Author Topic: IntelliStation 9229 on the way (Read 15084 times)

EverythingIBM · « **on:** Wed, 12 May 2010, 00:29:58 »

Yep... I did it. Ordered an Intellistation 9229 with a 2.66 Ghz dual core. Sadly it only has 2 GB of RAM installed but supports 8GB (stupid ECC yet again). So, I'll have to scramble around looking for RAM for it later on. And, get a back fan for it; all M Pros don't have back fans installed which I'm starting to find strange.

I'm not crazy, not crazy at all.

I've given up trying to upgrade intellistation 6225, so, I guess after 5 years it's time to get a new one.

microsoft windows · « **Reply #1 on:** Wed, 12 May 2010, 18:41:36 »

I've given up trying to make my computers modern. They are by no means my first priority in life.

Right now I'm typing this on a 14-year-old machine with Windows 95. Got a 200Mhz Pentium with 256KB of external cache, along with 64MB of RAM and a 3.6GB hard disk.

ch_123 · « **Reply #2 on:** Wed, 12 May 2010, 18:43:41 »

I must say, that is a pretty nifty find.

kishy · « **Reply #3 on:** Wed, 12 May 2010, 18:44:48 »

Quote from: ch_123;181640

I must say, that is a pretty nifty find.

And a pretty acceptable deal too, all things considered. I doubt you could build an equivalent (or better, for that matter) system for cheaper than that.

ch_123 · « **Reply #4 on:** Wed, 12 May 2010, 18:47:39 »

I want an Intellistation myself, albeit a POWER5 one so that I can say that I own an AIX machine.

EverythingIBM · « **Reply #5 on:** Wed, 12 May 2010, 19:36:18 »

Quote from: microsoft windows;181639

I've given up trying to make my computers modern. They are by no means my first priority in life.

Right now I'm typing this on a 14-year-old machine with Windows 95. Got a 200Mhz Pentium with 256KB of external cache, along with 64MB of RAM and a 3.6GB hard disk.

That's pretty sucky for a 14-year old machine. 300PLs had 384 MB of RAM (but I guess you don't use IBM computers). And why not windows 98? Windows 95 had a bad interface in my opinion, but 98 had it perfect.

Quote from: ch_123;181640

I must say, that is a pretty nifty find.

Yeah! There were other intellistations like that with 4 GB of RAM going for $340 as well. But I missed out; like I said, they DID sell like hot cakes. That's a cheap price for a computer, let alone an IBM one. So, I'm NOT losing this one out of my grasp. I was so mad last time! GRRRRRR!

Quote from: kishy;181641

And a pretty acceptable deal too, all things considered. I doubt you could build an equivalent (or better, for that matter) system for cheaper than that.

It's actually very good for a quick cheap and decently fast computer since I'll be needing one. I doubt I could build anything that good even with lots of money; the case is very nice. Has a lock with IBM keys too. I'll have four, great!

Quote from: ch_123;181642

I want an Intellistation myself, albeit a POWER5 one so that I can say that I own an AIX machine.

The POWER intellistations don't work with windows (as we both know), they're absolutely extraordinarily heavy, and are very expensive... are the power processors really faster than the intel ones?

InSanCen · « **Reply #6 on:** Thu, 13 May 2010, 18:38:26 »

Quote from: EverythingIBM;181667

The POWER intellistations don't work with windows (as we both know), they're absolutely extraordinarily heavy, and are very expensive... are the power processors really faster than the intel ones?

Given a suitable application, then yes. Hell yes. POWER was not meant for consumers, it was meant for large calculation type applications. I would kill for a recent POWER if ports to it were available for the numbers I crunch.

ch_123 · « **Reply #7 on:** Thu, 13 May 2010, 18:51:30 »

Who needs Windows when you've got AIX...

InSanCen · « **Reply #8 on:** Fri, 14 May 2010, 01:30:07 »

Quote from: ch_123;182171

Who needs Windows when you've got AIX...

There, FTFY :-)

EverythingIBM · « **Reply #9 on:** Sat, 15 May 2010, 17:25:43 »

I have a question about these computers.
They're made in the BTX style:

But they're not P4s.... and made way after BTX was abandoned. So, how on earth did IBM get a motherboard made in the BTX style for a core 2 duo 2.66?

I'm actually really curious to see who made the MOBO in CPUZ. Either IBM or MSI I'm assuming.

ch_123 · « **Reply #10 on:** Sat, 15 May 2010, 17:29:38 »

Probably Foxconn, they make a load of OEM motherboards (and iPods/iPhones etc)

It's completely conceivable that IBM decided to stick to the same rough design for their systems, especially as they were phasing out production of PCs and workstations.

EverythingIBM · « **Reply #11 on:** Sat, 15 May 2010, 17:41:15 »

Quote from: ch_123;182754

Probably Foxconn, they make a load of OEM motherboards (and iPods/iPhones etc)

It's completely conceivable that IBM decided to stick to the same rough design for their systems, especially as they were phasing out production of PCs and workstations.

I just find that so weird, this is probably the first, and last, BTX-style core 2 duo motherboard clocked at 2.66 Ghz.

Yeah, these were "the last" M Pros made, so that makes sense. However, there ARE intellistation-based cases with the vent on the opposite side, so, that is why I'm confused that they used the left-style, when, they could have easily used the other ATX case.

I'm not complaining though, I think it's great that the motherboard is on the left side. Makes it easier for me.

ch_123 · « **Reply #12 on:** Sat, 15 May 2010, 18:30:36 »

But a complete ***** to upgrade it - evidenced by the fact that you had to buy an entire new machine to upgrade from an old processor to a slightly less old processor.

I'm sure if the people at IBM knew about this, they'd get a laugh out of the fact that their discontinued products are wreaking vendor lock-in from beyond the figurative grave...

D-EJ915 · « **Reply #13 on:** Sat, 15 May 2010, 19:18:42 »

Either that or the pic is flipped lol. Also Foxconn makes everything in PCs these days.

kishy · « **Reply #14 on:** Sat, 15 May 2010, 19:53:34 »

I think the key upgrade parts should be at least slightly upgradeable...video card, hard drive, RAM, processor (unless the system is configured to only accept the chip it shipped with - not unheard of, but hopefully not the case).

Power supply might be an interesting one, but hopefully upgradeable as well.

Ultimately I think EIBM did pretty well for his money here but upgrading the machine isn't likely to be worth it (it's good value for the money as it is, but if further money goes into that machine it will cease to be IMO).

EverythingIBM · « **Reply #15 on:** Sat, 15 May 2010, 21:30:26 »

Quote from: ch_123;182788

But a complete ***** to upgrade it - evidenced by the fact that you had to buy an entire new machine to upgrade from an old processor to a slightly less old processor.

I'm sure if the people at IBM knew about this, they'd get a laugh out of the fact that their discontinued products are wreaking vendor lock-in from beyond the figurative grave...

I guess you're right: IBM could have made it a lot more malleable for newer processors. But today, everything is about who can make the cheapest computer for the highest price.

Quote from: D-EJ915;182796

Either that or the pic is flipped lol. Also Foxconn makes everything in PCs these days.

No it's not flipped. You can look at other pictures and see the vent is on the left side, furthermore the IBM schematics even show it in the BTX format.

I only seen foxconn for my cables; I don't have computers that have actual chip boards made by them.

Quote from: kishy;182799

I think the key upgrade parts should be at least slightly upgradeable...video card, hard drive, RAM, processor (unless the system is configured to only accept the chip it shipped with - not unheard of, but hopefully not the case).

Power supply might be an interesting one, but hopefully upgradeable as well.

Ultimately I think EIBM did pretty well for his money here but upgrading the machine isn't likely to be worth it (it's good value for the money as it is, but if further money goes into that machine it will cease to be IMO).

The video card is probably PCIE 2.0, the RAM goes up to 8GB (so that's good). I just needed a quick, cheap, solution for my music gear.
It's not that old of a machine anyhow.

InSanCen · « **Reply #16 on:** Sun, 16 May 2010, 12:45:11 »

Quote from: EverythingIBM;182810

I only seen foxconn for my cables; I don't have computers that have actual chip boards made by them.

I would be more than a bit surprised if you didn't. Foxconn are *the* largest OEM in the IIRC.

EverythingIBM · « **Reply #17 on:** Sun, 16 May 2010, 23:47:44 »

Quote from: InSanCen;182967

I would be more than a bit surprised if you didn't. Foxconn are *the* largest OEM in the IIRC.

Quote

Among other things, Foxconn produces the Mac mini, the iPod, the iPad, and the iPhone for Apple Inc - Wikipedia

Huh, no wonder why none of my intellistation components are made by them. Except some measly cables, but I could replace them all if I was insane about it.

kishy · « **Reply #18 on:** Sun, 16 May 2010, 23:50:11 »

Foxconn makes incredibly good products so I find your statement ridiculous.

There's a very good chance the mobo is indeed a Foxconn. Doesn't have to be branded as such to be that way.

EverythingIBM · « **Reply #19 on:** Sun, 16 May 2010, 23:53:58 »

Quote from: kishy;183010

Foxconn makes incredibly good products so I find your statement ridiculous.

There's a very good chance the mobo is indeed a Foxconn. Doesn't have to be branded as such to be that way.

It was a joke.

No it's not foxconn, it's MSI. I've never seen a single IBM computer with a foxconn motherboard.

As for the intellistation 9229, it could be, but I highly doubt it.

kishy · « **Reply #20 on:** Mon, 17 May 2010, 01:02:25 »

MSI's still in the mobo business? That's a shame...

Hopefully they've come a long way from fake cache chips.

ricercar · « **Reply #21 on:** Mon, 17 May 2010, 12:39:08 »

I've had multiple MSI motherboards and graphics cards, and would buy again. WHat's the beef?

kishy · « **Reply #22 on:** Mon, 17 May 2010, 12:44:29 »

Quote from: ricercar;183185

I've had multiple MSI motherboards and graphics cards, and would buy again. WHat's the beef?

Whoops, that's PC-Chips. MSI is fine AFAIK. Don't know why I confused those two...

ch_123 · « **Reply #23 on:** Mon, 17 May 2010, 13:05:12 »

I've heard nothing but bad things about PC Chips motherboards...

InSanCen · « **Reply #24 on:** Mon, 17 May 2010, 16:17:34 »

PC-Chips and ECS (Same company last I heard) suck balls. Although ECS has been trying to make inroads into the higher end market recently.

MSI on th eother hand, make some damn good products. My Neo2 Platinum was a superb board. In my scheme of things, they are firmly up there with Gigabyte, below Supermicro, and above Asus.

itlnstln · « **Reply #25 on:** Mon, 17 May 2010, 16:19:24 »

I had an ECS mobo back in the day. I don't remember it being bad ever. That was back when I used to upgrade once a year, so maybe it didn't have time to fail.

ch_123 · « **Reply #26 on:** Mon, 17 May 2010, 16:33:45 »

Quote from: InSanCen;183251

PC-Chips and ECS (Same company last I heard) suck balls. Although ECS has been trying to make inroads into the higher end market recently.

MSI on th eother hand, make some damn good products. My Neo2 Platinum was a superb board. In my scheme of things, they are firmly up there with Gigabyte, below Supermicro, and above Asus.

I had a bad experience with an MSI motherboard, although that could have been caused by a dodgy PSU... Either way, I stick with Gigabyte. I had some bad luck with ASUS too.

kishy · « **Reply #27 on:** Mon, 17 May 2010, 16:47:15 »

I've read numerous people bash ECS but I have yet to see anyone back it up with something that would have been the fault of the manufacturer (I believe I have read "I overclocked my CPU and it stopped working"-type stories, but if you overclock, you're taking a gamble and in my book it's not the manufacturer's fault if it fails to overclock reliably).

PC-Chips is an easy target: "fake cache chips"

EverythingIBM · « **Reply #28 on:** Mon, 17 May 2010, 17:19:14 »

Quote from: kishy;183269

I've read numerous people bash ECS but I have yet to see anyone back it up with something that would have been the fault of the manufacturer (I believe I have read "I overclocked my CPU and it stopped working"-type stories, but if you overclock, you're taking a gamble and in my book it's not the manufacturer's fault if it fails to overclock reliably).

PC-Chips is an easy target: "fake cache chips"

Yeah I wouldn't overclock a computer for the life of me. I would assume that's hell on the capacitors.

MSI has been fine for me, I think they're decent. Don't think I had an ASUS board before, everyone says they're good (can't prove or disprove it). The motherboards IBM chooses or manufactures themselves seem to have always been good. The capacitors inside my intellistation are all straight, none are bent, and look very healthy. There's this one gigantic capacitor in the middle of the motherboard though, I'm wondering why it's so big. Not as big as some of the ones in the iMac G3s!

Supposedly rubicon makes the best capacitors. I've never had any burst on me: and I have some pretty old electronic equipment.

EverythingIBM · « **Reply #29 on:** Mon, 17 May 2010, 22:18:13 »

Okay here's some photos:

The bigger one is my older intellistation, it's obviously way heavier (the 50-pounder). The differences are: it doesn't have a back fender, there's no metal under the top handle (cheapo IBM, reminds me of iMac G3s), and it has a key lock instead of a little loop for a padlock. So IBM added more sophistocated and expensive methods, but also cheapening down on other things.

The insides are absolutely crazy, that funny metal side thing (I'm wondering if I should just take it out without putting it back in), the "dust buffer" I couldn't figure how to get off, I was going to clean inside there.

Here's an excerpt from the manual, the texts in brackets is my own, obviously.

Quote

The computer might come with an air baffle that directs airflow to the microprocessor (wait, MIGHT come with one? They ALL come with one, otherwise the computer would overheat). When you install optional devices, you might have to remove the air baffle to access some components.

To remove the air baffle, complete the following steps:
1. Press in on the tabs on each side of the air baffle. (I don't see any tabs, it's as coherent (or baffling) as the other "air baffle" on type 6225, which, didn't explain everything).
2. Lift the air baffle out of the computer and set it aside. (no ****?)
Show Image

When I was cleaning it out, it had a lot of dust in the front vent, even remnants of a moth wing:

That's what you get for $300 I guess. The rest of the computer was cleaned out though, they just didn't want to get a migrane from figuring out how to remove the front bezel and whatnot.

kishy · « **Reply #30 on:** Mon, 17 May 2010, 22:30:50 »

The air "baffle" thing is a common thing in BTX systems. I've seen BTX Dells with a similar arrangement (or at least for exhaust from the CPU - that was a weird semi-BTX type deal)

EverythingIBM · « **Reply #31 on:** Mon, 17 May 2010, 22:43:32 »

Quote from: kishy;183377

The air "baffle" thing is a common thing in BTX systems. I've seen BTX Dells with a similar arrangement (or at least for exhaust from the CPU - that was a weird semi-BTX type deal)

Yeah, I know.

And CPUZ says IBM made the motherboard: not terribly surprisingly since it's HIGHLY customized.

Like I said, I was surprised a core 2 duo at 2.66 ghz in BTX format, but made way later in the "vista" era.

EverythingIBM · « **Reply #32 on:** Mon, 17 May 2010, 22:51:12 »

Okay here's the windows 7 rating:

6.1 for the processor, DAMN! I'm sure that's way overkill.

I'll go take a look at the speedfan ratings later. I expect it's cooled sufficiently, even without a backfan.

EDIT: it said the CPU was at 95 celsius, but each cores at 25 celsius (yeah okay)... and it never detected the GPU or the hard drive. Stupid speedfan can't detect anything. I don't really trust its readings were accurate.

Zalusithix · « **Reply #33 on:** Mon, 17 May 2010, 23:03:14 »

Win7 ratings scale over 6 quite easily with modern hardware. I'm at a 7.4 processor rating (7.3 overall) and I'm not on an extreme OC either (i920 @ 3.6GHz). Considering I still have things that can bog it down, I don't consider it overkill. =)

For that matter, there's no such thing as overkill on a computer. You can never have too much power!

And as for the cooled sufficiently, throw OCCT on there and let it burn in for an hour or two at the minimum to be sure.

EverythingIBM · « **Reply #34 on:** Mon, 17 May 2010, 23:07:53 »

Quote from: Zalusithix;183385

Win7 ratings scale over 6 quite easily with modern hardware. I'm at a 7.4 processor rating (7.3 overall) and I'm not on an extreme OC either (i920 @ 3.6GHz). Considering I still have things that can bog it down, I don't consider it overkill. =)

For that matter, there's no such thing as overkill on a computer. You can never have too much power!

Well, unless IBM makes a computer with an i920 at 3.6 Ghz, I won't be getting one (FAR TOO LONG have I been using non-IBM computers). Besides, this is probably one of the fastest IBM PCs around at the moment. And I'm sure I paid a lot less than you did.

Zalusithix · « **Reply #35 on:** Mon, 17 May 2010, 23:12:25 »

Oh, you paid less... that much is for sure, but mine was far from esoteric processor wise. I was only commenting on the fact that 6+ ratings in Win7 aren't really "overkill" with any modern hardware. Perhaps from what you were used to it might seem so at first, but like all things tech wise, you'll eventually get used to it and want more. =)

kishy · « **Reply #36 on:** Mon, 17 May 2010, 23:17:29 »

I believe I hit low 5s across the board on my desktop (specs considerably below OP's purchase).

Currently I can't boot into Windows 7 though it's still on the drive. A reinstall of the OS on the first partition wiped out the Win7 bootloader and the disk doesn't want to repair it, so for now I'm stuck.

Zalusithix · « **Reply #37 on:** Mon, 17 May 2010, 23:20:24 »

What OS was on the other partition? If it was a Linux distro using GRUB, then it should be easy enough to chainload the windows partition as a GRUB entry.

EverythingIBM · « **Reply #38 on:** Mon, 17 May 2010, 23:20:36 »

Quote from: Zalusithix;183388

Oh, you paid less... that much is for sure, but mine was far from esoteric processor wise. I was only commenting on the fact that 6+ ratings in Win7 aren't really "overkill" with any modern hardware. Perhaps from what you were used to it might seem so at first, but like all things tech wise, you'll eventually get used to it and want more. =)

It's best to have new and old computers (best of both worlds). I find myself wanting a lot of old hardware/software. But also faster computers to run the new stuff. Whatever. I'm going to have some fun with this new intellistation; but wow, the hard drive sounds like rocks grinding in webwit's mouth. Louder than the ultra SCSI 320.

kishy · « **Reply #39 on:** Mon, 17 May 2010, 23:22:53 »

Quote from: Zalusithix;183390

What OS was on the other partition? If it was a Linux distro using GRUB, then it should be easy enough to chainload the windows partition as a GRUB entry.

XP 32 bit (and previously a partition in the middle containing XP 64 bit, but upon discovering nVidia can't write good drivers if their lives depend on it, that went byebye too)

*nix doesn't touch hardware I respect.

Zalusithix · « **Reply #40 on:** Mon, 17 May 2010, 23:32:23 »

Quote from: kishy;183394

XP 32 bit (and previously a partition in the middle containing XP 64 bit, but upon discovering nVidia can't write good drivers if their lives depend on it, that went byebye too)

*nix doesn't touch hardware I respect.

Personally, I wouldn't let XP touch hardware I respect. ;p But you're pretty much screwed with an XP/Win7 dual boot without jumping through some hoops if the 7 bootloader is dead. I'm sure there are multiple methods to fix the problem, but I'm not familiar with them off the top of my head.

EverythingIBM · « **Reply #41 on:** Thu, 20 May 2010, 02:38:23 »

I'm still trying to figure out how to remove the "air baffle," I don't get it. It's really making me mad, WHY WON'T IT COME OFF?!?! IBM should be more specific on how to remove it... they showed little arrows in the direction of how you're to take off the front bezel, why couldn't they do that with the baffle?

Does anyone have any ideas on how to remove it? I REALLY want to clean the dust off of the CPU heatsink.

EverythingIBM · « **Reply #42 on:** Sun, 06 June 2010, 22:39:35 »

Alright I should give a response as to how to open the baffle. You simply push the little tab in the middle to the RIGHT and pull out. It can be tricky because it may seem like you're about to break the stupid tab. It's made of ABS, unlike the front bezel. The older intellistations had all of the plastic made of ABS.

EverythingIBM · « **Reply #43 on:** Thu, 10 June 2010, 19:44:43 »

Quote from: ripster;191246

Show Image

Oh... it looks like IBMster is jealous of my intellistations (later I'll get pictures of all my computers along with the iPad for fun). I'LL MAKE YOU DROOL RIPSTER.

Seals huh? Reminds me back in the days of Warcraft 2:

Damn stupid seals, they'd get in the way of building things.

shag · « **Reply #44 on:** Tue, 15 June 2010, 18:46:36 »

Joining the brotherhood of IntelliStation owners...

E-IBM, here's the picture I wanted to send you but miserably failed. Disregard the rubbish keyboard on the Cisco server.

ch_123 · « **Reply #45 on:** Tue, 15 June 2010, 18:52:05 »

What's the Cisco machine like? I never knew they made workstations... or is it a server?

kishy · « **Reply #46 on:** Tue, 15 June 2010, 19:49:56 »

"Media Convergence Server" on the front bezel

ch_123 · « **Reply #47 on:** Tue, 15 June 2010, 19:52:09 »

Quote from: kishy;193483

"Media Convergence Server"

Stop right there. Don't want to know any more =P

kishy · « **Reply #48 on:** Tue, 15 June 2010, 19:55:55 »

lol, wonderful Cisco propriety.

ch_123 · « **Reply #49 on:** Tue, 15 June 2010, 19:58:52 »

News:

Author Topic: IntelliStation 9229 on the way (Read 15084 times)