Author Topic: WAT (Optical Switches)  (Read 4840 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline daerid

  • Thread Starter
  • Posts: 4276
  • Location: Denver, CO
    • Rossipedia
WAT (Optical Switches)
« on: Sun, 23 November 2014, 03:03:28 »


Up right now on MassDrop as the Bloody B640 Optical Keyboard

What do you guys think? I'm tempted just to see if it makes any difference.

Offline nubbinator

  • Dabbler Supreme
  • * Maker
  • Posts: 8658
  • Location: Orange County, CA
  • Model M "connoisseur"
Re: WAT (Optical Switches)
« Reply #1 on: Sun, 23 November 2014, 03:10:04 »
My thoughts?  Zero difference.  The travel to actuation is the main factor and it seems like it has a pretty standard travel.  While optical whatever can be faster, I doubt it will make any difference at all.  The only thing I could think is that it may be a little smoother since it has fewer points of contact.

That doesn't mean it's not interesting, just not my cup of tea for daily use.

Offline Karura

  • Professional Canadian
  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 1574
  • Location: Canada
  • SKidata life.
Re: WAT (Optical Switches)
« Reply #2 on: Sun, 23 November 2014, 03:55:57 »
I am curious to know how it would wear in the long run. Dust would probably be a big problem for these switches if it blocks the laser.

"Remember boys, raccoon cold... don't worry, raccoon will find cave." -Sent

Offline CPTBadAss

  • Woke up like this
  • Posts: 14368
    • Tactile Zine
Re: WAT (Optical Switches)
« Reply #3 on: Sun, 23 November 2014, 06:43:26 »
So that's really cool. Anyone want to pool money to buy one so we can do a teardown?

Offline Daniel Beardsmore

  • Posts: 1874
  • Location: Hertfordshire, England
  • RIP
    • Boring twaddle
Re: WAT (Optical Switches)
« Reply #4 on: Sun, 23 November 2014, 06:43:36 »
In a Cherry MX switch, the movable contact provides the tactile feel and click sound by engaging with the slider. Having removed the switch contacts, you're left with a design that can only ever be linear. Oops. As I said before, you'd do better off putting an optical sensor into an Alps-style switch as the tactile or click leaf is a separate component on the opposite side of the switch. Personally I'd go for refitting an Omron B3G-S series as they feel much better with the contacts removed.
Bore Awards
Most Boring Person on the Planet – 2011 Winner

Offline 0100010

  • Posts: 1127
  • Location: DFW, TX, US
  • Not Sure
Re: WAT (Optical Switches)
« Reply #5 on: Sun, 23 November 2014, 08:44:19 »
Looks to be infrared, not laser.  Looks like it can only be a linear switch.  I can see now people shortening the height of that leaf to reduce travel / actuation time.
  Quoting me causes a posting error that you need to ignore.

Offline faceyourfaces

  • Posts: 78
  • Location: New York
Re: WAT (Optical Switches)
« Reply #6 on: Sun, 23 November 2014, 14:32:37 »
It looked cool at first but I lost interest after realizing they could only be linear.

Offline hwood34

  • underwater squad
  • * Exalted Elder
  • Posts: 5917
  • Location: USA
  • #1 CL stan
    • Keyboard Illuminati
Re: WAT (Optical Switches)
« Reply #7 on: Sun, 23 November 2014, 14:35:57 »
I'm just interested in how smooth these will be to standard MX and ALPS switches that have more moving parts
IV KWK Info Thread & KBK Info Thread IV (out of date)

Old GBs: Gateron Switches (2015) | CF-LX R1 (2015) | CF-LX R2 (2017) | CF-LXXX (2017) | Gen.s Gem Caps (2015)

"Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary"

Offline engicoder

  • Posts: 721
  • Location: North Carolina
Re: WAT (Optical Switches)
« Reply #8 on: Sun, 23 November 2014, 15:26:55 »
It would, in theory, have the potential to be faster because an optical switch should eliminate the debounce time (~5ms), so your activation could be detected more quickly. Not sure how much 5ms will buy you in gaming performance, but true performance isn't really what sells gaming hardware these days.

Editted...so many typos  :-[
« Last Edit: Sun, 23 November 2014, 15:28:53 by engicoder »
   

Offline blackbox

  • Posts: 725
Re: WAT (Optical Switches)
« Reply #9 on: Sun, 23 November 2014, 15:31:09 »
Cool, but my past experience with a4tech makes me very sceptical to the quality of the product.
Keyboards: Dell AT102W (matias standard clicky), Maltron two-hand 3D fully ergonomic keyboard (Vintage MX Black). CM QF XT (MX Grey) IBM model M

The LAN table!
http://geekhack.org/index.php?topic=62536.0

Offline dorkvader

  • Posts: 6288
  • Location: Boston area
  • all about the "hack" in "geekhack"
Re: WAT (Optical Switches)
« Reply #10 on: Sun, 23 November 2014, 19:49:32 »
haata did a teardown here
https://www.flickr.com/photos/triplehaata/sets/72157647389243857/
I'm just interested in how smooth these will be to standard MX and ALPS switches that have more moving parts

only one more moving part (the contact leaf). I think the smoothness is more defined by the stem shape and general construction. See for example vintage linear futaba has tons of parts but still feels smooth.
« Last Edit: Sun, 23 November 2014, 19:51:54 by dorkvader »

Offline skuko

  • Posts: 624
  • Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Re: WAT (Optical Switches)
« Reply #11 on: Mon, 24 November 2014, 03:19:31 »
the spacebar looks really crappy, why do they have to come up these kinds of things, especially if they know that the default caps will wear out pretty quickly? :(

Offline mougrim

  • Posts: 768
  • Location: Ukraine
Re: WAT (Optical Switches)
« Reply #12 on: Mon, 24 November 2014, 03:59:56 »
Hmm, at one point of my life I used A4 keyboards... and they weren't so bad for rubberdomed. But this spacebar... They realize this throwing out of the window all "Cherry-compatibility", cuz there are no keyset with same spacebar?

But I like idea. There were so few optical switches...

P.S. But they'd better made something with Hall effect or magnetic reed switches.
IBM AT Model F, Vortexgear Race 3, AEKII (Alps Cream Damped), Metoo Zero (modded to Kailh Box Navy)

Offline appleonama

  • Trollo en USA
  • * Exquisite Elder
  • Posts: 1330
Re: WAT (Optical Switches)
« Reply #13 on: Mon, 24 November 2014, 04:04:35 »
Id like to see a teardown of this

EDIT: nvm

haata did a teardown here
https://www.flickr.com/photos/triplehaata/sets/72157647389243857/
I'm just interested in how smooth these will be to standard MX and ALPS switches that have more moving parts

only one more moving part (the contact leaf). I think the smoothness is more defined by the stem shape and general construction. See for example vintage linear futaba has tons of parts but still feels smooth.

Offline jacobolus

  • Posts: 3661
  • Location: San Francisco, CA
Re: WAT (Optical Switches)
« Reply #14 on: Mon, 24 November 2014, 06:39:19 »
Personally I'd go for refitting an Omron B3G-S series as they feel much better with the contacts removed.
Even better reason to put this in an Omron switch: the actuation point on those is terrible, substantially above the click/tactile point.

Offline berserkfan

  • Posts: 2135
  • Location: Not CONUS Not CONUS Not CONUS Not CONUS
  • changing diapers is more fun than model f assembly
Re: WAT (Optical Switches)
« Reply #15 on: Mon, 24 November 2014, 06:40:25 »
I'm so not interested because it's only linear. Furthermore I don't think I can just buy the switches and stick them in my Hengyu or Tipro, even if they say Cherry MX compatible.

But this may spell death for lubed linears on geekhack, because it promises to be so much smoother.

Really hope someone will support a teardown. We've got to reverse engineer it!

Lastly, I think that spacebar is manageable. It looks like a 6.25x to me. If the A4tech people had any common sense, they would be paying their Chinese OEM less money to buy components that are standard ie the costar stabilizers and 6.25x wires that are so common in Chinese keyboard manufacturing. So we might very well be looking at a spacebar that has different plastic moulding but otherwise uses the same 6.25x inside.
Most of the modding can be done on your own once you break through the psychological barriers.

Offline CPTBadAss

  • Woke up like this
  • Posts: 14368
    • Tactile Zine
Re: WAT (Optical Switches)
« Reply #16 on: Mon, 24 November 2014, 07:55:32 »
So that's really cool. Anyone want to pool money to buy one so we can do a teardown?

haata did a teardown here
https://www.flickr.com/photos/triplehaata/sets/72157647389243857/

That was easy :). Thanks haata. Would love to know how they feel. Guess I'll add that to the list of thing to try if I'm ever in the Bay Area again.

Offline iLLucionist

  • * Elevated Elder
  • Posts: 2735
  • Location: Netherlands
  • Topre is Love.
Re: WAT (Optical Switches)
« Reply #17 on: Mon, 24 November 2014, 15:22:46 »
Daaaamm who cares if it is linear.. It has lasers and that's ALWAYS a good thing :-p
MJT2 Browns o-rings - HHKB White - ES-87 Smoke White Clears - 87UB 55g

Offline JinDesu

  • * Destiny Supporter
  • Posts: 303
Re: WAT (Optical Switches)
« Reply #18 on: Mon, 24 November 2014, 15:28:29 »
At a $120, it's not a bad price - but the form factor and the MX Red spring rate is a nogo for me. I'd do MX blacks in a TKL.
Someday somebody will best me, but it won't be today, and it won't be you.

Proud owner of a Filco Majestouch Cherry MX Blue Tenkeyless, KBT Race S, & Realforce 101

Offline HaaTa

  • Master Kiibohd Hunter
  • Posts: 794
  • Location: San Jose, CA, USA
  • Kiibohds!
    • http://kiibohd.com
Re: WAT (Optical Switches)
« Reply #19 on: Mon, 24 November 2014, 16:04:53 »
Trying the switches out, they are definitely nicer than Cherry MX Blacks.

TBH, I'm actually really impressed. This company is actually doing something novel with switches. The pcb and case design is sorta meh. The stabilizers are pretty neat (minus the spacebar which is sorta annoying to take off, you have to remove the screws from the back side first).
The sensor and emitter were also custom made for this switch.
Kiibohd

ALWAYS looking for cool and interesting switches
I take requests for making keyboard converters (i.e. *old keyboard* to USB).

Offline mougrim

  • Posts: 768
  • Location: Ukraine
Re: WAT (Optical Switches)
« Reply #20 on: Mon, 24 November 2014, 16:37:05 »
Trying the switches out, they are definitely nicer than Cherry MX Blacks.

TBH, I'm actually really impressed. This company is actually doing something novel with switches. The pcb and case design is sorta meh. The stabilizers are pretty neat (minus the spacebar which is sorta annoying to take off, you have to remove the screws from the back side first).
The sensor and emitter were also custom made for this switch.

Is it quiet?
IBM AT Model F, Vortexgear Race 3, AEKII (Alps Cream Damped), Metoo Zero (modded to Kailh Box Navy)

Offline berserkfan

  • Posts: 2135
  • Location: Not CONUS Not CONUS Not CONUS Not CONUS
  • changing diapers is more fun than model f assembly
Re: WAT (Optical Switches)
« Reply #21 on: Mon, 24 November 2014, 19:14:39 »
Trying the switches out, they are definitely nicer than Cherry MX Blacks.

TBH, I'm actually really impressed. This company is actually doing something novel with switches. The pcb and case design is sorta meh. The stabilizers are pretty neat (minus the spacebar which is sorta annoying to take off, you have to remove the screws from the back side first).
The sensor and emitter were also custom made for this switch.

Great job hataa, but I'm highly disappointed. You can only use this switch on their PCB. But that said I am curious when you say something feels better than Cherry blacks. It still isn't tactile, so what makes it nicer? Just the smoothness?
Most of the modding can be done on your own once you break through the psychological barriers.

Offline faceyourfaces

  • Posts: 78
  • Location: New York
Re: WAT (Optical Switches)
« Reply #22 on: Mon, 24 November 2014, 19:21:54 »
The stabilizers are pretty neat (minus the spacebar which is sorta annoying to take off, you have to remove the screws from the back side first).


What kind of stabilizers are in this board?

Offline dorkvader

  • Posts: 6288
  • Location: Boston area
  • all about the "hack" in "geekhack"
Re: WAT (Optical Switches)
« Reply #23 on: Mon, 24 November 2014, 20:01:43 »
It still isn't tactile, so what makes it nicer? Just the smoothness?

I haven't tried, but usually that's what you look at when comparing linear switches. That and how they respond to off-axis presses.

Offline mougrim

  • Posts: 768
  • Location: Ukraine
Re: WAT (Optical Switches)
« Reply #24 on: Tue, 25 November 2014, 02:09:01 »
Last optical switches I saw was from some japanese company... So I'm glad to see revival of it. Linear switches just not my thing, but... when they will start selling this in my country, I may try it...
IBM AT Model F, Vortexgear Race 3, AEKII (Alps Cream Damped), Metoo Zero (modded to Kailh Box Navy)