Author Topic: Optimal keyboards for trackers using standards set by FTII  (Read 3733 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline danwomansan

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 78
  • Location: Somewhere in Ontario, Canada
  • Also known by my real name, ********!
Optimal keyboards for trackers using standards set by FTII
« on: Sun, 11 January 2015, 22:46:15 »
I am a tracker musician, and I primarily use FTII-derived key control layouts, which are heavy around the keyboard, though in a different way from typing and video games.


This is a mock-up of what the layouts generally look like (based off of a mixture of Renoise, Milkytracker, and Famitracker default bindings, using this image as a reference)

Purple keys are note keys, numbers denote which octave they are. It is important that these be in US standard as very few trackers are written to be compatible with other key layouts.
Keys with blue on them are used for value entry in the instrument/volume/effect parameter columns.
Keys with teal on them will modify the pattern by removing notes, adding whitespace, or adding different forms of note stops.
Keys with red on them modify the view/note mode the tracker is in.
Keys with bright orange on them are navigation keys.
Keys with green on them are used for inputting effect calls when in the effect number/letter column.
Keys with a black blob on them vary from tracker to tracker but are used for shortcuts to keep your hand from the mouse, different depending on tracker.
And any keys that were not blanked out but do not have a colour on them have a use but I forgot it, since they are probably not used in Renoise.

In order of importance:
1. Typewriter area and arrow keys
2. Insert and backspace
3. Delete (massive speedup in most cases when present)
4. Home/End

Every other key does something you can do with the mouse in modern trackers and are therefore not vital.

The most optimal layout for tracker usage puts all of the navigation keys in generally the same place, lines the top and bottom with mode keys, puts the numpad on the left side instead of the right (doesn't matter really since you can just get any keyboard without a numpad and a separate numpad and it's really mostly my own preference to have it on the left), and doesn't put any of the top-4 importance keys in an FN layer.
it's pronounced "danw omansen", not "dan woman san"

Offline Data

  • Posts: 2608
  • Location: Orlando, FL
Re: Optimal keyboards for trackers using standards set by FTII
« Reply #1 on: Sun, 11 January 2015, 23:09:57 »
What are you showing us here?

Are you asking for suggestions?  I'm lost.

Offline danwomansan

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 78
  • Location: Somewhere in Ontario, Canada
  • Also known by my real name, ********!
Re: Optimal keyboards for trackers using standards set by FTII
« Reply #2 on: Sun, 11 January 2015, 23:11:32 »
er, yes, kind of.

suggestions, discussion about which keyboard would be the best for it

honestly I don't expect too much to happen in the way of discussion as I'm not sure there are many other tracker musicians here
it's pronounced "danw omansen", not "dan woman san"

Offline Data

  • Posts: 2608
  • Location: Orlando, FL
Re: Optimal keyboards for trackers using standards set by FTII
« Reply #3 on: Sun, 11 January 2015, 23:22:33 »
Well I'm not one of those, but it seems like any full-size or TKL keyboard with ANSI layout would work, based on your drawing.  Is this for live performances or more like studio recordings?

Offline danwomansan

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 78
  • Location: Somewhere in Ontario, Canada
  • Also known by my real name, ********!
Re: Optimal keyboards for trackers using standards set by FTII
« Reply #4 on: Sun, 11 January 2015, 23:26:19 »
Note entry is sequenced; there is no performance, save coming up with melodies or chord progressions before you enter them.
it's pronounced "danw omansen", not "dan woman san"

Offline Snowdog993

  • Grace Under Pressure
  • Posts: 1587
  • Location: Over There! (Pointing)
  • Justifiably Clueless.
Re: Optimal keyboards for trackers using standards set by FTII
« Reply #5 on: Sun, 11 January 2015, 23:29:15 »
Note entry is sequenced; there is no performance, save coming up with melodies or chord progressions before you enter them.

Is this like a MIDI composing software for a Roland-32 or something like that? 

Edit Roland MT-32  I remember now.
« Last Edit: Mon, 12 January 2015, 00:14:36 by Snowdog993 »

Offline danwomansan

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 78
  • Location: Somewhere in Ontario, Canada
  • Also known by my real name, ********!
Re: Optimal keyboards for trackers using standards set by FTII
« Reply #6 on: Sun, 11 January 2015, 23:32:51 »
Trackers are a form of sequencer that are the grandfather of modern-day pianoroll sequencers like FL Studio or Ableton, and a modern tracker looks like this:


tracker pictured is Renoise, extremely popular among any electronic musician who needs to chop samples
it's pronounced "danw omansen", not "dan woman san"

Offline Data

  • Posts: 2608
  • Location: Orlando, FL
Re: Optimal keyboards for trackers using standards set by FTII
« Reply #7 on: Sun, 11 January 2015, 23:48:27 »
Interesting.

I like those types of music.   :)

Offline Snowdog993

  • Grace Under Pressure
  • Posts: 1587
  • Location: Over There! (Pointing)
  • Justifiably Clueless.
Re: Optimal keyboards for trackers using standards set by FTII
« Reply #8 on: Sun, 11 January 2015, 23:51:21 »
Wow that looks pretty cool!  I really don't personally know anyone here too well.  I'm sure there are several here that do that sort of thing.  Good luck!