True, even using a magnifying glass and on slow motion would be hard to keep the good aim - there are too many holes to drill. Not impossible though.
Do you think that would make any diference using SMD components? The smd switch requires 2 holes instead of 4 (the 2 plastic reference pins).
Another option would be to create some kind of standard for the plates, this would help to reduce the prices because everybody would be using the same plates instead of being constantly reinventing the wheel.
I saw lots and lots of plate designs in the forum and I think that we could use the initial GH60++ idea as an initial standard:
... What I envision for the GH60++ is a variety of sizes with a common core.
GH60++ 60% 5x15
GH60++ 65% 5x16
GH60++ 70% 6x15
GH60++ 75% 6x16
GH60++ 75% PCB with break lines for 60, 65 and 70% sizes.Assuming this idea we would have two options for the plate designs:
1) the obvious individual design, 4 plates - one for each kind of layout (60, 65, 70 and 75%)
2) one design with weak lines to fold and cut the plate (more or less like what samwisekoi did with the PCB)
So, standard plates, standard PCB and, sure, standard cases ...
So someone by any reason want to build one slightly variation (a winless kb), it would require some kind of cover at the win hole switch ...