Yea seriously, what SPF do you use anyway?
Yea seriously, what SPF do you use anyway?
my chapstic says spf 30Show Image(http://img.emoticonplus.com/Zyrg.gif)
Wait, you thought it was good?
I thought you had good taste in films....
bah and more bah. allow me to educate you:All fantastic movies.Show Image(http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/villains/images/0/06/Martians.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20140120001808)Show Image(http://www.fashiongonerogue.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Barbarella-Movie-Poster.jpg)Show Image(https://pmcdeadline2.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/blade_runner.jpg)
prepare for this to be desecrated: blade runner 2 is being filmed this month with some pretty boy as the lead. it will make ghost busters 3 look... a little less terrible.
bah and more bah. allow me to educate you:All fantastic movies.Show Image(http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/villains/images/0/06/Martians.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20140120001808)Show Image(http://www.fashiongonerogue.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Barbarella-Movie-Poster.jpg)Show Image(https://pmcdeadline2.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/blade_runner.jpg)
prepare for this to be desecrated: blade runner 2 is being filmed this month with some pretty boy as the lead. it will make ghost busters 3 look... a little less terrible.
They're doing a 2nd Blade Runner without Ford? I SHALL NOT WATCH.
Blade Runner is not exactly something that needed to be re-made.
I read The Edge of Human (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blade_Runner_2:_The_Edge_of_Human), which I thought at the time would have made a neat sequel.
I read The Edge of Human (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blade_Runner_2:_The_Edge_of_Human), which I thought at the time would have made a neat sequel.
Never knew that existed. I thoroughly enjoyed Jeter's first sick insane book, Dr Adder, but the later ones did not move me as much.
He could be considered a worthy, if lesser, successor to ****, and if anyone continued the franchise, he would be a good choice.
Blade Runner is not exactly something that needed to be re-made.
Blade Runner is not exactly something that needed to be re-made.
Blade Runner is basically the perfect dystopian Sci-fi movie. Just act like a sequel or remake doesn't exist, that's what I prefer to do with Star Wars.
I LIKEShow Image(https://cdn.cloudpix.co/images/angelababy/angelababy-angela-yeung-wing-tv-62013733c81cd05e893dba8e25bb7c9b-large-582959.jpg)
Blade Runner is not exactly something that needed to be re-made.
Blade Runner is basically the perfect dystopian Sci-fi movie. Just act like a sequel or remake doesn't exist, that's what I prefer to do with Star Wars.
I didn't like blade runner..
It was too slow.. and the plot is very thin..
But I'm a sci-fi hardcore, so nothing in it was new to me..
I think if someone watched blade-runner at the very beginning of their dive into Sci-Fi, it would be enjoyable.
Blade Runner is not exactly something that needed to be re-made.
Blade Runner is basically the perfect dystopian Sci-fi movie. Just act like a sequel or remake doesn't exist, that's what I prefer to do with Star Wars.
I didn't like blade runner..
It was too slow.. and the plot is very thin..
But I'm a sci-fi hardcore, so nothing in it was new to me..
I think if someone watched blade-runner at the very beginning of their dive into Sci-Fi, it would be enjoyable.
Blade Runner is not exactly something that needed to be re-made.
Blade Runner is basically the perfect dystopian Sci-fi movie. Just act like a sequel or remake doesn't exist, that's what I prefer to do with Star Wars.
I didn't like blade runner..
It was too slow.. and the plot is very thin..
But I'm a sci-fi hardcore, so nothing in it was new to me..
I think if someone watched blade-runner at the very beginning of their dive into Sci-Fi, it would be enjoyable.
I think Blade Runner still stands as a really great sci-fi movie, but at the time of it's release it was pretty advanced. It's like watching Citizen Kane now vs. 70 years ago, because most of the groundbreaking innovations that it had at it's release that made (make) it such a great film are considered pretty commonplace now. So while watching it now might not be as amazing as it was at that time, it's still considered one of the best, if not the best, film ever made because of those innovations.
just look at all these details - name one film that has gone through this trouble in the last twenty years.
http://io9.gizmodo.com/142-behind-the-scenes-photos-reveal-blade-runners-minia-1691950942Show Image(https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--L8oXSjb6--/c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800/a7vawcuqlnbgmjsu2adj.jpg)
just look at all these details - name one film that has gone through this trouble in the last twenty years.
http://io9.gizmodo.com/142-behind-the-scenes-photos-reveal-blade-runners-minia-1691950942Show Image(https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--L8oXSjb6--/c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800/a7vawcuqlnbgmjsu2adj.jpg)
Modern CGI is just as time intensive to draw, and just as detailed..
There are more similarities than differences between CGI and Miniature prop making
yes, just look at all these time intensive details:Show Image(http://cartoonbros.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Frozen-2.png)
On a slightly less facetious point, I've done a lot of 3D work 3DSMax many years ago, and yes, it is painful and tedious, but there is a lot of shortcuts and coding techniques that produce a lesser product in a shorter time frame. and, time is money
You don't have any idea what you're talking about, Any CGI character from large budget movies take hundreds of hours to program, build, animate, and texture..
You don't have any idea what you're talking about, Any CGI character from large budget movies take hundreds of hours to program, build, animate, and texture..
oh the irony. only hundreds of hours? So elsa was made in a week? yep. you sound like you know.
In a nutshell, this is what's wrong with the world today.oh the irony. only hundreds of hours? So elsa was made in a week? yep. you sound like you know.
That's just the base element, depending on where you draw the line on what constitutes Elsa, costumes, customized lighting, hair physics, makeup.
There is absolutely no less work involved in the creation of Cgi movies vs prop movies.
Props are nice to blow up or light on fire, but they generally lack the complex geometry possible in CGI.
Notice that tower had mostly flat panels with bumpy protrusions, it'd be very difficult to add complex curvature as in CGI.
You are diminishing what cgi artists do, and yet you know nothing about it..
In a nutshell, this is what's wrong with the world today.oh the irony. only hundreds of hours? So elsa was made in a week? yep. you sound like you know.
That's just the base element, depending on where you draw the line on what constitutes Elsa, costumes, customized lighting, hair physics, makeup.
There is absolutely no less work involved in the creation of Cgi movies vs prop movies.
Props are nice to blow up or light on fire, but they generally lack the complex geometry possible in CGI.
Actually, CGI tries to emulates the "complex geometry" found in this world either real or imagined, not the other way around. but you knew that, right? You're only actually just kidding here, surely. For example, you clearly will know the "complex geometry" of sunlight / translucency / refraction / reflection and oh, i'm bored now still can't be reliably modelled by cgi.Notice that tower had mostly flat panels with bumpy protrusions, it'd be very difficult to add complex curvature as in CGI.
You are diminishing what cgi artists do, and yet you know nothing about it..
"bumpy protrustions" - that's clearly the technical term. The artist will state, I'll have some "bumpy protrustions" over here, some more "bumpy protrustions" over here, and some really large "bumpy protrusions" here. Sounds like weird science all over.
By complex curvature, you mean... a sphere, for example a football - something people have been making long before the first resistor ever appeared? That's really complex. Or maybe, you mean weird shapes with curves, just like what Raphael, Leonardo and all the other Greats were chiselling out of marble long before you learnt to say "I've just pooed my nappy"? Those shapes the Greats were carving - just imagine the mathematical equations needed to define them. Wow, MUCH COMPLEX.
Pro-tip, trying to sound like you know what you're talking about by stating your opinions as fact may work with your 15-year-old friends but just sometimes doesn't work in the big-pant-wearing world. For example, computers can't render "curvature". Only straight lines. a cgi 'sphere' is a high resolution multi-faceted shape, or at best, mathematical equations which approximate curves.
I love that you feel you are the defender of the true faith and have to press this point. I think I've forgotten more about 3d workflows than you appear to know.
Do tell me oh wise "Zoltar Speaks" (inserts 10c), what else do i know nothing about?
Blade Runner is not exactly something that needed to be re-made.
Blade Runner is basically the perfect dystopian Sci-fi movie. Just act like a sequel or remake doesn't exist, that's what I prefer to do with Star Wars.
I didn't like blade runner..
It was too slow.. and the plot is very thin..
But I'm a sci-fi hardcore, so nothing in it was new to me..
I think if someone watched blade-runner at the very beginning of their dive into Sci-Fi, it would be enjoyable.
I thought you had good taste in films....
Blade Runner is basically the perfect dystopian Sci-fi movie. Just act like a sequel or remake doesn't exist, that's what I prefer to do with Star Wars.
Stuff that's wrong.
tp you're dealing with a troll.
i figured you'd know this by now.
have you seen half of the **** this kid posts?
tp you're dealing with a troll.
i figured you'd know this by now.
have you seen half of the **** this kid posts?
No, I don't actually read the stuff he posts..
I just say --stuff-- in response to what I'd assume he'd say to me..
I am at the level where I don't need to read most posts.. I already have a moderately relevant response ready.
tp you're dealing with a troll.
i figured you'd know this by now.
have you seen half of the **** this kid posts?
No, I don't actually read the stuff he posts..
I just say --stuff-- in response to what I'd assume he'd say to me..
I am at the level where I don't need to read most posts.. I already have a moderately relevant response ready.
DONT GET SNARKY WITH ME TP. I WILL CUT YOU.
Very basically, I go through a decision tree.
Without reading your current response ...
do you like me tp?
do you like me tp?
#Nohomo ?
do you like me tp?
#Nohomo ?
tp you're better than this >.>
woooooooooooow offended. i thought we were homies. we were going to start a food business together!!!
tp you're dealing with a troll.
i figured you'd know this by now.
have you seen half of the **** this kid posts?
best you can do?tp you're dealing with a troll.
"troll" that word doesn't mean what you think it means.i figured you'd know this by now.
toiletpaper explains he doesn't actually read anything.have you seen half of the **** this kid posts?
oh i remember you. you tried to call me out for being a shill for hhkb's or whatever. go you.
sorry, i'll fall in line, sir. model m's are awesome and you should pay £200 for one. no less than £200. and get flashy led's because they're cool.
Very basically, I go through a decision tree.This actually explains a lot. :p
Without reading your current response..
You either agree/ disagree
I weigh the likelyhood of the two, and accordingly prepare a response.
Now, at this moment, I feel there is a 50% chance for either case..
So, in these cases, I would offer a neutral explanation of my process..
So whether you agree or disagree, it would be relevant..
If you agree, you would've said something like, oh do tell, how does that work.
If you disagree, you would've said something like that's ridiculous, I h8 Tp..
In which case this neutral statement would be enough to cover both.
I know that Fohat has a personal vendetta against Tp4. Over many altercations, Tp4 told him that he's pretty much wrong about everything with respect to the economy/ science/ religion.
And in explaining the Tp4 response process would itself be enough of a retort to whatever fohat may have said.
For the record: the last gif I posted was directed at Quincyjones's webcomic
I fully agree to you, you should have seen how this little sh!t sat DT on fire while he was banned on GH... Most toxic, disrespectfull and highly cancerous person I've ever witnessed on forums. I am sorry for the poor GH folks who have to deal with this individual.
I know that Fohat has a personal vendetta against Tp4. Over many altercations, Tp4 told him that he's pretty much wrong about everything with respect to the economy/ science/ religion.
And in explaining the Tp4 response process would itself be enough of a retort to whatever fohat may have said.
Not at all. But I do consider it profoundly rude, disrespectful, and/or disingenuous during the course of a "discussion" to spew out random statements without reading and understanding what the others have to say, or at the very least thoroughly skimming their comments and links, and responding with logical and meaningful analyses (backed up by neutral 3rd-party science or journalism, if at all possible) to the points that they (and/or you) are putting forward.
It is not just you, others behave much the same, Redmaus comes to mind.
Frankly, I find many of your posts to be partially or mostly incoherent and I walk away with the feeling that you are actually saying very little. But you are the owner of this thread, so you get to set the "rules of discourse" ....
I fully agree to you, you should have seen how this little sh!t sat DT on fire while he was banned on GH... Most toxic, disrespectfull and highly cancerous person I've ever witnessed on forums. I am sorry for the poor GH folks who have to deal with this individual.
I know that Fohat has a personal vendetta against Tp4. Over many altercations, Tp4 told him that he's pretty much wrong about everything with respect to the economy/ science/ religion.
And in explaining the Tp4 response process would itself be enough of a retort to whatever fohat may have said.
Not at all. But I do consider it profoundly rude, disrespectful, and/or disingenuous during the course of a "discussion" to spew out random statements without reading and understanding what the others have to say, or at the very least thoroughly skimming their comments and links, and responding with logical and meaningful analyses (backed up by neutral 3rd-party science or journalism, if at all possible) to the points that they (and/or you) are putting forward.
It is not just you, others behave much the same, Redmaus comes to mind.
Frankly, I find many of your posts to be partially or mostly incoherent and I walk away with the feeling that you are actually saying very little. But you are the owner of this thread, so you get to set the "rules of discourse" ....
I fully agree to you, you should have seen how this little sh!t sat DT on fire while he was banned on GH... Most toxic, disrespectfull and highly cancerous person I've ever witnessed on forums. I am sorry for the poor GH folks who have to deal with this individual.
I know that Fohat has a personal vendetta against Tp4. Over many altercations, Tp4 told him that he's pretty much wrong about everything with respect to the economy/ science/ religion.
And in explaining the Tp4 response process would itself be enough of a retort to whatever fohat may have said.
Not at all. But I do consider it profoundly rude, disrespectful, and/or disingenuous during the course of a "discussion" to spew out random statements without reading and understanding what the others have to say, or at the very least thoroughly skimming their comments and links, and responding with logical and meaningful analyses (backed up by neutral 3rd-party science or journalism, if at all possible) to the points that they (and/or you) are putting forward.
It is not just you, others behave much the same, Redmaus comes to mind.
Frankly, I find many of your posts to be partially or mostly incoherent and I walk away with the feeling that you are actually saying very little. But you are the owner of this thread, so you get to set the "rules of discourse" ....
hahahhaahahha... I remember this troll.. -cookie-
This guy couldn't take the heat. and got all sorts of butt-hurt over something completely irrelevant to him.
DT as a place is fine, like any other place..
But, I'll admit to ruffling a few feathers, when I landed that Giant Truth Thread over there.
Everywhere has their clic crowd who believe they're entitled to the forum -stance and opinion..
However the truth is, you're actually just frogs at the bottom of a well content with your own little sky..
That Rootwyrm guy, sigh.............. I almost laughed when he mentioned he's got some friction with paypal now....
That was completely his own doing, Had he just given Berserkfan more time to do some coordination and transfers, it would've all been much better..
you should have seen how this little sh!t sat DT on fire while he was banned on GH
While Berserkfan ... caused many innocent people the loss of considerable hard-earned money....
...a box for me may yet arrive, I don't know
The depth and breadth of your understanding of the situation and the players is reassuring.
The depth and breadth of your understanding of the situation and the players is reassuring.
I think my understanding of the situation is quite good, I'm not down any money here or hoping that the sun will come out tomorrow. Or, tomorrow's tomorrow. Or, tomorrow's' tomorrow's tomorrow...
While Berserkfan generated a disastrous avalanche of disappointment and caused many innocent people the loss of considerable hard-earned money, I feel certain that there is an untold story and a "perfect storm" of emotional and panic-laden circumstances that we will never know about. And I doubt that there is a surplus of money left in his pocket, either.
When TP4 attempted to defend Berserkfan, he was ridiculed and flamed, both here and there.
Personally, I am out a bit over $100 (and a box for me may yet arrive, I don't know) but I feel disappointment, not anger.
The conclusion I draw from this thread is that going outside causes issues.
The conclusion I draw from this thread is that going outside causes issues.
You don't want to ever go outside in general.. there's nothing out there that's not on the internet.
Except, you know, real human experiences.The conclusion I draw from this thread is that going outside causes issues.
You don't want to ever go outside in general.. there's nothing out there that's not on the internet.
Except, you know, real human experiences.The conclusion I draw from this thread is that going outside causes issues.
You don't want to ever go outside in general.. there's nothing out there that's not on the internet.
Yeah and I love the smell after it rains too.Except, you know, real human experiences.The conclusion I draw from this thread is that going outside causes issues.
You don't want to ever go outside in general.. there's nothing out there that's not on the internet.
I kind of like fresh air. Green plants are reassuring, too.
Yeah and I love the smell after it rains too.Except, you know, real human experiences.The conclusion I draw from this thread is that going outside causes issues.
You don't want to ever go outside in general.. there's nothing out there that's not on the internet.
I kind of like fresh air. Green plants are reassuring, too.
Also concerts are pretty amazing.
Yeah and I love the smell after it rains too.Except, you know, real human experiences.The conclusion I draw from this thread is that going outside causes issues.
You don't want to ever go outside in general.. there's nothing out there that's not on the internet.
I kind of like fresh air. Green plants are reassuring, too.
Also concerts are pretty amazing.
I got plants @ home.. lots of um..
House surrounded by large grass fields..
Just crack a window..
/But obviously Tp4 don't crack the window cuz outside air is unfiltered and it's HOT... and potentially humid..Show Image(http://emoticoner.com/files/emoticons/onion-head/wet-onion-head-emoticon.gif?1292862524)
I got plants @ home.. lots of um..
House surrounded by large grass fields..
Just crack a window..
/But obviously Tp4 don't crack the window cuz outside air is unfiltered and it's HOT... and potentially humid..Show Image(http://emoticoner.com/files/emoticons/onion-head/wet-onion-head-emoticon.gif?1292862524)
Where do you live tp?
I got plants @ home.. lots of um..
House surrounded by large grass fields..
Just crack a window..
/But obviously Tp4 don't crack the window cuz outside air is unfiltered and it's HOT... and potentially humid..Show Image(http://emoticoner.com/files/emoticons/onion-head/wet-onion-head-emoticon.gif?1292862524)
Where do you live tp?
New Jersey = Pollution..Show Image(http://emoticoner.com/files/emoticons/onion-head/help-onion-head-emoticon.gif?1292862508)
I got plants @ home.. lots of um..
House surrounded by large grass fields..
Just crack a window..
/But obviously Tp4 don't crack the window cuz outside air is unfiltered and it's HOT... and potentially humid..Show Image(http://emoticoner.com/files/emoticons/onion-head/wet-onion-head-emoticon.gif?1292862524)
Where do you live tp?
New Jersey = Pollution..Show Image(http://emoticoner.com/files/emoticons/onion-head/help-onion-head-emoticon.gif?1292862508)
Come up to Michigan, you can trade the pollution for criminals and craft beer.