With some improvements in their dyesub capabilities, they'd find themselves with plenty of new designs and group buys to work with.
Well, that doesn't address the very common case of sets that were only run once and yet are still in high (and recurring) demand as new folks enter the hobby. Another manufacturer comes along with the ability to run SA and DSA sets and, naturally, they are going to want to step in and fulfill the demand that SP simply can not. I get that. And I fully endorse their desire and willingness to support the community in this way.
I just want them to involve the designer; to give the designer proper credit and allow them to financially benefit from the new sales.I have no desire to shut down alternate avenues for highly sought after product, just so long as it done fairly and in a way that properly acknowledges and rewards the original designer, who by the way, not only came up with the idea for the set (along with any original novelties) but also
created the marketplace demand for it, which these other companies are unfairly exploiting without so much as a nod of recognition to the person responsible for it all. It may not technically violate any laws, but it sure violates every definition of honorable/respectful/ethical behavior that I know of.