I presume that minus must be alt-gr 8? Interesting selection – I presume it's intended for Belgians as well, given the Dutch IJ digraph on there (that leads down the Path of Pain – cf i/I vs i/İ and ı/I, ß/SS, “hyphen-minus” … Unicode is a crawling horror).
Not a lot of people give any consideration to undoing the damage to typography caused by the typewriter. The down side, though, is the issue that many desirable symbols require Unicode (minus being one of them). Windows hasn't shaken off ANSI yet, so having an actual keyboard layout where you can't type a lot of characters isn't a legitimate target for many layout developers, and even with Autohotkey it took some time before it was possible to generate Unicode characters via the Autohotkey_L fork. I have no idea what the situation is with other operating systems and frameworks.
The confusion over the meaning of ASCII is probably not helped by widespread use of "extended ASCII", which isn't ASCII, or standard, and isn't typically compatible with Latin-1 and therefore doesn't slot unharmed within UTF-8. What does upset me is that Britain was involved in the creation of ASCII and still no-one pushed for 8-bit from day 1 (cf C trigraphs), so it was unsuitable for mainland Europe from the get go. ASCII was never meant to be a standard – they plan for "national use" characters that would prevent international data interchange. :headdesk:
We've rushed into computing too fast, taking too many shortcuts and leaving a legacy of chaos in our wake. Nothing ever changes – look at the incompatible nightmare that is wireless.
Standardisation has always sucked.