Author Topic: What is the exact sensitivity layout of the Realforce 104UB?  (Read 2440 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rythh

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 44
  • Location: East Coast, United States
What is the exact sensitivity layout of the Realforce 104UB?
« on: Wed, 27 February 2013, 23:21:47 »
Hey guys, I have been looking around everywhere and I can't seem to find the exact weight distribution of the 104UB.  Everywhere I look it just says that the layout is separated by 35g, 45g, and 55g depending on the expected finger to be used, but does anyone have an image or something of which key is which force?

Thanks!

Offline metalliqaz

  • * Maker
  • Posts: 4951
  • Location: the Making Stuff subforum
  • Leopold fanboy
Re: What is the exact sensitivity layout of the Realforce 104UB?
« Reply #1 on: Wed, 27 February 2013, 23:22:59 »
I did see a picture once, but I have no idea where.  Anyway, as far as I know, all keys are 45g except esc which is 55g and every "pinky" key which is 35g.

Offline metalliqaz

  • * Maker
  • Posts: 4951
  • Location: the Making Stuff subforum
  • Leopold fanboy
Re: What is the exact sensitivity layout of the Realforce 104UB?
« Reply #2 on: Wed, 27 February 2013, 23:27:02 »
Found on google image cache... terrible, but it shows what I mean. Ignore the red boxes...

Offline Michael

  • Formerly Bro Caps
  • * Maker
  • Posts: 4632
  • REEEeeeeEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeeEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEeeeee
Re: What is the exact sensitivity layout of the Realforce 104UB?
« Reply #3 on: Wed, 27 February 2013, 23:27:13 »

Offline metalliqaz

  • * Maker
  • Posts: 4951
  • Location: the Making Stuff subforum
  • Leopold fanboy
Re: What is the exact sensitivity layout of the Realforce 104UB?
« Reply #4 on: Wed, 27 February 2013, 23:27:54 »
Wow that's interesting, which board has the quad-weight layout?

Offline Rythh

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 44
  • Location: East Coast, United States
Re: What is the exact sensitivity layout of the Realforce 104UB?
« Reply #5 on: Wed, 27 February 2013, 23:30:12 »
Is the quad layout for the 104UB? 

And either way I am happy, I just wanted to be sure most of the keys were NOT going to be 55g, the lighter the actuation force the better!  Is it a definite that they didn't change the layout to include more 55g?

Offline Hyde

  • Posts: 2643
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • White Tofu Extraordinaire
Re: What is the exact sensitivity layout of the Realforce 104UB?
« Reply #6 on: Wed, 27 February 2013, 23:30:14 »
http://deskthority.net/marketplace-f11/topre-realforce-87u-10th-anniversary-edition-t1592-150.html

Ring finger is 40g, pinkie is 35g, esc is 55g, everything else is 45g.

Though I vaguely remember there's only 3 force difference, so maybe ring and pinkie are both 35g.

Archiss ProgresTouch Retro - Gateron Yellow  |  Topre Realforce 104UW - 45g Silent  |  Topre Type Heaven  |  Beige Filco Ninja 104 - MX Red  |  Das Keyboard - MX Brown  |  Poker II - MX Red  |  Race II - MX Brown  |  Matias Quiet Pro - Matias Dampened ALPS  |  Logitech K840 - Romer G  |  Cherry MX Board 2.0 - MX Red  |  Cherry G84-4100 - ML  |  IBM Model M
Roccat Kone Pure  |  Logitech G203  |  Logitech G303  |  Logitech G302  |  Razer Naga  |  CM Storm Xornet  |  Razer Goliathus Mobile Stealth  |  Razer Goliathus Control  |  Artisan Hien  |  Artisan Hayate  |  Artisan Shiden

Offline metalliqaz

  • * Maker
  • Posts: 4951
  • Location: the Making Stuff subforum
  • Leopold fanboy
Re: What is the exact sensitivity layout of the Realforce 104UB?
« Reply #7 on: Wed, 27 February 2013, 23:32:47 »
Is the quad layout for the 104UB? 

And either way I am happy, I just wanted to be sure most of the keys were NOT going to be 55g, the lighter the actuation force the better!  Is it a definite that they didn't change the layout to include more 55g?

Definitely no 55g.

Offline Rythh

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 44
  • Location: East Coast, United States
Re: What is the exact sensitivity layout of the Realforce 104UB?
« Reply #8 on: Wed, 27 February 2013, 23:35:43 »
Excellent, that is awesome to know.  Well this thread was a huge success, got a good answer and it was the one I wanted to hear!