Author Topic: Anyone have any experience with "untested" IBM keyboards?  (Read 1978 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline willmurray461

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 7
Anyone have any experience with "untested" IBM keyboards?
« on: Sat, 26 August 2017, 10:35:30 »
Has anyone here bought an untested IBM keyboard? Moreover, did it work or not? Sources like clickykeyboards.com say to never buy them because they're probably broken, but I was wondering if anyone bought one and the seller just doesn't have an adapter to test it. Also, if they're broken what are the main points of failure and how can they be repaired?

Offline 1391406

  • Posts: 1191
  • Posts: 24838
Re: Anyone have any experience with "untested" IBM keyboards?
« Reply #1 on: Sat, 26 August 2017, 16:28:48 »
I've had pretty good luck buying untested IBM boards, but I don't do it very often and I'm a lot more critical about listing details. If it seems to me that a seller genuinely doesn't have a way to test the keyboard, I'm more inclined to buy it. IBM Model M's are extremely durable.
Unicomp Classic | Chicony KB-5181 (Monterey Blues) | IBM Model M (1391401) | IBM XT Model F | IBM AT Model F | Dell AT101W | 122-key IBM Model F
IBM Model M13 | Apple Extended Keyboard | Apple Extended Keyboard II | MTEK K104 | NTC KB-6251/2 | Realforce 87U | Realforce 104U | Type Heaven

Offline klennkellon

  • Posts: 1278
  • Location: Southern California
  • I like bottoming out
Re: Anyone have any experience with "untested" IBM keyboards?
« Reply #2 on: Sat, 26 August 2017, 18:58:34 »
Model M's are pretty durable. If you find one chances are it's functional. Even ones missing some rivets.

Ripster did drop tests awhile back and found that the rivet loss is mostly on the edges so sometimes keys on the very edges like Numpad "-" might be temperamental.

Offline fohat.digs

  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 6533
  • Location: 35°55'N, 83°53'W
  • weird funny old guy
Re: Anyone have any experience with "untested" IBM keyboards?
« Reply #3 on: Sat, 26 August 2017, 19:28:56 »
I have bought at least 2 dozen used Model Ms and all worked properly except for 2 late-1990s 42Hs built at Greenock.
From the US Constitution, Article 1, Section 8 :

The   Congress   shall have Power
To declare War,  grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
To provide for calling forth the Militia  to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

Offline ander

  • * Esteemed Elder
  • Posts: 1187
  • Location: Vancouver, BC
  • I type, therefore I am
Re: Anyone have any experience with "untested" IBM keyboards?
« Reply #4 on: Sun, 27 August 2017, 04:13:04 »
"Untested" usually means the seller doesn't have a PS/2 connection and literally can't test the board. (Relatively few peeps still use desktop PCs, and they'd need a pretty old laptop to still have PS/2.) It's a good reason for selling the board, too, right—a board they can't use?

Model F's and M's are legendary for their durability. They cost hundreds of bucks back in the '80s/'90s (in '80s/'90s dollars), and that's because they were built like nothing else. Even a board that's been used every day in a business environment for over 20 years is usually still perfectly usable—just dirty, but due to IBM's superior materials, they're easy to clean up, too.

I'm sure there's the occasional shady seller who uses "untested" as an excuse to dump a borked board. But that must be rare, for I've bought many an "untested" IBM board and found it was fine. And if you have any problems with one at all, the swell guys here will be happy to help you get it working again.
« Last Edit: Sun, 27 August 2017, 04:14:55 by ander »
We are not chasing wildly after beauty with fear at our backs. – Natalie Goldberg

Offline rowdy

  • HHKB Hapster
  • * Erudite Elder
  • Posts: 21175
  • Location: melbourne.vic.au
  • Missed another sale.
Re: Anyone have any experience with "untested" IBM keyboards?
« Reply #5 on: Mon, 28 August 2017, 17:19:09 »
My first two were untested, both missing a few keycaps, and both missing cables.  They were also both fairly grubby, although not as bad as some I've seen.

One had a fixed cable and I fabricated a replacement out of an old PS/2 keyboard I have.  It works fine.

The other was missing an SDL cable.  I eventually got an orihalcon cable, and that keyboard works fine too.  In fact that one is the nicest Model M I have used.  I had occasion to open it up recently, and discovered that maybe one rivet was missing.
"Because keyboards are accessories to PC makers, they focus on minimizing the manufacturing costs. But that’s incorrect. It’s in HHKB’s slogan, but when America’s cowboys were in the middle of a trip and their horse died, they would leave the horse there. But even if they were in the middle of a desert, they would take their saddle with them. The horse was a consumable good, but the saddle was an interface that their bodies had gotten used to. In the same vein, PCs are consumable goods, while keyboards are important interfaces." - Eiiti Wada

NEC APC-H4100E | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED red | Ducky DK9008 Shine MX blue LED green | Link 900243-08 | CM QFR MX black | KeyCool 87 white MX reds | HHKB 2 Pro | Model M 02-Mar-1993 | Model M 29-Nov-1995 | CM Trigger (broken) | CM QFS MX green | Ducky DK9087 Shine 3 TKL Yellow Edition MX black | Lexmark SSK 21-Apr-1994 | IBM SSK 13-Oct-1987 | CODE TKL MX clear | Model M 122 01-Jun-1988

Ị̸͚̯̲́ͤ̃͑̇̑ͯ̊̂͟ͅs̞͚̩͉̝̪̲͗͊ͪ̽̚̚ ̭̦͖͕̑́͌ͬͩ͟t̷̻͔̙̑͟h̹̠̼͋ͤ͋i̤̜̣̦̱̫͈͔̞ͭ͑ͥ̌̔s̬͔͎̍̈ͥͫ̐̾ͣ̔̇͘ͅ ̩̘̼͆̐̕e̞̰͓̲̺̎͐̏ͬ̓̅̾͠͝ͅv̶̰͕̱̞̥̍ͣ̄̕e͕͙͖̬̜͓͎̤̊ͭ͐͝ṇ̰͎̱̤̟̭ͫ͌̌͢͠ͅ ̳̥̦ͮ̐ͤ̎̊ͣ͡͡n̤̜̙̺̪̒͜e̶̻̦̿ͮ̂̀c̝̘̝͖̠̖͐ͨͪ̈̐͌ͩ̀e̷̥͇̋ͦs̢̡̤ͤͤͯ͜s͈̠̉̑͘a̱͕̗͖̳̥̺ͬͦͧ͆̌̑͡r̶̟̖̈͘ỷ̮̦̩͙͔ͫ̾ͬ̔ͬͮ̌?̵̘͇͔͙ͥͪ͞ͅ