Author Topic: XArmor U9BL Review  (Read 11935 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Phaedrus2129

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 1131
XArmor U9BL Review
« on: Sat, 14 August 2010, 16:44:21 »
http://hardwareaware.com/review/xarmor-u9bl/

Quote
Backlit keyboards, that is keyboards with LEDs illuminating the keys from behind, seem to be considered a “must have” for every respectable gamer. Currently the market for backlit keyboards is more or less cornered by companies like Logitech, Razer, Microsoft, and Saitek, who offer various gaming-oriented keyboards. However, these keyboards are all rubber dome or scissor switch boards, and use cheap diffusive lighting. While they may suffice for someone who just wants a glowy keyboard, they certainly won’t impress someone looking for a quality mechanical keyboard. But the vast majority of mechanical keyboards are not backlit; until recently the only company offering backlit keyboards was Deck, who makes very high quality, but feature-poor backlit keyboards.

Enter XArmor and the U9BL.
Daily Driver: Noppoo Choc Mini
Currently own: IBM Model M 1391401 1988,  XArmor U9 prototype
Previously owned: Ricercar SPOS, IBM M13 92G7461 1994, XArmor U9BL, XArmor U9W prototype, Cherry G80-8200LPDUS, Cherry G84-4100, Compaq MX-11800, Chicony KB-5181 (SMK Monterey), Reveal KB-7061, Cirque Wave Keyboard (ergonomic rubber domes), NMB RT101 (rubber dome), Dell AT101W

Offline gr1m

  • Posts: 439
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #1 on: Sat, 14 August 2010, 17:41:48 »
Your conclusion is more suited to a score of 7/10 than it is to 8/10.

Offline Phaedrus2129

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 1131
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #2 on: Sat, 14 August 2010, 19:34:32 »
Quote from: gr1m;212639
Your conclusion is more suited to a score of 7/10 than it is to 8/10.

I was debating between 7.5 or 8. If I gave a 7.5 it would be because I felt that the keycaps were a huge problem. When it comes down to it, they aren't. They're better than 99.9% of backlit keyboard keycaps which are just painted. Deck is the only company using double shot keycaps, period. These funky dye-sub-rubber-coated-laser-engraved keycaps could be improved by being double shot, but it isn't a *huge* issue.

If I had to break down the point deductions, it would be
-0.5 -- MX blues on a gaming keyboard
-0.5 -- Rube Goldberg keycaps
-1.0 -- Price competition against Deck with an inferior product

Put it at $130 or $140 with MX browns and double shots and I would be very, very tempted to give it a 10/10, but would probably find some build quality issue to nitpick to bring it to 9.5.
Daily Driver: Noppoo Choc Mini
Currently own: IBM Model M 1391401 1988,  XArmor U9 prototype
Previously owned: Ricercar SPOS, IBM M13 92G7461 1994, XArmor U9BL, XArmor U9W prototype, Cherry G80-8200LPDUS, Cherry G84-4100, Compaq MX-11800, Chicony KB-5181 (SMK Monterey), Reveal KB-7061, Cirque Wave Keyboard (ergonomic rubber domes), NMB RT101 (rubber dome), Dell AT101W

Offline xtremerunnerars

  • Posts: 7
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #3 on: Sat, 14 August 2010, 20:36:48 »
Your review's got me interested now, since I was previously looking at Decks.

Could you compare the glow to any of the Decks (specifically the Frost and Ice) as far as whether or not you think it would be annoying after some time or straining on the eyes?

Also, for the price (since I'm a student) how do you think it compares to a Filco in addition to the Decks?

Offline Phaedrus2129

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 1131
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #4 on: Sat, 14 August 2010, 20:55:58 »
I haven't gotten my hands on a Deck before, so I can't comment on that.

A U9BL for $130 blows Filco out of the water, better keycaps, good build quality, backlighting, and media controls and hub and wrist rest, for $127.50 shipped, vs. $150 shipped for a Filco which is just a basic keyboard.
Daily Driver: Noppoo Choc Mini
Currently own: IBM Model M 1391401 1988,  XArmor U9 prototype
Previously owned: Ricercar SPOS, IBM M13 92G7461 1994, XArmor U9BL, XArmor U9W prototype, Cherry G80-8200LPDUS, Cherry G84-4100, Compaq MX-11800, Chicony KB-5181 (SMK Monterey), Reveal KB-7061, Cirque Wave Keyboard (ergonomic rubber domes), NMB RT101 (rubber dome), Dell AT101W

Offline chongyixiong

  • Posts: 257
  • Location: South East Asia
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #5 on: Sat, 14 August 2010, 22:54:19 »
Quote from: Phaedrus2129;212676
I haven't gotten my hands on a Deck before, so I can't comment on that.

But you said, "until recently the only company offering backlit mechanical keyboards was Deck, who makes very high quality, but feature-poor backlit keyboards."

Quote from: ripster;212703
Yeah.  But if I wanted keyboards that glowed I'd move to Chernobyl.

Your sentiment might not be shared by other gamers alike and I do agree with that the Brown cherries are more suited for gaming as compared to the blues.

All in all, that's a pretty good review, but to give Xarmor justice, can I just point one thing out?

Those pictures are crappy in a sense that you used flash and all with at least a few pictures out of focus, only decent picture was the last one (provided by Xarmor) and the backlight in darkness pic.

I think you edited and posted up the article in the middle of the night, but maybe some natural outdoor shots or at least with some sunlight might have made the article more worthwhile?

Cheers, just my $0.02.
« Last Edit: Sat, 14 August 2010, 22:57:04 by chongyixiong »

Offline Phaedrus2129

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 1131
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #6 on: Sat, 14 August 2010, 23:00:56 »
My camera is craaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa*breath*aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaappppppppppppp. I'm saving for an SLR, in between keyboard purchases.
Daily Driver: Noppoo Choc Mini
Currently own: IBM Model M 1391401 1988,  XArmor U9 prototype
Previously owned: Ricercar SPOS, IBM M13 92G7461 1994, XArmor U9BL, XArmor U9W prototype, Cherry G80-8200LPDUS, Cherry G84-4100, Compaq MX-11800, Chicony KB-5181 (SMK Monterey), Reveal KB-7061, Cirque Wave Keyboard (ergonomic rubber domes), NMB RT101 (rubber dome), Dell AT101W

Offline chongyixiong

  • Posts: 257
  • Location: South East Asia
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #7 on: Sat, 14 August 2010, 23:08:00 »
Quote from: Phaedrus2129;212715
My camera is craaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa*breath*aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaappppppppppppp. I'm saving for an SLR, in between keyboard purchases.


It's the lighting condition man.. I'm sure you could do better in daylight. Or borrow a decent camera (if you feel that your current one is inadequate) and take pictures in the day, not in the night.

PS: Why don't you put one of this in the reviews section?

Offline Phaedrus2129

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 1131
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #8 on: Sat, 14 August 2010, 23:23:04 »
Maybe taking the picture in daylight could have helped, but there's no way to disable this camera's flash... Cheap Kodak piece of ****. And no one I know has an SLR or even a high-end point and shoot. I'm stuck until I save up a few hundred to get a decent refurbished camera, maybe a T2i or something.
Daily Driver: Noppoo Choc Mini
Currently own: IBM Model M 1391401 1988,  XArmor U9 prototype
Previously owned: Ricercar SPOS, IBM M13 92G7461 1994, XArmor U9BL, XArmor U9W prototype, Cherry G80-8200LPDUS, Cherry G84-4100, Compaq MX-11800, Chicony KB-5181 (SMK Monterey), Reveal KB-7061, Cirque Wave Keyboard (ergonomic rubber domes), NMB RT101 (rubber dome), Dell AT101W

Offline Homeless

  • Posts: 9
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #9 on: Sun, 15 August 2010, 00:25:07 »
If they ever come out with a brown version at a cheaper price i'd be all over it

Offline Phaedrus2129

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 1131
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #10 on: Sun, 15 August 2010, 00:36:33 »
Cheaper with MX browns would be unlikely, since MX browns cost more than MX blues.
Daily Driver: Noppoo Choc Mini
Currently own: IBM Model M 1391401 1988,  XArmor U9 prototype
Previously owned: Ricercar SPOS, IBM M13 92G7461 1994, XArmor U9BL, XArmor U9W prototype, Cherry G80-8200LPDUS, Cherry G84-4100, Compaq MX-11800, Chicony KB-5181 (SMK Monterey), Reveal KB-7061, Cirque Wave Keyboard (ergonomic rubber domes), NMB RT101 (rubber dome), Dell AT101W

Offline chongyixiong

  • Posts: 257
  • Location: South East Asia
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #11 on: Sun, 15 August 2010, 02:03:09 »
Quote from: ripster;212721
Lol.  This place is starting to sound like DPReview Forums.

It's a blog, Chong.  I thought the pics of the PCB were quite good and most reviewers never bother to open up the keyboard.

Well, sorry about that but I was thinking since his is one of the first in-depth reviews of the unit it might help other people (and Xarmor) if the pictures were taken better. He's not doing a disservice either right?

Quote from: Phaedrus2129;212728
Maybe taking the picture in daylight could have helped, but there's no way to disable this camera's flash... Cheap Kodak piece of ****. And no one I know has an SLR or even a high-end point and shoot. I'm stuck until I save up a few hundred to get a decent refurbished camera, maybe a T2i or something.

Sorry for being anal, but this is what I do.

Offline washuai

  • Posts: 410
  • Location: SF
    • http://home.earthlink.net/~haruai/
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #12 on: Wed, 18 August 2010, 10:30:53 »
Yes, lighting can help even crappy cameras.  A camera that can't disable flash . . Cheap cameras in my experience means no flash or never use it flash not always flash on.  A disposable camera has that thing beat - was it free?
⌨(home)Realforce 87U ⌨(backup) Filco Majestouch 104 Brown ⌨(backup)Cherry G80-8200LPDUS ⌨(work)Leopold FC200RT/AB
☛CST L-Trac-X ☛Logitech Wireless Optical Trackman ☛ Razer 3500 dpi ☛MS Explorer DeathAdder

Lay-a-bouts:  ⌨Full 109 Key Virtually Indestructable  Keyboard ⌨Compaq Radio Quack GYUR84SK
Wishlist: ⌨KBDmania Pure ⌨Déck 82 ice/frost/toxic/royal ⌨Ricercar spos G86-62410EUAGSA ☠ ✞⌨miniGuru(s) ☠
 ✐Intuos or Cintiq

Offline instantkamera

  • Posts: 617
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #13 on: Wed, 18 August 2010, 11:08:04 »
Quote from: ripster;212721
Lol.  This place is starting to sound like DPReview Forums.


Only the part where the canon-tards hang out. The STFers and Nikonians can generally behave themselves :tongue:

kidding of course, but perhaps we should follow the DPR model here and have a separate forum for each switch type...

Quote from: Phaedrus2129;212728
Maybe taking the picture in daylight could have helped, but there's no way to disable this camera's flash... Cheap Kodak piece of ****.


Black electrical tape.

Also, flash can actually help in daylight, as fill for shadows. Especially when it is indirect/diffuse or fairly weak (i.e. cheap kodak camera).
Realforce 86UB - Razer Blackwidow - Dell AT101W - IBM model MCST  LtracX - Kensington Orbit - Logitech Trackman wheel opticalAMD PhenomII x6 - 16GB RAM - SSD - RAIDDell U2211H - Spyder3 - Eye One Display 2

Offline aegrotatio

  • Posts: 334
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #14 on: Wed, 18 August 2010, 23:52:17 »
Doesn't your finger fit in front of the flash like mine does?  I'm definitely missing something, here.
Daily Drivers: Ducky DK1087XM || DSI ASK-6600 || Rosewill RK-9000 BL, BR, BL, and RE || ABS M1 || Das Keyboard Silent || HHKB Lite and Lite 2 || DSI Big Font (kids love it)
Yearning for: Any ALPS keyboard || Any tenkeyless mechanical keyboard
Permanent collection: Poker Blue and Brown || Adesso MKB-125B || SIIG MiniTouch Geek Hack Space Saver || Chicony 5181 Monterey Blue || Chicony 5191 Clone Cherry Blues || Key Tronic 3600 || Unicomp Endurapro & SmarTrex || A crate of IBM Model M and Model M Space Saving boards || NeXTstation Slab || Amiga 3000 || BTC-5100C black and beige || SIIG MiniTouch Plus black and beige
Retired collection: SIIG MiniTouch Monterey Blue || Razer BlackWidow

Offline geonny

  • Posts: 10
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #15 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 17:20:22 »
What's the difference between the XArmor U9BL and the XArmor U9BL-S?  I don't see anything different when I read the specs, but the "S" is a few dollars cheaper, so that makes me think that there is something different.

Offline muchadoaboutnothing

  • Posts: 667
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #16 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 17:22:28 »
Quote from: geonny;326993
What's the difference between the XArmor U9BL and the XArmor U9BL-S?  I don't see anything different when I read the specs, but the "S" is a few dollars cheaper, so that makes me think that there is something different.


U9BL-S uses nonclicky MX Brown switches, U9BL uses clicky MX Blue switches.

Offline geonny

  • Posts: 10
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #17 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 17:52:40 »
Quote from: muchadoaboutnothing;326995
U9BL-S uses nonclicky MX Brown switches, U9BL uses clicky MX Blue switches.


I like the clicky switches, so I think I'll order the U9BL.  I just got a Razor Blackwidow today, and I hate it.  The fonts they use on the keys are hard to read.  This keyboard is going in the trash.

Anyway, thanks for your help, I appreciate it.

Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #18 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 18:08:30 »
Quote from: geonny;327007
I like the clicky switches, so I think I'll order the U9BL.  I just got a Razor Blackwidow today, and I hate it.  The fonts they use on the keys are hard to read.



Exactly, the fonts used on the blakcwidow aren't used even on the worst SF B movies, and the choice of reversing the lower/upper case legends, is probably more idiotic than the fonts itself.
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #19 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 18:10:51 »
Quote from: Phaedrus2129;212757
Cheaper with MX browns would be unlikely, since MX browns cost more than MX blues.


This is a further proof that the selling price has nothing to do with the production cost.
A blue switch is obviously more costly to produce.
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline RebelExtrm02

  • Posts: 15
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #20 on: Fri, 08 April 2011, 22:47:18 »
Quote from: geonny;327007
I like the clicky switches, so I think I'll order the U9BL.  I just got a Razor Blackwidow today, and I hate it.  The fonts they use on the keys are hard to read.  This keyboard is going in the trash.

Anyway, thanks for your help, I appreciate it.

Make sure you order the U9BL off of ergogeek.com. It's the new revision that has all the problems of the first boards fixed. The new revision has a line on the spacebar instead of a dot. The one with the dot is the old one still sold some places and should be avoided.

Offline geonny

  • Posts: 10
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #21 on: Tue, 12 April 2011, 19:45:33 »
Quote from: RebelExtrm02;327141
Make sure you order the U9BL off of ergogeek.com. It's the new revision that has all the problems of the first boards fixed. The new revision has a line on the spacebar instead of a dot. The one with the dot is the old one still sold some places and should be avoided.

I ordered it through Amazon, and I'm now using it.  It has the line on the space bar.  Thanks for the tip though.

Just curious, but what problems did the first board have?
« Last Edit: Tue, 12 April 2011, 19:50:31 by geonny »

Offline geonny

  • Posts: 10
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #22 on: Tue, 12 April 2011, 19:49:38 »
Quote from: The Solutor;327013
Exactly, the fonts used on the blakcwidow aren't used even on the worst SF B movies, and the choice of reversing the lower/upper case legends, is probably more idiotic than the fonts itself.


It just irritates me that you can't get a good view of the fonts from the advertising pictures.  If I had see the fonts, I'd never have ordered the keyboard.

It's hard to imagine why any company would put that font on a keyboard.  They must have received many complaints by now, yet they don't change it.  I guess they don't want to sell a lot of keyboards....come to think of it, they have no real website so I guess you can't write to them to complain if you wanted to.

Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #23 on: Tue, 12 April 2011, 20:03:19 »
They have the worst mail support ever seen, I had a reclusa and was a nice KB well built and pleasurable to type on, but that keyboard was sold by MS so the support, although far from perfect, was very different.
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline geonny

  • Posts: 10
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #24 on: Wed, 13 April 2011, 01:26:54 »
For some reason, the back light keeps going off.  I'll turn it on and set it to the brightness that I want, then for no reason, it'll just go  off.  It might take a few minutes or a few hours, but it just goes off.

It would be nice if the keyboard had an on/off switch that controlled the back light, that way, it could never go  off.  Whenever you use software to control something like that, it's never reliable.

Offline RebelExtrm02

  • Posts: 15
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #25 on: Wed, 13 April 2011, 08:36:04 »
Quote from: geonny;329680
I ordered it through Amazon, and I'm now using it.  It has the line on the space bar.  Thanks for the tip though.

Just curious, but what problems did the first board have?


I read they had some finish problems with the keycaps andwith the coating and lettering as well as some problems with switches coming loose from bad soldering and the like. These have all been rectified in the new revision.

Offline geonny

  • Posts: 10
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #26 on: Wed, 13 April 2011, 20:07:35 »
Quote from: RebelExtrm02;329942
I read they had some finish problems with the keycaps andwith the coating and lettering as well as some problems with switches coming loose from bad soldering and the like. These have all been rectified in the new revision.


Okay, thanks.  You'd think that a $140 keyboard would have better quality control....well, hopefully they do now.:smile:

Offline RebelExtrm02

  • Posts: 15
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #27 on: Wed, 13 April 2011, 22:04:07 »
Quote from: geonny;330303
Okay, thanks.  You'd think that a $140 keyboard would have better quality control....well, hopefully they do now.:smile:


No doubt, but they did learn their lesson and make a good board now. Unfortunately, they left a bad taste in a lot of peoples mouths and scared of some potential customers. I forgive them though. :p

Offline The Solutor

  • Posts: 2262
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #28 on: Thu, 14 April 2011, 02:22:38 »
Quote from: RebelExtrm02;329942
I read they had some finish problems with the keycaps andwith the coating and lettering as well as some problems with switches coming loose from bad soldering and the like. These have all been rectified in the new revision.


No doubt that the early models had some glitches, as happened and happen to almost any industrial device, but here, criticize Xarmor become a national sport, and the bias on the comment is more than evident.

The u9 its just a good keyboard sold at a relatively cheap price (for the US customers at least), which is still unbeaten by any backlit mechanical keyboard.

We will see if the mionix one will manage to do it.
The problem with quotes on the Internet is you never know if they are true  (Abraham Lincoln)

Offline geonny

  • Posts: 10
XArmor U9BL Review
« Reply #29 on: Sat, 16 April 2011, 00:44:32 »
Quote from: ripster;330516
I still like the Razer Black Widow better.  Better built, designed, and nice firmware/software.


Yes, but if are a two fingered, hunt and peck typer like I am, you need to be able to read the keys, and you can't with a Black Widow. (you'd think that someone with a brain would tell them to change their font to something that's readable.)