« previous next »
Pages:  [1]     Go Down

Author Topic: Portable induction hub?  (Read 2917 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Naweo

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 199
Portable induction hub?
« on: Sun, 02 January 2022, 15:58:19 »
Hey,

2 of my 4 electric cooker hubs are broken and I was thinking about buying a single or double portable induction hub at least until my landlord can get to switch it. Anyone who thinks it could be worth it?
Logged

Offline Sintpinty

  • Carbon Based Life Form
  • Posts: 1651
  • Location: New York Supreme, SE
  • The lone and level lands stretch far away
    • My Roblox Profile
Re: Portable induction hub?
« Reply #1 on: Sun, 02 January 2022, 20:58:19 »
Quote from: Naweo on Sun, 02 January 2022, 15:58:19
Hey,

2 of my 4 electric cooker hubs are broken and I was thinking about buying a single or double portable induction hub at least until my landlord can get to switch it. Anyone who thinks it could be worth it?

I have an induction stove and yes it is worth it
Logged
Just my thoughts

Online Findecanor

  • Posts: 5131
  • Location: Stockholm
Re: Portable induction hub?
« Reply #2 on: Sun, 02 January 2022, 22:14:18 »
Just remember that induction hubs work only with cookware that have steel/iron in the bottom. Cast iron pans work well.
Pots made from pure aluminium don't.

Proper induction stoves are fast and energy-efficient. Beware of bad user interfaces though. All stoves I've tried have had crappy touch controls, not even multitouch.
Logged
🍉 "Ceterum censeo Microslop esse delendam" 🍉

Offline fohat.digs

  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 6565
  • Location: 35°55'N, 83°53'W
  • weird funny old guy
Re: Portable induction hub?
« Reply #3 on: Mon, 03 January 2022, 08:28:29 »
Depending on whether you have good money invested in good cookware, induction may or may not be a good choice.

There is great cookware that is not magnetic as well as gear that is. Personally, I have lots of cookware that would never work with induction.
Logged
"We are on the precipice of signing an agreement to advance talks with Iran that preserves the good parts of former President Barack Obama’s Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) while amplifying its flaws.
Mr. Obama came to an agreement that did not involve America’s most precious treasure, the lives and limbs of our soldiers.  The 1.7 billion dollars of frozen Iranian assets released by Obama pales in comparison to the 300 billion being floated as a rebuilding fund.
So far, speculation that Iran will be free in the future to continue its nuclear program is the opposite of Trump’s stated goal for the war and in direct opposition to what Mr. Obama negotiated."
- Bill Roberts 2026-06-17
Pages:  [1]     Go Up
« previous next »