Author Topic: IBM Selectric  (Read 5580 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ch_123

  • * Exalted Elder
  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 5860
IBM Selectric
« on: Fri, 30 July 2010, 09:50:37 »
Link

Shipping is too high to make it worth my time, but the price is good for people in the US.

Offline HaaTa

  • Master Kiibohd Hunter
  • Posts: 794
  • Location: San Jose, CA, USA
  • Kiibohds!
    • http://kiibohd.com
IBM Selectric
« Reply #1 on: Fri, 30 July 2010, 11:38:10 »
Neat. Nice price as well.

Just can't justify it though (what the hell am I gonna use it for?).
Kiibohd

ALWAYS looking for cool and interesting switches
I take requests for making keyboard converters (i.e. *old keyboard* to USB).

Offline EverythingIBM

  • Posts: 1269
IBM Selectric
« Reply #2 on: Fri, 30 July 2010, 15:38:09 »
Quote from: ch_123;207801
Link

Shipping is too high to make it worth my time, but the price is good for people in the US.


You should move out of ire-land to north america.
north america = moar ibm.
Keyboards: '86 M, M5-2, M13, SSK, F AT, F XT

Offline JBert

  • Posts: 764
IBM Selectric
« Reply #3 on: Sat, 07 August 2010, 17:38:37 »
It sold for $40... Shipping would be a lot though.
IBM Model F XT + Soarer's USB Converter || Cherry G80-3000/Clears

The storage list:
IBM Model F AT || Cherry G80-3000/Blues || Compaq MX11800 (Cherry brown, bizarre layout) || IBM KB-8923 (model M-style RD) || G81-3010 Hxx || BTC 5100C || G81-3000 Sxx || Atari keyboard (?)


Currently ignored by: nobody?

Disclaimer: we don\'t help you save money on [strike]keyboards[/strike] hardware, rather we make you feel less bad about your expense.
[/SIZE]

Offline J888www

  • Posts: 270
IBM Selectric
« Reply #4 on: Sun, 08 August 2010, 12:25:12 »
Quote from: HaaTa;207817
Just can't justify it though (what the hell am I gonna use it for?).

You can convert it into a keyboard, with a kit from usbtypewriter.com, to use with an ultra portable laptop to make it not portable.
My money will be on everyone staring with astonishment.
hl=en_GB&fs=1">
hl=en_GB&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385">[/youtube]
Often outspoken, please forgive any cause for offense.
Thank you all in GH for reading.

Keyboards & Pointing Devices :-
[/FONT]One Too Many[/COLOR]

Offline ch_123

  • * Exalted Elder
  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 5860
IBM Selectric
« Reply #5 on: Sun, 08 August 2010, 13:41:00 »
I'd assume that process is designed for mechanical typewriters, which would relatively easy to convert to a computer interface because of their simplicity. As for the Selectric, Wikipedia has this rather ominous blurb of text -

Quote
Despite appearances, these machines were not simply Selectric typewriters with an RS-232 connector added. A Selectric is a marvel of mechanical and production—but not electronic—engineering. As with other electric typewriters, and electric adding machines of the era, Selectrics are best thought of as electromechanical devices: The only electric components are the power cord, power switch, and electric motor. The electric motor runs continuously. The keys are not electrical pushbuttons, as they are on a computer keyboard. Pressing a key does not produce an electrical signal, but rather engages a series of clutches which couple the motor power to the mechanism to turn and tilt the element. A Selectric would work equally well if hand-cranked at sufficient speed.

Adapting this mechanism to the needs of computer input/output was nontrivial. The keyboard and printing mechanism were mechanically separated (so that keystrokes do not necessarily result in immediate printing), microswitches were added to the keyboard, solenoids were added to allow the computer to trigger the typing mechanism, and interface electronics were needed. Several mechanical components, in particular the motor and the main clutch, had to be upgraded from the typewriter versions to reliably support continuous operation. Additional microswitches had to be added to sense the state of various parts of the mechanism, such as case (upper vs. lower).

Even after adding all those solenoids and switches, getting a Selectric to talk to a computer was a large project. The Selectric mechanism, as documented in its service manual, had many peculiar requirements. If commanded to shift to upper case when it was already in upper-case, the mechanism locked up and never signaled "done". Same thing for shifting the ribbon direction or initiating a carriage-return. These commands could only be issued at particular times, with the Selectric in a particular state, and then not again until the terminal signaled the operation was complete.

In addition the Selectric spoke neither ASCII nor EBCDIC, but a unique code based on the tilt/rotate commands to the golf ball. That and the bit-parallel interface and peculiar timing requirements meant the Selectric could not be directly hooked up to a modem. Indeed it needed a relatively large amount of logic to reconcile the two devices.