At the Kentucky CHASE bank. Mr B (banker) and Mr U (Unicomp).
B: Long time no see, what brings you here?
U: New product idea, need some money. You see, a bunch of these old mechanical keyboards from 25 years ago are selling like hotcakes.
B: I've heard of Ebay. My husband buys Cupie dolls there.
U: No, this is going to make us MILLIONs.
B: OK, how many you gonna sell.
U: I dunno. This guy sells one a week. There's this website named Geekhack with over 500 members.
B: How much to retool?
U: $40,000
B: (Clicks on the calculator a bit.) Boy, the weather here has sure turned hot......
lol, this isnt quite accurate tho. FOr instance, a (very inexpensive) color upgrade would affect all of unicomp's models, not just one. If they retool to produce minis they can again produce a range (for instance, with trackpoint and without). The 40k isnt going into just one model but into revamping their whole (already existing and already selling) product line.
And if they're smart they'll allocate a part of that to a more targeted marketing campaign too.
I mean look, the Das company and matias basically have one model which is their big seller, and they're not only in business but seem to be thriving. Unicomp has more than just one model and it seems perpetually on the verge of bankruptcy.
The difference is in ambition and imagination, not finance capital. If you have the former, and with a proven product and technology with a long history, no less, the latter will follow. If that isnt true, then all of american capitalism is in trouble.
(yea, i know its in trouble but that had to do with the housing bubble, not the fundamentals of the capitalist system which is what i'm talking about, and whcih has been remarkably resilient as a system for two centuries, outlasting all other economic systems, so dont tell me the basic principles of capitalism are bad - i'm talking about the most basic concepts here: good product and imaginative marketing = finance capital follows). Its in this fundamental economic concept that unicomp failed -- they had a good product and they couldnt find a way to market and diversify it - thats a management failure, not a failure of the product itself.