is possible, doesn't mean it could form that way...
It would have to start solid to first create the outer shell, then for some reason, the inside would have to go Poooof, then the pressure pushes outwards making the planet larger, but to have a strong enough shell at the earths current volumn
You'd already have quite a LARGE solid ball to begin with.. How would the center have so much potential energy stored up that it would suddenly expand in gas form..Show Image(http://emoticoner.com/files/emoticons/onion-head/embarrassed2-onion-head-emoticon.gif?1292862502)
I mean, isn't that pretty much what my picture tries to explain? Another more simple scenario would be that a planet starts solid, pressure and heat rise at its core, the crystal grows, but when it has reached a certain size or diameter the centrifugal energy of its rotation forces the liquid inside to flow away from the centre, collecting more close to the crust, making it partly hollow, why wouldn't that be possible?. If that doesn't make any sense I'm sorry. Next time I see that geologist from 100 years in the future I'll ask him, I promise. :))
Because centrifugal or, more accurately, centripetal force cannot act in all directions evenly at once. If that were the dominant force in creating the shape of our planet, our planet would be shaped like a donut and be completely unstable because zero force would be applied at the poles.
"and be completely unstable because zero force would be applied at the poles.", well that would explain why there would be two big holes at the poles. IDK man, I'm no scientist, geologist or mathematician, don't use works like "centripetal force ", I'm loo lazy to look it up. If planets form out of hot gasses rather then rocks crashing into each other until they get big enough, it might be somehow possible, we don't know yet how these things behave exactly, neither can I explain it.
Ok, yes.. but that isn't how planets are formed..
when the materials first accrete inwards, what would it deposit onto to create the cavity..
I have made a quick little diagram, again with paint, to show you how I would imagine such a planet to be formed. Puush link: http://puu.sh/p11pi.png
Keep in mind, at this stage our planet would still rotate really fast, I think centrifugal force might play is not insignificant role in how the gasses and molten silicates would behave and form.
Just because a balloon is possible, doesn't mean it could form that way...
It would have to start solid to first create the outer shell, then for some reason, the inside would have to go Poooof, then the pressure pushes outwards making the planet larger, but to have a strong enough shell at the earths current volumn
You'd already have quite a LARGE solid ball to begin with.. How would the center have so much potential energy stored up that it would suddenly expand in gas form..Show Image(http://emoticoner.com/files/emoticons/onion-head/embarrassed2-onion-head-emoticon.gif?1292862502)
I mean, isn't that pretty much what my picture tries to explain? Another more simple scenario would be that a planet starts solid, pressure and heat rise at its core, the crystal grows, but when it has reached a certain size or diameter the centrifugal energy of its rotation forces the liquid inside to flow away from the centre, collecting more close to the crust, making it partly hollow, why wouldn't that be possible?. If that doesn't make any sense I'm sorry. Next time I see that geologist from 100 years in the future I'll ask him, I promise. :))
Because centrifugal or, more accurately, centripetal force cannot act in all directions evenly at once. If that were the dominant force in creating the shape of our planet, our planet would be shaped like a donut and be completely unstable because zero force would be applied at the poles.
"and be completely unstable because zero force would be applied at the poles.", well that would explain why there would be two big holes at the poles. IDK man, I'm no scientist, geologist or mathematician, don't use works like "centripetal force ", I'm loo lazy to look it up. If planets form out of hot gasses rather then rocks crashing into each other until they get big enough, it might be somehow possible, we don't know yet how these things behave exactly, neither can I explain it.
You'll make MSPaint diagrams to explain ideas you don't even understand, but not look up a simple phrase that might help you understand the argument you're making.
That's very conspiracy theorist of you.