And the truth is, "it depends". As a big time IBM Fan (Thinkpad Laptops and the awesome Model M) it has perplexed me about why one "identical" board is better feeling than another. They all sort of feel the same - but not quite. Well, to test a theory, I decided to buy a second example of my current leading favorite Model M - the M13 white keyboard as built by Lexmark (Maxi-Switch in Black is a favorite, very close but not quite as good a feel as my original M13 White from IBM/Lexmark.)
So I bought another M13 White, built just three months later, also by Lexmark in 1994. And it felt - the same but different.
With the older board holding a slight edge for typing enjoyment. Why? Same company, assembly line and parts - so why?
Usage and "break-in period". How much and how hard was it used before you got it? The three month newer board felt brand new. Almost too new. More bounce to the keys, took a little more pressure to trip the hammers, etc. Subtle but real diffiernces. And they almost have to be about the difference in usage/keystroke volume, as I doubt if Lexmark changed much in a 90 day period.
Do IBM/Lexmark/Unicomp boards have a "break-in period"? They start out great - and get better with time! In fact, the Unicomp seems to come closest to ideal out ot the box, with slightly better key action.
Anybody else notice a "break-in period" with your Model M?? ThinkPad Fan