Author Topic: Geekbench score thread (Read 14381 times)

EverythingIBM · « **Reply #50 on:** Tue, 01 February 2011, 15:05:10 »

I feel sad.... here's mine:
http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/349346

1609 :sad:

But apparently it has the "IBM IBM Bios". I'm skeptical now.
(and I actually have 4GB of memory; but the computer reserves a gig to itself always, and I'm running x86 anyways)

EDIT:
if you want some fun trivia, the motherboard is always stated as MSIS instead of MSI... don't know why. One cool thing about the mobo is that it has a gold pin to hold the CMOS battery in, and a lavender PCI-e x16 lever.

EDIT#2:
I had a better idea, I looked up other models of 6225 IBMs:
http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/search?q=6225
They all have the same motherboard obviously, but the scores vary. Apparently mine got the lowest 0_o
The highest score has the same bloody [strike]processor as I do[/strike], the SAME MODEL!

mr_a500 · « **Reply #51 on:** Sun, 24 April 2011, 13:32:57 »

Oooh, now I'm up to a whopping 1780.

(at least it beats my previous 244)

audioave10 · « **Reply #52 on:** Sun, 24 April 2011, 14:00:50 »

Score...4286.
I didn't bother to save it online.
E8500 @ 3.8Ghz
4 GB DDR2 1000 RAM
GTX 275 896MB
WD 640GB Black

reaper · « **Reply #53 on:** Sun, 24 April 2011, 21:04:28 »

^ Then I fail. =(

audioave10 · « **Reply #54 on:** Sun, 24 April 2011, 21:08:08 »

That 6-core is wicked!

Hey, Ripster, with that UEFI board you can easy OC that to a 4.5Ghz - 4.8Ghz range with no stress.

vils · « **Reply #55 on:** Mon, 25 April 2011, 05:34:02 »

Not bad for a typewriter

iMav · « **Reply #56 on:** Mon, 05 September 2011, 08:22:37 »

Not bad for a mobile i5

This is in a new Mac mini. Thought about getting the quad-core i7 (server edition). But wanted the better discrete graphics. As far as getting the mobile i5 over the i7? I was impatient and took whatever they had at the local Apple store.

keyboardlover · « **Reply #57 on:** Mon, 05 September 2011, 08:42:58 »

I got 6581 for my Thinkpad X220 Netbook. Seems pretty decent for a Netbook eh?

[ Attachment Invalid Or Does Not Exist ] 25869[/ATTACH]

bavman · « **Reply #58 on:** Mon, 05 September 2011, 11:12:18 »

http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/419548

My pc running hackintosh. Although i heard you can score about 1k higher with the 64-bit paid version, but who would waste their money on that?

sam113101 · « **Reply #59 on:** Mon, 05 September 2011, 15:26:47 »

http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/476595
Not bad.

IvanIvanovich · « **Reply #60 on:** Thu, 08 September 2011, 12:56:51 »

1224-HTPC

130-Retro Gaming

verbel · « **Reply #61 on:** Fri, 09 September 2011, 15:00:57 »

Quote from: ripster;336742

10,770.

Geekhack is the only place I know where lower is better.

Ripster is that score with your CPU over clocked? I have pretty much the same setup except I have a ASRock MB and I get 8592.

keyboardlover · « **Reply #62 on:** Fri, 09 September 2011, 15:03:15 »

Call me Mr. Taco bell, I can make your ASRock!

verbel · « **Reply #63 on:** Sat, 10 September 2011, 04:02:38 »

Thanks I'll try giving it a read through. Gonna take a while its a bit of a jungle.

Index · « **Reply #64 on:** Sun, 11 September 2011, 00:41:40 »

My score

Hrm, seems ok =/

Xuan · « **Reply #65 on:** Mon, 12 September 2011, 19:03:13 »

mine. Thinkpad X201 notebook.

Quote from: keyboardlover;410840

I got 6581 for my Thinkpad X220 Netbook. Seems pretty decent for a Netbook eh?

(Attachment Link) 25869[/ATTACH]

Not netbook, Notebook.

forTruce · « **Reply #66 on:** Mon, 12 September 2011, 23:31:42 »

Quote from: ripster;232780

Still got those beat.

Those early necro-thread scores crack me up. BigPook - I TOLD you to get a Intel Quad!

I'm callin' you out Ripster...

mistakemistake · « **Reply #67 on:** Tue, 07 August 2012, 01:10:40 »

This thread is hella old. Let's see some new scores?
15,008

Nadger · « **Reply #68 on:** Tue, 07 August 2012, 22:24:50 »

New Score: http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/928759
Old Score: http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/view/341596

Anynoupy · « **Reply #69 on:** Wed, 08 August 2012, 08:14:04 »

There's my score

The 1156 i7 CPUs seem to still be doing great, and it's largely enough for my everyday use !

funkymeeba · « **Reply #70 on:** Wed, 08 August 2012, 22:41:38 »

Here's my home Linux machine: http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/view/931466

Since it gives few details on my machine, it's a stock Xeon E3-1230 processor on an ASUS P8B WS motherboard. My particular Linux is Funtoo. Not a bad score for a machine that uses a rather low amount of power.

mistakemistake · « **Reply #71 on:** Wed, 08 August 2012, 22:42:58 »

Quote from: funkymeeba on Wed, 08 August 2012, 22:41:38

Here's my home Linux machine: http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/view/931466

Since it gives few details on my machine, it's a stock Xeon E3-1230 processor on an ASUS P8B WS motherboard. My particular Linux is Funtoo. Not a bad score for a machine that uses a rather low amount of power.

OHHH the E series Xeon! Nice!

WRXChris · « **Reply #72 on:** Wed, 08 August 2012, 23:02:33 »

2600k @ a modest 4.5GHz/1.32V, ASUS P67 Sabretooth MB, 8GB GSkill 1600 9/9/9/24, Win 7... best rig I've ever built!

13,452

The_Beast · « **Reply #73 on:** Wed, 08 August 2012, 23:25:02 »

11812 w/ 3770k, I was expecting more but I have no OC and only 8Gb ram
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/931537

csm725 · « **Reply #74 on:** Thu, 09 August 2012, 05:11:30 »

2500k @ 4.4, 16GB 1600MHZ RAM, some open programs:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/932097
10,552

Hak Foo · « **Reply #75 on:** Tue, 04 September 2012, 00:25:35 »

Stupid question: why does browser not show correct CPU speed?

Mine:
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/1002724

At stock, 8337. So basically, your 33 percent overclock is getting you about 25 percent more performance.

mistakemistake · « **Reply #76 on:** Wed, 11 September 2013, 09:51:39 »

how am i still winning?

News:

Author Topic: Geekbench score thread (Read 14381 times)