Author Topic: Buckling Springs switches compatible with Cherry MX keycaps?  (Read 4039 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Marenz

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 1
Buckling Springs switches compatible with Cherry MX keycaps?
« on: Thu, 31 January 2013, 10:03:09 »
Hello!

I finally want to have a keyboard with a native neo2 layout ( http://neo-layout.org/ ). For that reason, I want to print custom keycaps for the neo layout at http://www.wasdkeyboards.com
They say they use Cherry MX compatible keycaps, so I was wondering where I can put these keycaps on now. One of my favourite keyboards would be one of the unicomp ones with buckling spring switches (and integrated mouse even, e.g. http://pckeyboard.com/page/EnduraPro/UB404G6 but of course I have no idea whether my keycaps would fit. Does any one know whether Cherry MX keycaps are compatible with Buckling Srpings switches?

My other plan would be to get a Cherry G80-3000LSCDE-2  and put the key caps on that one.

I am also happy about other suggestions on how I could come to my native neo2 mechanical keyboard.
I've been reading up a lot on the technologies and figured a buckling spring might be the best, but a Cherry MX Clear or Brown switch might also be okay.

I fancy a NKRO but maybe you guys will tell me I don't need that and I will believe you. But I certainly will want a PS/2 :)

Offline fohat.digs

  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 6564
  • Location: 35°55'N, 83°53'W
  • weird funny old guy
Re: Buckling Springs switches compatible with Cherry MX keycaps?
« Reply #1 on: Thu, 31 January 2013, 10:18:52 »
Cherry and IBM keys are totally different.

People have cut and epoxied pieces to put together "Frankenstein" keys but they are almost always horrible.

The buckling spring barrel requires a large opening, because that is the chamber in which the spring has to buckle.
"We are on the precipice of signing an agreement to advance talks with Iran that preserves the good parts of former President Barack Obama’s Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) while amplifying its flaws.
Mr. Obama came to an agreement that did not involve America’s most precious treasure, the lives and limbs of our soldiers.  The 1.7 billion dollars of frozen Iranian assets released by Obama pales in comparison to the 300 billion being floated as a rebuilding fund.
So far, speculation that Iran will be free in the future to continue its nuclear program is the opposite of Trump’s stated goal for the war and in direct opposition to what Mr. Obama negotiated.
"
- Bill Roberts 2026-06-17