Author Topic: Idea for better Unicomp logo  (Read 16904 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Oqsy

  • Posts: 861
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #50 on: Tue, 06 July 2010, 18:02:43 »
I take it back, I think the current unicomp logo is the best of all possible logos.
[sigpic]Currently in use: Rosewill RK9000 and CH DT225[/sigpic]
"Private misfortunes make for public welfare."

Offline InSanCen

  • Posts: 560
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #51 on: Wed, 07 July 2010, 09:29:26 »
Quote from: EverythingIBM;199605
I seriously think people need to stop being so hard on Pentium 4 chips


Why should we? It was a very inefficient design... Go look up a few things. Barrel Shifters and a long-ass pipeline. Cache Misses too while you are at it. When you understand that, you may come back and attempt to defend the chip. They were that bad. If you stumble across Darek Mihoka's page that was written when the P4 was originally released, you may learn a few things if you actually bother to read it.
Currently Using :- IBM M13 1996, Black :
Currently Own :- 1391406 1989 & 1990 : AT Model F 1985 : Boscom 122 (Black) : G80-3000 : G80-1800 (x2) : Wang 724 : G81-8000LPBGB (Card Reader, MY) : Unitek : AT102W : TVS Gold :
Project\'s :- Wang 724 Pink-->White Clicky : USB Model M : IBM LPFK :
Pointing stuff :- Logitech MX-518 : I-One Lynx R-15 Trackball : M13 Nipple : Microsoft Basic Optical\'s
:

Offline Oqsy

  • Posts: 861
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #52 on: Wed, 07 July 2010, 17:54:45 »
Unicomp logo... hmmmmmm
[sigpic]Currently in use: Rosewill RK9000 and CH DT225[/sigpic]
"Private misfortunes make for public welfare."

Offline Oqsy

  • Posts: 861
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #53 on: Wed, 07 July 2010, 20:16:07 »
[sigpic]Currently in use: Rosewill RK9000 and CH DT225[/sigpic]
"Private misfortunes make for public welfare."

Offline Oqsy

  • Posts: 861
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #54 on: Wed, 07 July 2010, 20:17:10 »
or one of those little seats that comes with a wheel under it!  just the one..... oh damn, umm what are they called again?
[sigpic]Currently in use: Rosewill RK9000 and CH DT225[/sigpic]
"Private misfortunes make for public welfare."

Offline Pylon

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 852
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #55 on: Thu, 08 July 2010, 08:37:04 »
A unicycle?

Offline microsoft windows

  • Blue Troll of Death
  • * Exalted Elder
  • Posts: 3621
  • President of geekhack.org
    • Get Internet Explorer 6
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #56 on: Thu, 08 July 2010, 08:41:28 »
Quote from: kishy;199513
You've apparently never tried to edit video on your Pentium 1.

And apparently, never have on a G3 either.

It's virtually impossible on one, and practically impressive on the other.


I used G3's for years. Trust me. I know how fast/slow they are.
CLICK HERE!     OFFICIAL PRESIDENT OF GEEKHACK.ORG    MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN MERRY CHRISTMAS

Offline Computer-Lab in Basement

  • The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.
  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 3025
  • Location: NCC-1701, USS Enterprise
  • Live long and prosper
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #57 on: Thu, 08 July 2010, 08:57:48 »
But you never tried to edit video on them!  kishy's argument is that G3's were much better at editing video than a Pentium 1.
tp thread is tp thread
Sometimes it's like he accidentally makes a thread instead of a google search.

IBM Model M SSK | IBM Model F XT | IBM Model F 122 | IBM Model M 122 | Ducky YOTD 2012 w/ blue switches | Poker II w/ Blue switches | Royal Kludge RK61 w/ Blue switches

Offline microsoft windows

  • Blue Troll of Death
  • * Exalted Elder
  • Posts: 3621
  • President of geekhack.org
    • Get Internet Explorer 6
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #58 on: Thu, 08 July 2010, 09:29:53 »
I don't really believe that. The pentium computers ran everything else much better. I bet the video editing is probably more software-related than hardware-related.
CLICK HERE!     OFFICIAL PRESIDENT OF GEEKHACK.ORG    MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN MERRY CHRISTMAS

Offline Oqsy

  • Posts: 861
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #59 on: Thu, 08 July 2010, 18:27:24 »
On topic threads stay on topic.

On topic threads don't bother with processor X versus processor Y arguments because they're irrelevant.  

On topic threads don't bother with OS (A) versus OS (B) because they're irrelevant.

On topic threads don't bother with IBM versus Apple versus Microsoft versus Intel versus AMD versus VIA versus MSI versus ATI versus Coca-Cola versus Pepsi because they're irrelevant.

On topic threads stay on topic.


unicomp
[sigpic]Currently in use: Rosewill RK9000 and CH DT225[/sigpic]
"Private misfortunes make for public welfare."

Offline Computer-Lab in Basement

  • The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.
  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 3025
  • Location: NCC-1701, USS Enterprise
  • Live long and prosper
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #60 on: Thu, 08 July 2010, 18:39:19 »
Well said Oqsy.
tp thread is tp thread
Sometimes it's like he accidentally makes a thread instead of a google search.

IBM Model M SSK | IBM Model F XT | IBM Model F 122 | IBM Model M 122 | Ducky YOTD 2012 w/ blue switches | Poker II w/ Blue switches | Royal Kludge RK61 w/ Blue switches

Offline kishy

  • Posts: 1576
  • Location: Windsor, ON Canada
  • Eye Bee M
    • http://kishy.ca/
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #61 on: Thu, 08 July 2010, 18:44:11 »
Quote from: Oqsy;200833
unicomp


I rather like that...slightly stylize it, find a way to make it look good on a keyboard and it'd be nice.

The blue kind of pays respect to their origins as well.
Enthusiast of springs which buckle noisily: my keyboards
Want to learn about the Kishsaver?
kishy.ca

Offline Oqsy

  • Posts: 861
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #62 on: Thu, 08 July 2010, 20:11:26 »
kishy: that was the thought, a little homage to the IBM heritage without being overt copyright / trademark infringement :D

I'll play around with illustrator or photoshop later and see if I can do it up right.  If it meets with enough approval we can make a template for replacement decals for num caps scroll lock indicator area :D  

Or perhaps one of you would like to try to prove me wrong that the AMD Sempron is the best processor ever built.  

Whatever...
[sigpic]Currently in use: Rosewill RK9000 and CH DT225[/sigpic]
"Private misfortunes make for public welfare."

Offline kishy

  • Posts: 1576
  • Location: Windsor, ON Canada
  • Eye Bee M
    • http://kishy.ca/
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #63 on: Thu, 08 July 2010, 20:22:46 »
Went from Sempron(64) 2800 to Athlon64 3200. Sempron was a good performer.

AthlonXP Semprons are also rather decent.
Enthusiast of springs which buckle noisily: my keyboards
Want to learn about the Kishsaver?
kishy.ca

Offline Oqsy

  • Posts: 861
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #64 on: Thu, 08 July 2010, 21:17:55 »
here's a quick attempt

[sigpic]Currently in use: Rosewill RK9000 and CH DT225[/sigpic]
"Private misfortunes make for public welfare."

Offline EverythingIBM

  • Posts: 1269
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #65 on: Thu, 08 July 2010, 21:45:09 »
Quote from: InSanCen;200238
Why should we? It was a very inefficient design... Go look up a few things. Barrel Shifters and a long-ass pipeline. Cache Misses too while you are at it. When you understand that, you may come back and attempt to defend the chip. They were that bad. If you stumble across Darek Mihoka's page that was written when the P4 was originally released, you may learn a few things if you actually bother to read it.


It works, and works well. That's all I care about.

Quote from: ripster;200526
Needs a bit more artistic flair I'd say.

Should use Frida Kahlo's Unibrow as one of the Rebus figures.
Show Image


That's a good idea ripster, an IBM logo with a uni-brow flare to it. How about two computers connected to one another? Get it? Uni-comp[uter]. Oh well.
Keyboards: '86 M, M5-2, M13, SSK, F AT, F XT

Offline quadibloc

  • Posts: 770
  • Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • Layout Fanatic
    • John Savard's Home Page
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #66 on: Thu, 08 July 2010, 22:05:47 »
Quote from: kishy;199592
Lol, they still get that hot...you're just dissipating it at the same rate as it builds up (or something like that).
This was not phrased properly.

They still produce as much heat even with proper cooling that dissipates the heat as fast as it generates.

But they don't get as hot (reach the same temperature) if they are properly cooled.

Of course, cooling always dissipates heat as fast as it generates - eventually. The difference is that if you put more effort into cooling a microprocessor, the rate of heat removal becomes equal to that of heat production at a lower equilibrium temperature. This is because, in general, heat flow from one place to another is proportional to the difference in temperature. So, if you want to remove lots of heat fast from a computer chip that isn't that hot to begin with, ice-cold water, or, better yet, liquid nitrogen might be advised.

If microprocessors could survive being hot enough (like the chips they make out of silicon carbide to put in cars) then the microprocessor could dissipate heat as fast as it was produced simply by acting as a space heater, without a fan at all. They could mount the microprocessor on the outside of the case, and you could use it to keep your coffee warm.

Offline ch_123

  • * Exalted Elder
  • Posts: 5860
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #67 on: Fri, 09 July 2010, 09:20:27 »
Quote from: Oqsy;200833
On topic threads stay on topic.

On topic threads don't bother with processor X versus processor Y arguments because they're irrelevant.  

On topic threads don't bother with OS (A) versus OS (B) because they're irrelevant.

On topic threads don't bother with IBM versus Apple versus Microsoft versus Intel versus AMD versus VIA versus MSI versus ATI versus Coca-Cola versus Pepsi because they're irrelevant.

On topic threads stay on topic.


unicomp


You're going off topic...

Offline Oqsy

  • Posts: 861
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #68 on: Fri, 09 July 2010, 09:50:26 »
The little unicomp logo was definitely ON topic.  I even did a bigger version.  parallel conversations and complete thread jacking are different animals...  thread jacking to troll about processors and apple sucks / doesn't suck is the lowest of the low.
[sigpic]Currently in use: Rosewill RK9000 and CH DT225[/sigpic]
"Private misfortunes make for public welfare."

Offline audioave10

  • Posts: 498
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #69 on: Fri, 09 July 2010, 10:29:43 »
DECK Legend "Toxic" - SOLD
96 IBM Model M 82G2383- 95 IBM Model M 92G7453 - SOLD
Cherry G80-3000/Blues
new: MechanicalEagle Z77 RGB/Blues

Offline EverythingIBM

  • Posts: 1269
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #70 on: Fri, 09 July 2010, 22:00:59 »
What about the uni-ball pen things, they're pretty weird:
http://uniball.com/home/index.html

IT DOESN'T SMUDGE!!! WOW!
Keyboards: '86 M, M5-2, M13, SSK, F AT, F XT

Offline Oqsy

  • Posts: 861
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #71 on: Fri, 09 July 2010, 22:14:15 »
Unitard.
[sigpic]Currently in use: Rosewill RK9000 and CH DT225[/sigpic]
"Private misfortunes make for public welfare."

Offline EverythingIBM

  • Posts: 1269
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #72 on: Fri, 09 July 2010, 22:25:06 »
Quote from: Oqsy;201158
Unitard.
Show Image

I'm reminded of this for some reason:


For some odd reason, I can't get the little MIDI loops from that game on the level out of my mind. CURSE YOU MIDI FILES!
Keyboards: '86 M, M5-2, M13, SSK, F AT, F XT

Offline ricercar

  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 1697
  • Location: Silicon Valley
  • mostly abides
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #73 on: Sat, 10 July 2010, 21:59:53 »
Originally Posted by microsoft windows
My Gateway2000 from the year before could beat the snot of a Power Macintrash G3. Besides, all those things ran was Mac OS, which at the time was useless garbage.


Originally Posted by kishy
You've apparently never tried to edit video on your Pentium 1.
And apparently, never have on a G3 either.
It's virtually impossible on one, and practically impressive on the other.


This is my memory of the G3 era. 1997 was the year when Apple published advertising with an open mouth shark on the G3 PowerBook screens because they outperformed the Pentium I they were marketed against.
I trolled Geekhack and all I got was an eponymous SPOS.

Offline TexasFlood

  • Posts: 1084
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #74 on: Sat, 10 July 2010, 22:39:46 »

Offline EverythingIBM

  • Posts: 1269
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #75 on: Sat, 10 July 2010, 22:45:34 »
Quote from: TexasFlood;201449
Show Image

MENINBLUE ATTACK! AAAAAAAAH!

Quote from: ricercar;201441
Originally Posted by microsoft windows
My Gateway2000 from the year before could beat the snot of a Power Macintrash G3. Besides, all those things ran was Mac OS, which at the time was useless garbage.


Originally Posted by kishy
You've apparently never tried to edit video on your Pentium 1.
And apparently, never have on a G3 either.
It's virtually impossible on one, and practically impressive on the other.


This is my memory of the G3 era. 1997 was the year when Apple published advertising with an open mouth shark on the G3 PowerBook screens because they outperformed the Pentium I they were marketed against.

My memory of the G3 was utter garbage. It was the first computer I really got to use too. They were slow, had nothing on them, and literally were a cheap rip off of windows 95.

Ah, then I got my 300PL and all was redeemed. Wonderful computer.
Keyboards: '86 M, M5-2, M13, SSK, F AT, F XT

Offline TexasFlood

  • Posts: 1084
Idea for better Unicomp logo
« Reply #76 on: Sun, 11 July 2010, 00:02:21 »
Quote from: EverythingIBM;201452
MENINBLUE ATTACK! AAAAAAAAH!

Yes, :wink:, it's the font that gave me the look i had in mind.  Looking at it again, maybe could run some of the letters together might look a bit sleeker, something like this:


or

or
« Last Edit: Sun, 11 July 2010, 02:27:23 by TexasFlood »