i'm stunned.
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/11/30/showbiz/actor-paul-walker-dies/
I thought about posting this yesterday, glad someone did. I'm very sad, one of my favorite movies. :( not sure how they will finish 7 now. Maybe stateham will kill him off.. Rip.
I thought about posting this yesterday, glad someone did. I'm very sad, one of my favorite movies. :( not sure how they will finish 7 now. Maybe stateham will kill him off.. Rip.
Think of Batman or The Crow. They'll figure something honorable for the man and the character he was playing.
I thought about posting this yesterday, glad someone did. I'm very sad, one of my favorite movies. :( not sure how they will finish 7 now. Maybe stateham will kill him off.. Rip.
Think of Batman or The Crow. They'll figure something honorable for the man and the character he was playing.
Very true ! He was great in joyride, eight below, running scared, pleasantville, into the blue, and the death and life of bobby z to name some..
I thought about posting this yesterday, glad someone did. I'm very sad, one of my favorite movies. :( not sure how they will finish 7 now. Maybe stateham will kill him off.. Rip.
Think of Batman or The Crow. They'll figure something honorable for the man and the character he was playing.
Very true ! He was great in joyride, eight below, running scared, pleasantville, into the blue, and the death and life of bobby z to name some..
What I meant by the reference was about Heath Ledger and Brandon Lee.
Dont forget the other guy in the carI think his name was Roger. Might not be famous but still equally tragic
Dont forget the other guy in the carI think his name was Roger. Might not be famous but still equally tragic
I don't know, man. They're both just two guys that we don't know, and If you're going to consider the deaths tragic you'll have no time to do anything else, because you'll have to think almost every death is tragic then. Let the families and relatives give a ****, we shouldn't, because they're insignificant to us.
Dont forget the other guy in the carI think his name was Roger. Might not be famous but still equally tragic
I don't know, man. They're both just two guys that we don't know, and If you're going to consider the deaths tragic you'll have no time to do anything else, because you'll have to think almost every death is tragic then. Let the families and relatives give a ****, we shouldn't, because they're insignificant to us.
ah yes, there goes THAT guy.
edit: On the bright side, I'm happy nobody here has called it "ironic".
The irony.... so sad.....
ah yes, there goes THAT guy.
You say no one cares here?I said nobody should care.
You say no one cares here?I said nobody should care.
**** youYou say no one cares here?I said nobody should care.
Why shouldn't we care? Because in our LIVES he's nobody, and I suggest people and their emotional feelings for somebody you haven't met in any way should go away. If he donated to charity - he's done it, it doesn't go away if he dies. If he was going to donate more, too bad, let the affected starving kids in Africa or whatever care, we shouldn't, with out iPhones and computers. If he was a good guy to work with, let the people he worked with care, why should we care? He never did anything useful for us. He never finished your ****ing essays or gave you money for taxes or stuff. He was a rich white guy that happened to be placed in fast cars that were recorded and had explosions that were probably digitally imposed afterwards, and suddenly all of that became real with a lot less of what made it cool.You say no one cares here?I said nobody should care.
why's that? you're the authority of what people should and shouldn't care about now?
like i said, it's THAT guy. there is always one.
Why shouldn't we care? Because in our LIVES he's nobody, and I suggest people and their emotional feelings for somebody you haven't met in any way should go away. If he donated to charity - he's done it, it doesn't go away if he dies. If he was going to donate more, too bad, let the affected starving kids in Africa or whatever care, we shouldn't, with out iPhones and computers. If he was a good guy to work with, let the people he worked with care, why should we care? He never did anything useful for us. He never finished your ****ing essays or gave you money for taxes or stuff. He was a rich white guy that happened to be placed in fast cars that were recorded and had explosions that were probably digitally imposed afterwards, and suddenly all of that became real with a lot less of what made it cool.You say no one cares here?I said nobody should care.
why's that? you're the authority of what people should and shouldn't care about now?
like i said, it's THAT guy. there is always one.
And that is why I suggest people shouldn't care. If I die tomorrow, what would you think? I suppose not a whole lot, so then why should people care more about this other stranger? Because he was basically your ****ing court jester?
There is no reason for all of the people that sat in a chair or a sofa and watched pretty pictures, occasionally grunting at speshul scenes while shovelling **** in your mouth, to care about this man's death.
:-*
Why shouldn't we care? Because in our LIVES he's nobody, and I suggest people and their emotional feelings for somebody you haven't met in any way should go away. If he donated to charity - he's done it, it doesn't go away if he dies. If he was going to donate more, too bad, let the affected starving kids in Africa or whatever care, we shouldn't, with out iPhones and computers. If he was a good guy to work with, let the people he worked with care, why should we care? He never did anything useful for us. He never finished your ****ing essays or gave you money for taxes or stuff. He was a rich white guy that happened to be placed in fast cars that were recorded and had explosions that were probably digitally imposed afterwards, and suddenly all of that became real with a lot less of what made it cool.You say no one cares here?I said nobody should care.
why's that? you're the authority of what people should and shouldn't care about now?
like i said, it's THAT guy. there is always one.
And that is why I suggest people shouldn't care. If I die tomorrow, what would you think? I suppose not a whole lot, so then why should people care more about this other stranger? Because he was basically your ****ing court jester?
There is no reason for all of the people that sat in a chair or a sofa and watched pretty pictures, occasionally grunting at speshul scenes while shovelling **** in your mouth, to care about this man's death.
:-*
****, i hope you're like 12 or something because you try WAY too hard.
but with that said, people are different. some mourn the lost of celebs, some don't. and you aren't anybody to tell people what they should care about.
and to answer your question, yeah i wouldn't give a ****. but i find you annoying so maybe that's why.
Why shouldn't we care? Because in our LIVES he's nobody, and I suggest people and their emotional feelings for somebody you haven't met in any way should go away. If he donated to charity - he's done it, it doesn't go away if he dies. If he was going to donate more, too bad, let the affected starving kids in Africa or whatever care, we shouldn't, with out iPhones and computers. If he was a good guy to work with, let the people he worked with care, why should we care? He never did anything useful for us. He never finished your ****ing essays or gave you money for taxes or stuff. He was a rich white guy that happened to be placed in fast cars that were recorded and had explosions that were probably digitally imposed afterwards, and suddenly all of that became real with a lot less of what made it cool.You say no one cares here?I said nobody should care.
why's that? you're the authority of what people should and shouldn't care about now?
like i said, it's THAT guy. there is always one.
And that is why I suggest people shouldn't care. If I die tomorrow, what would you think? I suppose not a whole lot, so then why should people care more about this other stranger? Because he was basically your ****ing court jester?
There is no reason for all of the people that sat in a chair or a sofa and watched pretty pictures, occasionally grunting at speshul scenes while shovelling **** in your mouth, to care about this man's death.
:-*
Why shouldn't we care? Because in our LIVES he's nobody, and I suggest people and their emotional feelings for somebody you haven't met in any way should go away. If he donated to charity - he's done it, it doesn't go away if he dies. If he was going to donate more, too bad, let the affected starving kids in Africa or whatever care, we shouldn't, with out iPhones and computers. If he was a good guy to work with, let the people he worked with care, why should we care? He never did anything useful for us. He never finished your ****ing essays or gave you money for taxes or stuff. He was a rich white guy that happened to be placed in fast cars that were recorded and had explosions that were probably digitally imposed afterwards, and suddenly all of that became real with a lot less of what made it cool.You say no one cares here?I said nobody should care.
why's that? you're the authority of what people should and shouldn't care about now?
like i said, it's THAT guy. there is always one.
And that is why I suggest people shouldn't care. If I die tomorrow, what would you think? I suppose not a whole lot, so then why should people care more about this other stranger? Because he was basically your ****ing court jester?
There is no reason for all of the people that sat in a chair or a sofa and watched pretty pictures, occasionally grunting at speshul scenes while shovelling **** in your mouth, to care about this man's death.
:-*
I care because my good friend who I've been close with since I was 5 years old was Paul's closest friend. In the course of less than 2 years, my friends lost his dad and now his best friend. Paul affected my friends life in so many positive ways, and my friend wouldnt be where he is today without Paul. The internet is a big place, your lack of compassion and arrogance are offensive to friends and family and im glad that my friend isnt a keyboard geek so he doesnt have to be exposed to your lack of humanity.
Why shouldn't we care? Because in our LIVES he's nobody, and I suggest people and their emotional feelings for somebody you haven't met in any way should go away. If he donated to charity - he's done it, it doesn't go away if he dies. If he was going to donate more, too bad, let the affected starving kids in Africa or whatever care, we shouldn't, with out iPhones and computers. If he was a good guy to work with, let the people he worked with care, why should we care? He never did anything useful for us. He never finished your ****ing essays or gave you money for taxes or stuff. He was a rich white guy that happened to be placed in fast cars that were recorded and had explosions that were probably digitally imposed afterwards, and suddenly all of that became real with a lot less of what made it cool.You say no one cares here?I said nobody should care.
why's that? you're the authority of what people should and shouldn't care about now?
like i said, it's THAT guy. there is always one.
And that is why I suggest people shouldn't care. If I die tomorrow, what would you think? I suppose not a whole lot, so then why should people care more about this other stranger? Because he was basically your ****ing court jester?
There is no reason for all of the people that sat in a chair or a sofa and watched pretty pictures, occasionally grunting at speshul scenes while shovelling **** in your mouth, to care about this man's death.
:-*
****, i hope you're like 12 or something because you try WAY too hard.
but with that said, people are different. some mourn the lost of celebs, some don't. and you aren't anybody to tell people what they should care about.
and to answer your question, yeah i wouldn't give a ****. but i find you annoying so maybe that's why.
Why shouldn't we care? Because in our LIVES he's nobody, and I suggest people and their emotional feelings for somebody you haven't met in any way should go away. If he donated to charity - he's done it, it doesn't go away if he dies. If he was going to donate more, too bad, let the affected starving kids in Africa or whatever care, we shouldn't, with out iPhones and computers. If he was a good guy to work with, let the people he worked with care, why should we care? He never did anything useful for us. He never finished your ****ing essays or gave you money for taxes or stuff. He was a rich white guy that happened to be placed in fast cars that were recorded and had explosions that were probably digitally imposed afterwards, and suddenly all of that became real with a lot less of what made it cool.You say no one cares here?I said nobody should care.
why's that? you're the authority of what people should and shouldn't care about now?
like i said, it's THAT guy. there is always one.
And that is why I suggest people shouldn't care. If I die tomorrow, what would you think? I suppose not a whole lot, so then why should people care more about this other stranger? Because he was basically your ****ing court jester?
There is no reason for all of the people that sat in a chair or a sofa and watched pretty pictures, occasionally grunting at speshul scenes while shovelling **** in your mouth, to care about this man's death.
:-*
****, i hope you're like 12 or something because you try WAY too hard.
but with that said, people are different. some mourn the lost of celebs, some don't. and you aren't anybody to tell people what they should care about.
and to answer your question, yeah i wouldn't give a ****. but i find you annoying so maybe that's why.
Good to see you have noting to say on the actual topic and instead keep judging people with predictable cop-outs and a few narrow minded arguments. I don' think the "priority" or "authority" it seems you think I think I have is exclusive to me, it's something I think everyone has. Or should have. I never said I'm the whiteknight and saviour of how people should feel and think, but provided arguments against something I saw as unnecessary. If you think the way I express myself is asinine and/or stupid, live happily ever after with your hatred of a random guy on the internet and lack of substantial contribution to a topic.
Why shouldn't we care? Because in our LIVES he's nobody, and I suggest people and their emotional feelings for somebody you haven't met in any way should go away. If he donated to charity - he's done it, it doesn't go away if he dies. If he was going to donate more, too bad, let the affected starving kids in Africa or whatever care, we shouldn't, with out iPhones and computers. If he was a good guy to work with, let the people he worked with care, why should we care? He never did anything useful for us. He never finished your ****ing essays or gave you money for taxes or stuff. He was a rich white guy that happened to be placed in fast cars that were recorded and had explosions that were probably digitally imposed afterwards, and suddenly all of that became real with a lot less of what made it cool.You say no one cares here?I said nobody should care.
why's that? you're the authority of what people should and shouldn't care about now?
like i said, it's THAT guy. there is always one.
And that is why I suggest people shouldn't care. If I die tomorrow, what would you think? I suppose not a whole lot, so then why should people care more about this other stranger? Because he was basically your ****ing court jester?
There is no reason for all of the people that sat in a chair or a sofa and watched pretty pictures, occasionally grunting at speshul scenes while shovelling **** in your mouth, to care about this man's death.
:-*
****, i hope you're like 12 or something because you try WAY too hard.
but with that said, people are different. some mourn the lost of celebs, some don't. and you aren't anybody to tell people what they should care about.
and to answer your question, yeah i wouldn't give a ****. but i find you annoying so maybe that's why.
Good to see you have noting to say on the actual topic and instead keep judging people with predictable cop-outs and a few narrow minded arguments. I don' think the "priority" or "authority" it seems you think I think I have is exclusive to me, it's something I think everyone has. Or should have. I never said I'm the whiteknight and saviour of how people should feel and think, but provided arguments against something I saw as unnecessary. If you think the way I express myself is asinine and/or stupid, live happily ever after with your hatred of a random guy on the internet and lack of substantial contribution to a topic.
and now this is turning into discussing paicrai. great.
Why shouldn't we care? Because in our LIVES he's nobody, and I suggest people and their emotional feelings for somebody you haven't met in any way should go away. If he donated to charity - he's done it, it doesn't go away if he dies. If he was going to donate more, too bad, let the affected starving kids in Africa or whatever care, we shouldn't, with out iPhones and computers. If he was a good guy to work with, let the people he worked with care, why should we care? He never did anything useful for us. He never finished your ****ing essays or gave you money for taxes or stuff. He was a rich white guy that happened to be placed in fast cars that were recorded and had explosions that were probably digitally imposed afterwards, and suddenly all of that became real with a lot less of what made it cool.You say no one cares here?I said nobody should care.
why's that? you're the authority of what people should and shouldn't care about now?
like i said, it's THAT guy. there is always one.
And that is why I suggest people shouldn't care. If I die tomorrow, what would you think? I suppose not a whole lot, so then why should people care more about this other stranger? Because he was basically your ****ing court jester?
There is no reason for all of the people that sat in a chair or a sofa and watched pretty pictures, occasionally grunting at speshul scenes while shovelling **** in your mouth, to care about this man's death.
:-*
****, i hope you're like 12 or something because you try WAY too hard.
but with that said, people are different. some mourn the lost of celebs, some don't. and you aren't anybody to tell people what they should care about.
and to answer your question, yeah i wouldn't give a ****. but i find you annoying so maybe that's why.
Good to see you have noting to say on the actual topic and instead keep judging people with predictable cop-outs and a few narrow minded arguments. I don' think the "priority" or "authority" it seems you think I think I have is exclusive to me, it's something I think everyone has. Or should have. I never said I'm the whiteknight and saviour of how people should feel and think, but provided arguments against something I saw as unnecessary. If you think the way I express myself is asinine and/or stupid, live happily ever after with your hatred of a random guy on the internet and lack of substantial contribution to a topic.
What exactly do you want me to say? I don't know how he impacted the lives of every person that is mourning him. Sure, to me and you he was nobody significant other than an entertainer. But then you have somebody like Chris that did impact him personally. So there is no need for you to come in here and tell people they shouldn't give a **** simply because you don't. THAT is what I'm getting at.
Ftr I don't hate you. I just find you annoying. Or do you want to tell me how I should feel about you?
How is your ****ty attitude about the dude being dead and people mourning him that you claim shouldn't "on topic" exactly?Oh right, it's not.It's a thread about a dude being dead and people mourn him, posting about it seems pretty on topic, right?
Oh right, it's not.It's a thread about a dude being dead and people mourn him, posting about it seems pretty on topic, right?
Oh right, it's not.It's a thread about a dude being dead and people mourn him, posting about it seems pretty on topic, right?Show Image(http://www.globalnerdy.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/cool-story-bro.jpg)
I mean, you know, except for the fact the thread isn't called "How do you feel about Paul Walker dying and people mourning him".
But it's not and you're not.
Since it's called simply "R.I.P. Paul Walker" means that the range of what can be considered on topic is pretty wide, but arguments between two people about stuff not related to Paul Walker being dead, or death itself isn't on topic.Oh right, it's not.It's a thread about a dude being dead and people mourn him, posting about it seems pretty on topic, right?Show Image(http://www.globalnerdy.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/cool-story-bro.jpg)
I mean, you know, except for the fact the thread isn't called "How do you feel about Paul Walker dying and people mourning him".
But it's not and you're not.
Since it's called simply "R.I.P. Paul Walker" means that the range of what can be considered on topic is pretty wide, but arguments between two people about stuff not related to Paul Walker being dead, or death itself isn't on topic.Oh right, it's not.It's a thread about a dude being dead and people mourn him, posting about it seems pretty on topic, right?Show Image(http://www.globalnerdy.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/cool-story-bro.jpg)
I mean, you know, except for the fact the thread isn't called "How do you feel about Paul Walker dying and people mourning him".
But it's not and you're not.
If a thread is called "Discuss" and people start discussing, saying "The thread wasn't called Discuss ClickClacks, you morons" isn't valid, nor on the topic of discussion. What I posted seems to be within the purpose of this thread because the thread name is not very specific, but mentions someone being dead.
Basically |-onions-| *INSERT STUFF ABOUT ONIONS* |-onions-| That space is labelled onions and nothing more.
Here-here.. Perhaps being couped up in the ice and snow of Norge has left you mind feeble &.your heart cold..?
This is GeekHack not wingebook
Since it's called simply "R.I.P. Paul Walker" means that the range of what can be considered on topic is pretty wide, but arguments between two people about stuff not related to Paul Walker being dead, or death itself isn't on topic.Oh right, it's not.It's a thread about a dude being dead and people mourn him, posting about it seems pretty on topic, right?Show Image(http://www.globalnerdy.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/cool-story-bro.jpg)
I mean, you know, except for the fact the thread isn't called "How do you feel about Paul Walker dying and people mourning him".
But it's not and you're not.
If a thread is called "Discuss" and people start discussing, saying "The thread wasn't called Discuss ClickClacks, you morons" isn't valid, nor on the topic of discussion. What I posted seems to be within the purpose of this thread because the thread name is not very specific, but mentions someone being dead.
Basically |-onions-| *INSERT STUFF ABOUT ONIONS* |-onions-| That space is labelled onions and nothing more.
Seriously, what the **** are you even discussing anymore?
You're the one who decided to determine what was and wasn't on topic. People tried to dispel your on topic argument, and they are the ones who went off topic?
(Attachment Link)
When I ****ing post something about the dead ****ing guy and **** in a thread about the dead guy, it's on topic, and when people beg to differ ON THE TOPIC OF THE DEAD GUY and opinions and stuff ABOUT THE DEAD GUY, it's fine. But when people start talking about ME (A guy that isn't American and doesn't drive fast cars) in a thread about someone else (A guy that drove fast cars and was American), I think I can say they're off topic.
And for tjcaustin... Have this empty space ->
The craziest part about this is for me that it occurred just a few miles from my place. It's very sad indeed.