Author Topic: Should we be worried for Unicomp?  (Read 1172 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Internetlad

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 710
Should we be worried for Unicomp?
« on: Fri, 09 December 2011, 15:33:40 »
I own a Unicomp SpaceSaver 104, Use it at work and love the heck out of the thing. I was reading an (old) article on NPR about unicomp and the 'boards they produce, which got me thinking, it really is a niche market. Even amongst enthusiasts, are unicomp boards valued at their price (New 80 bucks+ shipping) over a model m (used ~40)?

You don't hear people asking about new BS keyboards, it's IBM Model M this and that. The old M's are built like tanks, and rarely break, so they don't make much off of replacement parts and I doubt they even bother with a service station deal. I think Unicomp is carrying out a real labour of love here. (They've been demoted from what IBM used to mass produce, to a niche market where they're running a Yahoo! store and customized phone orders)

Weigh in. Is it known about Unicomp's status businesswise? Am I wrong? Should we be worried for new BS keyboards?
"Beep . . . Beep . . . Beep" -Sputnik I


Visit the Typing Test and try!

Offline ownerer

  • Posts: 27
Should we be worried for Unicomp?
« Reply #1 on: Fri, 09 December 2011, 21:02:33 »
Someone should just redesign their website for them.

???

Keyboards.

Offline Tony

  • Posts: 1189
Should we be worried for Unicomp?
« Reply #2 on: Sat, 10 December 2011, 03:55:26 »
We should worry for our own financial problem after buying so many mechanical keyboards, and let Unicomp managers worry for themselves.

For durability Unicomp should learn a bit from Razer which got much revenue from teenage gamers with not so durable but good looking keyboards
Keyboard: Filco MJ1 104 brown, Filco MJ2 87 brown, Compaq MX11800, Noppoo Choc Brown/Blue/Red, IBM Model M 1996, CMStorm Quickfire Rapid Black
Layout: Colemak experience, speed of 67wpm