Author Topic: Build quality noppoo choc mini ?  (Read 17842 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline popol

  • Posts: 134
Build quality noppoo choc mini ?
« Reply #50 on: Thu, 08 September 2011, 08:04:18 »
for the built quality and the LEAGUE the comparison stands and you're right the Noppoo would be more of a Traban!!!

Offline itlnstln

  • Posts: 7048
Build quality noppoo choc mini ?
« Reply #51 on: Thu, 08 September 2011, 08:16:16 »
What's wrong with Noppoo's build quality?  Mine's solid as a rock.


Offline sordna

  • Posts: 2249
Build quality noppoo choc mini ?
« Reply #52 on: Thu, 08 September 2011, 10:45:00 »
If you want Ferrari performance, you gotta go to Kinesis Advantage or Maltron. Traditional flat staggered layouts are akin to steam engines. No matter how you much polish them with NKRO, fancy keycaps, detachable cables, and whatnot, they are still the same inefficient design that's been around for decades.
Kinesis Contoured Advantage & Advantage2 LF with Cherry MX Red switches / Extra keys mod / O-ring dampening mod / Dvorak layout. ErgoDox with buzzer and LED mod.
Also: Kinesis Advantage Classic, Kinesis Advantage2, Data911 TG3, Fingerworks Touchstream LP, IBM SSK (Buckling spring), Goldtouch GTU-0077 keyboard

Offline N8N

  • Posts: 795
Build quality noppoo choc mini ?
« Reply #53 on: Thu, 08 September 2011, 10:51:19 »
Quote from: sordna;412682
If you want Ferrari performance, you gotta go to Kinesis Advantage or Maltron. Traditional flat staggered layouts are akin to steam engines. No matter how you much polish them with NKRO, fancy keycaps, detachable cables, and whatnot, they are still the same inefficient design that's been around for decades.


Eh, I don't use a non-standard layout keyboard because I don't want to have to sit down in front of someone else's machine and be completely at a loss as to how to type on it.  Granted that would suck to have to be subjected to the indignity of rubber domes after becoming accustomed to tactile mechanical goodness, but at least I won't have to figure out a new layout.  Having a great "ergonomic" keyboard is only useful if you carry it around with you wherever you go

At least that's my theory and I'm sticking to it.
Filco Majestouch-2 with Cherry Corp. doubleshot keys - Leopold Tenkeyless Tactile Force with Wyse doubleshots - Silicon Graphics 9500900 - WASD V1 - IBM Model M 52G9658 - Noppoo Choc Pro with Cherry lasered PBT keycaps - Wyse 900866-01 - Cherry G80-8200LPBUS/07 - Dell AT101W - several Cherry G81s (future doubleshot donors) (order of current preference) (dang I have too many keyboards, I really only need two)

Offline sordna

  • Posts: 2249
Build quality noppoo choc mini ?
« Reply #54 on: Thu, 08 September 2011, 11:00:25 »
I disagree. I'm sure Schumacher can regular drive street cars fine, even though they are vastly different than his Formula 1 racer that he spends hours training in.

Case in point: I have a Kinesis Advantage and even typing Dvorak on it, AND I have a Poker, an IBM mini, laptops, etc with the traditional layout (and I type them in regular QWERTY).
I am fully efficient in both. I just happen to do 100WPM on one and 75WPM on the others because of the keyboards' efficiency (and my own personal limits). I never did more than 80WPM before getting the Kinesis.

Other users, including iMav have an Advantage and regular keyboards, and can switch back and forth. While learning a new layout, it's better to stick with it for a week or two, but once you learn it well, you can start going back and forth and soon you'll be a master of both, and you'll be able to objectively compare them.
« Last Edit: Thu, 08 September 2011, 11:13:54 by sordna »
Kinesis Contoured Advantage & Advantage2 LF with Cherry MX Red switches / Extra keys mod / O-ring dampening mod / Dvorak layout. ErgoDox with buzzer and LED mod.
Also: Kinesis Advantage Classic, Kinesis Advantage2, Data911 TG3, Fingerworks Touchstream LP, IBM SSK (Buckling spring), Goldtouch GTU-0077 keyboard