I was with you there until you got to the Typematrix part.
Do you use one?
Not quite. All that I've written is based on mere imagination. I didn't use one but listened to some people's advice who are happily using the product, and have read lots of reviews in favour of it and etc. Besides, my using it doesn't justify my recommendation, but I just took the courage to make it. Combining my 28 years of experience in computing and having to type on all (almost) sorts of different boards (including switches with buckling springs, cherries, alps, plain and quality rubber domes, membranes and scissors, except topres and red cherries) and searching through maybe hundreds or thousands of pages on ergonomics for my carpal tunnel pains, I thought
1. TypeMatrix's scissor switches wouldn't at least be worse than any standard notebook's scissors
2. As I'm using a Kinesis Advantage Pro and happy with it, a vertical ergonomic layout rather than an angled one would be better
3. Not everyone has to be satisfied with a mechanical switch, and maybe it may be worse for those who are not accustomed with them. Sometimes some switches like cherry blacks may turn out to be stiffer than rubber and more tiring
4. As Qwerty is also known to be purposefully designed for slowing down the typists a hundred or so years ago and not accepted as an ergonomically good design a board that is natively Dvorak by design (in fact it is Colemak too with fn+f5) should do what he wanted.
Anyway, so much I said, he doesn't even care about the ergonomics, a decision that should be respected.
If anything about the TypeMatrix we don't know but you do please share it with us.
Cheers
I'd be interested in high quality scissor brands, but I don't believe in anything but the standard layout. Wavy upside down sideways curved rearranged keyboards have no appeal to me since I get no fatigue with the normal layout.
As a note, I'll be getting my Topre Realforce 86U in a a week or two... I hope I'll have a better experience coding with it than with my beloved Kinesis.