Author Topic: PCB vs Plate  (Read 11389 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Astounding

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 158
PCB vs Plate
« on: Tue, 05 July 2011, 18:31:18 »
Which mounting method is superior?


DISCUSS/FIGHT

Offline SecrtAgentMan

  • Posts: 100
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #1 on: Tue, 05 July 2011, 18:34:32 »
Well I've never tried PCB, but with plate I like the added rigidity and the extra weight on my board just feels nice when picking up.

Maybe one day I'll get a poker and try it out :D

The one thing that I don't like with plate mount is dat ping.

Offline daerid

  • Posts: 4276
  • Location: Denver, CO
    • Rossipedia
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #2 on: Tue, 05 July 2011, 18:51:40 »
I personally like plate better, as I tend to bottom out a lot and enjoy the tactile feedback of the plate. I find it tends to make the keys feel a bit sturdier.

Plus the weight. Helps keep that mofo put.

Offline elbowglue

  • Posts: 583
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #3 on: Tue, 05 July 2011, 20:19:31 »
PCB mounted.  Well mounted PCB keyboards (ricercar spos) are awesome.  Poorly mounted PCB keyboards (Mx8100) stink, you need to reinforce these.
My keyboards: Filco Cherry Blue Tenkeyless(daily home), Compaq MX11800 (modded to blacks), Compaq "MX 84u",  Wellington\'s Dampened Endurapro, Pinkalicious Filco Blue Cherry, Chicony KB-5191, Chicony KB-5181, Desko MOS 5023 UP "elbowglue" spos (modded to blues), Siig Minitouch (monterey blue), SMK-88 (blue cherries), Ricercar SPOS
Smallest to biggest keyboards in inches (Length X Height) - Length is most important for a midline mouse position

KBC Poker: 11.6 x 3.9 - HHKB: 11.6 x 4.3 - Siig Minitouch (Geekhack Space Saver): 11.6 x 6 - Deck/Tg3 82: 12 x 6 - Noppoo Choc Mini 12.4 x 5.3 - Compaq "MX 84u": 13.1 x 7.5 - Filco Tenkeyless: 14 x 5.3 - Cherry "ricercar spos" G86-62410EUAGSA: 14 x 7.75 - Topre Realforce 86u: 14.4 x 6.65 - Desko "elbowglue spos" MOS 5023 UP: 14.5 x 8.4 - IBM Model M Spacesaver: 15.3 x 7 - G80-1800: 15.9 x 7.1 - Adesso MKB-125B: 16 x 7.3 - Compaq Mx11800, Cherry G80-11900: 16.25 x 7.5 - Filco Standard: 17.3 x 5.4 - Unicomp Endurapro: 17.9 x 7.1 - Adesso MKB-135B: 18.3 x 6.0 - Cherry G80-3000: 18.5 x 7.6 - IBM Model M, Unicomp Customizer: 19.3 x 8.27

Offline Astounding

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 158
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #4 on: Tue, 05 July 2011, 21:56:34 »
Quote from: daerid;374050
I personally like plate better, as I tend to bottom out a lot and enjoy the tactile feedback of the plate. I find it tends to make the keys feel a bit sturdier.

Plus the weight. Helps keep that mofo put.

The heavier weight pretty much sells me on plate, it's got to feel sturdier than PCB as well I'd think.

Offline keyboardlover

  • Posts: 4022
  • Hey Paul Walker, Click It or Ticket!
    • http://www.keyboardlover.com
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #5 on: Wed, 06 July 2011, 17:40:42 »
I prefer plate-mounted for Topre and PCB-mounted for cherries. My Filco with ergo clears is the exception though.

Offline redpill

  • Posts: 503
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #6 on: Wed, 06 July 2011, 17:45:41 »
I'm leaning toward PCB mounted for MX Browns, I like the increased travel, gives me more room to not bottom out after the tactile bump.  I like to say typing on my KBC Poker with browns feels like sticking my fingers into a bowl of rice krispies.

^ Current Favorite ^  Topre Realforce 87UB 55g  |  Topre Realforce 103UB 55g | KBC Poker/Browns/Sanded KeycapsDucky 1087 | Filco MajesFoam-2 | IBM Model M 1390131 Feb '87 | Still Love: Microsoft Trackball Explorer x3 | Now Unused:  Microsoft Natural Ergo 4k x2

Offline IvanIvanovich

  • Mr. Silk Underwear
  • Posts: 8199
  • Location: USA
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #7 on: Wed, 06 July 2011, 18:02:48 »
Pcb all the way. If you disagree, I'm not listening.

Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #8 on: Wed, 06 July 2011, 18:04:46 »
Good PCB mounted keyboards are way better, usually switches are more precisely placed and more precisely leveled, the lack of the additional resonance chamber makes them less prone to resonance problems, are way easier to mod (and modifiability is one of the not questionable advantage of cherry boards over other technologies), and are also lighter and cheaper.

Quote
I like the increased travel


What increased travel ?
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline RiGS

  • Posts: 1594
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #9 on: Wed, 06 July 2011, 18:07:51 »
He must be thinking that PCB and plate mounted keyboards use the same switches, and the lack of plate provides more travel, but this is not the case.
Last edited by RiGS; Jan 2011

Offline redpill

  • Posts: 503
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #10 on: Wed, 06 July 2011, 18:10:08 »
whether it is or it's just perception, that's how it winds up feeling on my PCB-mounted Poker.

^ Current Favorite ^  Topre Realforce 87UB 55g  |  Topre Realforce 103UB 55g | KBC Poker/Browns/Sanded KeycapsDucky 1087 | Filco MajesFoam-2 | IBM Model M 1390131 Feb '87 | Still Love: Microsoft Trackball Explorer x3 | Now Unused:  Microsoft Natural Ergo 4k x2

Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #11 on: Wed, 06 July 2011, 18:15:19 »
Switches are completely identical other than the two additional nubs, obviously the PCB can have a bit more flex than a steel plate id not supported by the keyboards back cover, but we are speaking about fractions of millimeters
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline Astounding

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 158
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #12 on: Wed, 06 July 2011, 18:15:47 »
Quote from: The Solutor;374895
Switches are completely identical other than the two additional nubs, obviously the PCB can have a bit more flex than a steel plate id not supported by the keyboards back cover, but we are speaking about fractions of millimeters

Are you saying they feel the same to type on?

Offline RiGS

  • Posts: 1594
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #13 on: Wed, 06 July 2011, 18:16:59 »
He said they had the same key travel.
Last edited by RiGS; Jan 2011

Offline ironman31

  • Posts: 834
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #14 on: Wed, 06 July 2011, 18:17:18 »
Quote from: Astounding;374896
Are you saying they feel the same to type on?

Definitely not true.
Keyboards:
IBM Model M Space Saving Keyboard (Used), HHKB Pro 2 (White, Lettered), Realforce 87U all-45g in White, Filco Majestouch 2 TKL with Cherry MX Browns, Model F PC/ATNoppoo Choc Mini (MX Browns), Model F XT, IBM Model M 1397735 (bought NIB), (2) Siig Minitouch (GHSS) one with XM, one with complicated ALPs (modded),2 Dell AT101W, Cherry G80-11900HRMUS (modded with MX browns)



Pointing Devices:
Logitech G500, Evoluent VerticalMouse 3, Logitech G5, CST 2545W, Microsoft IntelliMouse Trackball, Logitech M570, Logitech MX revolution


Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #15 on: Wed, 06 July 2011, 18:18:15 »
Quote from: ripster;374892
Could be Hamblets theory of resonance chambers under the MX switch.  That was one weird ass theory.

 

Rip, wake up.

I'm not speaking about filcos here, nor about ring, I'm speaking about the sound emitted by good plate mounted (or working filcos) keyboards v.s. good pcb mounted ones
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline redpill

  • Posts: 503
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #16 on: Wed, 06 July 2011, 18:18:33 »
Also I've noticed the Poker feels like it needs slightly more force to actuate than the browns on my MJ2; it does have sanded keys, I would if I could have removed enough material from the keycap that the lessened weight could make the spring feel different?

^ Current Favorite ^  Topre Realforce 87UB 55g  |  Topre Realforce 103UB 55g | KBC Poker/Browns/Sanded KeycapsDucky 1087 | Filco MajesFoam-2 | IBM Model M 1390131 Feb '87 | Still Love: Microsoft Trackball Explorer x3 | Now Unused:  Microsoft Natural Ergo 4k x2

Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #17 on: Wed, 06 July 2011, 18:19:47 »
Quote from: Astounding;374896
Are you saying they feel the same to type on?

 
I'm saying what I said: that there isn't an additional travel.

Typing feeling is a different matter
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline Astounding

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 158
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #18 on: Wed, 06 July 2011, 18:21:26 »
Quote from: RiGS;374897
He said they had the same key travel.

So which feels more solid?  Plate I would assume... then the question is steel or aluminum.

Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #19 on: Wed, 06 July 2011, 18:25:44 »
Quote from: redpill;374901
Also I've noticed the Poker feels like it needs slightly more force to actuate than the browns on my MJ2; it does have sanded keys, I would if I could have removed enough material from the keycap that the lessened weight could make the spring feel different?

 

I guess that the tolerances from different batches are more pronounced than the ones due to the keycap's weights, but obviously even the keycaps can make the difference.

You should switch-o-meter your poker to quickly see what happens
« Last Edit: Wed, 06 July 2011, 18:29:00 by The Solutor »
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline IvanIvanovich

  • Mr. Silk Underwear
  • Posts: 8199
  • Location: USA
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #20 on: Wed, 06 July 2011, 18:33:19 »
I have a same perception on the Poker I have with reds. It does seem there is more key travel and key tension than on my Leopold as I almost never bottom out unless gaming. I bottom out on my Leopold all the time.
« Last Edit: Wed, 06 July 2011, 18:35:23 by lysol »

Offline elbowglue

  • Posts: 583
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #21 on: Wed, 06 July 2011, 18:35:15 »
Depends on what you mean by more solid.  Switches that are plate mounted will not "slide away" from you when you press down on it.  Thus the force diagram should be completely accurate.  Bad PCB mounted keyboards will "flex down" when you press on them, (especially in the middle of the keyboard of the MX8100).  So plate mounted = more solid.

However, there is a world of difference in bottoming out characteristics.  It feels like you are hitting a steel plate when you bottom out with filcos or other plate mounted keyboards.  This is not pleasant feeling or sounding at all.  Bottoming out against a PCB feels really nice on the other hand.

I typically bottom out a lot especially if I am typing fast, so I really feel there is a significant difference in PCB mounted vs Plate mounted, especially when it comes to cherry brown switches.
My keyboards: Filco Cherry Blue Tenkeyless(daily home), Compaq MX11800 (modded to blacks), Compaq "MX 84u",  Wellington\'s Dampened Endurapro, Pinkalicious Filco Blue Cherry, Chicony KB-5191, Chicony KB-5181, Desko MOS 5023 UP "elbowglue" spos (modded to blues), Siig Minitouch (monterey blue), SMK-88 (blue cherries), Ricercar SPOS
Smallest to biggest keyboards in inches (Length X Height) - Length is most important for a midline mouse position

KBC Poker: 11.6 x 3.9 - HHKB: 11.6 x 4.3 - Siig Minitouch (Geekhack Space Saver): 11.6 x 6 - Deck/Tg3 82: 12 x 6 - Noppoo Choc Mini 12.4 x 5.3 - Compaq "MX 84u": 13.1 x 7.5 - Filco Tenkeyless: 14 x 5.3 - Cherry "ricercar spos" G86-62410EUAGSA: 14 x 7.75 - Topre Realforce 86u: 14.4 x 6.65 - Desko "elbowglue spos" MOS 5023 UP: 14.5 x 8.4 - IBM Model M Spacesaver: 15.3 x 7 - G80-1800: 15.9 x 7.1 - Adesso MKB-125B: 16 x 7.3 - Compaq Mx11800, Cherry G80-11900: 16.25 x 7.5 - Filco Standard: 17.3 x 5.4 - Unicomp Endurapro: 17.9 x 7.1 - Adesso MKB-135B: 18.3 x 6.0 - Cherry G80-3000: 18.5 x 7.6 - IBM Model M, Unicomp Customizer: 19.3 x 8.27

Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #22 on: Wed, 06 July 2011, 18:38:57 »
Quote from: ripster;374902
I don't remember mentioning ping.  Hamblet was talking about the bottoming out sound.

And of course they feel slightly different.  Look how they are mounted.

 
I'm speaking about it too, as any other sound, the diffusion path is completely different and influenced by a zillion of factors, same of them can be scientifically evaluated, same of them can be just guessed, even in laboratories full of instrumentation.

Stradivari violins are studied since 1700 and their secrets are still not fully understood, hardly me and you can tell a definitive word about the keyboard's sound.
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline keyboardlover

  • Posts: 4022
  • Hey Paul Walker, Click It or Ticket!
    • http://www.keyboardlover.com
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #23 on: Wed, 06 July 2011, 19:41:42 »
Quote from: ripster;374917
May SEEM that way but physically impossible to be technically true.  McGurk Effect from the duller sound and easier to feel tactile point maybe.

Don't think so. The PCB flexes when you type on a PCB mounted board.

Offline keyboardlover

  • Posts: 4022
  • Hey Paul Walker, Click It or Ticket!
    • http://www.keyboardlover.com
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #24 on: Wed, 06 July 2011, 21:30:31 »
I see your ego hasn't changed.

Anyway, I don't see any reason why the PCB wouldn't start flexing before bottoming out. I'm sure it flexes even slightly as soon as you start pressing the key down. I have tried it before and seen it happen.

I'll post a vid if I get a free minute.

Offline Astounding

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 158
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #25 on: Wed, 06 July 2011, 21:46:00 »
How does it feel to bottom out on aluminum?

Offline daerid

  • Posts: 4276
  • Location: Denver, CO
    • Rossipedia
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #26 on: Wed, 06 July 2011, 23:06:31 »
Quote from: ripster;375006
It would only flex after bottoming out.  So the travel is really unchanged before the bottoming out point.  And anyway you'd have to pound $20 in RipOmeter Nickels to get a few extra microns.

I was going to do a wiki on how the sliders in a Cherry MX work but got bored when I realized my Number One Key Expert status had little chance of competition.  I'm a little worried about those KBC-forum guys.

 
Okay, that's just lazy and complacent. Did you really create all those wikis just to claim that title? I find that hard to believe. If so, that's some straight up rock star syndrome right there. You don't wanna make a wiki, that's fine. You don't owe anybody anything, but that statement just screams "arrogant *******". And I personally find you funny and informative. Don't ruin it :)

Offline Chobopants

  • Posts: 590
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #27 on: Wed, 06 July 2011, 23:37:02 »
My guess is he most likely actually DID add it to the wiki but said that to stir some stuff up. :)
Realforce 87UW 45g - Filco Blue 87 - Filco Linear R - Filco Brown 104

Offline keyb_gr

  • Posts: 1384
  • Location: Germany
  • Cherrified user
    • My keyboard page (German)
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #28 on: Thu, 07 July 2011, 11:54:20 »
You guys should study the support braces in the bottom case of a Cherry board (MX3000, whatever). The PCB sits right on top of these, and there must not be any components in the way. The case designer needs to be familiar with the PCB, and further PCB redesigns need to take case design into account. If you do it right, it is absolutely possible to do a totally solid PCB mounting. The PCB clamping setup is not exactly a case of bad industry design either.

Geez, I've been watching too much EEVBlog lately.
Hardware in signatures clutters Google search results. There should be a field in the profile for that (again).

This message was probably typed on a vintage G80-3000 with blues. Double-shots, baby. :D

Offline redpill

  • Posts: 503
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #29 on: Thu, 07 July 2011, 13:56:57 »
Quote from: lysol;374915
I have a same perception on the Poker I have with reds. It does seem there is more key travel and key tension than on my Leopold as I almost never bottom out unless gaming. I bottom out on my Leopold all the time.

Yes exactly.  And doing side-by-side key presses, I don't think it's just a matter of them sounding different or something, they definitely feel different.

Just speculating but could it be a dynamic resulting from the plate mounted switches being affixed on their sides and a PCB mount that is more underneath, so the keypress force is vectored in different directions?  Not sure how to describe that more effectively.
« Last Edit: Thu, 07 July 2011, 13:59:26 by redpill »

^ Current Favorite ^  Topre Realforce 87UB 55g  |  Topre Realforce 103UB 55g | KBC Poker/Browns/Sanded KeycapsDucky 1087 | Filco MajesFoam-2 | IBM Model M 1390131 Feb '87 | Still Love: Microsoft Trackball Explorer x3 | Now Unused:  Microsoft Natural Ergo 4k x2

Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #30 on: Thu, 07 July 2011, 14:08:22 »
Quote from: keyb_gr;375446
You guys should study the support braces in the bottom case of a Cherry board (MX3000, whatever). The PCB sits right on top of these, and there must not be any components in the way. The case designer needs to be familiar with the PCB, and further PCB redesigns need to take case design into account. If you do it right, it is absolutely possible to do a totally solid PCB mounting. The PCB clamping setup is not exactly a case of bad industry design either.

 
Indeed Cherry boards are an example of industrial projects, while most of the other cherry boards are more artisanal products, and the integration of the case's design with its functionality is a good example of the different approach.
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline redpill

  • Posts: 503
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #31 on: Fri, 08 July 2011, 00:36:40 »
It didn't occur to you that a keyboard-sized PCB might have more flex than your tiny little frankenpad?

^ Current Favorite ^  Topre Realforce 87UB 55g  |  Topre Realforce 103UB 55g | KBC Poker/Browns/Sanded KeycapsDucky 1087 | Filco MajesFoam-2 | IBM Model M 1390131 Feb '87 | Still Love: Microsoft Trackball Explorer x3 | Now Unused:  Microsoft Natural Ergo 4k x2

Offline weipim

  • Posts: 104
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #32 on: Fri, 08 July 2011, 01:01:26 »
Quote from: ripster;375006
It would only flex after bottoming out.  So the travel is really unchanged before the bottoming out point.  And anyway you'd have to pound $20 in RipOmeter Nickels to get a few extra microns.

I was going to do a wiki on how the sliders in a Cherry MX work but got bored when I realized my Number One Key Expert status had little chance of competition.  I'm a little worried about those KBC-forum guys.

 
just send the G-man to China,
illigal child keyboard porns

Offline redpill

  • Posts: 503
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #33 on: Fri, 08 July 2011, 01:02:35 »
Well the feel of the browns on my Poker is stiffer than the browns on my plate mounted Filco.  It's not McGurk because I wouldn't expect them to be, I'd expect them to be the same because they are both browns.  So why is that?  If it was a matter of expectation there should be a bias in them feeling similar, not different.

^ Current Favorite ^  Topre Realforce 87UB 55g  |  Topre Realforce 103UB 55g | KBC Poker/Browns/Sanded KeycapsDucky 1087 | Filco MajesFoam-2 | IBM Model M 1390131 Feb '87 | Still Love: Microsoft Trackball Explorer x3 | Now Unused:  Microsoft Natural Ergo 4k x2

Offline weipim

  • Posts: 104
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #34 on: Fri, 08 July 2011, 01:08:25 »
Quote from: ripster;375937
Who's the #1 Keyboard Expert on KBC-China forums?

Actually it's the Koreans that worry me the most.  Lots of modding technology CNC expertise but simply horrible sense of color coordination.

lmao i'd be laughing so hard if the feds busted that chinese ass after I revealed his name.

I have no clue who is the no.1 shizzle in korea, but in China there is a lot of experts, not only in kbc

Offline csm725

  • Posts: 276
  • I BLEED RED AND GOLD
    • http://csm725.com
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #35 on: Fri, 08 July 2011, 01:10:31 »
Quote from: ripster;375937
Who's the #1 Keyboard Expert on KBC-China forums?

Actually it's the Koreans that worry me the most.  Lots of modding technology CNC expertise but simply horrible sense of color coordination.
They cut it, we paint it pal.

Offline redpill

  • Posts: 503
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #36 on: Fri, 08 July 2011, 01:11:10 »
Quote from: ripster;375937
Who's the #1 Keyboard Expert on KBC-China forums?

Actually it's the Koreans that worry me the most.  Lots of modding technology CNC expertise but simply horrible sense of color coordination.

And they actually use their expertise to BUILD crazy kick-ass keyboards, not just wikis.  That should be your next project.  You know you can do it.

^ Current Favorite ^  Topre Realforce 87UB 55g  |  Topre Realforce 103UB 55g | KBC Poker/Browns/Sanded KeycapsDucky 1087 | Filco MajesFoam-2 | IBM Model M 1390131 Feb '87 | Still Love: Microsoft Trackball Explorer x3 | Now Unused:  Microsoft Natural Ergo 4k x2

Offline Izza

  • Posts: 35
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #37 on: Fri, 08 July 2011, 01:13:57 »
Depends on the size of the keyboard, and how well the PCB is mounted.

The 8113 (along with other Cherry boards), IMO, is a great example of poor mounting, and PCB flex as a result. It makes the button presses mushy.

On the other hand the Poker, being small, and with proper (if dainty) mounting of the PCB... feels just fine to me.

Plate is nice, but I prefer PCB for easier access.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

Offline redpill

  • Posts: 503
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #38 on: Fri, 08 July 2011, 01:25:32 »
If the travel is the same, why would the mounting make it feel longer or stiffer?  (inuendo softball but please try to resist)

^ Current Favorite ^  Topre Realforce 87UB 55g  |  Topre Realforce 103UB 55g | KBC Poker/Browns/Sanded KeycapsDucky 1087 | Filco MajesFoam-2 | IBM Model M 1390131 Feb '87 | Still Love: Microsoft Trackball Explorer x3 | Now Unused:  Microsoft Natural Ergo 4k x2

Offline Izza

  • Posts: 35
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #39 on: Fri, 08 July 2011, 01:30:12 »
Quote from: ripster;375957
Yeah, that 8113 was built so badly I just raped the doubleshot keys and threw that sorry ass carcass in the dumpsters.  Once again, the FEEL is different.  I'm saying the switch travel is 4.0mm.  Always.  There's even a Key Travel Wiki in my sig.

At least I learned how much different worn Cherry Clears feel from new ones.


Yeah, the switch travel would not change... I'm not sure why people would think otherwise.

The overall travel (finger movement til' bottoming out) sure.

Have not tried brand-spanking-new clears. The ones I have tried felt like gritty browns, even after cleaning, so perhaps they were worn?
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

Offline Izza

  • Posts: 35
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #40 on: Fri, 08 July 2011, 01:33:53 »
Quote from: redpill;375959
If the travel is the same, why would the mounting make it feel longer or stiffer?  (inuendo softball but please try to resist)

 
We're referring to the switch's travel itself. That cannot change unless it were to physically change in dimension, design, etc.

The effect you're feeling is due to bowing of the board. As you're pressing down on the key, the spring is compressing, causing an equal (and opposite) force on the other end of the switch - as you probably have guessed, would then apply force to the board, and "bend" it.

Edit: Ripster probably has an image detailing this better than I can.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

Offline Izza

  • Posts: 35
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #41 on: Fri, 08 July 2011, 01:41:10 »
Well, I don't think it would bend the board into a taco or anything, but we've already observed the effect by the change in feel. It doesn't take much.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

Offline Izza

  • Posts: 35
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #42 on: Fri, 08 July 2011, 01:46:36 »
Ah, I'm just referring to PCB-mounted.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

Offline daerid

  • Posts: 4276
  • Location: Denver, CO
    • Rossipedia
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #43 on: Fri, 08 July 2011, 01:50:51 »
I think ripster's right on this one. Since some of the force is absorbed and transferred by lateral motion, the actual rebound force on the pcb mounted switch is less than on a plate mount, making it feel a little "soggy".

Offline Izza

  • Posts: 35
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #44 on: Fri, 08 July 2011, 01:59:10 »
So we've been in agreement? Haha.

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

Offline Astounding

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 158
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #45 on: Fri, 08 July 2011, 02:08:01 »
Quote from: ripster;375957
Yeah, that 8113 was built so badly I just raped the doubleshot keys and threw that sorry ass carcass in the dumpsters.  Once again, the FEEL is different.  I'm saying the switch travel is 4.0mm.  Always.  There's even a Key Travel Wiki in my sig.

At least I learned how much different worn Cherry Clears feel from new ones.

 
You threw away cherry switches?

Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #46 on: Fri, 08 July 2011, 07:44:02 »
Quote from: ripster;375957
Yeah, that 8113 was built so badly I just raped the doubleshot keys and threw that sorry ass carcass in the dumpsters.  Once again, the FEEL is different.  I'm saying the switch travel is 4.0mm.  Always.  There's even a Key Travel Wiki in my sig.

 
+1


Quote
At least I learned how much different worn Cherry Clears feel from new ones.


Funny. I refused, just yesterday, to buy an used cherry clear board just because I was concerned about the tactility.

I guess that an ergo clear board made with well used clear stem would be not too different from a brand new brown one.
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline Lester

  • Posts: 210
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #47 on: Fri, 08 July 2011, 08:34:00 »
My ducky 1087 is plate.
I love my ducky 1087.

Plate wins!

Offline calavera

  • Posts: 1713
  • Location: South Korea
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #48 on: Fri, 08 July 2011, 08:47:47 »
This comes down to personal preference. Some people like PCB mount for lighter switches like red or modded blacks. Some like plate mount everything, like me.
You're comparing apples to oranges here, there is no winner. Whatever floats your boat is the best, screw what others think.

Offline keyb_gr

  • Posts: 1384
  • Location: Germany
  • Cherrified user
    • My keyboard page (German)
PCB vs Plate
« Reply #49 on: Fri, 08 July 2011, 10:04:55 »
For me, PCB-mounted wins. G80-3000s with old-style case in particular are some of the most service-friendly boards you'll find. Plate-mounted switches are a pain in the rear when it comes to servicing, modding and hacking.

Plate-mounted has the definite advantage of giving the board more rigidity, no doubt about that. A G80 is best left flat on the desk, extending the feet will give a pretty hollow sound. A modest G81 actually feels a lot more solid because it has a metal backplate... they should really come up with a better key mechanism to go with these, then they'd have a winner.
Hardware in signatures clutters Google search results. There should be a field in the profile for that (again).

This message was probably typed on a vintage G80-3000 with blues. Double-shots, baby. :D