New materials and finishes are very nice. The price is nice, too. I personally don’t like the NR logo. The serif font looks generic and out of place on a modern keyboard.Yea the NR logo feels like an odd choice. Maybe it might help if we knew what it stood for
I really dig the overall design, but that logo in a corner throws me off the text is too plain and not aesthetically pleasing, it looks really good on the weight but I do not think it is the best option for top right corner. Overall this project looks very exciting, I am very interested in G10 and PC.
EDIT: It would be nice to have RGB pcb with underglow since there is going to be PC version.
Need this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ****!
Given your signature, I see you throw the word 'need' around pretty carelessly. ;)
New materials and finishes are very nice. The price is nice, too. I personally don’t like the NR logo. The serif font looks generic and out of place on a modern keyboard.
Agree, the branding is unattractive imo
Choose another theme / item to attach (like the Leaf) to the branding / badge. Something simple and clean.
I've always wanted to get a Fox Lab board, and 65% is my favorite form factor. But I really don't like the logo. I hope you reconsider it. I agree that a more simple symbol would be nice. Maybe if you have to go with "NR" you could use braille :)
NR in braille:
⠝⠗
I've always wanted to get a Fox Lab board, and 65% is my favorite form factor. But I really don't like the logo. I hope you reconsider it. I agree that a more simple symbol would be nice. Maybe if you have to go with "NR" you could use braille :)
NR in braille:
⠝⠗
Hmm, braille on the blocker sounds pretty awesome. The bumps on that blocker might feel and look good! ;D
I've always wanted to get a Fox Lab board, and 65% is my favorite form factor. But I really don't like the logo. I hope you reconsider it. I agree that a more simple symbol would be nice. Maybe if you have to go with "NR" you could use braille :)
NR in braille:
⠝⠗
This keyboard design is on point. However, if that logo was a symbol or more aesthetic it would be so much more attractive. (Imagine if it were a leaf for example?) this board has potential senter. That logo on the top right needs work however. If this was named Leaf 65 with leaf branding it would look a thousand times better imo. For example imagine if the Kyuu had a bland font and letters on the right blocker, it would be a less sought after board imo. (You get the idea).I really agree. If that logo could have a more attractive design, this would be endgame level for me
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'd love to see a white and purple color option
Would love to see a blocker-less top.
Would love to see a blocker-less top.
Yess! This. I'd love to have a real function key instead of a corner blocker. Although pretty, it's of no use to me.
Please have an option for a no blocker kit.
In!
Possibility of split spacebar/backspace support?
Love the gaskets! Would like to see split bs option as well
Any support for split spacebar or backspace?
Either way, I'm in
The logo on the top right corner will be removed. New renders will be coming soon. Stay tuned.Are you going to remake it or remove it completly? I like the 65% boards with those logos, it a beautiful way to brand them
I was planning on getting an e-yellow Polaris, but prefer 65% boards, so this may change my mind.
Personally, I like the final column, from top to bottom, to be Home, End, Page Up, Page Down, and the right arrow key. So, apart from not liking the logo in the upper right, it also prevents me from having the layout I prefer. Meaning that I would prefer an extra key as opposed to a logo I don't care for.
I don't expect things to be changed for my preferences, but you asked for opinions and responses, and this is just what I feel personally.
I don't mind the logo on the back, however. And I'm interested in what other e-colors will be available.
The logo on the top right corner will be removed. New renders will be coming soon. Stay tuned.Are you going to remake it or remove it completly? I like the 65% boards with those logos, it a beautiful way to brand them
Are you going to be machining blocks of G10, it are you somehow laying it up in the shape of the case?
The logo on the top right corner will be removed. New renders will be coming soon. Stay tuned.Are you going to remake it or remove it completly? I like the 65% boards with those logos, it a beautiful way to brand them
I personally want to remove it and make it a key or rotary encoder.
Rotary encoder would be awesome in my view!
Also, that e-cyan color looks incredible! I would grab that immediately. Will it be available as part of this buy @senter?
I personally want to remove it and make it a key or rotary encoder.
Rotary encoder would be awesome in my view!
Also, that e-cyan color looks incredible! I would grab that immediately. Will it be available as part of this buy @senter?
Yes
I personally like a logo a lot, just not the "NR" logo. I think a fox of some sort with brass insert is nice. I never like a knob. It looks so intruding. Classic logo with insert is always the best.
I personally want to remove it and make it a key or rotary encoder.
The logo on the top right corner will be removed. New renders will be coming soon. Stay tuned.Are you going to remake it or remove it completly? I like the 65% boards with those logos, it a beautiful way to brand them
I personally want to remove it and make it a key or rotary encoder.
I'd like to provide two PCB versions as we did before.
One version will be the HS MX switch version, regular 2u BS adn 7u spacebar.
Another version will be the non-HS, multiple layouts supporting, ALPS (and maybe more) switches supporting version. I like split spacebar so definitely yes for it. Not sure about split BS.
The logo on the top right corner will be removed. New renders will be coming soon. Stay tuned.Are you going to remake it or remove it completly? I like the 65% boards with those logos, it a beautiful way to brand them
I personally want to remove it and make it a key or rotary encoder.
Nice to hear about the logo. I'm curious if you have a plan to improve QC with the polycarbonate cases going forward - it looked like there were a number of leaf60 poly cases that were heavily scratched. I'm considering a poly board as a lighter option to bring to work so am curious :)
Please, make a rotary encoder.The logo on the top right corner will be removed. New renders will be coming soon. Stay tuned.Are you going to remake it or remove it completly? I like the 65% boards with those logos, it a beautiful way to brand them
I personally want to remove it and make it a key or rotary encoder.
Guys. Given the diverse opinions towards the top-right logo/key, I may provide both. The no-logo top case will have WKL option but the logo top will not. I don't want to make 4 versions of the top case LOL
The logo version still needs a logo design. For this specific design, I personally like it to be simple and am not passionate about the logo design. I've put most of my effort on the material experimenting and structure design. More suggestions will be appreciated.
Guys. Given the diverse opinions towards the top-right logo/key, I may provide both. The no-logo top case will have WKL option but the logo top will not. I don't want to make 4 versions of the top case LOLHow about the reverse? WKL with logo and non-WKL with knob? :cool:
The logo version still needs a logo design. For this specific design, I personally like it to be simple and am not passionate about the logo design. I've put most of my effort on the material experimenting and structure design. More suggestions will be appreciated.
Nice to hear about the logo. I'm curious if you have a plan to improve QC with the polycarbonate cases going forward - it looked like there were a number of leaf60 poly cases that were heavily scratched. I'm considering a poly board as a lighter option to bring to work so am curious :)
Thanks for bringing this up. We're always improving the QC. However, it's also true that oversight happens, especially when there are too many orders and too many options. Instead of desperately trying to improve the QC, I try to improve the quality from the root. Take PVD finish as an example, I would abandon this finish completely and use other finishes which are much easier to be made perfectly. The anodizing holes and rubber inserts mentioned in the OP are for the same logic.
The scratches on several PC Leaf60 was another story. There were 4 or 5 PC cases didn't come out good originally. They turned into good shape after wet sanding. Apparently, they are not good after completely drying. Now I learned that PC cases must be made perfect in the first place.
Another potential issue of PC you didn't mention is the warping on top cases. Some PC leaf60 top cases were slightly warped. I shipped out them as A-stock cause they are good after screws are fastened. There were no serious complaints about this afaik. Some people are not completely happy tho. I haven't found a good solution for this expect QC. I will declare this issue to those who still want the PC case in this GB.
Are you going to be machining blocks of G10, it are you somehow laying it up in the shape of the case?
CNC milling G10 blocks is the plan. The factory told me it will work. We'll decide after we get the prototypes.
I love the idea of a mini fox logo instead of a rotary encoder.+1 not the hugest fan of a rotary encoder, so having the option with or without it would be nice!
What about that (x) on your avatar as the logo?
boo, you knobby haters!!Agreed, rotary can be done nicely. its just that i dont see that happening with the current design of the "fox65". a rotary would need some blank space around it to look god.
but on a serious note, I don't see it as a FOTM because it's been around for years. The first time I got into mech keyboards was when I saw the DAS keyboards, just the full size wasn't for me. I very quickly came across GH and custom boards.
aesthetically it can be done really well, take the Satisfaction 75 and VN66 as an example and look at the timberwolf renders. I guess it is a matter of opinion.
I also appreciate that QMK needs to go some way before we can go beyond just volume control. I'd hope to think we can do other things with it, such as video or music editing, photo editing - similar to the ideas of the surface dial. But I digress.
I liked the NR logo and would much prefer having a logo there over a key or just blank, my biggest dislike of 65 and 75% boards is how they tend to look like a block of chocolate if it is all just keys.
Oh I almost forgot to mention split Bs is a must have!
+ 1 for split backspaceOh I almost forgot to mention split Bs is a must have!
Yes, agreed. This really is a dealbreaker.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
would it be possible to lower the price?
would it be possible to lower the price?
Well thats a first :))
I trust fox lab more just with things in the past morewould it be possible to lower the price?
Well thats a first :))
Torn between this and Polaris, Price would be the deciding factor
would it be possible to lower the price?
Well thats a first :))
Torn between this and Polaris, Price would be the deciding factor
I will need to replace my car soon. If things worked this way, instead of buying the right car in my price range, I'd love to pick something more expensive and ask them to lower the price, because price would be my deciding factor. If only life worked that way.
would it be possible to lower the price?
Well thats a first :))
Torn between this and Polaris, Price would be the deciding factor
I will need to replace my car soon. If things worked this way, instead of buying the right car in my price range, I'd love to pick something more expensive and ask them to lower the price, because price would be my deciding factor. If only life worked that way.
I will need to replace my car soon. If things worked this way, instead of buying the right car in my price range, I'd love to pick something more expensive and ask them to lower the price, because price would be my deciding factor. If only life worked that way.
Are you trying to say Tesla aren't going to be lowering their prices to ensure that I, the single most important individual in the world despite only being 1 out of their millions of customers, can purchase a Model 3 instead of the PT Cruiser that I can actually afford?
I'm really not sure how they think they can possibly compete with Chrysler.
Because mech keyboards group buys and car market are totally the same thing! Am I smart yet?
I know others have said it, but just as some critical feedback, the logo on the back seems a bit uninspired and this board would be better off without it, or maybe a new monogram? I think it might be worth trialing out a few alternatives out with the community?
what is the price range for this keyboard
what is the price range for this keyboard
From the OP:
Estimated price for the basic kit (all alu/PC): $295
would it be possible to lower the price?
Well thats a first :))
Torn between this and Polaris, Price would be the deciding factor
I will need to replace my car soon. If things worked this way, instead of buying the right car in my price range, I'd love to pick something more expensive and ask them to lower the price, because price would be my deciding factor. If only life worked that way.
That's exactly how the market works, sellers gauges the demand, and buyers gauge whether the price is right for them or not.
Or I could try being smart, with an anecdote and come out looking like I don't understand the market.
I don't expect the average internet user to be educated enough to understand basic economics, but I expect them to mind their own business. Here is a cartoon to make it easy for you to understand the basics:
love ity-you too.
would it be possible to lower the price?
Well thats a first :))
Torn between this and Polaris, Price would be the deciding factor
I will need to replace my car soon. If things worked this way, instead of buying the right car in my price range, I'd love to pick something more expensive and ask them to lower the price, because price would be my deciding factor. If only life worked that way.
That's exactly how the market works, sellers gauges the demand, and buyers gauge whether the price is right for them or not.
Or I could try being smart, with an anecdote and come out looking like I don't understand the market.
I don't expect the average internet user to be educated enough to understand basic economics, but I expect them to mind their own business. Here is a cartoon to make it easy for you to understand the basics:
I came up with the anecdote because it was by far the most polite way that I could respond to the absurdity of your comment while resisting the temptation to excoriate your self-centered naiveté. I'm sure that I'm more than twice your age, and am familair with economic theory on a spectrum from Hayek to Marx. Not only do I comprehend the nature of capitalist markets, I'm also mature enough to realize that such markets do not respond to the immature requests of individuals who are entitled, out-of-touch, and unable to comprehend that the world in general does not place them at their needs above all other societal priorities and cannot discern the difference between a free market and a pampering parent. Your utter puerility was only compounded by the condescension with which you alluded to sub-rudimentary and anecdotal economic concepts as if they were a justification of you immature perspective, as opposed to a confirmation of it. Markets respond to socioeconomic forces on a macro level, and then only sluggishly. The notion that one individual entreating a manufacturer to ignore all of the pragmatic factors that affect their pricing, especially in a specialized area where margins are slim, is as impractical as it is self-centered, given that small-scale specialized production allows none of the leeway in pricing made possible by mass-production. I suppose I could chalk this up to the Dunning–Kruger effect, but I was not initially referring to a lack of metacognition, only to a lack of maturity. Your response, however, is classic, as it attempted to impugn my imagined incomprehension with an argument far more cognitively infantile than the perspective that you mistakenly attributed to me. I suppose I should have simply been less polite and suggested that the sooner you learn that the world doesn't care how spoiled you are the better you will be equipped to handle the myriad instances where life will inevitably and utterly ignore your sense of entitlement.
would it be possible to lower the price?
Well thats a first :))
Torn between this and Polaris, Price would be the deciding factor
I will need to replace my car soon. If things worked this way, instead of buying the right car in my price range, I'd love to pick something more expensive and ask them to lower the price, because price would be my deciding factor. If only life worked that way.
That's exactly how the market works, sellers gauges the demand, and buyers gauge whether the price is right for them or not.
Or I could try being smart, with an anecdote and come out looking like I don't understand the market.
I don't expect the average internet user to be educated enough to understand basic economics, but I expect them to mind their own business. Here is a cartoon to make it easy for you to understand the basics:
I came up with the anecdote because it was by far the most polite way that I could respond to the absurdity of your comment while resisting the temptation to excoriate your self-centered naiveté. I'm sure that I'm more than twice your age, and am familair with economic theory on a spectrum from Hayek to Marx. Not only do I comprehend the nature of capitalist markets, I'm also mature enough to realize that such markets do not respond to the immature requests of individuals who are entitled, out-of-touch, and unable to comprehend that the world in general does not place them at their needs above all other societal priorities and cannot discern the difference between a free market and a pampering parent. Your utter puerility was only compounded by the condescension with which you alluded to sub-rudimentary and anecdotal economic concepts as if they were a justification of you immature perspective, as opposed to a confirmation of it. Markets respond to socioeconomic forces on a macro level, and then only sluggishly. The notion that one individual entreating a manufacturer to ignore all of the pragmatic factors that affect their pricing, especially in a specialized area where margins are slim, is as impractical as it is self-centered, given that small-scale specialized production allows none of the leeway in pricing made possible by mass-production. I suppose I could chalk this up to the Dunning–Kruger effect, but I was not initially referring to a lack of metacognition, only to a lack of maturity. Your response, however, is classic, as it attempted to impugn my imagined incomprehension with an argument far more cognitively infantile than the perspective that you mistakenly attributed to me. I suppose I should have simply been less polite and suggested that the sooner you learn that the world doesn't care how spoiled you are the better you will be equipped to handle the myriad instances where life will inevitably and utterly ignore your sense of entitlement.
would it be possible to lower the price?
Well thats a first :))
Torn between this and Polaris, Price would be the deciding factor
would it be possible to lower the price?
Well thats a first :))
Torn between this and Polaris, Price would be the deciding factor
But one board is a 60% and another is a 65%. They're different products. $30 seems about right to cover the difference?
Also lol @ seeing keyboard fans argue by citing Hayek and Marx, didn't know I stumbled into the Marginal Revolution comments over here.
Any new renders with the logo removed?
Any new renders with the logo removed?
Just imagine it without the letters lmao
I like the idea but I'm worried this might be too similar to Keycult's brand, which also has a key for a logo.
Update:Thanks for hearing our feedback, loved the new logo.
1. New logoShow Image(https://i.imgur.com/zqywuB2.jpg)
I came up with the idea when I was working on the Fox Lab rebranding.
You might have noticed the new Fox Lab logo on my avatar. It can be read as Fox or f(x).
Similarly, the new logo showing above can be read as Fox while the shape of it is a key.
There's an F above, an O below, and an X inside the O.
A separate version without the top left logo will also be provided. A key will replace the Key.
2. The name of this kit is changed to Key 65. Now it's a Key board :)
3. The weight will also use the new Key logo.
There's also an alternative option. It's an engraved Chinese/Kanji character 键/鍵 which means Key in English.Show Image(https://i.imgur.com/7rl51AR.jpg)
Which one is better?
4. Plate layouts have been updated in OP. ALPS plate layout is TBD. I'm considering to support the ALPS XDA caps (https://www.reddit.com/r/MechanicalKeyboards/comments/cr07fk/alps_xda_on_epink_leaf60_info_in_comments/).
iso support?This.
iso support?This.
I personally like the key logo a lot more than NR so this is fine for me. I would have personally preferred an actual fox or leaf logo.
Not gonna lie, I think the new logo looks worse. And it's even worse when you also have another player (Keycult) in the community who uses a "key" as it's company logo.
The NR logo, although not amazing in itself, looked better.
A leaf logo from previous keyboard would have looked pretty sweet for the corner. Just saying ;)
I personally like the key logo a lot more than NR so this is fine for me. I would have personally preferred an actual fox or leaf logo.All of this.
iso support?This.
your location says bay area why would you want ISO
I like this logo better than the "NR" for sure, but I don't think it's quite there yet. I think part of the reason is because it doesn't efficiently use the space, it's too narrow. I honestly think it'd be best to just put "Key65" in a non-serif font in the top right. Actually, I like "Fox Lab" or "Fox" better. Just please use a non-serif font, I think all lowercase would look even better, like "foxlab" or "fox.lab"
I still think you should put the leaf to continue the theme of the leaf boards+1
I think the new design is a big improvement and I will be in either way, but I get why people don't like this logo either.
I really like the suggestion of the kanji character on the blocker instead. But as someone else pointed out it has a lot of strokes and isn't that clean. If you were to move the character to the blocker, maybe a much simpler one could be used. I really like the ketsu kanji for "missing" or "lack of" and I think it's fitting for a blocker space. :pShow Image(https://i.imgur.com/p7OOXKo.png)
Even the leaf from previous boards would look really nice too. Either way though I think it currently looks great as is and will be buying.
Glad the logo has changed. Much prefer the kanji character on both the kb top and on the weight.
How about plate and PCB ISO Support?
iso support?
I prefer key logo on the back. Btw you said "A separate version without the top left logo will also be provided. A key will replace the Key. " Did u mean top right?
Sorry am new don't know how to do quote thing.
Glad the logo has changed. Much prefer the kanji character on both the kb top and on the weight.
How about plate and PCB ISO Support?iso support?
PCB wise, ISO layout is supported. I don't plan to add ISO support on the plates.
I can share the plate file if someone needs.
I think I prefer the Chinese character over the key logo. I know people have noted that the multiple strokes make it look less streamlined but that's actually the main appeal for me. The numerous strokes makes the character more visually interesting imo.
The new key logo is nice no doubt but it's not really exciting to me since the key imagery is already being used by Keycult. Let me be clear: the logo design is certainly distinct enough from Keycult's and other keyboard companies are entitled to use key related logo. I'm fine with this being on the back of the board.
I'm only saying that I would've liked to see a logo that takes inspiration from anything else. I get that a key is a great candidate for a keyboard company's logo since it's a nod to the product and the image of a key is instantly recognizable; the f(x) reference is a nice touch too. With that said, it's like seeing an electronics company enter the market with an apple as its logo a year after Apple already got established. The design of this new company's apple logo would certainly be different enough from Apple's but consumers have already associated the image of an apple with the company who laid claim to it first.
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
Actually, your logo is pretty good. Can’t you just use it directly instead of the key design?I much prefer this logo as well. It’s clean, small, and gets the FOX brand front and center.
I am an OG Fox Labs owner, with an Orange TKL that I still hold dearly in my collection, though my tastes and preferences have changed.I like the edit you did and prefer it sideways ,it's doesn't look like a male gender symbol or Xman logo.
I think the originality and simplicity of the synergy between the name and design language was the beauty in the Orange, Time, and Leaf. The name of the board was very clearly represented in the weight/accent design. Never was there a need to put the Fox name in logo or text on those.
The key logo puts the Fox name on the board where it doesn't need it, and previous boards didn't either. Other "brands" are too concerned with putting their name in a very obvious place and it makes the keyboard feel less premium, IMO. I have a lot of respect for senter/runninghack, but this direction is not in line with what I have come to expect from them.
Overall/In general, I like the F(x) logo. The fox-key logo looks unfinished and doesn't show much thought or design. The Kanji logo risks blending in with other designs that I've seen in the past, and comes off as a bit of an easy out.
Edit: Saw the plate cutouts logo version and actually much prefer this over the current key design. I shortened up the fangs on the F, and it doesn't look so disproportionate. Also, keeping it in this sideways orientation makes it less obvious and glaring that you are looking at a giant letter F. Also, the segments/cutouts are very reminiscent of the Orange and Leaf designs with negative space.
I am an OG Fox Labs owner, with an Orange TKL that I still hold dearly in my collection, though my tastes and preferences have changed.This flipped vertically, would make it again f(x) and keeps the key symbol.
I think the originality and simplicity of the synergy between the name and design language was the beauty in the Orange, Time, and Leaf. The name of the board was very clearly represented in the weight/accent design. Never was there a need to put the Fox name in logo or text on those.
The key logo puts the Fox name on the board where it doesn't need it, and previous boards didn't either. Other "brands" are too concerned with putting their name in a very obvious place and it makes the keyboard feel less premium, IMO. I have a lot of respect for senter/runninghack, but this direction is not in line with what I have come to expect from them.
Overall/In general, I like the F(x) logo. The fox-key logo looks unfinished and doesn't show much thought or design. The Kanji logo risks blending in with other designs that I've seen in the past, and comes off as a bit of an easy out.
Edit: Saw the plate cutouts logo version and actually much prefer this over the current key design. I shortened up the fangs on the F, and it doesn't look so disproportionate. Also, keeping it in this sideways orientation makes it less obvious and glaring that you are looking at a giant letter F. Also, the segments/cutouts are very reminiscent of the Orange and Leaf designs with negative space.
it's doesn't look like a male gender symbol or Xman logo.+1
I... actually don't like the new logo compared to the NR. I agree with some of the others that it looks like a male gender symbol/xmen symbol and flat out 'it doesn't stand out' stance. If this board isn't going to have a special theme like Clock, Orange, Leaf, I really think a nicer 'Key' or 'f(x)' symbol would be better. Or perhaps a stylized fox - the animal - logo? This current logo feels a lot like something one would whip up in Powerpoint using the shapes and text tools you have in Microsoft Office. imo compared with a lot of the other boards coming out the logo for this one is weak. I understand this isn't a super high end luxury board like Iron165 or the higher end Chimera 65 (the cannon logo is really awesome imo) or the 7V (whose design is nice but the layout is not what I'm looking for) but compared to previous Fox Labs works it's really underwhelming.+1 this. I was hoping for an actual fox or a leaf.
Nothing about the new logo is even remotely similar to Keycult's logo except for the fact that they are both a key.
This one is way worse though. I suggest picking leaf or fox logo instead.
Nothing about the new logo is even remotely similar to Keycult's logo except for the fact that they are both a key.
This one is way worse though. I suggest picking leaf or fox logo instead.
So they are nothing alike except they both look like the same thing (a key)...?! Umm...
Separately, I am not a huge fan of the new logo in any case (sorry!), but I actually don’t mind the one flipped on the side etc. the F(x) is better too, imho.
I like the Key lobo but its a but weird off centered. Forma the kanji/chinese logo, i dont like it. It dont mean anything forma me, just a random asian lettersDon't let the weebs catch you saying that they might go haywire lol
logo is absolutely fine imo, I rather waiting for reply for the ISO plate support. Because PCB does support ISO but no plate? what plate should I use then or ISO only plateless?
logo is absolutely fine imo, I rather waiting for reply for the ISO plate support. Because PCB does support ISO but no plate? what plate should I use then or ISO only plateless?
Getting custom plates cut after the fact is not difficult at all, if the designer is willing to share plate files, or at least the stock dimensions.
logo is absolutely fine imo, I rather waiting for reply for the ISO plate support. Because PCB does support ISO but no plate? what plate should I use then or ISO only plateless?
Getting custom plates cut after the fact is not difficult at all, if the designer is willing to share plate files, or at least the stock dimensions.
I honestly have no clue where I can get custom plates done :P So I rather have it directly from the "vendor" / designer. do you have any suggestions?
I like the Key lobo but its a but weird off centered. Forma the kanji/chinese logo, i dont like it. It dont mean anything forma me, just a random asian letters
Username checks outI like the Key lobo but its a but weird off centered. Forma the kanji/chinese logo, i dont like it. It dont mean anything forma me, just a random asian letters
I don't like your profile picture, it doesn't mean anything to me. It's just a random wolf.
Just because it holds no meaning to you does not mean that it has no value to the creator.
Would have genuinely loved it a lot if it was a nicely stylized f(x) but not a fan of the key logo :/This is actually a really good suggestion. A stylistic f(x) might be better than a key which many of claimed to be too similar to the keycult logo.
Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
I'm sure many people won't agree but I incline to the view that art is subjective. The logo design was a headache to me because I"m not an artist and graphic design is really not my forte. Even worse, I was trying to make a logo that can please everyone including myself. Now I understand that's not possible. People from different backgrounds have different opinions. I've heard it's related to a concept called Construal level (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construal_level_theory). Take foreign-language tattoo as an example, some Chinese characters the westerners think cool may look very silly by Chinese people, even if the syntax is correct. In the Key logo, some people mentioned that the X looks like the X-men logo. I've watched X-men movies many times but I didn't realize it until double-check. I was just not sensitive to the X-men's X because English is not my native tongue. To be honest, the top right corner logos on several other 65% kits don't look good to me as well. Sorry, I'm not gonna name them BTW. Some even look very stupid to me. Similarly, I have mixed feelings about the popular katakana sub-legends on many keysets. What makes these things good design? Apparently, the katakana sub-legends are not practically useful. Are popular designs objectively good or just suitable for the correct group of people? These questions have been puzzled me for quite some time now.
Anyway, the 6 versions of top case options should satisfy many of you, definitely not all of you though. I'm pretty happy with the Key logo so I'll keep it. It looks simple but believe me I put a lot of thoughts into it.
At the end of the day, the logo is just a logo. It may make mundane objects seem sophisticated and alluring, but it doesn't change what the keyboard is. I wouldn't even add a logo there if I knew it can cause so many conflicting viewpoints.
Again, I'm not an artist. Even the decisions are made, I'm open for comments about what I said.
I'm sure many people won't agree but I incline to the view that art is subjective. The logo design was a headache to me because I"m not an artist and graphic design is really not my forte. Even worse, I was trying to make a logo that can please everyone including myself. Now I understand that's not possible. People from different backgrounds have different opinions. I've heard it's related to a concept called Construal level (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construal_level_theory). Take foreign-language tattoo as an example, some Chinese characters the westerners think cool may look very silly by Chinese people, even if the syntax is correct. In the Key logo, some people mentioned that the X looks like the X-men logo. I've watched X-men movies many times but I didn't realize it until double-check. I was just not sensitive to the X-men's X because English is not my native tongue. To be honest, the top right corner logos on several other 65% kits don't look good to me as well. Sorry, I'm not gonna name them BTW. Some even look very stupid to me. Similarly, I have mixed feelings about the popular katakana sub-legends on many keysets. What makes these things good design? Apparently, the katakana sub-legends are not practically useful. Are popular designs objectively good or just suitable for the correct group of people? These questions have been puzzled me for quite some time now.
Anyway, the 6 versions of top case options should satisfy many of you, definitely not all of you though. I'm pretty happy with the Key logo so I'll keep it. It looks simple but believe me I put a lot of thoughts into it.
At the end of the day, the logo is just a logo. It may make mundane objects seem sophisticated and alluring, but it doesn't change what the keyboard is. I wouldn't even add a logo there if I knew it can cause so many conflicting viewpoints.
Again, I'm not an artist. Even the decisions are made, I'm open for comments about what I said.
Honestly, the whole redesign thing was ridiculous. Constructive criticism is fine if it concerns the feel of the board or if potential flaws are present, but the aesthetics of the board should always be what the designer has in mind. If you don't like the design, just don't buy the board...
I'm sure many people won't agree but I incline to the view that art is subjective. The logo design was a headache to me because I"m not an artist and graphic design is really not my forte. Even worse, I was trying to make a logo that can please everyone including myself. Now I understand that's not possible. People from different backgrounds have different opinions. I've heard it's related to a concept called Construal level (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construal_level_theory). Take foreign-language tattoo as an example, some Chinese characters the westerners think cool may look very silly by Chinese people, even if the syntax is correct. In the Key logo, some people mentioned that the X looks like the X-men logo. I've watched X-men movies many times but I didn't realize it until double-check. I was just not sensitive to the X-men's X because English is not my native tongue. To be honest, the top right corner logos on several other 65% kits don't look good to me as well. Sorry, I'm not gonna name them BTW. Some even look very stupid to me. Similarly, I have mixed feelings about the popular katakana sub-legends on many keysets. What makes these things good design? Apparently, the katakana sub-legends are not practically useful. Are popular designs objectively good or just suitable for the correct group of people? These questions have been puzzled me for quite some time now.
Anyway, the 6 versions of top case options should satisfy many of you, definitely not all of you though. I'm pretty happy with the Key logo so I'll keep it. It looks simple but believe me I put a lot of thoughts into it.
At the end of the day, the logo is just a logo. It may make mundane objects seem sophisticated and alluring, but it doesn't change what the keyboard is. I wouldn't even add a logo there if I knew it can cause so many conflicting viewpoints.
Again, I'm not an artist. Even the decisions are made, I'm open for comments about what I said.
Honestly, the whole redesign thing was ridiculous. Constructive criticism is fine if it concerns the feel of the board or if potential flaws are present, but the aesthetics of the board should always be what the designer has in mind. If you don't like the design, just don't buy the board...
I'm sure many people won't agree but I incline to the view that art is subjective. The logo design was a headache to me because I"m not an artist and graphic design is really not my forte. Even worse, I was trying to make a logo that can please everyone including myself. Now I understand that's not possible. People from different backgrounds have different opinions. I've heard it's related to a concept called Construal level (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construal_level_theory). Take foreign-language tattoo as an example, some Chinese characters the westerners think cool may look very silly by Chinese people, even if the syntax is correct. In the Key logo, some people mentioned that the X looks like the X-men logo. I've watched X-men movies many times but I didn't realize it until double-check. I was just not sensitive to the X-men's X because English is not my native tongue. To be honest, the top right corner logos on several other 65% kits don't look good to me as well. Sorry, I'm not gonna name them BTW. Some even look very stupid to me. Similarly, I have mixed feelings about the popular katakana sub-legends on many keysets. What makes these things good design? Apparently, the katakana sub-legends are not practically useful. Are popular designs objectively good or just suitable for the correct group of people? These questions have been puzzled me for quite some time now.
Anyway, the 6 versions of top case options should satisfy many of you, definitely not all of you though. I'm pretty happy with the Key logo so I'll keep it. It looks simple but believe me I put a lot of thoughts into it.
At the end of the day, the logo is just a logo. It may make mundane objects seem sophisticated and alluring, but it doesn't change what the keyboard is. I wouldn't even add a logo there if I knew it can cause so many conflicting viewpoints.
Again, I'm not an artist. Even the decisions are made, I'm open for comments about what I said.
Honestly, the whole redesign thing was ridiculous. Constructive criticism is fine if it concerns the feel of the board or if potential flaws are present, but the aesthetics of the board should always be what the designer has in mind. If you don't like the design, just don't buy the board...
Well thats kind of the point of an IC isn't it?
What means the kanji?
What means the kanji?
What means the kanji?
it means 'key'
I'm sure many people won't agree but I incline to the view that art is subjective. The logo design was a headache to me because I"m not an artist and graphic design is really not my forte. Even worse, I was trying to make a logo that can please everyone including myself. Now I understand that's not possible. People from different backgrounds have different opinions. I've heard it's related to a concept called Construal level (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construal_level_theory). Take foreign-language tattoo as an example, some Chinese characters the westerners think cool may look very silly by Chinese people, even if the syntax is correct. In the Key logo, some people mentioned that the X looks like the X-men logo. I've watched X-men movies many times but I didn't realize it until double-check. I was just not sensitive to the X-men's X because English is not my native tongue. To be honest, the top right corner logos on several other 65% kits don't look good to me as well. Sorry, I'm not gonna name them BTW. Some even look very stupid to me. Similarly, I have mixed feelings about the popular katakana sub-legends on many keysets. What makes these things good design? Apparently, the katakana sub-legends are not practically useful. Are popular designs objectively good or just suitable for the correct group of people? These questions have been puzzled me for quite some time now.
Anyway, the 6 versions of top case options should satisfy many of you, definitely not all of you though. I'm pretty happy with the Key logo so I'll keep it. It looks simple but believe me I put a lot of thoughts into it.
At the end of the day, the logo is just a logo. It may make mundane objects seem sophisticated and alluring, but it doesn't change what the keyboard is. I wouldn't even add a logo there if I knew it can cause so many conflicting viewpoints.
Again, I'm not an artist. Even the decisions are made, I'm open for comments about what I said.
Honestly, the whole redesign thing was ridiculous. Constructive criticism is fine if it concerns the feel of the board or if potential flaws are present, but the aesthetics of the board should always be what the designer has in mind. If you don't like the design, just don't buy the board...
Well thats kind of the point of an IC isn't it?
Exactly.
The problem with this trend of using top blocker logos is that the logo is way too dominant and often designed by someone who is not a graphic designer by profession (at least not a good one). To be quite honest most of them look terrible. So not only did I sacrifice a key, I now have to look at a bad logo whenever I look down on my keyboard.
Nobody buys a keyboard for the logo, so why does it have to be so dominant? This trend doesn't serve anybody but the designer.
The fact that the past 7 pages are pretty much all about the logo and not about the keyboard says something. Personally I don't think the first version was that bad but it was still an easy pass because of the in-your-face branding which I dislike.
I really like this board and feel that it's a shame they discussions derailed but maybe it is a good indication to future GB runners of what not to do. Your keyboard should be about exactly that, not the logo.
Put it on underneath or a tiny one on the side/back if you really need to have it.
Sure we can move on and not buy the keyboard, but it's a shame not to because this one and others are lovely and people are just venting because the branding is is holding them back from committing to the purchase. As long as we're all civil it should be OK. That's what an IC is for.
What color options will be available? When will the GB happen? Will the PCB support VIA configurator?
What color options will be available? When will the GB happen? Will the PCB support VIA configurator?
Color options are still TBD. It highly depends on what you say in the IC period.
I'm not familiar with VIA configurator but I'll look into it.
How does the titanium plate compare in firmness / sound to aluminum / brass? Also since you are considering a POM case, please consider POM plates as well - I really dig my singa with a POM plate.. unique sound and a soft flexy bottom out.I can't speak for plates but I have a titanium bicycle and it's extremely vibration dampening/absorbent vs carbon fibre or aluminium
At the end of the day, the logo is just a logo. It may make mundane objects seem sophisticated and alluring, but it doesn't change what the keyboard is. I wouldn't even add a logo there if I knew it can cause so many conflicting viewpoints.
I was planning on getting an e-yellow Polaris, but prefer 65% boards, so this may change my mind.
Personally, I like the final column, from top to bottom, to be Home, End, Page Up, Page Down, and the right arrow key. So, apart from not liking the logo in the upper right, it also prevents me from having the layout I prefer. Meaning that I would prefer an extra key as opposed to a logo I don't care for.
I don't expect things to be changed for my preferences, but you asked for opinions and responses, and this is just what I feel personally.
I don't mind the logo on the back, however. And I'm interested in what other e-colors will be available.
Polaris is a great board. Kevin and Ai have good taste. I may get a Polaris as well.
TBH I didn't like the NR logo. Fox lab is not just me tho and my partner insisted on the logo. I'm glad he admits he's wrong now.
E-black, E-white, E-red will all be available like before. You already know how E-yellow looks. Here are two other colors I prototyped before.Show Image(https://i.imgur.com/NgUfwAY.jpg)Show Image(https://i.imgur.com/q3EJYqz.jpg)
+1 for gray top case + white/black logo color. hyped for this! :D
I'm still super interested in learning more about the newer stuff I've never seen before in keyboards; G10 case and Pattern Welded steel weight, are you having protos made for these so we can sort of estimate what they would look like/sound/feel if they were to happen?
I am so in ! Is there a discord I can join so to get regular infos and discussions of this ?
Is red a possibility?
Sent from my SM-N950F using Tapatalk
How does the titanium plate compare in firmness / sound to aluminum / brass? Also since you are considering a POM case, please consider POM plates as well - I really dig my singa with a POM plate.. unique sound and a soft flexy bottom out.
At the end of the day, the logo is just a logo. It may make mundane objects seem sophisticated and alluring, but it doesn't change what the keyboard is. I wouldn't even add a logo there if I knew it can cause so many conflicting viewpoints.
WK and WKL options for 3 different tops sound fantastic. I think these are great options, and you've gone above and beyond expectations. I see some people are (still) complaining about logo issues. Honestly I feel hypebeasts have taken over much of the hobby, and their lust for "aesthetics" is ruining the main purpose of ICs.
About color options - in the past you've offered MAO white. Is that possible here? Or is the process too difficult? I have it on my Leaf 80's plate, and I really love the matte white effect. I think it would be really great as an accent.
As for the board itself, I own a Leaf 80, and it's my favorite board. The brand may not be as hyped as other brands, but their build quality is just as good. I have no doubt in the quality of Fox Labs, and I'm very excited for this GB. I definitely want one aluminum with the gray/black(unless MAO white is available) and one polycarb. The price point is amazing, and Fox Labs has a history of solid manufacturing and delivery. I'd encourage anyone to buy into this.
Thanks for taking the feedback in stride and offering a number of options. It looks like I'm in the minority here but I'll probably end up going with the Kanji with the winkey.
Also, are you still considering POM as a material option?
At the end of the day, the logo is just a logo. It may make mundane objects seem sophisticated and alluring, but it doesn't change what the keyboard is. I wouldn't even add a logo there if I knew it can cause so many conflicting viewpoints.
WK and WKL options for 3 different tops sound fantastic. I think these are great options, and you've gone above and beyond expectations. I see some people are (still) complaining about logo issues. Honestly I feel hypebeasts have taken over much of the hobby, and their lust for "aesthetics" is ruining the main purpose of ICs.
About color options - in the past you've offered MAO white. Is that possible here? Or is the process too difficult? I have it on my Leaf 80's plate, and I really love the matte white effect. I think it would be really great as an accent.
As for the board itself, I own a Leaf 80, and it's my favorite board. The brand may not be as hyped as other brands, but their build quality is just as good. I have no doubt in the quality of Fox Labs, and I'm very excited for this GB. I definitely want one aluminum with the gray/black(unless MAO white is available) and one polycarb. The price point is amazing, and Fox Labs has a history of solid manufacturing and delivery. I'd encourage anyone to buy into this.
Thanks. MAO white is not difficult to deal with. It's just a matter of interest. I count your comment as a vote.
Hand polished raw aluminum? Otherwise probably going to just cerakote :)
Do you have a date planned?
Also very interested. This could be my endgame.Variety is the spice of Life
Also very interested. This could be my endgame.Variety is the spice of Life
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
could
Do you have a date planned?
also interested!
Do you have a date planned?
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
Will there be unlimited slots for each option? I really like the key logo and the kanji so it would be nice if I'd be able to get in on both options.
Very interested! Any idea on build quantites?
I hope it is not a super limited run, so I can get one!
Good man!!!Do you have a date planned?
also interested!Do you have a date planned?
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
If everything goes right, GB will start in this month. We're waiting for the prototypes, nothing else.
I won't the GB with just the renders and deal with uncertainties after I collected your money.
I wouldn't hesitate to start GB after I can make sure all the finishes, materials, and processing will work.
Right now we're trying to solve several G10 milling issues. We need to use the correct end mills and proper configurations (rpm, feed rate) for this material. Otherwise, there are flaking and other issues.
Do you have a date planned?
also interested!Do you have a date planned?
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
If everything goes right, GB will start in this month. We're waiting for the prototypes, nothing else.
I won't the GB with just the renders and deal with uncertainties after I collected your money.
I wouldn't hesitate to start GB after I can make sure all the finishes, materials, and processing will work.
Right now we're trying to solve several G10 milling issues. We need to use the correct end mills and proper configurations (rpm, feed rate) for this material. Otherwise, there are flaking and other issues.
Nice !Do you have a date planned?
also interested!Do you have a date planned?
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
If everything goes right, GB will start in this month. We're waiting for the prototypes, nothing else.
I won't the GB with just the renders and deal with uncertainties after I collected your money.
I wouldn't hesitate to start GB after I can make sure all the finishes, materials, and processing will work.
Right now we're trying to solve several G10 milling issues. We need to use the correct end mills and proper configurations (rpm, feed rate) for this material. Otherwise, there are flaking and other issues.
Nice !
Will you give an ISO «ready to go» file so we can order a custom plate on our own ?
Possible to have it before the GB so we can ask for a quote ?Nice !
Will you give an ISO «ready to go» file so we can order a custom plate on our own ?
Yes. I can do that.
Please don't end the gb before the 27th of September!Pay day ?
Nice !
Will you give an ISO «ready to go» file so we can order a custom plate on our own ?
Yes. I can do that.
where would one order such a plate?Possible to have it before the GB so we can ask for a quote ?Nice !
Will you give an ISO «ready to go» file so we can order a custom plate on our own ?
Yes. I can do that.
where would one order such a plate?Possible to have it before the GB so we can ask for a quote ?Nice !
Will you give an ISO «ready to go» file so we can order a custom plate on our own ?
Yes. I can do that.
logo is absolutely fine imo, I rather waiting for reply for the ISO plate support. Because PCB does support ISO but no plate? what plate should I use then or ISO only plateless?
Getting custom plates cut after the fact is not difficult at all, if the designer is willing to share plate files, or at least the stock dimensions.
I honestly have no clue where I can get custom plates done :P So I rather have it directly from the "vendor" / designer. do you have any suggestions?
There's a number of options available, depending on your budget and location in the world. Would advise creating another topic/post about this question, and fielding answers separately outside of this thread. Lasergist, Laserboost, Big Blue Saw, etc. I find that if enough people are interested in a custom plate, better to run a side group order to get quantities up for lower cost.
Yes :D really looking forward to this onePlease don't end the gb before the 27th of September!Pay day ?
The logo kinda grows on me to be honest, I like it better now. Some questions tho:
1. Will there be extra hotswap pcb with standard layout? (2u bspace, 6.25u spacebar etc
I'm still super interested in learning more about the newer stuff I've never seen before in keyboards; G10 case and Pattern Welded steel weight, are you having protos made for these so we can sort of estimate what they would look like/sound/feel if they were to happen?
The factory told me that G10 is too difficult to work with with their machines. I insisted to order a prototype. Let's see how would it turns out.
I also ordered a pattern-welded steel weight. The patterns on the sample material are not very good. The supplier can offer more options only if we have a bulk purchase. The prototyping is more for verifying this option. I don't think many people will choose this weight but I really want to offer it at least once.
any progress on the alps plate? Definitely buying one assuming alps is supported!
The logo kinda grows on me to be honest, I like it better now. Some questions tho:
1. Will there be extra hotswap pcb with standard layout? (2u bspace, 6.25u spacebar etc)
2. Any anodized option, specifically Teal / Turquoise / Tiffany Blue color? I know you will have e-teal but wonder if it's available anodized
Most likely in for a PC version with split spacebar! Are there still plans for a rotary encoder on the top right?
Is FR4 plate a possibility?
Will there be any way to get the logo blocker to be a shiny badge rather than an e-coated brass? Prototypes look good though!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
any progress on the alps plate? Definitely buying one assuming alps is supported!
ALPS plate has been canceled due to limited demand. Your reply is the first one I've seen about this option. The PCB still supports ALPS but I won't provide ALPS plate options in the GB. I'll make ALPS plates for myself tho. If you wanna join, I can help you with the ALPS plate. PM me.
Is that a blue grey version I see?
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk
The logo kinda grows on me to be honest, I like it better now. Some questions tho:
1. Will there be extra hotswap pcb with standard layout? (2u bspace, 6.25u spacebar etc)
2. Any anodized option, specifically Teal / Turquoise / Tiffany Blue color? I know you will have e-teal but wonder if it's available anodized
1. The hotswap PCB supports 7u space and 2u bs
2. Two anodized colors will be available. They are blue and grey.
The logo kinda grows on me to be honest, I like it better now. Some questions tho:
1. Will there be extra hotswap pcb with standard layout? (2u bspace, 6.25u spacebar etc)
2. Any anodized option, specifically Teal / Turquoise / Tiffany Blue color? I know you will have e-teal but wonder if it's available anodized
1. The hotswap PCB supports 7u space and 2u bs
2. Two anodized colors will be available. They are blue and grey.
The logo kinda grows on me to be honest, I like it better now. Some questions tho:
1. Will there be extra hotswap pcb with standard layout? (2u bspace, 6.25u spacebar etc)
2. Any anodized option, specifically Teal / Turquoise / Tiffany Blue color? I know you will have e-teal but wonder if it's available anodized
1. The hotswap PCB supports 7u space and 2u bs
2. Two anodized colors will be available. They are blue and grey.
no chance that the hotswap pcb supporting 6.25u instead?
I would also like a hotswap pcb that just has a standard 6.25u spacebar.The logo kinda grows on me to be honest, I like it better now. Some questions tho:
1. Will there be extra hotswap pcb with standard layout? (2u bspace, 6.25u spacebar etc)
2. Any anodized option, specifically Teal / Turquoise / Tiffany Blue color? I know you will have e-teal but wonder if it's available anodized
1. The hotswap PCB supports 7u space and 2u bs
2. Two anodized colors will be available. They are blue and grey.
no chance that the hotswap pcb supporting 6.25u instead?
Same here.I would also like a hotswap pcb that just has a standard 6.25u spacebar.The logo kinda grows on me to be honest, I like it better now. Some questions tho:
1. Will there be extra hotswap pcb with standard layout? (2u bspace, 6.25u spacebar etc)
2. Any anodized option, specifically Teal / Turquoise / Tiffany Blue color? I know you will have e-teal but wonder if it's available anodized
1. The hotswap PCB supports 7u space and 2u bs
2. Two anodized colors will be available. They are blue and grey.
no chance that the hotswap pcb supporting 6.25u instead?
Agreed. The 7u spacebar on the hotswap PCB is kind of a dealbreaker for me.I would also like a hotswap pcb that just has a standard 6.25u spacebar.The logo kinda grows on me to be honest, I like it better now. Some questions tho:
1. Will there be extra hotswap pcb with standard layout? (2u bspace, 6.25u spacebar etc)
2. Any anodized option, specifically Teal / Turquoise / Tiffany Blue color? I know you will have e-teal but wonder if it's available anodized
1. The hotswap PCB supports 7u space and 2u bs
2. Two anodized colors will be available. They are blue and grey.
no chance that the hotswap pcb supporting 6.25u instead?
Prototyping has been finished. Here is a comparison between the render and the real thing.Show Image(https://i.imgur.com/YaVcWgg.jpg)Show Image(https://i.imgur.com/X1s8kZr.jpg)
More photos:Show Image(https://i.imgur.com/3ynIsjj.jpg)Show Image(https://i.imgur.com/dzr8zu3.jpg)Show Image(https://i.imgur.com/ff0NjBU.jpg)
Unfortunately, the G10 case and the damast steel weight didn't turn out to be good. We haven't given up but we decide to run the GB without these two options first. GB will start on Sept. 25th and last two weeks.
Unfortunately, the G10 case and the damast steel weight didn't turn out to be good. We haven't given up but we decide to run the GB without these two options first. GB will start on Sept. 25th and last two weeks.
Prototyping has been finished. Here is a comparison between the render and the real thing.Show Image(https://i.imgur.com/YaVcWgg.jpg)Show Image(https://i.imgur.com/X1s8kZr.jpg)
More photos:Show Image(https://i.imgur.com/3ynIsjj.jpg)Show Image(https://i.imgur.com/dzr8zu3.jpg)Show Image(https://i.imgur.com/ff0NjBU.jpg)
Unfortunately, the G10 case and the damast steel weight didn't turn out to be good. We haven't given up but we decide to run the GB without these two options first. GB will start on Sept. 25th and last two weeks.
Is there gonna be a GB for this?
GB will start on Sept. 25th and last two weeks.
Do you know what time the group buy will open?
Is there gonna be a GB for this?GB will start on Sept. 25th and last two weeks.
The logo kinda grows on me to be honest, I like it better now. Some questions tho:
1. Will there be extra hotswap pcb with standard layout? (2u bspace, 6.25u spacebar etc)
2. Any anodized option, specifically Teal / Turquoise / Tiffany Blue color? I know you will have e-teal but wonder if it's available anodized
1. The hotswap PCB supports 7u space and 2u bs
2. Two anodized colors will be available. They are blue and grey.
What kind of blue is it? Is it teal or dark blue?
And please won’t you make the hotswap PCB has standard layout (6.25u space) as it’s more common for keycaps?
Does the pcb have build in under side led? Is there gonna be ona proxy site or like a google form order type of thing
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
So what materials have actually been decided?
Between the 2 logos (kanji/chinese character and the key), are they both created the same way? the key logo looks like it uses a separately milled piece which is discrete from the top case while the kanji logo looks like its engraved directly on the top part of the case.
The logo kinda grows on me to be honest, I like it better now. Some questions tho:
1. Will there be extra hotswap pcb with standard layout? (2u bspace, 6.25u spacebar etc)
2. Any anodized option, specifically Teal / Turquoise / Tiffany Blue color? I know you will have e-teal but wonder if it's available anodized
1. The hotswap PCB supports 7u space and 2u bs
2. Two anodized colors will be available. They are blue and grey.
What kind of blue is it? Is it teal or dark blue?
And please won’t you make the hotswap PCB has standard layout (6.25u space) as it’s more common for keycaps?
The anode blue is about the same with blue in the render with GMK Nautilus in OP.
No, another group of people will argue the 7u space layout is better if we change.
The logo kinda grows on me to be honest, I like it better now. Some questions tho:
1. Will there be extra hotswap pcb with standard layout? (2u bspace, 6.25u spacebar etc)
2. Any anodized option, specifically Teal / Turquoise / Tiffany Blue color? I know you will have e-teal but wonder if it's available anodized
1. The hotswap PCB supports 7u space and 2u bs
2. Two anodized colors will be available. They are blue and grey.
What kind of blue is it? Is it teal or dark blue?
And please won’t you make the hotswap PCB has standard layout (6.25u space) as it’s more common for keycaps?
The anode blue is about the same with blue in the render with GMK Nautilus in OP.
No, another group of people will argue the 7u space layout is better if we change.
Honestly, I don't get your argument. Why choose something uncommon over common?
This is different than the case of your logo. You can use that argument on that since it's purely subjective and there's no standardization of how a logo usually looks.
But this is not the same as that. It's an objective and undeniable fact that 6.25u is a standard layout that's more common. Meanwhile, 7u is not.
As a comparison, this is just as bizarre as a base keycap kit with ISO caps instead of ANSI caps. They can argue all they want ISO is better but the fact remains that ANSI is more general.
If they want more variety than the standard layout, shouldn't they get solder PCB instead? Isn't that supposed to be the key difference between solder and hotswap? You can't change layout in hotswap, that's why the layout should be standard.
You can see that a lot of people under my previous post asking for 6.25u hotswap pcb. Please, make it possible.
The logo kinda grows on me to be honest, I like it better now. Some questions tho:
1. Will there be extra hotswap pcb with standard layout? (2u bspace, 6.25u spacebar etc)
2. Any anodized option, specifically Teal / Turquoise / Tiffany Blue color? I know you will have e-teal but wonder if it's available anodized
1. The hotswap PCB supports 7u space and 2u bs
2. Two anodized colors will be available. They are blue and grey.
What kind of blue is it? Is it teal or dark blue?
And please won’t you make the hotswap PCB has standard layout (6.25u space) as it’s more common for keycaps?
The anode blue is about the same with blue in the render with GMK Nautilus in OP.
No, another group of people will argue the 7u space layout is better if we change.
Honestly, I don't get your argument. Why choose something uncommon over common?
This is different than the case of your logo. You can use that argument on that since it's purely subjective and there's no standardization of how a logo usually looks.
But this is not the same as that. It's an objective and undeniable fact that 6.25u is a standard layout that's more common. Meanwhile, 7u is not.
As a comparison, this is just as bizarre as a base keycap kit with ISO caps instead of ANSI caps. They can argue all they want ISO is better but the fact remains that ANSI is more general.
If they want more variety than the standard layout, shouldn't they get solder PCB instead? Isn't that supposed to be the key difference between solder and hotswap? You can't change layout in hotswap, that's why the layout should be standard.
You can see that a lot of people under my previous post asking for 6.25u hotswap pcb. Please, make it possible.
Two things:
1: 6.25u bottom row being more common on keyboards does not imply any sort of advantage on its own. Being more common is not, by itself, a positive thing (if anything, it could be a negative in a community like this). The associated advantage is supposed to be broader keycap compatibility, but 7u bottom row is an extremely common setup to support in enthusiast keysets. GMK is the manufacturer of choice for keycaps in the community right now, and every GMK set that I've seen in recent years supports 7u bottom row in the base kit, so I really don't think that keyset compatibility is a major issue here for most buyers. What keysets are people trying to use that don't support 7u bottom row? The factors that differentiate the two bottom row options, then, are left to aesthetics and functionality, and it's harder to make an argument that 6.25u is somehow objectively superior in those regards. That's a can of worms I don't want to open.
2: If neither bottom row option is objectively superior (or even if one is, really), 6.25u bottom row being more common on keyboards as a whole doesn't mean that the majority of potential buyers of this keyboard would prefer 6.25u over 7u. You don't have any data to support that, so I don't really get your argument. It seems to boil down to "I like X, and lots of other people in the world like X, so X should be the thing of choice for everything, everywhere." Not every keyboard has to be for every person, or even the majority of people in the wider community. If you want to try and prove that the group of people interested in this keyboard would on average prefer 6.25u over 7u (and I don't just mean counting the people and taking the larger number), that's fine, and you would then have a decent argument for changing the default (in the absence of strong feelings from the designer). But without that proof, your argument doesn't seem convincing. You can make your argument about ISO because of the numbers involved, but that's not the case here. A board can be successful with a default 7u bottom row. See the U80-A and the Koyu, for recent examples. Why would a designer with an interest in broad appeal like RAMA have 7u as the default bottom row? Because they like it more, and the market will support it.
The logo kinda grows on me to be honest, I like it better now. Some questions tho:
1. Will there be extra hotswap pcb with standard layout? (2u bspace, 6.25u spacebar etc)
2. Any anodized option, specifically Teal / Turquoise / Tiffany Blue color? I know you will have e-teal but wonder if it's available anodized
1. The hotswap PCB supports 7u space and 2u bs
2. Two anodized colors will be available. They are blue and grey.
What kind of blue is it? Is it teal or dark blue?
And please won’t you make the hotswap PCB has standard layout (6.25u space) as it’s more common for keycaps?
The anode blue is about the same with blue in the render with GMK Nautilus in OP.
No, another group of people will argue the 7u space layout is better if we change.
Honestly, I don't get your argument. Why choose something uncommon over common?
This is different than the case of your logo. You can use that argument on that since it's purely subjective and there's no standardization of how a logo usually looks.
But this is not the same as that. It's an objective and undeniable fact that 6.25u is a standard layout that's more common. Meanwhile, 7u is not.
As a comparison, this is just as bizarre as a base keycap kit with ISO caps instead of ANSI caps. They can argue all they want ISO is better but the fact remains that ANSI is more general.
If they want more variety than the standard layout, shouldn't they get solder PCB instead? Isn't that supposed to be the key difference between solder and hotswap? You can't change layout in hotswap, that's why the layout should be standard.
You can see that a lot of people under my previous post asking for 6.25u hotswap pcb. Please, make it possible.
Two things:
1: 6.25u bottom row being more common on keyboards does not imply any sort of advantage on its own. Being more common is not, by itself, a positive thing (if anything, it could be a negative in a community like this). The associated advantage is supposed to be broader keycap compatibility, but 7u bottom row is an extremely common setup to support in enthusiast keysets. GMK is the manufacturer of choice for keycaps in the community right now, and every GMK set that I've seen in recent years supports 7u bottom row in the base kit, so I really don't think that keyset compatibility is a major issue here for most buyers. What keysets are people trying to use that don't support 7u bottom row? The factors that differentiate the two bottom row options, then, are left to aesthetics and functionality, and it's harder to make an argument that 6.25u is somehow objectively superior in those regards. That's a can of worms I don't want to open.
2: If neither bottom row option is objectively superior (or even if one is, really), 6.25u bottom row being more common on keyboards as a whole doesn't mean that the majority of potential buyers of this keyboard would prefer 6.25u over 7u. You don't have any data to support that, so I don't really get your argument. It seems to boil down to "I like X, and lots of other people in the world like X, so X should be the thing of choice for everything, everywhere." Not every keyboard has to be for every person, or even the majority of people in the wider community. If you want to try and prove that the group of people interested in this keyboard would on average prefer 6.25u over 7u (and I don't just mean counting the people and taking the larger number), that's fine, and you would then have a decent argument for changing the default (in the absence of strong feelings from the designer). But without that proof, your argument doesn't seem convincing. You can make your argument about ISO because of the numbers involved, but that's not the case here. A board can be successful with a default 7u bottom row. See the U80-A and the Koyu, for recent examples. Why would a designer with an interest in broad appeal like RAMA have 7u as the default bottom row? Because they like it more, and the market will support it.
Personally not getting a hotswap pcb due to the lack of split backspace but I like the fact that it supports 7u space. I doubt anyone who plans on spending upwards of $300 shipped on this board intends to slap some cheap keyset on it without any 7u compatibility. Hell, I cant even think of any sets out there that support standard 65% ONLY. 99% of 65% compatible sets will have compatibility for 7u. So even your point which states 6.25u makes more sense because its more common isnt really true in the case for this board.
I get what you're saying, especially the bit about only recent sets being more friendly towards 7u. I guess the point I was trying to make is that not many sets that support 65% will not have any support for 7u. I could be wrong though so feel free to correct me on this if ever.
I'm still getting the regular soldered pcb though :p
Im ready to order :)Is there gonna be a GB for this?GB will start on Sept. 25th and last two weeks.
Is there a set amount of keyboards or will go unlimited for two weeks?
Honestly, I don't get your argument. Why choose something uncommon over common?
This is different than the case of your logo. You can use that argument on that since it's purely subjective and there's no standardization of how a logo usually looks.
But this is not the same as that. It's an objective and undeniable fact that 6.25u is a standard layout that's more common. Meanwhile, 7u is not.
As a comparison, this is just as bizarre as a base keycap kit with ISO caps instead of ANSI caps. They can argue all they want ISO is better but the fact remains that ANSI is more general.
If they want more variety than the standard layout, shouldn't they get solder PCB instead? Isn't that supposed to be the key difference between solder and hotswap? You can't change layout in hotswap, that's why the layout should be standard.
You can see that a lot of people under my previous post asking for 6.25u hotswap pcb. Please, make it possible.
Will you open source the plate files? ;)
ETA?
I'm so ready for this GB! Where do we purchase?
soooo where can i spend my money?
Where do we order one?
Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk