Author Topic: Website Dedicated To The IBM M4-1 (Read 1180 times)

bugfix · « **on:** Mon, 21 February 2011, 13:31:26 »

"simply the best keyboard ever produced"

Pah.

db_Iodine · « **Reply #1 on:** Mon, 21 February 2011, 14:03:14 »

I really think the white one looks better than the black one.

Anyone know why webwit hates it?

Findecanor · « **Reply #2 on:** Mon, 21 February 2011, 14:31:29 »

This one has low-profile switches that are not scissor switches, right? How stable are the keys then?

db_Iodine · « **Reply #3 on:** Mon, 21 February 2011, 14:35:44 »

Quote from: ripster;298882

Well, I'm typing on one right now (iMav's checks out perfectly). It's pretty balky at the top of the stroke.

I prefer the DealExtreme as a HHKB killer since the Trackpoint 2 is not sensitive enough even with mouse sensitivity at MAXIMUM. But that's on a 1900x1200 screen so for portable use it would be nice.

One problem as a laptop keyboard - the cord weighs as much as the keyboard.

The problem with me would be that my laptop has a 1920x1200 screen. I've never really liked those trackpoints, so I wouldn't be using it anyway.

ch_123 · « **Reply #4 on:** Mon, 21 February 2011, 15:21:05 »

Say, Ripster, those M4 pictures look rather familiar...

ch_123 · « **Reply #5 on:** Mon, 21 February 2011, 15:28:25 »

I might have to steal that picture back for the IBM wiki.

iMav · « **Reply #6 on:** Sat, 26 March 2011, 05:14:51 »

I haven't seen any distinction made between the M4 and the M4-1 on that site. And no BRS reference!

Amateurs.

ch_123 · « **Reply #7 on:** Sat, 26 March 2011, 05:37:12 »

A lot of the information on the M4-1 is misleading or wrong. The IBM Wiki's M4 section is far more useful.

Pylon · « **Reply #8 on:** Sat, 13 August 2011, 14:07:14 »

Thread Necro, but one of the pictures isn't even of an M4.

News:

Author Topic: Website Dedicated To The IBM M4-1 (Read 1180 times)